(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
} | } | ||
</style> | </style> | ||
− | <style>.blu{color:a36dc0 !important; | + | <style>.blu{background-color:#a36dc0 !important;box-shadow:0px 3px 1px #a36dc0 !important} </style> |
<div class="section hold"></div> | <div class="section hold"></div> | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<div style="position:absolute;top: 20;width:100%"> | <div style="position:absolute;top: 20;width:100%"> | ||
<div class="row "> | <div class="row "> | ||
− | <h2 style="padding-left:200px; padding-top:calc(100vh - 250px)">Improved | + | <h2 style="padding-left:200px; padding-top:calc(100vh - 250px)">Improved Biobrick</h2> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<p class="borderleft"> | <p class="borderleft"> | ||
− | We | + | We learned that the iGEM 2010 Team BCCS-Bristol had used BBa_K381001 to detect the soil nitrate and |
nitrite to demonstrate the fertility of soil. Thus, farmers can determine which soils are | nitrite to demonstrate the fertility of soil. Thus, farmers can determine which soils are | ||
fertilized by detecting the fluorescence of GFP reporter gene. In this way, farmers only need to | fertilized by detecting the fluorescence of GFP reporter gene. In this way, farmers only need to | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
economic costs and the impact of eutrophication on ecosystems, the use of BBa_K381001 has great | economic costs and the impact of eutrophication on ecosystems, the use of BBa_K381001 has great | ||
benefits for both agriculture and the environment. However, due to the influence of outdoor | benefits for both agriculture and the environment. However, due to the influence of outdoor | ||
− | temperature, GFP fluorescence density | + | temperature, GFP fluorescence density fluctuated significantly. This instability is unfavorable |
for the detection of soil fertility. In addition, the detection of GFP fluorescence signal requires | for the detection of soil fertility. In addition, the detection of GFP fluorescence signal requires | ||
special equipment that is not readily available for farmers. Therefore, we replaced GFP with blue | special equipment that is not readily available for farmers. Therefore, we replaced GFP with blue | ||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
The construction of BBa_K381001 can be seen from Figure 1A. We transformed the plasmid containing | The construction of BBa_K381001 can be seen from Figure 1A. We transformed the plasmid containing | ||
BBa_K381001 into DH5α competent E. coli strain and cultured at 37 ℃ overnight to dilute to OD600 = | BBa_K381001 into DH5α competent E. coli strain and cultured at 37 ℃ overnight to dilute to OD600 = | ||
− | 0.4. Then we took half of bacteria as control and the rest was added SNP aqueous solution, and | + | 0.4. Then we took half of the bacteria as control and the rest was added SNP aqueous solution, and |
induced at 37 ℃ for 6 h. Then the fluorescence intensity of cells was observed under microplate | induced at 37 ℃ for 6 h. Then the fluorescence intensity of cells was observed under microplate | ||
reader (Figure 1B) and fluorescence inverted microscope (Figure 1C). The histogram of GFP | reader (Figure 1B) and fluorescence inverted microscope (Figure 1C). The histogram of GFP | ||
− | fluorescent density and microscope images indicated that PyeaR could effectively activated by NO | + | fluorescent density and microscope images indicated that PyeaR could be effectively activated by NO |
and there was almost no leakage expression. | and there was almost no leakage expression. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
The construction of BBa_K2817007 can be seen from Figure 2A. We transformed the plasmid containing | The construction of BBa_K2817007 can be seen from Figure 2A. We transformed the plasmid containing | ||
BBa_K2817007 into DH5α, and cultured at 37 ℃ overnight to dilute to OD = 0.4. Then we took half as | BBa_K2817007 into DH5α, and cultured at 37 ℃ overnight to dilute to OD = 0.4. Then we took half as | ||
− | control and the other half added SNP aqueous solution and induced at 37 ℃ for 6 h. We also set up | + | control and the other half added SNP aqueous solution and induced at 37 ℃ for 6 h. We also set up a |
negative control group which doesn’t contain amilCP. After 6 h at 37 ℃, 1 mL of the bacterial | negative control group which doesn’t contain amilCP. After 6 h at 37 ℃, 1 mL of the bacterial | ||
solution was centrifuged at 8,000 r.p.m for 1 min (Figure 2B). We could directly observe the result | solution was centrifuged at 8,000 r.p.m for 1 min (Figure 2B). We could directly observe the result |
Latest revision as of 03:27, 18 October 2018
-
folder_openProject
-
placeLab
-
detailsParts
-
lightbulb_outlineHP
-
peopleTeam
Improved Biobrick
Improvement
This year, we chose BBa_K381001 (PyeaR-GFP) as an alternative to our inflammatory sensor, due to promoter PyeaR is sensitive to nitrate and nitrite. When nitrate and nitrite enter E. coli, they will be converted to nitric oxide. Then nitric oxide will bind to the repressor protein NsrR that inactivates PyeaR to inhibit transcription of downstream genes.
We learned that the iGEM 2010 Team BCCS-Bristol had used BBa_K381001 to detect the soil nitrate and nitrite to demonstrate the fertility of soil. Thus, farmers can determine which soils are fertilized by detecting the fluorescence of GFP reporter gene. In this way, farmers only need to apply fertilizer in places where there is no fertility, which can save excess fertilizer. Given the economic costs and the impact of eutrophication on ecosystems, the use of BBa_K381001 has great benefits for both agriculture and the environment. However, due to the influence of outdoor temperature, GFP fluorescence density fluctuated significantly. This instability is unfavorable for the detection of soil fertility. In addition, the detection of GFP fluorescence signal requires special equipment that is not readily available for farmers. Therefore, we replaced GFP with blue chromoprotein (amilCP encoded protein) for visual detection. On the one hand, amilCP expression is less affected by temperature and is a more stable reporter than GFP. On the other hand, blue chromoprotein can be visualized by human eyes, instead of requiring the special equipment. Therefore, we believe that our improved part BBa_K2817007 is very beneficial to farmers.
According to the results of the ShanghaiTechChina_B 2016 team, 100μM Sodium Nitroprusside Dihydrate (SNP) aqueous solution can continually release NO, and the NO concentration is stable at about 5.5μM. Since our project also tested for inflammatory signals, we chose this concentration before testing for BBa_K381001 and BBa_K2817007.
The construction of BBa_K381001 can be seen from Figure 1A. We transformed the plasmid containing BBa_K381001 into DH5α competent E. coli strain and cultured at 37 ℃ overnight to dilute to OD600 = 0.4. Then we took half of the bacteria as control and the rest was added SNP aqueous solution, and induced at 37 ℃ for 6 h. Then the fluorescence intensity of cells was observed under microplate reader (Figure 1B) and fluorescence inverted microscope (Figure 1C). The histogram of GFP fluorescent density and microscope images indicated that PyeaR could be effectively activated by NO and there was almost no leakage expression.
Figure 1. The test of BBa_K381001. A, the construction of BBa_K381001. B, Histogram of GFP fluorescence: LB control, without SNP, with 100μM SNP. C, GFP fluorescence image from top to bottom: without SNP, with 100μM SNP.
The construction of BBa_K2817007 can be seen from Figure 2A. We transformed the plasmid containing BBa_K2817007 into DH5α, and cultured at 37 ℃ overnight to dilute to OD = 0.4. Then we took half as control and the other half added SNP aqueous solution and induced at 37 ℃ for 6 h. We also set up a negative control group which doesn’t contain amilCP. After 6 h at 37 ℃, 1 mL of the bacterial solution was centrifuged at 8,000 r.p.m for 1 min (Figure 2B). We could directly observe the result of PyeaR being activated by NO without special equipment.
Figure 2. The test of BBa_K2817007. A, the construction of BBa_K2817007. B, Pellets of bacteria transformed with plasmid containing BBa_K2817007 after induction of 6h. From left to right: negative control group, without SNP group, with 100μM SNP group.
In conclusion, we confirmed our improvement through an experimental comparison between the two parts. In the future, we will further confirm the situation of different concentrations of NO and different temperature conditions.