Difference between revisions of "Team:EPFL/Public Engagement"

Line 47: Line 47:
 
                 and disadvantages of each of them. The workshop “Windows: The Neglected Child in Bioinformatics” was particularly useful for us as well, given that an important part of our project was Bioinformatics based. We were able to learn and discuss
 
                 and disadvantages of each of them. The workshop “Windows: The Neglected Child in Bioinformatics” was particularly useful for us as well, given that an important part of our project was Bioinformatics based. We were able to learn and discuss
 
                 the guidelines of implementing bioinformatic software that helped us verify what we were doing, we elaborate on this in our Integrated Human Practices page.</p>
 
                 the guidelines of implementing bioinformatic software that helped us verify what we were doing, we elaborate on this in our Integrated Human Practices page.</p>
 +
 +
            </div>
 +
          </div>
 +
        </div>
 +
 +
        <div class="row row-grid align-items-center">
 +
          <div class="col-lg-7">
 +
            <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/fc/T--EPFL--Europe3.jpg" class="img-center img-fluid rounded shadow" width="400">
 +
          </div>
 +
          <div class="col-lg-5 ml-lg-auto">
 +
            <div class="pt-lg-lg pl-lg-5">
 +
 +
              <p class="lead text-gray my-4">We attended many of different workshops that were organised by the various iGEM teams and organisations. Many of them we found insurmountable useful and it was a great chance to view different perspectives of the teams persenting, for example
 +
                the “Online Public Engagement in Written Format” given by iGEM Copenhagen introduced us to the use of ‘Medium’ as a social platform and we entered a very fruitful discussion about the different social platforms we can use and the advantages
 +
                and disadvantages of each of them. The workshop “Windows: The Neglected Child in Bioinformatics” was particularly useful for us as well, given that an important part of our project was Bioinformatics based. We were able to learn and discuss
 +
                the guidelines of implementing bioinformatic software that helped us verify what we were doing, we elaborate on this in our Integrated Human Practices page.
 +
              </p>
  
 
             </div>
 
             </div>

Revision as of 13:47, 11 October 2018

iGEM EPFL 2018

Education & Public Engagement

Reaching out with the public and the scientific community was important to us. Here is our journey

The iGEM European Meetup was our first opportunity to interact with the iGEM Community and other iGEMers and we could not be more excited to be there. It did not take long for us to start meeting teams, almost minutes from when we arrived, we put up our poster and the poster sessions began even before the event was scheduled to start. We were so excited to be in a space where everyone was so thrilled about their project and it was a great energy to start the conference off.

We attended many of different workshops that were organised by the various iGEM teams and organisations. Many of them we found insurmountable useful and it was a great chance to view different perspectives of the teams persenting, for example the “Online Public Engagement in Written Format” given by iGEM Copenhagen introduced us to the use of ‘Medium’ as a social platform and we entered a very fruitful discussion about the different social platforms we can use and the advantages and disadvantages of each of them. The workshop “Windows: The Neglected Child in Bioinformatics” was particularly useful for us as well, given that an important part of our project was Bioinformatics based. We were able to learn and discuss the guidelines of implementing bioinformatic software that helped us verify what we were doing, we elaborate on this in our Integrated Human Practices page.

We attended many of different workshops that were organised by the various iGEM teams and organisations. Many of them we found insurmountable useful and it was a great chance to view different perspectives of the teams persenting, for example the “Online Public Engagement in Written Format” given by iGEM Copenhagen introduced us to the use of ‘Medium’ as a social platform and we entered a very fruitful discussion about the different social platforms we can use and the advantages and disadvantages of each of them. The workshop “Windows: The Neglected Child in Bioinformatics” was particularly useful for us as well, given that an important part of our project was Bioinformatics based. We were able to learn and discuss the guidelines of implementing bioinformatic software that helped us verify what we were doing, we elaborate on this in our Integrated Human Practices page.