Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
h('p', null, 'The model proposed by Subramanian and Gomez is of the form:'), | h('p', null, 'The model proposed by Subramanian and Gomez is of the form:'), | ||
h(g.MathJax.Node, {formula: 'y(t) = a + \\frac{(k−a)}{(1+e^{−b(t−m)})},'}), | h(g.MathJax.Node, {formula: 'y(t) = a + \\frac{(k−a)}{(1+e^{−b(t−m)})},'}), | ||
− | h('p', null, 'where ', i('y(t)'), ' is the concentration of the amplicon at ', i('t'), ', ', i('a'), ' is the starting concentration, is the maximum concentration, ', i('m'), ' is the time at which maximum growth occurs, and ', i('b'), ' is a free parameter representing how steep the growth is. We fit our data to this model using SciPy’s curve_fit function. It is also worth noting that our data and fitted parameters are actually in units of fluorescence, not concentration. We assumed that the two were proportional and worked in terms of fluorescence instead because that was the data we had readily available.') | + | h('p', null, 'where ', i('y(t)'), ' is the concentration of the amplicon at ', i('t'), ', ', i('a'), ' is the starting concentration, is the maximum concentration, ', i('m'), ' is the time at which maximum growth occurs, and ', i('b'), ' is a free parameter representing how steep the growth is. We fit our data to this model using SciPy’s curve_fit function. It is also worth noting that our data and fitted parameters are actually in units of fluorescence, not concentration. We assumed that the two were proportional and worked in terms of fluorescence instead because that was the data we had readily available.'), |
− | h('p', null, 'Once the model parameters have been obtained, we can compute ', i('T_p'), ' by ', i('T_p = m-\\frac{2}{b}')) | + | h('p', null, 'Once the model parameters have been obtained, we can compute ', i('T_p'), ' by ', i('T_p = m-\\frac{2}{b}'), '[1].') |
) | ) | ||
) | ) |
Revision as of 08:37, 17 October 2018