(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
text-align: center; | text-align: center; | ||
font-size: 40px; | font-size: 40px; | ||
− | |||
color: white; | color: white; | ||
} | } | ||
Line 50: | Line 49: | ||
text-align: center; | text-align: center; | ||
font-size: 40px; | font-size: 40px; | ||
− | |||
color: white; | color: white; | ||
} | } | ||
Line 60: | Line 58: | ||
text-align: center; | text-align: center; | ||
font-size: 60px; | font-size: 60px; | ||
− | |||
color: white; | color: white; | ||
} | } | ||
Line 366: | Line 363: | ||
<strong> Dialogue: </strong> ynthetic biology and ethical issues </br> | <strong> Dialogue: </strong> ynthetic biology and ethical issues </br> | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/38/T--Mingdao--3-3-2-P1.jpeg" alt="" style="width: | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/38/T--Mingdao--3-3-2-P1.jpeg" alt="" style="width:24%"> |
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/c/c1/T--Mingdao--3-3-2-P2.jpeg" alt="" style="width: | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/c/c1/T--Mingdao--3-3-2-P2.jpeg" alt="" style="width:24%"> |
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/0c/T--Mingdao--3-3-2-P3.jpeg" alt="" style="width: | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/0c/T--Mingdao--3-3-2-P3.jpeg" alt="" style="width:24%"> |
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/6d/T--Mingdao--3-3-2-P4.jpeg" alt="" style="width: | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/6d/T--Mingdao--3-3-2-P4.jpeg" alt="" style="width:24%"></center> |
</br></br> | </br></br> | ||
Line 387: | Line 384: | ||
Issue: Pros and Cons of Biotech</br> | Issue: Pros and Cons of Biotech</br> | ||
Rules followed SINGAPORE SECONDARY SCHOOLS DEBATING CHAMPIONSHIPS</br> | Rules followed SINGAPORE SECONDARY SCHOOLS DEBATING CHAMPIONSHIPS</br> | ||
− | Schedule: | + | Schedule:</br> |
− | <img class="center" src=" "></br> | + | <img class="center" src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/e/e0/T--Mingdao--sammsascheduel.png"></br> |
<p style="text-indent:2em; color:black; font-size:20px;"> | <p style="text-indent:2em; color:black; font-size:20px;"> | ||
We had a fierce fight on balancing the pros and cons of the applications of the synthetic engineering in human’s life. We gave many convincing examples, stated a lot of facts, used different viewpoints to discuss the issue. We talked about examples from eugenics to superweeds, from International Monsanto Tribunal to Taiwan Anti-GMO Organizations. And yet, we’re equipped with a sharpening vision and depth perception to strengthen our proposition. | We had a fierce fight on balancing the pros and cons of the applications of the synthetic engineering in human’s life. We gave many convincing examples, stated a lot of facts, used different viewpoints to discuss the issue. We talked about examples from eugenics to superweeds, from International Monsanto Tribunal to Taiwan Anti-GMO Organizations. And yet, we’re equipped with a sharpening vision and depth perception to strengthen our proposition. |
Latest revision as of 09:52, 17 October 2018
Pros and Cons of Biotech
Participants: Mingdao High School students vs. iGEMers (Team CCU-Taiwan) Date: Sep. 4, 2018 Location: Conference Hall at Mingdao High School Dialogue: ynthetic biology and ethical issues
Why: To discuss the impact of synthetic biology and ethical issues in genetic engineering
How: A debate competition held in Mingdao High School (MDHS) in cooperation with iGEM Team CCU-Taiwan What:
Issue: Pros and Cons of Biotech Rules followed SINGAPORE SECONDARY SCHOOLS DEBATING CHAMPIONSHIPS Schedule:
We had a fierce fight on balancing the pros and cons of the applications of the synthetic engineering in human’s life. We gave many convincing examples, stated a lot of facts, used different viewpoints to discuss the issue. We talked about examples from eugenics to superweeds, from International Monsanto Tribunal to Taiwan Anti-GMO Organizations. And yet, we’re equipped with a sharpening vision and depth perception to strengthen our proposition. Reflection:
It’s a great experience for us to organize my team timely and effectively, and a rare opportunity to stand in opposition to an iGEM team, CCU-Taiwan. We really did much work to research in the topic of GMO and have learned a lot from this competition. Special thanks to the volunteers, CCU participants and Debate Club from MDHS, for the help to organize this debate competition. Without them, we can’t ever have such a fantastic and meaningful competition in the life of high school students.