|
|
Line 216: |
Line 216: |
| </ul> | | </ul> |
| | | |
− | <div class="col m1"></div>
| |
− | </div>
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
| <h1>Carbon Footprint Analysis</h1> | | <h1>Carbon Footprint Analysis</h1> |
| <p>Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext </p> | | <p>Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext </p> |
| | | |
| | | |
− |
| + | |
| + | <div class="col m1"></div> |
| + | </div> |
| | | |
| <!-- RIGHT BETWEEN THOSE TWO COMMENTS --> | | <!-- RIGHT BETWEEN THOSE TWO COMMENTS --> |
Revision as of 14:05, 13 October 2018
Human Practices
For the StyGreen project, Human Practices was not a box that needed to be filled. It was a tool to integrate our project in the real world. As we are producing plastics, from the beginning Human Practices was very important, as it is a very sensitive subject. However, by talking to a lot of stakeholders, from suppliers to buyers and start-ups to multinationals, we have gained a lot of insights of how the plastic world works, and how we fit in this picture.
As Human Practices is not an binary subject, but something that you are working on the whole day, we gave a summary of the biggest influences on the design of our project. However, a lot of insight we had as well by talking to friends, family and complete strangers. One of the first questions always was: “why more plastics?”. We have thought about this a lot, and thought about what is good and what is bad about plastics. We looked into ‘biodegradable’ plastics
, as well as chemically created bio-plastics.
Project Timeline
To get a good overview, we invite you to have a look at our thought tree. This tree catched the new light in its leaves, and by choosing the right and wrong from it grew into a great tree. Also we had great conversations on how to grow the tree bigger if iGEM is ended. How to scale up the product, and which safety procedures we had to keep in mind.
-
Click on the icons in the timeline, and find out about all the insights we gained from our stakeholders and how the dialogues shaped our project.
Katja Loos
A very important part in our project was the decision on what we should create from waste. Katja Loos had a huge influence as she explained that bio degradable plastics are not as degradable as people think. See here what she told us.
Karin Ree
Karin Ree helped students who want to do research outside the regular field. She send us papers on the feasibility of other bioplastics. See here what she told us.
Avantium
To see how biomass is processed, we went to Delfzijl with to see the pilot plant of Avantium. We learned a lot about upscaling, safety and cellulosic biomass. See here how we did that.
Prof. dr. F. Picchioni
Prof. Dr. F. Picchioni had a great influence on our project. He changed our idea of plastics completely, as we saw plastics as something bad before the conversation with him. Find our interview with him here.
Collaboration Bordeaux
Together with the iGEM team of Bordeaux we talked about the ethics of our product. Find our ethics collaborationhere.
Gert-Jan Euverink
Gert-Jan Euverink was the supervisor of the winning 2012 iGEM team, and also representative of the CADOS project on extracting cellulose from sewage water. See here what we discussed with him.
Prof. Dr. A.J.M. Driessen
Prof. Driessen helped us in the forming of our genetic model. Find his input here.
RIVM
In our project, safety was very important. Together with the RIVM, we made sure that the safety was implemented in our design. See here how we did that.
EV Biotech
From the beginning, EV Biotech has been our intellectual partner, and helped us on structuring our work, and with ideas for in the lab. See here why we are them very grateful.
Molecular Dynamics model
In our Molecular Dynamics mode we found how to bind the cellulose best to the cellulose binding domain. Look here if you want to know more.
Flux Analysis Model
Due to our Flux Analysis Model, we were able to find how much kilo styrene we could produce per kilo biomass. Next to this we found the best knockouts. See here what we've learned.
Sergey (EV Bio)
At the TRIZ workshop, Sergey from EV Biotech gave us great insights on how we could make a continues process instead of a batch one. See here what we've learned.
Stakeholder Analysis
To find how our technology would influence the world, we did a Stakeholder Analysis which you can find here. Next to that you can find the interviews with businesses here.
Photanol
We went to Photanol to have a look into their lab, and saw how they did the first steps of the upscaling. See here what we've learned.
ZAP
What does it mean to make a pilot plant? What kind of permits do you need? The people of ZAP explained it to us here
KNN
KNN is our main biomass supplier. They provided us with their Recell, and are very curious how we will turn cellulose to glucose and styrene. Find our first talk with them here.
BioBTX
BioBTX is a company which is similar to us. They make biobased aromatics, but in a chemical way. We discussed with them the differences between chemical and biological way here.
Upscaling of our end-product
When we have a working product, we have several interested parties who would invest in us. We talked to them here.
Carbon Footprint Analysis
Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext Texttexttext