Difference between revisions of "Team:Vilnius-Lithuania/InterLab"

Line 25: Line 25:
 
     <div class="modal-content">
 
     <div class="modal-content">
 
         <h1>Description</h1>
 
         <h1>Description</h1>
        <p></p>
 
 
         <p></p>
 
         <p></p>
 
         <p>At the beginning of the InterLab study we completed three distinct calibration protocols. At first, we performed the <strong>LUDOX Protocol</strong> in order to obtain a conversion factor to transform absorbance (Abs<sub>600</sub>) from the plate reader into a comparable OD<sub>600</sub> measurement as would be obtained with a spectrophotometer. Next, we completed the <strong>Microsphere Protocol</strong> as it allows a standard curve of particle concentration which is used to convert Abs<sub>600</sub> measurements to an estimated number of cells. Finally, by completing the <strong>Fluorescein Protocol</strong> we generated a standard fluorescence curve which is used to compare fluorescence output of different test devices. Completion of the calibrations ensured that we take cell measurements under the same conditions. It is worth mentioning that prior calibration, we prepared competent E. coli DH5-alpha cells and transformed them according to the standard transformation protocol. During all of the experiments we tested 8 plasmids: 2 controls and 6 test devices (Tab 1). </p>
 
         <p>At the beginning of the InterLab study we completed three distinct calibration protocols. At first, we performed the <strong>LUDOX Protocol</strong> in order to obtain a conversion factor to transform absorbance (Abs<sub>600</sub>) from the plate reader into a comparable OD<sub>600</sub> measurement as would be obtained with a spectrophotometer. Next, we completed the <strong>Microsphere Protocol</strong> as it allows a standard curve of particle concentration which is used to convert Abs<sub>600</sub> measurements to an estimated number of cells. Finally, by completing the <strong>Fluorescein Protocol</strong> we generated a standard fluorescence curve which is used to compare fluorescence output of different test devices. Completion of the calibrations ensured that we take cell measurements under the same conditions. It is worth mentioning that prior calibration, we prepared competent E. coli DH5-alpha cells and transformed them according to the standard transformation protocol. During all of the experiments we tested 8 plasmids: 2 controls and 6 test devices (Tab 1). </p>
Line 170: Line 169:
 
           <p></p>
 
           <p></p>
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/b0/T--Vilnius-Lithuania--3_InterLab.png"
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/b0/T--Vilnius-Lithuania--3_InterLab.png"
      <p><strong>Fig. 3</strong> Standard curve of fluorescein generated by measuring the fluorescence of serial dilution stock (µM). Fluorescence is plotted against the fluorescein concentration.</p>
+
      <strong>Fig. 3</strong> Standard curve of fluorescein generated by measuring the fluorescence of serial dilution stock (µM). Fluorescence is plotted against the fluorescein concentration.</p>
  
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/d8/T--Vilnius-Lithuania--4_InterLab.png"
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/d8/T--Vilnius-Lithuania--4_InterLab.png"

Revision as of 15:56, 17 October 2018

InterLab

Studying Fluorescence

The goal of this year’s InterLab Study was to identify and minimize the sources of systematic variability in fluorescence measurements by normalizing to absolute cell count or colony-forming units (CFUs) instead of optical density (OD).

Participating in the fifth iGEM InterLab Study was a great opportunity to start this year’s competition as well as acquire some valuable knowledge which we implemented into practice during the project.

invert