Difference between revisions of "Template:SYSU-Software/statics/html/Human Practice/Gold.html"

Latest revision as of 18:22, 17 October 2018

       Human Practice

       Gold

       Overview

       The aim of our human practice project is to guide the design of CO-RAD in aspects such as topic selection,
       feature improvement and safety issues. The design of our software was based on real-world requirements right
       from the beginning, and we invited professionals and other iGEM teams to test our software and give us their
       suggestions. Feedbacks helped the further enhancement of our software. We have also set up a public WeChat
       account about synthetic biology as a bit of contribution to the community.

       Needs survey

       Pre-survey

       Before the meetings, we conducted a pre-survey to guide the in-depth investigation. Feedbacks from 9 iGEM teams
       were collected and the data turned out that the top three difficulties they encounter are :

Experiment Reproducing and Validating(76% teams have troubles in this area)
Finding New Creative Ideas(48% teams)
Searching for Information(28% teams).

   <img src="" />

Figure 4: Pre-survey

       Opinions from professionals and other teams

       Professor Lu suggested that we should approach the problems with interdisciplinary perspectives. He also
       mentioned that researchers traditionally choose to meet their remote collogues because they lack efficient
       tools to communicate and work together. Working in different places also made it difficult for scientists to
       exchange and work on creative ideas in time.

   <img src="">

Figure 5: Consulting with Prof.Lu

       We also had a meeting with SCUT-ChinaA team. They particularly pointed out that experiment protocols are
       important in collaborating, something we didn't think of before. That's when we formed the idea of protocol
       editing.

   <img src="" />

Figure 6: Meetup with SCUT-ChinaA

       We also consulted Professor Lee, biosafety committee member of our university, in order to improve the safety
       standard for our software. He talked about biosafety issues for <a href="javascript:void(0)" goto="Dry-Lab"> dry lab </a> and 
       <a href="javascript:void(0)" goto="Wet-Lab"> wet lab </a>,
       and we discussed potential solutions to these issues.

       Implementation

       Experiment validating

       To solve problem in validation, we built a circuit predicting feature that uses OED models to simulate the
       behavior of the circuits. Users can have visual plot, which displays the production rates of product.

       For more details <a href="javascript:void(0)" goto="Description">check Project</a>

       Inconvenience in collaboration

       Our real-time Synchronization Sketchpad lets users work on the same project at the same time, where they can see
       what changes other people are making instantly. This specifically for idea sharing and brainstorming. Moreover,
       Management Studio is definitely reliable assistant for managing and sharing your circuit design. We believe
       that our software will redefine remote collaborating, leading it to a simple and efficient process.

       For more details <a href="javascript:void(0)" goto="Design">Check Design</a>.

       Information Searching

       Synthetic biologists constantly need access to past projects and papers for reference and we try to make this
       process easier and faster by building a dedicated database and an improved search engine based on existing
       projects, with similar circuit searching featured added to make it more intelligent.

   <img src="" />

Figure 7：Searching result with keyword "PET"

       Protocol editing

       Good protocol is the first step of successful experiments. Protocol editor is implemented in our co-editing
       software mentioned above, as an additional feature inspired by SCUT-ChinaA team.

       For more details check <a herf="javascript:void(0)" goto="SCUT"> Collaboration:SCUT-ChinaA</a>

   <img src="" />

Figure 8: Protocol editing

       Biosafety

       After consulting Professor Lee's and the brainstorm among our team members, we checked all the existing parts
       and circuits in our database, removed those with potential risks, and added necessary warning messages in our
       designer.

       For more details check <a href="javascript:void(0)" goto="Wet-Lab"> Safety </a>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <div class="page-container">
+    <div class="last-page-identify" data-value="17"></div>
      <div class="header1">
          Human Practice
      </div>
      <div class="header2">
-         Gold:Integrated Huaman Practice
+         Gold
      </div>
      <div class="header3">
@@ Line 10: / Line 11: @@
      </div>
      <div class="content">
-         Our human practice project is used to guide the entire CO-Rad project in several aspects as: topic choosing,
+         The aim of our human practice project is to guide the design of CO-RAD in aspects such as topic selection,
-         feature improvement and safety issues. We first carried out surveys and gatherings with other teams and
+         feature improvement and safety issues. The design of our software was based on real-world requirements right
-        professionals to learn about their need, then we based our project on this data, then we showed our results to
+         from the beginning, and we invited professionals and other iGEM teams to test our software and give us their
-         the teams and professionals we got in touch with and made further adjustments about our project. To shoulder
+         suggestions. Feedbacks helped the further enhancement of our software. We have also set up a public WeChat
-         our obligation to the Syn-bio community and the entire society, we established a wechat public account and
+         account about synthetic biology as a bit of contribution to the community.
-         posed introduction of SYNBIO on it. We also encourage the readers to think out of the box so we had the global
-        challenge as our special topic.
      </div>
@@ Line 26: / Line 25: @@
      </div>
      <div class="content">
-         Before the meetings, we hold a pre-survey first to guide the in-depth investigation. The survey was conducted
+         Before the meetings, we conducted a pre-survey to guide the in-depth investigation. Feedbacks from 9 iGEM teams
-        among the iGEM teams both domestic and abroad to find out users’needs. we got feedbacks from 9 iGEM teams and
+         were collected and the data turned out that the top three difficulties they encounter are :
-         it turned out that the top three difficulties that a normal iGEM team encounter are
          <ol>
              <li>
-                 experiment reproducing and validating(76% teams have troubles in this area
+                 Experiment Reproducing and Validating(76% teams have troubles in this area)
              </li>
              <li>
-                 finding new creative ideas(48% teams)
+                 Finding New Creative Ideas(48% teams)
              </li>
              <li>
-                 searching for information(28% teams)
+                 Searching for Information(28% teams).
              </li>
          </ol>
      </div>
-     <img sec="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/b7/T--SYSU-Software--Pre-Survey.png" />
+     <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/b7/T--SYSU-Software--Pre-Survey.png" />
      <div class="caption">Figure 4: Pre-survey</div>
      <div class="header4">
-         Gatherings with professionals
+         Opinions from professionals and other teams
      </div>
      <div class="content">
-         We then chat with Prof.Lu about the situation we are in and asked for his opinions about the feasibility and
+         Professor Lu suggested that we should approach the problems with interdisciplinary perspectives. He also
-        utility of these ideas. Based on their own experience and knowledge, Lu lab suggested us to deal with the
+         mentioned that researchers traditionally choose to meet their remote collogues because they lack efficient
-        problems with interdisciplinary perspectives. When discussing the realization of the function, Lu lab thinks
+         tools to communicate and work together. Working in different places also made it difficult for scientists to
-         that the traditional remote collaborative methods is low-efficient and inconvenient, thus many researcher
+        exchange and work on creative ideas in time.
-         selected to meet their remote collaborators ,which costs plenty of time and energy. At the same time, remote
-        collaboration make it difficult to come up with valuable ideas an suggestion.
      </div>
      <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/c/cb/T--SYSU-Software--ConsultingLu.png">
      <div class="caption">Figure 5: Consulting with Prof.Lu</div>
      <div class="content">
-         We also gathered with SCUT-ChinaA team to introduce our project to each other and exchanged our opinions. After
+         We also had a meeting with SCUT-ChinaA team. They particularly pointed out that experiment protocols are
-        introducing our co-editing function with a presentation，one of their team members gave a great suggestion about
+        important in collaborating, something we didn't think of before. That's when we formed the idea of protocol
-        our project. He pointed out that we ignored the fact that experiment protocol is also an important element in
+        editing.
-        design collaboration. As a result, we, together with the SCUT team, come up with the idea of protocol editing.
      </div>
      <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a8/T--SYSU-Software--Meet.png" />
      <div class="caption">Figure 6: Meetup with SCUT-ChinaA</div>
      <div class="content">
-         Since we think highly of Biosafety, we consulted the university biosafety committee member Prof.LEE. about
+         We also consulted Professor Lee, biosafety committee member of our university, in order to improve the safety
-         <a href="javascript:void(0)" goto="Dry-Lab"> dry lab </a> and , had a member given an intrinsic talk to
+         standard for our software. He talked about biosafety issues for <a href="javascript:void(0)" goto="Dry-Lab"> dry lab </a> and
-         introduce concepts
+         <a href="javascript:void(0)" goto="Wet-Lab"> wet lab </a>,
-         and related policies to other teammates. After that, a discussion about the potential methods that could be
+         and we discussed potential solutions to these issues.
-        used to improve our project was addressed.
      </div>
      <div class="header3">
-         Realization
+         Implementation
-    </div>
-    <div class="content">
-        The Human practice guided the improvement of this project to fit the users’ demand of information searching,
-        experiment validating aid, ideas searching. Thanks to Prof.Lu for guiding our project design and we are also
-        grateful to the SCUT-ChinaA team for helping us fix the defect of unable to edit protocol, we also got generous
-        help from Professor LEE to improve our biosafety level.
      </div>
@@ Line 89: / Line 75: @@
      <div class="content">
          To solve problem in validation, we built a circuit predicting feature that uses OED models to simulate the
-         function of the circuits. The users could in this way model their circuit design and get simulation of
+         behavior of the circuits. Users can have visual plot, which displays the production rates of product.
-        intermediate products and end products.
      </div>
      <div class="content">
@@ Line 100: / Line 85: @@
      </div>
      <div class="content">
-         we solved this problem by building a co-editing software to let different users co-operate and inspire each
+         Our real-time Synchronization Sketchpad lets users work on the same project at the same time, where they can see
-        other as well as debug the design. the users can edit the same circuit in real time and have discussions on the
+         what changes other people are making instantly. This specifically for idea sharing and brainstorming. Moreover,
-         project they are co-operating on. we also deveolp the shared sketchpad, imitating draft paper, to make the
+        Management Studio is definitely reliable assistant for managing and sharing your circuit design. We believe
-        process of collaboration more convenient.
+        that our software will redefine remote collaborating, leading it to a simple and efficient process.
      </div>
      <div class="content">
          For more details <a href="javascript:void(0)" goto="Design">Check Design</a>.
      </div>
      <div class="header4">
-         Information searching
+         Information Searching
      </div>
      <div class="content">
-         From the pre-survey and talk with XMU-China, we find it is important for synthetic biologists to get past
+         Synthetic biologists constantly need access to past projects and papers for reference and we try to make this
-        successful experience quickly and accurately to optimize their own subjects, which can also be valuable to
+         process easier and faster by building a dedicated database and an improved search engine based on existing
-         inspire users in the process of collaboration. To solve this problem, we consulted the former members of our
+         projects, with similar circuit searching featured added to make it more intelligent.
-         team who build a searching engine, we improved last year’s searching function to make it more intelligent by
-        adding a similar circuit searching feature.
      </div>
      <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/ff/T--SYSU-Software--PET.png" />
@@ Line 125: / Line 107: @@
      </div>
      <div class="content">
-         The gathering with SCUT-ChinaA team made us realized that protocol display is also crucial in co-operation so
+         Good protocol is the first step of successful experiments. Protocol editor is implemented in our co-editing
-         we added a protocol editing function to let the users share and co-edit their protocols for design
+         software mentioned above, as an additional feature inspired by SCUT-ChinaA team.
-        improvements.
      </div>
-    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/9/99/T--SYSU-Software--protocol.png" />
-    <div class="caption">Figure 8: Protocol editing</div>
      <div class="content">
          For more details check <a herf="javascript:void(0)" goto="SCUT"> Collaboration:SCUT-ChinaA</a>
      </div>
+    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/9/99/T--SYSU-Software--protocol.png" />
+    <div class="caption">Figure 8: Protocol editing</div>
      <div class="header4">
-         Improved biosafety feature
+         Biosafety
      </div>
      <div class="content">
-         Combining the suggestions from Prof.LEE and the results of our group discussion. we finally decided to remove
+         After consulting Professor Lee's and the brainstorm among our team members, we checked all the existing parts
-        the risky parts and circuits from our database and add alert function in designer.
+        and circuits in our database, removed those with potential risks, and added necessary warning messages in our
+        designer.
      </div>
      <div class="content">
          For more details check <a href="javascript:void(0)" goto="Wet-Lab"> Safety </a>
      </div>
-     <div class="next-page-identify" data-value="19"></div> <!-- 这个是跳页标记 -->
+     <div class="next-page-identify" data-value="20"></div> <!-- 这个是跳页标记 -->
 </div>