(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<div id="bannerspace"> | <div id="bannerspace"> | ||
− | <div id="bannerquote"> | + | <div id="bannerquote">Biofilm Remover</div> |
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
<div class="contentbox"> | <div class="contentbox"> | ||
<h1 class="box-heading">Design</h1> | <h1 class="box-heading">Design</h1> | ||
− | <p>We hope that | + | <p>We hope that DspB, like siderophore, is regulated by AHL, and when AHL is present, the dspb gene will express. Given that the DspB enzyme activity is low, we planed to make it accumulate in cells first, and then be released by the subsequent lysis system.</p> |
<figure> | <figure> | ||
<figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 50%;margin-left:23%;margin-right:30%;"> | <figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 50%;margin-left:23%;margin-right:30%;"> | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
<div class="contentbox"> | <div class="contentbox"> | ||
<h1 class="box-heading">Result:</h1> | <h1 class="box-heading">Result:</h1> | ||
− | <p>In order to test the biofilm removal effect of | + | <p>In order to test the biofilm removal effect of DspB, we constructed the vector pET28a-dspB. </p> |
<figure> | <figure> | ||
<figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 50%;margin-left:22%;margin-right:30%;"> | <figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 50%;margin-left:22%;margin-right:30%;"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/5c/T--ECUST--result--biofilm_remove_BIOFILM1.jpg" alt=" class="B1"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/5c/T--ECUST--result--biofilm_remove_BIOFILM1.jpg" alt=" class="B1"> | ||
− | <figcaption><b>Figure 1. Construction of the expression vector pET28a- | + | <figcaption><b>Figure 1. Construction of the expression vector pET28a-dspB. The Kan represents kanamycin resistance marker. The part dspB was inserted by the restriction site BamHI and XhoI</b></figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<p>The plasmid was transformed into <i>E. coli</i> BL21, cultured at 37 °C for 12 h, and the plasmid was extracted and verified by PCR. </p> | <p>The plasmid was transformed into <i>E. coli</i> BL21, cultured at 37 °C for 12 h, and the plasmid was extracted and verified by PCR. </p> | ||
+ | <p></p> | ||
<figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 50%;margin-left:22%;margin-right:30%;"> | <figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 50%;margin-left:22%;margin-right:30%;"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/00/T--ECUST--result--biofilm_remove_BIOFILM2.jpg | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/00/T--ECUST--result--biofilm_remove_BIOFILM2.jpg | ||
Line 45: | Line 46: | ||
<figcaption><b>Figure 2. 1% Agarose Gel Electrophoresis of DNA extracted from the positive clones (a)and its identification by PCR(b), which shows that our vector was successfully constructed</b></figcaption> | <figcaption><b>Figure 2. 1% Agarose Gel Electrophoresis of DNA extracted from the positive clones (a)and its identification by PCR(b), which shows that our vector was successfully constructed</b></figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
− | <p>To test the expression of | + | <p>To test the expression of DspB, we cultured <i>E. coli</i> in LB medium containing 0.1% kan. <i>E. coli</i> was cultured at 37℃ and 220 rpm for all night, then inoculated into fresh medium and cultured until logarithmic phase.Add IPTG to final concentration of 20uM and culture <i>E. coli</i> over night at 25℃. Final OD600=0.437(diluted 16 fold) </p> |
+ | <p></p> | ||
<figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 50%;margin-left:22%;margin-right:30%;"> | <figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 50%;margin-left:22%;margin-right:30%;"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/0d/T--ECUST--result--biofilm_remove_BIOFILM3.jpg" alt=" class="B3"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/0d/T--ECUST--result--biofilm_remove_BIOFILM3.jpg" alt=" class="B3"> | ||
− | <figcaption><b>Figure 3.The SDS of | + | <figcaption><b>Figure 3.The SDS-PAGE of DspB |
Lane 1,2 Lane 1,2 before induction | Lane 1,2 Lane 1,2 before induction | ||
Lane 3 cell cultue media | Lane 3 cell cultue media | ||
Line 54: | Line 56: | ||
</b></figcaption> | </b></figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
− | <p>The expression of | + | <p>The expression of DspB was verified by SDS-PAGE(Figure 3). The cell culture medium was blank control, and the pre-induction cell supernatant was used as a negative control. </p> |
− | <p>In the figure 3 we can see that there are bands at about 37 kDa, these band of experimental groups are thicker than the negative control. And our target protein is about 40kDa. We think the protein here may be | + | <p>In the figure 3 we can see that there are bands at about 37 kDa, these band of experimental groups are thicker than the negative control. And our target protein is about 40kDa. We think the protein here may be DspB. </p> |
− | <p>Then, we tested whether the engineered bacteria expressed active | + | <p>Then, we tested whether the engineered bacteria expressed active DspB through enzyme activity experiments. </p> |
− | <p>4-nitrophenyl-N-acetyl -β-D-glucosaminide(NP-GlcNAc) is hydrolysed by DspB and become 4-nitrophenol with the maximum light absorption at 405 nm. 20 mLbacteria solution is disrupted and acted supernatant as | + | <p>4-nitrophenyl-N-acetyl -β-D-glucosaminide(NP-GlcNAc) is hydrolysed by DspB and become 4-nitrophenol with the maximum light absorption at 405 nm. 20 mLbacteria solution is disrupted and acted supernatant as DspB enzyme solution. |
− | We washed and shred the bacterial solution after induction, and took the supernatant as the enzyme reaction solution of | + | We washed and shred the bacterial solution after induction, and took the supernatant as the enzyme reaction solution of DspB while NP-GlcNAc working as a substrate.The enzyme activity experiment was carried out by using 100 μL of enzyme reaction solution and 100 μL of substrate solution (substrate concentration is 5 mM). </p> |
+ | <p></p> | ||
<figure> | <figure> | ||
<figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 50%;margin-left:22%;margin-right:30%;"> | <figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 50%;margin-left:22%;margin-right:30%;"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/b8/T--ECUST--result--biofilm_remove_BIOFILM4.jpg" alt=" class="B4"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/b8/T--ECUST--result--biofilm_remove_BIOFILM4.jpg" alt=" class="B4"> | ||
− | <figcaption><b>Figure | + | <figcaption><b>Figure 4:DspB enzyme activity assay curve |
</b></figcaption> | </b></figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<p>The enzyme activity of the supernatant calculated by the enzyme activity calculation formulais (Activity/(U/mL)=(kOD405-kseldecomposition)*18231.26 *dilution ratio) is 66.363U/mL. </p> | <p>The enzyme activity of the supernatant calculated by the enzyme activity calculation formulais (Activity/(U/mL)=(kOD405-kseldecomposition)*18231.26 *dilution ratio) is 66.363U/mL. </p> | ||
− | <p>The experiment proved that the recombinant bacteria expressed active | + | <p>The experiment proved that the recombinant bacteria expressed active DspB, and we used the <i>E. coli</i> supernatant with DspB activity to carry out the biofilm removal experiment.DH5a was cultured overnight in LB at 37 ° C and 220 rpm, and transferred to a 96-well plate at 37 ° C and cultured for 48 h, then discarded the supernatant .The biofilm was washed with PBS, and 200 uL of the reaction solution was added to react for the whole night. Add crystal violet to stain, wash the solution into the new well plate after alcohol washing, and measure the absorbance at 570 nm. The smaller the absorbance value, the better the membrane removal effect. </p> |
+ | <p></p> | ||
<figure> | <figure> | ||
<figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 50%;margin-left:22%;margin-right:30%;"> | <figure class="makeresponsive" style="width: 50%;margin-left:22%;margin-right:30%;"> | ||
Line 72: | Line 76: | ||
<figcaption><b>Figure 5. (a) Crystal violet staining results of different reaction solutions added to biofilm | <figcaption><b>Figure 5. (a) Crystal violet staining results of different reaction solutions added to biofilm | ||
(b) Biofilm removal rate of different reaction solutions added to biofilm | (b) Biofilm removal rate of different reaction solutions added to biofilm | ||
− | (c) | + | (c) DspB biofilm-removing curve |
OD570=51.96-51.24t0.0051 | OD570=51.96-51.24t0.0051 | ||
R2=0.98385 | R2=0.98385 | ||
Line 83: | Line 87: | ||
<div class="contentbox"> | <div class="contentbox"> | ||
<h1 class="box-heading">Reference</h1> | <h1 class="box-heading">Reference</h1> | ||
− | <p>1. Nature Communications 11 April 2017 Engineered probiotic Escherichia coli can eliminate and prevent Pseudomonas aeruginosa gut infection in animal models in Young Hwang</p> | + | <p>1. Nature Communications 11 April 2017 Engineered probiotic <i>Escherichia coli</i> can eliminate and prevent <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> gut infection in animal models in Young Hwang</p> |
− | <p>2. Biotechnological Products and Process Engineering 23 July 2004 Inhibiting mild steel corrosion from sulfate-reducing and iron-oxidizing bacteria using gramicidin-S-producing biofilms</p> | + | <p>2. Biotechnological Products and Process Engineering 23 July 2004 Inhibiting mild steel corrosion from <i>sulfate-reducing</i> and <i>iron-oxidizing bacteria</i> using gramicidin-S-producing biofilms</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Latest revision as of 01:34, 18 October 2018