Difference between revisions of "Team:TPHS San Diego/Notebook"
| Line 310: | Line 310: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | + | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
| − | Make a 1.0% agarose gel with 150 mL 1x TAE buffer and 15 μL of Ethidium Bromide in a medium sized gel frame. Load 10 μL of DNA Ladder and put 4 μL of 6x loading dye into each sample.Run the gel at 175 V for 45 mins-1 hr. <br> | + | <br>Make a 1.0% agarose gel with 150 mL 1x TAE buffer and 15 μL of Ethidium Bromide in a medium sized gel frame. Load 10 μL of DNA Ladder and put 4 μL of 6x loading dye into each sample.Run the gel at 175 V for 45 mins-1 hr. <br> |
| − | <br>Here is a picture of the gel simulated on a computer program called SnapGene. | + | <br>Here is a picture of the gel simulated on a computer program called SnapGene.<br> |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <p> | ||
| + | <br>Here is a picture of the actual gel:<br> | ||
| + | </p> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <p> | ||
| + | <br>Wells 3-12 were extracted from bacterial colonies that all have the same DNA inserted. BUT! When we run a gel or a restriction digest in which all the samples were cut with ECORI the results are not the same. For some samples it is probably due to the enzyme not cutting the DNA, but for the rest it is unknown. We will have to do further testing to figure out what the issue is.<br> | ||
| + | </p> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <p> | ||
| + | <br>Resolved: The issue was likely caused by the incompatibility of the enzymes in the buffer and poor primer design. When performing PCR, it is important to add restriction sites to the primers so that the product would include the restriction site: this was not done originally. Also, the enzymes used to perform the restriction digest, HindIII-HF and MluI, were not compatible in the same buffer. The HF stands for High Fidelity, indicating that the enzyme has reduced star activity, or reduced tendency to lose specificity, and can be used in a wider range of buffers.<br> | ||
| + | </p> | ||
| + | |||
</section> | </section> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 07:22, 13 October 2018
Day 1
Miniprep bacteria with pBAD-D4 (name of the plasmid in which we will be inserting the Chitinase genes, tags, etc.) to isolate the pBAD backbone Final DNA concentration: 123.7 ng/μL
Day 2
Restriction digest using BamHI and EcoRI to check for bacterial transformation to check to make sure that the plasmid is the expected length (will also send samples for sequencing) Wells: 1. DNA Ladder. 2. Just EcoRI 3. Just BamHI. 4. No enzyme. 5. Both enzymes
Day 3
Made KPi Buffer… (used in Chitinase Assay)
- Prepare 800 mL of dH2O in a suitable container.
- Add 2.405 g of K2HPO4 to the solution.
- Add 11.73 g of KH2PO4 to the solution.
- Add distilled water until volume is 1 L.
Day 4
Started Cloning of pBAD-GST-ChiA-FLAG construct. (Function of GST and FLAG: these are protein tags (onto chitinase) to purify and detect chitinase respectively) Did the restriction digest portion, will do gel purification, ligation, and plating tomorrow For protocol click here
Day 5
Ran gel of restriction digest of pBAD only and did Gel Purification (very straightforward after PCR, you want only the copied DNA) of restriction digest of GST/gBlock as we want to preserve the amount of DNA gBlock that we have and will lose less sample via PCR purification. Final concentrations: pBAD: 22 ng/μL gBlock: 10.6 ng/μL Did DNA ligation and plated BL21 competent cells cloned with GST-ChiA full construct (complete protocol is linked in yesterday’s log)
Day 6
Selected 10 colonies from Vector+Insert plate and put in 4 mL of LB+Ampicillin (LB is nutrients for bacterial growth, Ampicillin assists selection of transformed bacteria) media. Incubate in 37 ºC shaker for 24 hrs. Also, did restriction digest and gel on pBAD-D4 vector using MluI and HindIII to check and make sure the enzymes are cutting properly. (If DNA length match expected length, then enzymes are working properly) There is a chance we will have to do ligation and stuff again because there aren’t that many colonies. We will most likely use primers to enhance the gBlock/insert DNA and then try again. Depending on how these colonies turn out after we sequence them. Vector+Insert colony:
Day 7
Did Miniprep of the 10 bacteria colonies that we selected from Wednesday. Used NanoDrop machine to find DNA concentrations of all 10 samples.
| Sample 1: 97.1 ng/μL | Sample 2: 39.6 ng/μL | Sample 3: 47.3 ng/μL |
| Sample 4: 47.0 ng/μL | Sample 5: 41.8 ng/μL | Sample 6: 57.8 ng/μL |
| Sample 7: 33.6 ng/μL | Sample 8: 51.7 ng/μL | Sample 9: 41.5 ng/μL |
| Sample 10: 23.0 ng/μL | Sample pBAD-D4: 123.7 ng/μL |
Then we chose a specific restriction enzyme to cut both the original pBAD-D4 plasmid and our constructed plasmid such that we can distinguish between the two based on the length of their base pairs and the number of cuts that are made. We chose EcoRI-HF. This is in order to check that the plasmids that we are using are what we think they actually are. We want to have 250 ng per restriction digest reaction. Add 2 μL of buffer, 1 μL of enzyme, and fill to 20 μL with water. (Always add enzyme last). Then incubate at 37 ºC for 30 mins-1hr.
| Sample | Amount of DNA | Amount of Cut Smart Buffer | Amount of Water | Amount of Enzyme (EcoRI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pBAD-D4 | 2.02 μL | 2 μL | 14.98 μL | 1 μL |
| Sample 1: | 2.57 μL | 2 μL | 14.43 μL | 1 μL |
| Sample 2: | 6.31 μL | 2 μL | 10.69 μL | 1 μL |
| Sample 3: | 5.29 μL | 2 μL | 11.71 μL | 1 μL |
| Sample 4: | 5.32 μL | 2 μL | 11.68 μL | 1 μL |
| Sample 5: | 5.98 μL | 2 μL | 11.02 μL | 1 μL |
| Sample 6: | 4.33 μL | 2 μL | 12.7 μL | 1 μL |
| Sample 7: | 7.44 μL | 2 μL | 9.56 μL | 1 μL |
| Sample 8: | 4.84 μL | 2 μL | 12.16 μL | 1 μL |
| Sample 9: | 6.02 μL | 2 μL | 10.98 μL | 1 μL |
| Sample 10: | 10.87 μL | 2 μL | 6.13 μL | 1 μL |
Make a 1.0% agarose gel with 150 mL 1x TAE buffer and 15 μL of Ethidium Bromide in a medium sized gel frame. Load 10 μL of DNA Ladder and put 4 μL of 6x loading dye into each sample.Run the gel at 175 V for 45 mins-1 hr.
Here is a picture of the gel simulated on a computer program called SnapGene.
Here is a picture of the actual gel:
Wells 3-12 were extracted from bacterial colonies that all have the same DNA inserted. BUT! When we run a gel or a restriction digest in which all the samples were cut with ECORI the results are not the same. For some samples it is probably due to the enzyme not cutting the DNA, but for the rest it is unknown. We will have to do further testing to figure out what the issue is.
Resolved: The issue was likely caused by the incompatibility of the enzymes in the buffer and poor primer design. When performing PCR, it is important to add restriction sites to the primers so that the product would include the restriction site: this was not done originally. Also, the enzymes used to perform the restriction digest, HindIII-HF and MluI, were not compatible in the same buffer. The HF stands for High Fidelity, indicating that the enzyme has reduced star activity, or reduced tendency to lose specificity, and can be used in a wider range of buffers.