Search results

  • <th class="tableheaderadpbl">cfDNA Concentration <br>(ng/μL)</th> <th class="tableheaderadpbl">Spiked gene doping EPO <br>(ng/ml serum)</th>
    1.01 MB (137,519 words) - 03:57, 18 October 2018
  • <td><b>C (ng/<FONT face="Raleway">μ</FONT>l)</b></td> <td>C (ng/µl)</td>
    613 KB (54,281 words) - 14:25, 10 November 2018
  • Results: DNA: 37,6 [ng/ul] A260/280: 1,8 [-] Results: DNA: 50,5 ng/ul A260/280: 1,98 [-]
    125 KB (18,476 words) - 01:21, 18 October 2018
  • <td>72,5 ng/&mu;L</td> <td>118,9&nbsp;ng/&mu;L</td>
    590 KB (67,357 words) - 19:46, 17 October 2018
  • ...mised PCR, LAMP and RPA reactions to achieve the limit of detection of 0.1 ng/μL. <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:NYU_Abu_Dhabi/Results">Click here ...esults show that both LAMP and PCR have a similar sensitivity of up to 0.1 ng/μl of DNA. however, results from literature (4)(5) have shown that LAMP is
    76 KB (10,465 words) - 22:40, 17 October 2018
  • selected 50 ng/mL, 500 ng/mL, 1000 ng/mL, 2000 ng/mL antibody respectively. The ...p class="footnote">Parallel light observations at 50 ng/mL, 200 ng/mL, 500 ng/mL and 1000
    58 KB (5,822 words) - 04:00, 18 October 2018
  • <li>Kit 7 well 21B: 134.4 ng/μL</li> <li>Kit 7 well 21D: 109.0 ng/μL</li>
    234 KB (37,197 words) - 18:28, 17 October 2018
  • <td><b>C (ng/μl)</b></td> <td>C (ng/µl)</td>
    292 KB (22,730 words) - 00:07, 17 October 2018
  • r.unshift("ng"); i = r("ng"),
    310 KB (29,985 words) - 16:46, 28 September 2018
  • <th>Concentration [ng/μL]</th> <th>Concentration (ng/μL)</th>
    194 KB (24,145 words) - 03:40, 18 October 2018
  • <th> ng/µl <br> 260/280 <br> 260/230 </th> <th> ng/µl <br> 260/280 <br> 260/230 </th>
    18 KB (2,644 words) - 14:58, 9 December 2018
  • <th> ng/µl <br> 260/280 <br> 260/230 </th> <th> ng/µl <br> 260/280 <br> 260/230 </th>
    17 KB (2,497 words) - 13:58, 16 October 2018
  • ...were put in culture with Neurobasal, B27, GlutaMAX, and commercial NGF 50 ng/mL.</div> ...ifferent concentrations: 50 ng/mL, 250 ng/mL, 500 ng/mL, 750 ng/mL and 900 ng/mL. The optimal concentration was determined by modeling of NGF diffusion i
    69 KB (9,804 words) - 14:55, 10 November 2018
  • Final DNA concentration: 123.7 ng/μL<br><br> pBAD: 22 ng/μL
    27 KB (4,162 words) - 03:54, 18 October 2018
  • &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;-1µL pOW1 (17.6 ng/µL) DNA stock (0.8µL DNA, 4.2µL H2O)</br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;-Suspected cause 1: Template was at 18.2 ng/µL instead of the 96.5 labeled on the tube</br>
    191 KB (32,232 words) - 02:18, 17 October 2018
  • <th> ng/µl <br> 260/280 <br> 260/230 </th> <th> ng/µl <br> 260/280 <br> 260/230 </th>
    14 KB (1,916 words) - 11:17, 16 October 2018
  • ...ng/µl, taq-1: 8,9 ng/µl, taq-2: 9,9 ng/µl, Q5-1: 14,3 ng/µl, Q5-2: 7,2 ng/µl ...Oligos/Cells: template (10^4 copies each approach), templateb (20 ng), primer: b1a, b1s
    33 KB (3,696 words) - 11:34, 17 October 2018
  • <p class="c2"><span class="c0">? ng</span></p> ...asy digested (2 ng) were ligate with 4 &micro;L of insert cpg2 digested (? ng). Ligation were let overnight in the fidge. </span></p>
    98 KB (11,061 words) - 15:28, 17 October 2018
  • ...<tr><th><strong>Name of Plasmid</strong></th><th><strong>Concentration/(ng/*</strong>*μl)**</th><th><strong>A260/A280</strong></th></tr></thead> <tr><th>&nbsp;</th><th><strong>Concentration/(ng/*</strong>*μl)**</th><th><strong>A260/A280</strong></th><th><strong>A260/A
    97 KB (13,930 words) - 13:14, 26 November 2018
  • <th class="th-notebook">Measured concentration (ng/µL)</th> - p0-universel= 71,5 ng/µl , 64,9ng/µl <br>
    160 KB (18,433 words) - 00:37, 8 December 2018

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)