Difference between revisions of "Team:Purdue/Human Practices"

Line 85: Line 85:
 
<div class="col-sm-8">
 
<div class="col-sm-8">
 
<h3 style="margin-top:0;">Dr. Linnes</h3>
 
<h3 style="margin-top:0;">Dr. Linnes</h3>
<p>Dr. Linnes is an assistant professor at Purdue University who specializes in developing paper-based assays. She provided examples of paper-based assays she designed and brought to light different factors to include within our assay. Throughout the improvement of our assay, she was able to provide input and expertise in the design.</p>
+
<p>Dr. Linnes is an assistant professor in Biomedical Engineering at Purdue University who specializes in developing paper-based assays. She provided examples of paper-based assays she designed and brought to light different factors to include within our assay. Throughout the improvement of our assay, she was able to provide input and expertise in the design.</p>
 
<div class="spacer-extrasmall"></div>
 
<div class="spacer-extrasmall"></div>
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 23:57, 16 October 2018

Bootstrap Example

Human Practices

Overview

When considering how to develop our Candida albican detection assay into a more user friendly test, we consulted with several professionals to gain insight and conducted an Institutional Review Board (IRB) survey that provided feedback from potential users. Our process for Human Practices consisted of six basic steps.

Step 1

Doing research on the problem and learning diagnosis and treatment processes

Learning about how current tests are being used and what doctors would prefer to have was important in transforming our assay. We wanted to make sure that our diagnosis test could benefit professionals working.

Who we talked to:

Step 2

Developing our Paper-Based Assay

Throughout the process of building our paper-based assay, we consulted professionals who helped us change our assay to better fit the needs of healthcare professionals and patients everywhere.

Who we talked to:

Step 3

Learn how to Relay our research to the public

Communicating our research and transporting or assay to the public is important when making our assay more globally accessible.

Who we talked to:

Integrated HP:

Step 4

Changing our detection method based on the conversations with professionals

Originally we designed our assay with as many steps as necessary in order to gain the best results with the least amount of factors to account for. However, based on our talk Dr. Linnes who shed light on a method of a three step application system that users prefer. Due to this discovery, we modified our assay to fit within the three step application suggestion.

Step 5

Assess public knowledge through survey

A major part of our research was finding a way to make the assay more user-friendly than current brands. In order to do so we conducted an IRB survey that used Amazon Mechanical Turk that helped us receive feedback from a diverse demographic range.

Click here to learn more

Step 6

Public Engagement

We had the opportunity to work with Purdue University Libraries in creating an event called DIYBio and Maker, where we educated the Purdue community about synthetic biology and our project. During the event we interacted with students and shed light on the importance of synthetic biology and the implications of our research.

Collaboration

A major part of our research was finding a way to make the assay more user-friendly than current brands. In order to do so we conducted an IRB survey that used Amazon Mechanical Turk that helped us receive feedback from a diverse demographic range.

Click here to learn more