Difference between revisions of "Team:East Chapel Hill/Results"

Line 96: Line 96:
 
<h1>Results</h1>
 
<h1>Results</h1>
 
<p2> Due to experimental errors and lack of reproducibility, there is some uncertainty in several of our plating assays. However, the results from August 22nd, 2018 appear to be the most accurate due to the lack of growth of the fluoride-binding mutant. Upon looking at these results, we can reasonably infer that the promoter J23_102 and the riboswitch variation ‘FRS1’ are most effective in allowing for dynamic bacterial growth across varied levels of fluoride. </p2>
 
<p2> Due to experimental errors and lack of reproducibility, there is some uncertainty in several of our plating assays. However, the results from August 22nd, 2018 appear to be the most accurate due to the lack of growth of the fluoride-binding mutant. Upon looking at these results, we can reasonably infer that the promoter J23_102 and the riboswitch variation ‘FRS1’ are most effective in allowing for dynamic bacterial growth across varied levels of fluoride. </p2>
 +
<br> <br>
 +
<h1> Future Directions </h1>
 +
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
  
 
</html>
 
</html>

Revision as of 18:45, 17 October 2018

East Chapel Hill

Results

Due to experimental errors and lack of reproducibility, there is some uncertainty in several of our plating assays. However, the results from August 22nd, 2018 appear to be the most accurate due to the lack of growth of the fluoride-binding mutant. Upon looking at these results, we can reasonably infer that the promoter J23_102 and the riboswitch variation ‘FRS1’ are most effective in allowing for dynamic bacterial growth across varied levels of fluoride.

Future Directions