Difference between revisions of "Team:BNU-China/Interlab"

Line 244: Line 244:
 
   <div id="sidebar" style="color:#000000">
 
   <div id="sidebar" style="color:#000000">
  
     <h4>Methods</h4>
+
     <h4>Introduction</h4>
      <ul>
+
 
          <li><a href="#background">Background</a></li>
+
     <h4>Method</h4>
          <li><a href="#design">Design</a></li>
+
          <li><a href="#materials">Materials</a></li>
+
          <li><a href="#protocol">Protocol</a></li>
+
      </ul>
+
     <h4>Description</h4>
+
 
     <h4>Results</h4>
 
     <h4>Results</h4>
 
         <ul>
 
         <ul>
Line 266: Line 261:
  
 
           <div class="nine columns texttext">
 
           <div class="nine columns texttext">
               <div class="texttitle">Methods</div>
+
               <div class="texttitle">Introduction</div>
               <div
+
               <div>                             
                  <a id="background"></a>                             
+
                   <h3 class="classic-title";"><span></span></h3>  
                   <h3 class="classic-title";"><span>Background</span></h3>  
+
                   <p>The Measurement Committee is committed to achieving reliable and repeatable measurement. Therefore the interlab study is established, measurements made in different laboratories by measuring the expression of GFP will be no more variable than measurements taken within the same lab.
                   <p>“All of the 2016 iGEM teams are invited and encouraged to participate in the Third International InterLaboratory Measurement Study in synthetic biology.” Our team took part in this study which aimed to standardize the measurements of fluorescence in different labs. The main task was to quantify expression of GFP in common, comparable or absolute units. In our case, we measured fluorescence using plate reader.
+
 
   </p>
 
   </p>
 
               </div>
 
               </div>
 
        
 
        
               <div>
+
               <div>                            
                  <a id="design"></a>                               
+
                   <h3 class="classic-title";"><span></span></h3>
                   <h3 class="classic-title";"><span>Design</span></h3>
+
                   <p>After several years of hard work, the committee concluded a universal protocol for measuring GFP expression. In recent years, the interlab study aims to improve the protocol and identify and correct the sources of systematic variability as much as possible.
                   <p>Fluorescence is widely used as a proxy for promoter activity by expressing fluorescent proteins such as green fluorescent protein (GFP). Despite this is an indirect measurement, it provides a useful insight into expression levels and has significant advantage that it could be ontinuously monitored without disrupting cells.
+
 
   </p>
 
   </p>
                  <p>Fluorescence/OD600 is routinely used to give an adjustment of the relative expression per cell.</p>
+
               
                  <p>We aim to do this using the supplied FITC as a standard reference material. The standard curve could be constructed via measuring the fluorescence of a dilution series. We have previously performed this standard curve on our own instrument alongside a standard curve for purified GFP. Using these standard curves alongside your own standard curve for FITC it is thus possible to transform your relative measurements of fluorescence into absolute measurements of GFP molecules.</p>
+
                  <p>However, we aim to contain instrument variability, at least to some degree, by measuring a standard scattering solution of a mono-dispersed silica suspension (LUDOX). The objective is to see if a simple, single fixed-point measurement can be used as a ratiometric adjustment to provide greater uniformity in fluorescence/OD600 measurements across sites.</p> 
+
              </div>
+
 
                
 
                
 
              <div> 
 
                  <a id="materials"></a>                             
 
                  <h3 class="classic-title";"><span>Materials and methods</span></h3>
 
                  <h5>Plasmids used</h5>
 
                  <p style="margin:0 0 0 0">•  Plasmid DNA (100 pg/uL in 10uL of Buffer EB)</p>
 
                  <div style="padding-left:20px">
 
                  <p>
 
                  o Test Device 1: J23101.B0034.E0040.B0015 in pSB1C3<br>
 
                  o Test Device 2: J23106.B0034.E0040.B0015 in pSB1C3<br>
 
                  o Test Device 3: J23117.B0034.E0040.B0015 in pSB1C3<br>
 
                  o Positive Control Device: I20270 in pSB1C3 (Also located in Kit Plate 3, well 8P)<br>
 
                  o Negative Control Device: R0040 in pSB1C3 (Also located in Kit Plate 2, well 6F)<br>
 
                  </p>
 
                  </div>
 
             
 
 
                  <h5>Strain used</h5>
 
                  <p>• <i>Escherichia coli</i> TOP10</p>
 
                 
 
                  <h5>Materials</h5>
 
                  <p>
 
                  • FITC Standard: one tube with dried down FITC for creating a FITC standard<br>
 
                  • LUDOX: one tube with 30% colloidal silica suspended in 1mL of water<br>
 
                  • 1xPBS (phosphate buffered saline)<br>
 
                  • LB (Luria Bertani) media<br>
 
                  • Chloramphenicol (stock concentration 25 mg/mL dissolved in EtOH)<br>
 
                  • 50 ml Falcon tube (or equivalent) or 250 ml shake flask for cell growth<br>
 
                  • 1.5 ml eppendorf tubes for sample storage<br>
 
                  • Ice bucket with ice<br>
 
                  • Pipettes<br>
 
                  • 96 well plate <br>
 
  </p>
 
                 
 
                  <h5>Machines</h5>
 
                  <p>
 
                  • Thermo VARIOSKAN FLASH<br>
 
                  • MAPADA UV-3100PC SPECTROPHOTOMETER<br>
 
                  • YKKY(FM40)<br>
 
                  • AISITE electro-heating standing-temperature cultivator<br>
 
                  • HONOUR INCURATOR SHAKER<br>
 
                 
 
  </p>
 
 
                  <h5>Software</h5>
 
                  <p>
 
                  • Microsoft Excel<br>
 
                 
 
  </p>
 
 
                  <h5>Methods</h5>
 
                  <p style="margin:0 0 0 0">•  Calibration</p>
 
                  <div style="padding-left:45px">
 
                  <p>
 
                  o OD600 Reference point<br>
 
                  o FITC fluorescence standard curve<br>
 
                  o Test Device 3: J23117.B0034.E0040.B0015 in pSB1C3<br>
 
                  </p>
 
                  </div>
 
                  <p style="margin:0 0 0 0">•  Cell measurement</p>
 
                  <div style="padding-left:45px">
 
                  <p>
 
                  o Transformation<br>
 
                  o Measurements <br>
 
                  </p>
 
                  </div>
 
 
 
  </div>
 
 
 
                    <a  id="protocol"></a>
 
                  <h3 class="classic-title";"><span>Protocols</span></h3>
 
                    <div style="padding-left:45px">
 
                  <p><a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Peking/Interlab/Protocol:Calibration">>>Calibration</a><br>
 
                  <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Peking/Interlab/Protocol:Cell_measurement">>>Cell measurement</a></p>
 
                  </div>
 
                 
 
  
 
                   <div class="texttitle">Description</div>
 
                   <div class="texttitle">Description</div>

Revision as of 20:32, 7 October 2018

Proof

Interlab

The Peking iGEM 2016 team is participating in the third year of the iGEM Interlab study along with about 100 teams. We focused on quantifying expression of GFP in common, comparable or absolute units.

Introduction

The Measurement Committee is committed to achieving reliable and repeatable measurement. Therefore the interlab study is established, measurements made in different laboratories by measuring the expression of GFP will be no more variable than measurements taken within the same lab.

After several years of hard work, the committee concluded a universal protocol for measuring GFP expression. In recent years, the interlab study aims to improve the protocol and identify and correct the sources of systematic variability as much as possible.

Description

Figure 1. Above: from left to right: D1, D2, D3, Negative, Positive. Below: five mediums containing five different bacteria.


Plasmids containing promoters and GFP were taken from The 2016 DNA Distribution Kit and all devices were transformed into E. coli. Fluorescence of colonies was checked up under UV light.

5 ml of liquid LB-M medium with chloramphenicol were inoculated with two chosen colonies of each device. Liquid cultures were incubated for 16~18 hours in HONOUR INCURATOR SHAKER placed in incubator. OD of these cultures was measured by MAPADA UV-3100PC SPECTROPHOTOMETER and diluted to 0.02. Fluorescence of biological and also technical replicates was measured using Thermo VARIOSKAN FLASH following our protocol.


Results

Sequencing

• Device 1: J23101+I13504
• Device 2: J23106+I13504
• Device 3: J23117+I13504
• Positive Control Device: I20270 in pSB1C3
• Negative Control Device: R0040 in pSB1C3

>BBa_J23101 Part-only sequence (35 bp)
Tttacagctagctcagtcctaggtattatgctagc

>BBa_J23106 Part-only sequence (35 bp)
Tttacggctagctcagtcctaggtatagtgctagc

>BBa_J23117 Part-only sequence (35 bp)
Ttgacagctagctcagtcctagggattgtgctagc

>BBa_I13504 Part-only sequence (875 bp)
Aaagaggagaaatactagatgcgtaaaggagaagaacttttcactggagttgtcccaattcttgttgaattagatggtgatgttaatgggcacaaattttctgtcagtggagagggtgaaggtgatgcaacatacggaaaacttacccttaaatttatttgcactactggaaaactacctgttccatggccaacacttgtcactactttcggttatggtgttcaatgctttgcgagatacccagatcatatgaaacagcatgactttttcaagagtgccatgcccgaaggttatgtacaggaaagaactatatttttcaaagatgacgggaactacaagacacgtgctgaagtcaagtttgaaggtgatacccttgttaatagaatcgagttaaaaggtattgattttaaagaagatggaaacattcttggacacaaattggaatacaactataactcacacaatgtatacatcatggcagacaaacaaaagaatggaatcaaagttaacttcaaaattagacacaacattgaagatggaagcgttcaactagcagaccattatcaacaaaatactccaattggcgatggccctgtccttttaccagacaaccattacctgtccacacaatctgccctttcgaaagatcccaacgaaaagagagaccacatggtccttcttgagtttgtaacagctgctgggattacacatggcatggatgaactatacaaataataatactagagccaggcatcaaataaaacgaaaggctcagtcgaaagactgggcctttcgttttatctgttgtttgtcggtgaacgctctctactagagtcacactggctcaccttcgggtgggcctttctgcgtttata

>BBa_I20270 Part-only sequence (919 bp)
Ttgatggctagctcagtcctaggtacaatgctagctactagagtcacacaggaaagtactagatgcgtaaaggagaagaacttttcactggagttgtcccaattcttgttgaattagatggtgatgttaatgggcacaaattttctgtcagtggagagggtgaaggtgatgcaacatacggaaaacttacccttaaatttatttgcactactggaaaactacctgttccatggccaacacttgtcactactttcggttatggtgttcaatgctttgcgagatacccagatcatatgaaacagcatgactttttcaagagtgccatgcccgaaggttatgtacaggaaagaactatatttttcaaagatgacgggaactacaagacacgtgctgaagtcaagtttgaaggtgatacccttgttaatagaatcgagttaaaaggtattgattttaaagaagatggaaacattcttggacacaaattggaatacaactataactcacacaatgtatacatcatggcagacaaacaaaagaatggaatcaaagttaacttcaaaattagacacaacattgaagatggaagcgttcaactagcagaccattatcaacaaaatactccaattggcgatggccctgtccttttaccagacaaccattacctgtccacacaatctgccctttcgaaagatcccaacgaaaagagagaccacatggtccttcttgagtttgtaacagctgctgggattacacatggcatggatgaactatacaaataataatactagagccaggcatcaaataaaacgaaaggctcagtcgaaagactgggcctttcgttttatctgttgtttgtcggtgaacgctctctactagagtcacactggctcaccttcgggtgggcctttctgcgtttata

>BBa_R0040 Part-only sequence (54 bp)
tccctatcagtgatagagattgacatccctatcagtgatagagatactgagcac

Data

OD600 Reference Point

Table 1. OD600 Reference Point.


FITC Standard Curve

Table 2. Data of FITC standard curve.

Figure 2. FITC standard curve.


Normalization

Table 3. Normalization.


Cell Measurement

Table 4. Raw data of Abs600 measurement.

Table 5. Blank subtraction and correction of Abs600 measurement.

Figure 3. Blank subtraction and correction of Abs600 measurement.

Table 6. Raw data of fluorescence measurement.

Table 7. Blank substraction and correction of fluorescence measurement.

Figure 4. Blank subtraction and correction of fluorescence measurement.

Table 8.Raw data of Fl/Abs600.

Table 9. Raw data of average and SD.

Figure 4. Average level of devices.

Discussion

It is noticeable that the promoter of the Device 1 is strongest followed by the promoter of the Device 2 and Device 3.

Appendix

Individuals responsible for conducting InterLab study • Dong Yiming measured the devices. • Li Cheng processed the data.