Difference between revisions of "Team:DLUT China B/Notebook"

(初次上传。)
(修改文案。)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
     <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://2018.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:DLUT_China_B/css/style.css&action=raw&ctype=text/css">
 
     <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://2018.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:DLUT_China_B/css/style.css&action=raw&ctype=text/css">
 
     <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://2018.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:DLUT_China_B/css/nav.css&action=raw&ctype=text/css">
 
     <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://2018.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:DLUT_China_B/css/nav.css&action=raw&ctype=text/css">
    <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://2018.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:DLUT_China_B/css/bubbles.css&action=raw&ctype=text/css">
 
    <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://2018.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:DLUT_China_B/css/slideshow.css&action=raw&ctype=text/css">
 
 
     <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://2018.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:DLUT_China_B/css/fontawesome.css&action=raw&ctype=text/css">
 
     <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://2018.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:DLUT_China_B/css/fontawesome.css&action=raw&ctype=text/css">
 
     <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://2018.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:DLUT_China_B/css/contents.css&action=raw&ctype=text/css">
 
     <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://2018.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:DLUT_China_B/css/contents.css&action=raw&ctype=text/css">
 
+
    <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://2018.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:DLUT_China_B/css/notebook.css&action=raw&ctype=text/css">
 
</head>
 
</head>
 
<body>
 
<body>
Line 16: Line 14:
 
     <div id="moduleHeader">
 
     <div id="moduleHeader">
 
         <div id="nav"></div>
 
         <div id="nav"></div>
        <br>
+
         <div id="background" class="notebook"></div>
         <div class="moduleTitle">Project</div>
+
         <div class="moduleTitle">Notebook</div>
         <div class="subModule">
+
            <span>Notebook</span>
+
        </div>
+
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
  
 
     <div id="mainBody">
 
     <div id="mainBody">
         <nav id="contents"></nav>
+
         <div id="contents"></div>
 
         <div id="article">
 
         <div id="article">
 
             <div class="mainText">
 
             <div class="mainText">
Line 30: Line 25:
 
                     used in the direct method we used, the following experimental procedures were obtained.</p>
 
                     used in the direct method we used, the following experimental procedures were obtained.</p>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 +
            <h2 class="title">Liquid Crystal Debugging Experiment</h2>
 
             <div>
 
             <div>
                 <h2 class="title">Experimental Procedure Ⅰ</h2>
+
                 <div>
                <div class="mainText">
+
                    <h2 class="title">Experimental Procedure Ⅰ</h2>
                    <h3 class="title">Pretreatment</h3>
+
                    <div class="mainText">
                    <p>Prepare 5% Decon 90 cleaning solution, stir, pour into the slide pool, soak the slides overnight;
+
                        <h3 class="title">Pretreatment</h3>
                        pour off the overnight cleaning solution, shake it with deionized water to achieve the purpose
+
                        <p>Prepare 5% Decon 90 cleaning solution, stir, pour into the slide pool, soak the slides
                        of washing, repeat 10 times; reload The ionized water was rinsed in the ultrasonic for 15 min
+
                            overnight;
                        and repeated twice; the tweezers were clamped on one end of the slide and washed with deionized
+
                            pour off the overnight cleaning solution, shake it with deionized water to achieve the
                        water for 3 times, and dried with nitrogen, placed in an oven for 20 min, and taken out in a dry
+
                            purpose
                        slide pool. Dustproof and spare.</p>
+
                            of washing, repeat 10 times; reload the ionized water was rinsed in the ultrasonic for 15
                    <h3 class="title">Self-assembly of the upper and lower slides</h3>
+
                            min
                    <p>DMOAP self-assembly of the upper slide: The cleaned slide is immersed in a 0.2% (v/v) DMOAP
+
                            and repeated twice; the tweezers were clamped on one end of the slide and washed with
                        aqueous solution, allowed to stand at room temperature for half an hour, rinsed with deionized
+
                            deionized
                        water, dried by N2, and dried at 110℃ for 1 h. Dustproof and spare.</p>
+
                            water for 3 times, and dried with nitrogen, placed in an oven for 20 min, and taken out in a
                    <p>APTES/DMOAP hybrid self-assembly of the lower slide: Immerse the cleaned slide in 3% (v/v) APTES
+
                            dry
                        and 1% (v/v) DMOAP in 10 mmol/L acetic acid-sodium acetate solution (pH =5) The solution was
+
                            slide pool. Dustproof and spare.</p>
                        incubated at 80℃ for 2 h, rinsed with deionized water, dried with N2, dried at 110℃ for 1 h,
+
                        <h3 class="title">Self-assembly of the upper and lower slides</h3>
                        then immersed in 1% (v/v) GA solution for 37 h at 37℃. Ion water rinse, N2 blow dry, dustproof
+
                        <p>DMOAP self-assembly of the upper slide: The cleaned slide is immersed in a 0.2% (v/v) DMOAP
                        and spare.</p>
+
                            aqueous solution, allowed to stand at room temperature for half an hour, rinsed with
                    <h3 class="title">Fixation of Nanobodies</h3>
+
                            deionized
                    <p>The Nanobody was dissolved in 0.01 mol/L of PBS buffer (pH=7.4) and configured to have different
+
                            water, dried by N<sub>2</sub>, and dried at 110℃ for 1 h. Dustproof and spare.</p>
                        concentrations of the Nanobody solution. Appropriate amount of Nano-antibody solution was added
+
                        <p>APTES/DMOAP hybrid self-assembly of the lower slide: Immerse the cleaned slide in 3% (v/v)
                        dropwise to the surface of the lower slide, and reacted at 37℃ for 2 h. After removal, it was
+
                            APTES
                        washed with 0.01 mol/L PBS buffer (pH=7.4) and deionized water to remove unfixed Nanobody
+
                            and 1% (v/v) DMOAP in 10 mmol/L acetic acid-sodium acetate solution (pH =5) The solution was
                        molecules. N2 is blown dry, placed at -20℃ for freezing or dustproof at room temperature.</p>
+
                            incubated at 80℃ for 2 h, rinsed with deionized water, dried with N<sub>2</sub>, dried at
                    <h3 class="title">Production of liquid crystal cell</h3>
+
                            110℃ for 1 h,
                    <p>The treated upper and lower slides were assembled face to face, and the slides were separated by
+
                            then immersed in 1% (v/v) GA solution for 37 h at 37℃. Ion water rinse, N<sub>2</sub> blow
                        Mylar polyester sheets (intermediate open convex cavity), and the other three sides were fixed
+
                            dry, dustproof
                        with small clips except for the opening direction. A small amount of liquid crystal is injected
+
                            and spare.</p>
                        into the liquid crystal cell from the opening by capillary action, and the liquid crystal is
+
                        <h3 class="title">Fixation of Nanobodies</h3>
                        filled with the entire cavity, and then observed by a polarizing microscope. And record the
+
                        <p>The Nanobody was dissolved in 0.01 mol/L of PBS buffer (pH=7.4) and configured to have
                        image results.</p>
+
                            different
 +
                            concentrations of the Nanobody solution. Appropriate amount of Nano-antibody solution was
 +
                            added
 +
                            dropwise to the surface of the lower slide, and reacted at 37℃ for 2 h. After removal, it
 +
                            was
 +
                            washed with 0.01 mol/L PBS buffer (pH=7.4) and deionized water to remove unfixed Nanobody
 +
                            molecules. N<sub>2</sub> is blown dry, placed at -20℃ for freezing or dustproof at room
 +
                            temperature.</p>
 +
                        <h3 class="title">Production of liquid crystal cell</h3>
 +
                        <p>The treated upper and lower slides were assembled face to face, and the slides were separated
 +
                            by
 +
                            Mylar polyester sheets (intermediate open convex cavity), and the other three sides were
 +
                            fixed
 +
                            with small clips except for the opening direction. A small amount of liquid crystal is
 +
                            injected
 +
                            into the liquid crystal cell from the opening by capillary action, and the liquid crystal is
 +
                            filled with the entire cavity, and then observed by a polarizing microscope. And record the
 +
                            image results.</p>
 +
                    </div>
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
            </div>
 
  
            <div>
+
                <div>
                <h2 class="title">Optimization of Experimental Conditions</h2>
+
                    <h2 class="title">Optimization of Experimental Conditions</h2>
                <div class="mainText">
+
                    <div class="mainText">
                    <h3 class="title">Explore the appropriate antibody concentration</h3>
+
                        <h3 class="title time">Explore the appropriate antibody concentration</h3>
                    <p>Time:</p>
+
                        <p>Time:</p>
                    <ul>
+
                        <ul>
                        <li>20 July: Antibody concentration 50ng/ml. Antibody concentration 200ng/ml.</li>
+
                            <li>20 July: Antibody concentration 50ng/ml. Antibody concentration 200ng/ml.</li>
                        <li>21 July: Antibody concentration 500ng/ml. Antibody concentration 1000ng/ml.</li>
+
                            <li>21 July: Antibody concentration 500ng/ml. Antibody concentration 1000ng/ml.</li>
                        <li>30 July: Antibody concentration 1ng/ml. Antibody concentration 10ng/ml. Antibody
+
                            <li>30 July: Antibody concentration 1ng/ml. Antibody concentration 10ng/ml. Antibody
                            concentration 50ng/ml.
+
                                concentration 50ng/ml.
                        </li>
+
                            </li>
                    </ul>
+
                        </ul>
                    <p>Since the antibody itself has a corresponding perturbation effect on the liquid crystal, in order
+
                        <p>Since the antibody itself has a corresponding perturbation effect on the liquid crystal, in
                        to avoid the influence of the nano-antibody perturbation effect on the experimental results, we
+
                            order
                        carried out an experiment to determine the appropriate concentration of the antibody, and we
+
                            to avoid the influence of the nano-antibody perturbation effect on the experimental results,
                        selected 50 ng/mL, 500 ng/mL, 1000 ng/mL, 2000 ng/mL antibody respectively. The concentration
+
                            we
                        was tested and three parallel experimental groups were set for each concentration. Parallel
+
                            carried out an experiment to determine the appropriate concentration of the antibody, and we
                        light and conical light were used for observation. The parallel light observation results (Fig.
+
                            selected 50 ng/mL, 500 ng/mL, 1000 ng/mL, 2000 ng/mL antibody respectively. The
                        1) were all black, indicating that the liquid crystal remained vertical.</p>
+
                            concentration
                    <table class="img">
+
                            was tested and three parallel experimental groups were set for each concentration. Parallel
                        <tr>
+
                            light and conical light were used for observation. The parallel light observation results
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            (Fig.
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            1) were all black, indicating that the liquid crystal remained vertical.</p>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                        <table class="img">
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            <tr>
                        </tr>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                    </table>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                    <p class="footnote">Parallel light observations at 50 ng/mL, 200 ng/mL, 500 ng/mL and 1000 ng/mL</p>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                    <p class="footnote"><b>Figure 1</b> Effect of antigen concentration gradient on liquid crystal
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        alignment</p>
+
                            </tr>
                    <p>Since the experimental results did not result in antibody concentrations that caused the liquid
+
                        </table>
                        crystals to align in parallel and cause color changes, we continued to increase the
+
                        <p class="footnote">Parallel light observations at 50 ng/mL, 200 ng/mL, 500 ng/mL and 1000
                        concentration for experiments. Experiments were performed at 1 ng/mL and 10 ng/mL to obtain the
+
                            ng/mL</p>
                        results of parallel light. Parallel light observations still show all black, and cross-contrast
+
                        <p class="footnote"><b>Figure 1</b> Effect of antigen concentration gradient on liquid crystal
                        observations have crosshairs. It is indicated that the liquid crystals are still mostly arranged
+
                            alignment</p>
                        vertically. The critical concentration for changing the liquid crystal from the vertical
+
                        <p>Since the experimental results did not result in antibody concentrations that caused the
                        alignment to the parallel alignment was not found, but it was found that the antibody
+
                            liquid
                        concentration of 10 ng/mL or less did not cause a change in the color of the liquid crystal.</p>
+
                            crystals to align in parallel and cause color changes, we continued to increase the
                    <table class="img">
+
                            concentration for experiments. Experiments were performed at 1 ng/mL and 10 ng/mL to obtain
                        <tr>
+
                            the
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            results of parallel light. Parallel light observations still show all black, and
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            cross-contrast
                        </tr>
+
                            observations have crosshairs. It is indicated that the liquid crystals are still mostly
                    </table>
+
                            arranged
                    <p class="footnote">Parallel light observations at antibody concentrations of 1 ng/mL and 10
+
                            vertically. The critical concentration for changing the liquid crystal from the vertical
                        ng/mL</p>
+
                            alignment to the parallel alignment was not found, but it was found that the antibody
                    <p class="footnote"><b>Figure 2</b> Effect of high antibody concentration on liquid crystal
+
                            concentration of 10 ng/mL or less did not cause a change in the color of the liquid
                        alignment</p>
+
                            crystal.</p>
 +
                        <table class="img">
 +
                            <tr>
 +
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
 +
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
 +
                            </tr>
 +
                        </table>
 +
                        <p class="footnote">Parallel light observations at antibody concentrations of 1 ng/mL and 10
 +
                            ng/mL</p>
 +
                        <p class="footnote"><b>Figure 2</b> Effect of high antibody concentration on liquid crystal
 +
                            alignment</p>
  
                    <h3 class="title">Explore the appropriate antibody concentration</h3>
+
                        <h3 class="title time">Explore the appropriate antibody concentration</h3>
                    <p>Time:</p>
+
                        <p>Time:</p>
                    <ul>
+
                        <ul>
                        <li>23 Aug: Antibody concentration 125ng/ml. Antibody concentration 2000ng/ml.</li>
+
                            <li>23 Aug: Antibody concentration 125ng/ml. Antibody concentration 2000ng/ml.</li>
                    </ul>
+
                        </ul>
                    <p>Since the preliminary experiment for exploring the appropriate antibody concentration did not
+
                        <p>Since the preliminary experiment for exploring the appropriate antibody concentration did not
                        find a critical value of the antibody concentration that can change the alignment of the liquid
+
                            find a critical value of the antibody concentration that can change the alignment of the
                        crystal, it is known from the search that the concentration of the antibody below 10 ng/mL does
+
                            liquid
                        not affect the liquid crystal alignment, so we refer to the literature and related research. It
+
                            crystal, it is known from the search that the concentration of the antibody below 10 ng/mL
                        is recommended by field personnel to select a concentration of 500 ng/mL as the initial antibody
+
                            does
                        concentration for detecting the antigen. Since the amount of antigen (β2-MG) in the urine of our
+
                            not affect the liquid crystal alignment, so we refer to the literature and related research.
                        current patients with chronic kidney disease is 125 ng/mL in unit conversion, we hope to
+
                            It
                        determine the optimal antibody critical concentration by antigen concentration so that the
+
                            is recommended by field personnel to select a concentration of 500 ng/mL as the initial
                        concentration is lower than 125 ng/mL. The antigen does not allow the liquid crystals to be
+
                            antibody
                        aligned in parallel, while antigens at concentrations above 125 ng/mL just align the liquid
+
                            concentration for detecting the antigen. Since the amount of antigen (β<sub>2</sub>-MG) in
                        crystals in parallel.</p>
+
                            the urine of our
                    <p>Therefore, our team selected 125 ng/mL, 1000 ng/mL and 2000 ng/mL antigen concentrations for
+
                            current patients with chronic kidney disease is 125 ng/mL in unit conversion, we hope to
                        experiments. The number of bright spots in 0.125 ng/mL-2 ng/mL parallel light images increased
+
                            determine the optimal antibody critical concentration by antigen concentration so that the
                        accordingly, but the overall color was black, and the difference was not large enough (Figure
+
                            concentration is lower than 125 ng/mL. The antigen does not allow the liquid crystals to be
                        3). Not enough to determine the standard line of detection. (Note: due to 1000 ng/mL data file
+
                            aligned in parallel, while antigens at concentrations above 125 ng/mL just align the liquid
                        corruption, not shown in the figure)</p>
+
                            crystals in parallel.</p>
                    <table class="img">
+
                        <p>Therefore, our team selected 125 ng/mL, 1000 ng/mL and 2000 ng/mL antigen concentrations for
                        <tr>
+
                            experiments. The number of bright spots in 0.125 ng/mL-2 ng/mL parallel light images
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            increased
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            accordingly, but the overall color was black, and the difference was not large enough
                        </tr>
+
                            (Figure
                    </table>
+
                            3). Not enough to determine the standard line of detection. (Note: due to 1000 ng/mL data
                    <p class="footnote">Parallel light observations at antigen concentrations of 125 ng/mL and 2000
+
                            file
                        ng/mL</p>
+
                            corruption, not shown in the figure)</p>
                    <p class="footnote"><b>Figure 3</b> Effect of antigen concentration on liquid crystal alignment</p>
+
                        <table class="img">
 +
                            <tr>
 +
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
 +
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
 +
                            </tr>
 +
                        </table>
 +
                        <p class="footnote">Parallel light observations at antigen concentrations of 125 ng/mL and 2000
 +
                            ng/mL</p>
 +
                        <p class="footnote"><b>Figure 3</b> Effect of antigen concentration on liquid crystal alignment
 +
                        </p>
  
                    <h3 class="title">DMOAP interference exclusion experiment</h3>
+
                        <h3 class="title time">DMOAP interference exclusion experiment</h3>
                    <p>Time:</p>
+
                        <p>Time:</p>
                    <ul>
+
                        <ul>
                        <li>25 Aug: Antibody concentration 500ng/ml.</li>
+
                            <li>25 Aug: Antibody concentration 500ng/ml.</li>
                    </ul>
+
                        </ul>
                    <p>Since the previous experiments used high antibody concentration or high antigen concentration,
+
                        <p>Since the previous experiments used high antibody concentration or high antigen
                        the liquid crystals could not be arranged in parallel to discolor the observation. We reflect on
+
                            concentration,
                        whether the concentration of DMOAP in the experiment has an interference effect on the
+
                            the liquid crystals could not be arranged in parallel to discolor the observation. We
                        experimental results. Since DMOAP plays a role in inducing the vertical alignment of liquid
+
                            reflect on
                        crystals in the experiment, the reason for the analysis may be that DMOAP leads to the failure
+
                            whether the concentration of DMOAP in the experiment has an interference effect on the
                        to obtain ideal experimental results. So we chose 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8% DMOAP concentration,
+
                            experimental results. Since DMOAP plays a role in inducing the vertical alignment of liquid
                        and the antibody concentration was still 500 ng/mL. The DMOAP concentration was different, and
+
                            crystals in the experiment, the reason for the analysis may be that DMOAP leads to the
                        the number of bright spots in the parallel light image was different (Fig. 4). From 0.8% to 0.2%
+
                            failure
                        concentration, the main body of the image is black, but the number of bright spots is
+
                            to obtain ideal experimental results. So we chose 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8% DMOAP
                        significantly increased. The number of bright spots is much higher at 0.2%; the number of bright
+
                            concentration,
                        spots on the image is less at 0.8%, which is equivalent to the previous 1% concentration.</p>
+
                            and the antibody concentration was still 500 ng/mL. The DMOAP concentration was different,
                    <table class="img">
+
                            and
                        <tr>
+
                            the number of bright spots in the parallel light image was different (Fig. 4). From 0.8% to
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            0.2%
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            concentration, the main body of the image is black, but the number of bright spots is
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            significantly increased. The number of bright spots is much higher at 0.2%; the number of
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            bright
                        </tr>
+
                            spots on the image is less at 0.8%, which is equivalent to the previous 1%
                    </table>
+
                            concentration.</p>
                    <p class="footnote">Parallel light observations at DMOAP concentrations of 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, and
+
                        <table class="img">
                        0.8%</p>
+
                            <tr>
                    <p class="footnote"><b>Figure 4</b> Effect of DMOAP concentration on liquid crystal alignment</p>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                    <p>Since the experimental results are not ideal, we consider re-selecting the experimental protocol.
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        After consulting the literature and discussing with the professional researchers in the field,
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        we decided to use the competition method. The following is the experimental plan.</p>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
 +
                            </tr>
 +
                        </table>
 +
                        <p class="footnote">Parallel light observations at DMOAP concentrations of 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, and
 +
                            0.8%</p>
 +
                        <p class="footnote"><b>Figure 4</b> Effect of DMOAP concentration on liquid crystal alignment
 +
                        </p>
 +
                        <p>Since the experimental results are not ideal, we consider re-selecting the experimental
 +
                            protocol.
 +
                            After consulting the literature and discussing with the professional researchers in the
 +
                            field,
 +
                            we decided to use the competition method. The following is the experimental plan.</p>
 +
                    </div>
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
            </div>
 
  
            <div>
+
                <div>
                <h2 class="title">Experimental Procedure Ⅱ</h2>
+
                    <h2 class="title">Experimental Procedure Ⅱ</h2>
                <div class="mainText">
+
                    <div class="mainText">
                    <h3 class="title">Pretreatment</h3>
+
                        <h3 class="title">Pretreatment</h3>
                    <p>Prepare 5% Decon 90 (5ml Decon 90+95ml water) cleaning solution, stir, pour into the slide pool,
+
                        <p>Prepare 5% Decon 90 (5ml Decon 90+95ml water) cleaning solution, stir, pour into the slide
                        soak the slides overnight; pour off the overnight cleaning solution, shake it with deionized
+
                            pool,
                        water to achieve the purpose of washing, repeat 10 times; reload The ionized water was rinsed in
+
                            soak the slides overnight; pour off the overnight cleaning solution, shake it with deionized
                        the ultrasonic for 15 min and repeated twice; the tweezers were clamped on one end of the slide
+
                            water to achieve the purpose of washing, repeat 10 times; reload The ionized water was
                        and washed with deionized water for 3 times, and dried with nitrogen, placed in an oven for 20
+
                            rinsed in
                        min, and taken out in a dry slide pool. Dustproof and spare.</p>
+
                            the ultrasonic for 15 min and repeated twice; the tweezers were clamped on one end of the
                    <h3 class="title">Self-assembly of the upper and lower slides</h3>
+
                            slide
                    <p>DMOAP self-assembly of the upper slide: The cleaned slide is immersed in a 0.2% (v/v) DMOAP
+
                            and washed with deionized water for 3 times, and dried with nitrogen, placed in an oven for
                        aqueous solution, allowed to stand at room temperature for half an hour, rinsed with deionized
+
                            20
                        water, dried by N2, and dried at 110℃ for 1 h. Dustproof and spare.</p>
+
                            min, and taken out in a dry slide pool. Dustproof and spare.</p>
                    <p>APTES/DMOAP hybrid self-assembly of the lower slide: Immerse the cleaned slide in 3% (v/v) APTES
+
                        <h3 class="title">Self-assembly of the upper and lower slides</h3>
                        and 1% (v/v) DMOAP in 10 mmol/L acetic acid-sodium acetate solution (pH =5) The solution was
+
                        <p>DMOAP self-assembly of the upper slide: The cleaned slide is immersed in a 0.2% (v/v) DMOAP
                        incubated at 80 °C for 2 h, rinsed with deionized water, dried with N2, dried at 110℃ for 1 h,
+
                            aqueous solution, allowed to stand at room temperature for half an hour, rinsed with
                        then immersed in 1% (v/v) GA solution for 37 h at 37℃. Ion water rinse, N2 blow dry, dustproof
+
                            deionized
                        and spare.</p>
+
                            water, dried by N<sub>2</sub>, and dried at 110℃ for 1 h. Dustproof and spare.</p>
                    <h3 class="title">Immobilization of antigen</h3>
+
                        <p>APTES/DMOAP hybrid self-assembly of the lower slide: Immerse the cleaned slide in 3% (v/v)
                    <p>The antigen was dissolved in 0.01 mol/L of PBS buffer (pH = 7.4) and configured to have different
+
                            APTES
                        concentrations of the antigen solution. An appropriate amount of the antigen solution was added
+
                            and 1% (v/v) DMOAP in 10 mmol/L acetic acid-sodium acetate solution (pH =5) The solution was
                        dropwise to the surface of the lower slide and reacted at 37℃ for 2 h. After taking out, they
+
                            incubated at 80 °C for 2 h, rinsed with deionized water, dried with N<sub>2</sub>, dried at
                        were washed with 0.01 mol/L PBS buffer (pH=7.4) and deionized water, and the unfixed antigen
+
                            110℃ for 1 h,
                        molecules were removed, dried with N2 and stored at -20℃.</p>
+
                            then immersed in 1% (v/v) GA solution for 37 h at 37℃. Ion water rinse, N<sub>2</sub> blow
                    <h3 class="title">Production of liquid crystal cell</h3>
+
                            dry, dustproof
                    <p>The treated upper and lower slides were assembled face to face, and the slides were separated by
+
                            and spare.</p>
                        Mylar polyester sheets (intermediate open convex cavity), and the other three sides were fixed
+
                        <h3 class="title">Immobilization of antigen</h3>
                        with small clips except for the opening direction. A small amount of liquid crystal is injected
+
                        <p>The antigen was dissolved in 0.01 mol/L of PBS buffer (pH = 7.4) and configured to have
                        into the liquid crystal cell from the opening by capillary action, and the liquid crystal is
+
                            different
                        filled with the entire cavity, and then observed by a polarizing microscope. And record the
+
                            concentrations of the antigen solution. An appropriate amount of the antigen solution was
                        image results.</p>
+
                            added
                    <h3 class="title">Nanobody binds to immobilized antigen</h3>
+
                            dropwise to the surface of the lower slide and reacted at 37℃ for 2 h. After taking out,
                    <p>According to the competitive immunoassay method, an appropriate amount of a certain concentration
+
                            they
                        of the nano-antibody solution was sequentially added dropwise to the slide to which the antigen
+
                            were washed with 0.01 mol/L PBS buffer (pH=7.4) and deionized water, and the unfixed antigen
                        was immobilized, and reacted at 37℃ for 1 h. Rinse with 0.01 mol/L PBS buffer (pH=7.4) and
+
                            molecules were removed, dried with N<sub>2</sub> and stored at -20℃.</p>
                        deionized water to remove non-specific adsorbed substances, and dried with N2. A liquid crystal
+
                        <h3 class="title">Production of liquid crystal cell</h3>
                        cell was prepared according to the method (4), and a change in color and brightness of the
+
                        <p>The treated upper and lower slides were assembled face to face, and the slides were separated
                        liquid crystal film was observed using a polarizing microscope and image analysis was
+
                            by
                        performed.</p>
+
                            Mylar polyester sheets (intermediate open convex cavity), and the other three sides were
 +
                            fixed
 +
                            with small clips except for the opening direction. A small amount of liquid crystal is
 +
                            injected
 +
                            into the liquid crystal cell from the opening by capillary action, and the liquid crystal is
 +
                            filled with the entire cavity, and then observed by a polarizing microscope. And record the
 +
                            image results.</p>
 +
                        <h3 class="title">Nanobody binds to immobilized antigen</h3>
 +
                        <p>According to the competitive immunoassay method, an appropriate amount of a certain
 +
                            concentration
 +
                            of the nano-antibody solution was sequentially added dropwise to the slide to which the
 +
                            antigen
 +
                            was immobilized, and reacted at 37℃ for 1 h. Rinse with 0.01 mol/L PBS buffer (pH=7.4) and
 +
                            deionized water to remove non-specific adsorbed substances, and dried with N<sub>2</sub>. A
 +
                            liquid crystal
 +
                            cell was prepared according to the method (4), and a change in color and brightness of the
 +
                            liquid crystal film was observed using a polarizing microscope and image analysis was
 +
                            performed.</p>
 +
                    </div>
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
            </div>
 
  
            <div>
+
                <div>
                <h2 class="title">Experiment of Suitable Antigen Concentration</h2>
+
                    <h2 class="title time">Experiment of Suitable Antigen Concentration</h2>
                <div class="mainText">
+
                    <div class="mainText">
                    <p>Time:</p>
+
                        <p>Time:</p>
                    <ul>
+
                        <ul>
                        <li>30 Aug: Antigen concentration 500ng/ml; Antigen concentration 1000ng/ml; Antigen
+
                            <li>30 Aug: Antigen concentration 500ng/ml; Antigen concentration 1000ng/ml; Antigen
                            concentration 2000ng/ml; Antigen concentration 4000ng/ml.
+
                                concentration 2000ng/ml; Antigen concentration 4000ng/ml.
                        </li>
+
                            </li>
                        <li>2 Sept: Antigen concentration 100ng/ml; Antigen concentration 200ng/ml; Antigen
+
                            <li>2 Sept: Antigen concentration 100ng/ml; Antigen concentration 200ng/ml; Antigen
                            concentration 300ng/ml; Antigen concentration 400ng/ml.
+
                                concentration 300ng/ml; Antigen concentration 400ng/ml.
                        </li>
+
                            </li>
                    </ul>
+
                        </ul>
                    <p>We investigated the effect of antigens of different concentrations on the vertical alignment of
+
                        <p>We investigated the effect of antigens of different concentrations on the vertical alignment
                        liquid crystals without antibodies. The methods of antigen-antibody immobilization on glass were
+
                            of
                        collected from the literature of silkworm (crosslinked glutaraldehyde).The antigen was dissolved
+
                            liquid crystals without antibodies. The methods of antigen-antibody immobilization on glass
                        in 0.01 mol/L of PBS buffer (pH = 7.4) and configured to have
+
                            were
                        0.1mg/L, 0.2mg/L, 0.3mg/L, 0.4mg/L, 0.5mg/L, 1mg/L, 2mg/L and 4mg/L of the antigen solution to have
+
                            collected from the literature of silkworm (crosslinked glutaraldehyde).The antigen was
                        experiments with 1% DMOAP. For details of subsequent treatment, please refer to the third step of
+
                            dissolved
                        competitive immunoassay method. Antigen concentration gradient is small in the first five groups
+
                            in 0.01 mol/L of PBS buffer (pH = 7.4) and configured to have
                        while antigen concentration gradient of the last three groups is big. Three parallel experiments
+
                            0.1mg/L, 0.2mg/L, 0.3mg/L, 0.4mg/L, 0.5mg/L, 1mg/L, 2mg/L and 4mg/L of the antigen solution
                        were carried out in each group, and we chose the best picture to integrate them together. We
+
                            to have
                        observed bright spots separately under quadruple and tenfold objective. The specific results of
+
                            experiments with 1% DMOAP. For details of subsequent treatment, please refer to the third
                        the experiment are recorded as follows:</p>
+
                            step of
                    <table class="img">
+
                            competitive immunoassay method. Antigen concentration gradient is small in the first five
                        <tr>
+
                            groups
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            while antigen concentration gradient of the last three groups is big. Three parallel
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            experiments
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            were carried out in each group, and we chose the best picture to integrate them together. We
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            observed bright spots separately under quadruple and tenfold objective. The specific results
                        </tr>
+
                            of
                        <tr>
+
                            the experiment are recorded as follows:</p>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                        <table class="img">
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            <tr>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        </tr>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                    </table>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                    <p class="footnote">a. Images of 0.1mg/L, 0.2mg/mL, 0.3mg/L, 0.4mg/L, 0.5mg/L, 1mg/L, 2mg/L, 4mg/L
+
                            </tr>
                        of antigens in proper order under a quadruple objective</p>
+
                            <tr>
                    <table class="img">
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        <tr>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            </tr>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                        </table>
                        </tr>
+
                        <p class="footnote">a. Images of 0.1mg/L, 0.2mg/mL, 0.3mg/L, 0.4mg/L, 0.5mg/L, 1mg/L, 2mg/L,
                        <tr>
+
                            4mg/L
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            of antigens in proper order under a quadruple objective</p>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                        <table class="img">
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            <tr>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        </tr>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                    </table>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                    <p class="footnote">b. Images of 0.1mg/L, 0.2mg/mL, 0.3mg/L, 0.4mg/L, 0.5mg/L, 1mg/L, 2mg/L, 4mg/L
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        of antigens in proper order under a tenfold objective</p>
+
                            </tr>
                    <p>From the image, we can see that there is little difference among 0.1mg/L, 0.2mg/L and 0.3mg/L of
+
                            <tr>
                        antigens. It showed that the antigens in this concentration range have almost no effect on the
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        vertical alignment of liquid crystal. The number of bright spots increased, but not more
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        differences among 0.5mg/L-4mg/L. It suggested that the molecular weight of antigen may be too
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        small to affect the vertical alignment of liquid crystal. Therefore, the effect of antigens of
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        0.5mg/L concentration on the vertical alignment of liquid crystals is good.</p>
+
                            </tr>
 +
                        </table>
 +
                        <p class="footnote">b. Images of 0.1mg/L, 0.2mg/mL, 0.3mg/L, 0.4mg/L, 0.5mg/L, 1mg/L, 2mg/L,
 +
                            4mg/L
 +
                            of antigens in proper order under a tenfold objective</p>
 +
                        <p>From the image, we can see that there is little difference among 0.1mg/L, 0.2mg/L and 0.3mg/L
 +
                            of
 +
                            antigens. It showed that the antigens in this concentration range have almost no effect on
 +
                            the
 +
                            vertical alignment of liquid crystal. The number of bright spots increased, but not more
 +
                            differences among 0.5mg/L-4mg/L. It suggested that the molecular weight of antigen may be
 +
                            too
 +
                            small to affect the vertical alignment of liquid crystal. Therefore, the effect of antigens
 +
                            of
 +
                            0.5mg/L concentration on the vertical alignment of liquid crystals is good.</p>
 +
                    </div>
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
            </div>
 
  
            <div>
+
                <div>
                <h2 class="title">Experiment of Suitable Nanobody Concentration</h2>
+
                    <h2 class="title time">Experiment of Suitable Nanobody Concentration</h2>
                <div class="mainText">
+
                    <div class="mainText">
                    <p>Time:</p>
+
                        <p>Time:</p>
                    <ul>
+
                        <ul>
                        <li>8 Sept: Antigen concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 500 ng/ml; Antigen
+
                            <li>8 Sept: Antigen concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 500 ng/ml; Antigen
                            concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 1000 ng/ml; Antigen concentration 500ng/ml,
+
                                concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 1000 ng/ml; Antigen concentration
                            antibody concentration 1500 ng/ml; Antigen concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration
+
                                500ng/ml,
                            2000 ng/ml.
+
                                antibody concentration 1500 ng/ml; Antigen concentration 500ng/ml, antibody
                        </li>
+
                                concentration
                        <li>9 Sept: Antigen concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 250 ng/ml; Antigen
+
                                2000 ng/ml.
                            concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 500 ng/ml.
+
                            </li>
                        </li>
+
                            <li>9 Sept: Antigen concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 250 ng/ml; Antigen
                        <li>10 Sept: Antigen concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 500 ng/ml.</li>
+
                                concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 500 ng/ml.
                    </ul>
+
                            </li>
                    <p>After the experiment of suitable antigen concentration, we found that the effect of antigens of
+
                            <li>10 Sept: Antigen concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 500 ng/ml.</li>
                        0.5mg/L concentration on the vertical alignment of liquid crystals is good. Therefore, we take
+
                        </ul>
                        the concentration of antibody solution as 0.5mg/L as the premise to investigate suitable
+
                        <p>After the experiment of suitable antigen concentration, we found that the effect of antigens
                        nanobody concentration. An appropriate amount of 0.5mg/L, 1mg/L, 1.5mg/L and 0.5mg/L concentration
+
                            of
                        of the nano-antibody solution was sequentially added dropwise to the slide to which the antigen
+
                            0.5mg/L concentration on the vertical alignment of liquid crystals is good. Therefore, we
                        was immobilized. For details of subsequent treatment, please refer to the fifth step of
+
                            take
                        competitive immunoassay method .Three parallel experiments were carried out in each group, and
+
                            the concentration of antibody solution as 0.5mg/L as the premise to investigate suitable
                        we chose the best picture to integrate them together under both quadruple and tenfold objective.
+
                            nanobody concentration. An appropriate amount of 0.5mg/L, 1mg/L, 1.5mg/L and 0.5mg/L
                        As the results are good, we intend to explore the lowest limit of antibody concentration by
+
                            concentration
                        immersion(Add the liquid to a clean Petri dish and immerse the slide in). The specific results
+
                            of the nano-antibody solution was sequentially added dropwise to the slide to which the
                        of the experiment are recorded as follows:</p>
+
                            antigen
                    <table class="img">
+
                            was immobilized. For details of subsequent treatment, please refer to the fifth step of
                        <tr>
+
                            competitive immunoassay method .Three parallel experiments were carried out in each group,
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            and
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            we chose the best picture to integrate them together under both quadruple and tenfold
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            objective.
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            As the results are good, we intend to explore the lowest limit of antibody concentration by
                        </tr>
+
                            immersion(Add the liquid to a clean Petri dish and immerse the slide in). The specific
                    </table>
+
                            results
                    <p class="footnote">a. Images of 0.5mg/L, 1mg/L, 1.5mg/L and 2mg/L of Nanobodys in proper order under
+
                            of the experiment are recorded as follows:</p>
                        a quadruple objective</p>
+
                        <table class="img">
                    <table class="img">
+
                            <tr>
                        <tr>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        </tr>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                    </table>
+
                            </tr>
                    <p class="footnote">b. Images of 0.5mg/L, 1mg/L, 1.5mg/L and 2mg/L of nano-bodys in proper order under
+
                        </table>
                        a quadruple objective</p>
+
                        <p class="footnote">a. Images of 0.5mg/L, 1mg/L, 1.5mg/L and 2mg/L of Nanobodys in proper order
                    <table class="img">
+
                            under
                        <tr>
+
                            a quadruple objective</p>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                        <table class="img">
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            <tr>
                        </tr>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                    </table>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                    <p class="footnote">c. Images of 0.25mg/L and 0.5mg/L in proper order by immersion</p>
+
                            </tr>
 +
                        </table>
 +
                        <p class="footnote">b. Images of 0.5mg/L, 1mg/L, 1.5mg/L and 2mg/L of nano-bodys in proper order
 +
                            under
 +
                            a quadruple objective</p>
 +
                        <table class="img">
 +
                            <tr>
 +
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
 +
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
 +
                            </tr>
 +
                        </table>
 +
                        <p class="footnote">c. Images of 0.25mg/L and 0.5mg/L in proper order by immersion</p>
 +
                    </div>
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
            </div>
 
  
            <div>
+
                <div>
                <h2 class="title">Verify Antigen Concentration Experiment</h2>
+
                    <h2 class="title time">Verify Antigen Concentration Experiment</h2>
                <div class="mainText">
+
                    <div class="mainText">
                    <p>Time:</p>
+
                        <p>Time:</p>
                    <ul>
+
                        <ul>
                        <li>12 Sept: Antigen concentration 1000ng/ml, antibody concentration 1000 ng/ml; Antigen
+
                            <li>12 Sept: Antigen concentration 1000ng/ml, antibody concentration 1000 ng/ml; Antigen
                            concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 1000 ng/ml; Antigen concentration 62.5mg/L,
+
                                concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 1000 ng/ml; Antigen concentration
                            antibody concentration 5000 ng/ml; Antigen concentration 62.5 mg/L, antibody concentration
+
                                62.5mg/L,
                            1000 ng/ml;Antigen concentration 31.25 mg/L, antibody concentration 500 ng/ml; Antigen
+
                                antibody concentration 5000 ng/ml; Antigen concentration 62.5 mg/L, antibody
                            concentration 31.25 mg/L, antibody concentration 1000 ng/ml.
+
                                concentration
                        </li>
+
                                1000 ng/ml;Antigen concentration 31.25 mg/L, antibody concentration 500 ng/ml; Antigen
                    </ul>
+
                                concentration 31.25 mg/L, antibody concentration 1000 ng/ml.
                    <p>Due to the instability of the experimental results we have done before, we need to detect the
+
                            </li>
                        antigen concentration and antibody concentration, and use several extreme antigen concentrations
+
                        </ul>
                        to determine whether there is a problem with our antigen concentration. And considering the
+
                        <p>Due to the instability of the experimental results we have done before, we need to detect the
                        damage of the slide and the slide pool, in the self-assembly of the slide, the slide was dried
+
                            antigen concentration and antibody concentration, and use several extreme antigen
                        at 110℃ for 1 h and changed to dry at 80℃ for 1 h. At the same time, the antigen fixation
+
                            concentrations
                        process still adopts the method of soaking.</p>
+
                            to determine whether there is a problem with our antigen concentration. And considering the
                    <p>We changed the fixed antigen concentration to 1 mg/L and the corresponding antibody to 1000 ng/mL
+
                            damage of the slide and the slide pool, in the self-assembly of the slide, the slide was
                        (shown in Figure (5)a). Four parallel experiments were performed. We also made a fixed antigen
+
                            dried
                        to 62.5mg / L, 31.25mg / L, and explored the results of the two antigen concentrations, the
+
                            at 110℃ for 1 h and changed to dry at 80℃ for 1 h. At the same time, the antigen fixation
                        combined antibody was 500ng / ml and 1000 ng / ml (Figure (5) b, c, d, e), did four experiments,
+
                            process still adopts the method of soaking.</p>
                        four experiments in each group. Finally, we carried out the experimental results when the fixed
+
                        <p>We changed the fixed antigen concentration to 1 mg/L and the corresponding antibody to 1000
                        antigen was 500 ng/mL and the antibody was 1000 ng/mL (shown in Figure (5)f). Two parallel
+
                            ng/mL
                        experiments were performed to determine whether there was a deviation in the results of our
+
                            (shown in Figure (5)a). Four parallel experiments were performed. We also made a fixed
                        previous experiments.</p>
+
                            antigen
                    <table class="img">
+
                            to 62.5mg / L, 31.25mg / L, and explored the results of the two antigen concentrations, the
                        <tr>
+
                            combined antibody was 500ng / ml and 1000 ng / ml (Figure (5) b, c, d, e), did four
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            experiments,
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            four experiments in each group. Finally, we carried out the experimental results when the
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            fixed
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            antigen was 500 ng/mL and the antibody was 1000 ng/mL (shown in Figure (5)f). Two parallel
                        </tr>
+
                            experiments were performed to determine whether there was a deviation in the results of our
                    </table>
+
                            previous experiments.</p>
                    <p class="footnote">a. Antigen concentration 1 mg/L, antibody concentration 1000 ng/mL result
+
                        <table class="img">
                        image</p>
+
                            <tr>
                    <table class="img">
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        <tr>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            </tr>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                        </table>
                        </tr>
+
                        <p class="footnote">a. Antigen concentration 1 mg/L, antibody concentration 1000 ng/mL result
                    </table>
+
                            image</p>
                    <p class="footnote">b. Antigen concentration 62.5 mg/L, antibody concentration 500 ng/mL result
+
                        <table class="img">
                        image</p>
+
                            <tr>
                    <table class="img">
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        <tr>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            </tr>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                        </table>
                        </tr>
+
                        <p class="footnote">b. Antigen concentration 62.5 mg/L, antibody concentration 500 ng/mL result
                    </table>
+
                            image</p>
                    <p class="footnote">c. Antigen concentration 62.5 mg/L, antibody concentration 1000 ng/mL result
+
                        <table class="img">
                        image</p>
+
                            <tr>
                    <table class="img">
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        <tr>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            </tr>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                        </table>
                        </tr>
+
                        <p class="footnote">c. Antigen concentration 62.5 mg/L, antibody concentration 1000 ng/mL result
                    </table>
+
                            image</p>
                    <p class="footnote">d. Antigen concentration 31.25 mg/L, antibody concentration 500 ng/mL result
+
                        <table class="img">
                        image</p>
+
                            <tr>
                    <table class="img">
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        <tr>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            </tr>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                        </table>
                        </tr>
+
                        <p class="footnote">d. Antigen concentration 31.25 mg/L, antibody concentration 500 ng/mL result
                    </table>
+
                            image</p>
                    <p class="footnote">e. Antigen concentration 31.25 mg/L, antibody concentration 1000 ng/mL result
+
                        <table class="img">
                        image</p>
+
                            <tr>
                    <table class="img">
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        <tr>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        </tr>
+
                            </tr>
                    </table>
+
                        </table>
                    <p class="footnote">f. Antigen concentration 500ng/mL, antibody concentration 1000 ng/mL result
+
                        <p class="footnote">e. Antigen concentration 31.25 mg/L, antibody concentration 1000 ng/mL
                        image</p>
+
                            result
                    <p class="footnote"><b>Figure 5</b> Verification of extreme antigen concentration</p>
+
                            image</p>
                    <p>The result can be that the combination of the two can disturb the alignment of the liquid
+
                        <table class="img">
                        crystal. At the same time, the antigen is fixed.</p>
+
                            <tr>
 +
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
 +
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
 +
                            </tr>
 +
                        </table>
 +
                        <p class="footnote">f. Antigen concentration 500ng/mL, antibody concentration 1000 ng/mL result
 +
                            image</p>
 +
                        <p class="footnote"><b>Figure 5</b> Verification of extreme antigen concentration</p>
 +
                        <p>The result can be that the combination of the two can disturb the alignment of the liquid
 +
                            crystal. At the same time, the antigen is fixed.</p>
 +
                    </div>
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
            </div>
 
  
            <div>
+
                <div>
                <h2 class="title">Explore the Appropriate Concentration of Nanobodies Again</h2>
+
                    <h2 class="title time">Explore the Appropriate Concentration of Nanobodies Again</h2>
                <div class="mainText">
+
                    <div class="mainText">
                    <p>Time:</p>
+
                        <p>Time:</p>
                    <ul>
+
                        <ul>
                        <li>15 Sept: Antigen concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 1000 ng/ml; Antigen
+
                            <li>15 Sept: Antigen concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 1000 ng/ml; Antigen
                            concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 1500 ng/ml.
+
                                concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 1500 ng/ml.
                        </li>
+
                            </li>
                    </ul>
+
                        </ul>
                    <p>Following the last experiment, we thought that 500 ng/mL antigen fixation is currently
+
                        <p>Following the last experiment, we thought that 500 ng/mL antigen fixation is currently
                        reasonable. So we did the effect of antibody concentration of 1000 ng/mL and 1500 ng/mL at an
+
                            reasonable. So we did the effect of antibody concentration of 1000 ng/mL and 1500 ng/mL at
                        antigen concentration of 500 ng/mL (Figure (6) a, b), where we will self-assemble the upper and
+
                            an
                        lower slides. And considering the damage of the slide and the slide pool, in the self-assembly
+
                            antigen concentration of 500 ng/mL (Figure (6) a, b), where we will self-assemble the upper
                        of the slide, the slide was dried at 110℃ for 1 h and changed to dry at 80℃ for 1 h. At the same
+
                            and
                        time, the antigen fixation process still adopts the method of soaking. Three sets of parallel
+
                            lower slides. And considering the damage of the slide and the slide pool, in the
                        experiments were performed separately.</p>
+
                            self-assembly
                    <p>Then we also made a set of antigen concentration of 500 ng / ml, antibody concentration of 1500
+
                            of the slide, the slide was dried at 110℃ for 1 h and changed to dry at 80℃ for 1 h. At the
                        ng / ml (Figure (6) c). However, the method of soaking the immobilized antigen was not adopted,
+
                            same
                        but the previous dropping method was employed.</p>
+
                            time, the antigen fixation process still adopts the method of soaking. Three sets of
                    <table class="img">
+
                            parallel
                        <tr>
+
                            experiments were performed separately.</p>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                        <p>Then we also made a set of antigen concentration of 500 ng / ml, antibody concentration of
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            1500
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            ng / ml (Figure (6) c). However, the method of soaking the immobilized antigen was not
                        </tr>
+
                            adopted,
                    </table>
+
                            but the previous dropping method was employed.</p>
                    <p class="footnote">a. Antigen concentration 500ng/mL, antibody concentration 1000 ng/mL result
+
                        <table class="img">
                        imag.</p>
+
                            <tr>
                    <table class="img">
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        <tr>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            </tr>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                        </table>
                        </tr>
+
                        <p class="footnote">a. Antigen concentration 500ng/mL, antibody concentration 1000 ng/mL result
                    </table>
+
                            imag.</p>
                    <p class="footnote">b. Antigen concentration 500ng/mL, antibody concentration 1500 ng/mL result
+
                        <table class="img">
                        image</p>
+
                            <tr>
                    <table class="img">
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        <tr>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        </tr>
+
                            </tr>
                    </table>
+
                        </table>
                    <p class="footnote">c. Antigen concentration 500ng/mL, antibody concentration 1500 ng/mL result
+
                        <p class="footnote">b. Antigen concentration 500ng/mL, antibody concentration 1500 ng/mL result
                        image(Antigen drop fixation)</p>
+
                            image</p>
                    <p class="footnote"><b>Figure 6</b> Verifying the nanobody concentration experiment again</p>
+
                        <table class="img">
                    <p>The experimental results showed that the antibody concentration was responsive at 1000 ng/mL and
+
                            <tr>
                        1500 ng/mL, and the results were obvious. Among them, the method of dropping antigen is more
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        stable.</p>
+
                            </tr>
 +
                        </table>
 +
                        <p class="footnote">c. Antigen concentration 500ng/mL, antibody concentration 1500 ng/mL result
 +
                            image(Antigen drop fixation)</p>
 +
                        <p class="footnote"><b>Figure 6</b> Verifying the nanobody concentration experiment again</p>
 +
                        <p>The experimental results showed that the antibody concentration was responsive at 1000 ng/mL
 +
                            and
 +
                            1500 ng/mL, and the results were obvious. Among them, the method of dropping antigen is more
 +
                            stable.</p>
 +
                    </div>
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
            </div>
 
  
            <div>
+
                <div>
                <h2 class="title">The Influence of GA and APTES</h2>
+
                    <h2 class="title time">The Influence of GA and APTES</h2>
                <div class="mainText">
+
                    <div class="mainText">
                    <p>Time:</p>
+
                        <p>Time:</p>
                    <ul>
+
                        <ul>
                        <li>19 Sept: The influence with or without APTES and GA.</li>
+
                            <li>19 Sept: The influence with or without APTES and GA.</li>
                    </ul>
+
                        </ul>
                    <p>Since the previous results were more pronounced, we then explored the impact of GA and APTES on
+
                        <p>Since the previous results were more pronounced, we then explored the impact of GA and APTES
                        the results. We skipped the steps of immobilizing the antigen and dropping the antibody,
+
                            on
                        directly performing the GA addition step after self-assembly of the slide, and exploring the
+
                            the results. We skipped the steps of immobilizing the antigen and dropping the antibody,
                        effect of GA (shown in Figure (7)a). The impact of APTES is to observe the observations made
+
                            directly performing the GA addition step after self-assembly of the slide, and exploring the
                        after self-assembly (Figure (7)b).</p>
+
                            effect of GA (shown in Figure (7)a). The impact of APTES is to observe the observations made
                    <table class="img">
+
                            after self-assembly (Figure (7)b).</p>
                        <tr>
+
                        <table class="img">
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            <tr>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        </tr>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                    </table>
+
                            </tr>
                    <p class="footnote">a. APTES inquiry results</p>
+
                        </table>
                    <table class="img">
+
                        <p class="footnote">a. APTES inquiry results</p>
                        <tr>
+
                        <table class="img">
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            <tr>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        </tr>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                    </table>
+
                            </tr>
                    <p class="footnote">b. GA inquiry results</p>
+
                        </table>
                    <p class="footnote"><b>Figure 7</b> The impact of APTES and GA</p>
+
                        <p class="footnote">b. GA inquiry results</p>
                    <p>It can be seen from the results that APTES and GA are negligible for liquid crystal
+
                        <p class="footnote"><b>Figure 7</b> The impact of APTES and GA</p>
                        disturbance.</p>
+
                        <p>It can be seen from the results that APTES and GA are negligible for liquid crystal
 +
                            disturbance.</p>
 +
                    </div>
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
            </div>
 
  
            <div>
+
                <div>
                <h2 class="title">Hydrophilic Experiment of Slide</h2>
+
                    <h2 class="title">Hydrophilic Experiment of Slide</h2>
                <div class="mainText">
+
                    <div class="mainText">
                    <p>In order to investigate how hydrophilic the slides were before and after antigen addition, we
+
                        <p>In order to investigate how hydrophilic the slides were before and after antigen addition, we
                        conducted a measurement of the contact angle experiment. Among them, we will self-assemble the
+
                            conducted a measurement of the contact angle experiment. Among them, we will self-assemble
                        upper and lower slides, and the upper and lower slides will be dried at 110℃ for 1 h, changed to
+
                            the
                        be dried at 80℃ for 1 h. The method of immobilizing the antigen is to adopt a soaking
+
                            upper and lower slides, and the upper and lower slides will be dried at 110℃ for 1 h,
                        method.</p>
+
                            changed to
                    <p>No antigen was added, and the contact angle of 50 ng/mL antigen with 500 ng/mL antigen was shown
+
                            be dried at 80℃ for 1 h. The method of immobilizing the antigen is to adopt a soaking
                        (Fig. 8 (8) a, b, c).</p>
+
                            method.</p>
                    <table class="img">
+
                        <p>No antigen was added, and the contact angle of 50 ng/mL antigen with 500 ng/mL antigen was
                        <tr>
+
                            shown
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            (Fig. 8 (8) a, b, c).</p>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                        <table class="img">
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            <tr>
                        </tr>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                        <tr>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><p class="footnote">a. Unfixed antigen</p></td>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                            <td><p class="footnote">b. Antigen concentration 50ng/mL</p></td>
+
                            </tr>
                            <td><p class="footnote">c. Antigen concentration 500ng/mL</p></td>
+
                            <tr>
                        </tr>
+
                                <td><p class="footnote">a. Unfixed antigen</p></td>
                    </table>
+
                                <td><p class="footnote">b. Antigen concentration 50ng/mL</p></td>
 +
                                <td><p class="footnote">c. Antigen concentration 500ng/mL</p></td>
 +
                            </tr>
 +
                        </table>
  
                    <p class="footnote"><b>Figure 8</b> Results of the hydrophilicity test of the lower slide</p>
+
                        <p class="footnote"><b>Figure 8</b> Results of the hydrophilicity test of the lower slide</p>
                    <p>It can be concluded that as the concentration of the immobilized antigen increases, the slide
+
                        <p>It can be concluded that as the concentration of the immobilized antigen increases, the slide
                        changes from hydrophobic to hydrophilic.</p>
+
                            changes from hydrophobic to hydrophilic.</p>
 +
                    </div>
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
            </div>
 
  
            <div>
+
                <div>
                <h2 class="title">Study on Antigen Concentration and Fixed Time</h2>
+
                    <h2 class="title time">Study on Antigen Concentration and Fixed Time</h2>
                <div class="mainText">
+
                    <div class="mainText">
                    <p>Time:</p>
+
                        <p>Time:</p>
                    <ul>
+
                        <ul>
                        <li>26 Sept: Antigen concentrations of 500 ng/ml and 750 ng/ml were fixed for 12 h.</li>
+
                            <li>26 Sept: Antigen concentrations of 500 ng/ml and 750 ng/ml were fixed for 12 h.</li>
                        <li>27 Sept: Antigen concentrations of 500 ng/ml and 750 ng/ml were fixed for 8.5 h.</li>
+
                            <li>27 Sept: Antigen concentrations of 500 ng/ml and 750 ng/ml were fixed for 8.5 h.</li>
                    </ul>
+
                        </ul>
                    <p>After the discussion of the previous results, we discussed with the teacher, and then explored
+
                        <p>After the discussion of the previous results, we discussed with the teacher, and then
                        whether there is a problem with the antigen fixed time. We performed experimental results at
+
                            explored
                        antigen
+
                            whether there is a problem with the antigen fixed time. We performed experimental results at
                        concentrations of 50 ng/mL and 500 ng/mL and fixed for 8.5 h and 12 h (Figures (9) a, b, c, d).
+
                            antigen
                        Among them, we will self-assemble the upper and lower slides, and the upper and lower slides
+
                            concentrations of 50 ng/mL and 500 ng/mL and fixed for 8.5 h and 12 h (Figures (9) a, b, c,
                        will be
+
                            d).
                        dried at 110℃ for 1 h, changed to be dried at 80℃ for 1h. The antigen fixation method is fixed
+
                            Among them, we will self-assemble the upper and lower slides, and the upper and lower slides
                        by
+
                            will be
                        dropping.</p>
+
                            dried at 110℃ for 1 h, changed to be dried at 80℃ for 1h. The antigen fixation method is
                    <table class="img">
+
                            fixed
                        <tr>
+
                            by
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                            dropping.</p>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                        <table class="img">
                        </tr>
+
                            <tr>
                    </table>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                    <p class="footnote">a. Antigen 50ng/mL fixed 8.5h result image</p>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                    <table class="img">
+
                            </tr>
                        <tr>
+
                        </table>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                        <p class="footnote">a. Antigen 50ng/mL fixed 8.5h result image</p>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                        <table class="img">
                        </tr>
+
                            <tr>
                    </table>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                    <p class="footnote">b. Antigen 500ng/mL fixed 8.5h result image</p>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                    <table class="img">
+
                            </tr>
                        <tr>
+
                        </table>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                        <p class="footnote">b. Antigen 500ng/mL fixed 8.5h result image</p>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                        <table class="img">
                        </tr>
+
                            <tr>
                    </table>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                    <p class="footnote">c. Antigen 50ng/mL fixed 12h result image</p>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                    <table class="img">
+
                            </tr>
                        <tr>
+
                        </table>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                        <p class="footnote">c. Antigen 50ng/mL fixed 12h result image</p>
                            <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
+
                        <table class="img">
                        </tr>
+
                            <tr>
                    </table>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                    <p class="footnote">d. Antigen 500ng/mL fixed 12h result image</p>
+
                                <td><a href=""><img src=""></a></td>
                    <p class="footnote"><b>Figure 9</b> Results of antigen fixation time</p>
+
                            </tr>
                    <p>The experimental results show that the fixed time has a great relationship with the degree of
+
                        </table>
                        liquid
+
                        <p class="footnote">d. Antigen 500ng/mL fixed 12h result image</p>
                        crystal disturbance. The longer the time, the more serious the disturbance.</p>
+
                        <p class="footnote"><b>Figure 9</b> Results of antigen fixation time</p>
 +
                        <p>The experimental results show that the fixed time has a great relationship with the degree of
 +
                            liquid
 +
                            crystal disturbance. The longer the time, the more serious the disturbance.</p>
 +
                    </div>
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
  
 +
            <h2 class="title time">Experiment of Molecular Biology</h2>
 +
            <div class="mainText">
 +
                <p>Sept. 23</p>
 +
                <p>Transformation our two plasmids of BL21 cells. And Pipette 100 μL of the transformation onto a plate
 +
                    with antibiotic as appropiate (kanamycin 50 µg/ mL and 100 µg/mL for ampicillin).</p>
 +
                <p>Sept. 24</p>
 +
                <p>Picking up a single colony inoculation into 100 mL LB liquid medium (with antibiotic). 37℃, 220 rpm
 +
                    for 16 hours.</p>
 +
                <p>Sept. 25</p>
 +
                    <p>(1) Measured OD600, the value was less than 0.5, pipetted 1 mL cultures to 100 mL new LB liquid
 +
                        medium (with antibiotic). 37℃, 220 rpm for 4 hours.
 +
                    </p>
 +
                    <p>(2) Measured OD600, but the value was less than 0.5 too.</p>
 +
                <p>Sept. 26 ~ Sept. 28</p>
 +
                <p>We continued to train the cells, but the OD600 has been low, so we discussed the reasons for the
 +
                    failure and made a series of improvements to the steps.</p>
 +
                <p>Sept. 29</p>
 +
                <p>We repeat the steps of Sept. 24.</p>
 +
                <p>Sept. 30</p>
 +
                <p>Picking up a single colony inoculation into 5 mL LB liquid medium (with antibiotic). 37℃, 220 rpm for
 +
                    16 hours.</p>
 +
                <p>Oct. 1</p>
 +
                <p>Picking up a single colony inoculation into 5 mL LB liquid medium (with antibiotic). 37℃, 220 rpm for
 +
                    16 hours.</p>
 +
                <p>Oct. 2</p>
 +
                <p>When we reconfigured new medium, we found that the two pH meters we used were higher than the actual
 +
                    value of 2, so we switched to the pH test paper. </p>
 +
                <p>Than we repeat the steps of Sept. 24 again.</p>
 +
                <p>Oct. 3</p>
 +
               
 +
                    <p>(1) Today, We did the colony PCR and agarose gel. The methods are at the Protocols. But our retules
 +
                        was not good. We thought that was because we were’t boiled the cells.
 +
                    </p>
 +
                    <p>(2) We picked up a single colony inoculation from the plate into 5 mL LB liquid medium (with
 +
                        antibiotic). 37℃, 220 rpm for 16 hours.
 +
                    </p>
 +
               
 +
                <p>Oct. 4</p>
 +
               
 +
                    <p>(1) Pipetted 150 mL cultures to 15 mL LB liquid medium (with antibiotic). 37℃, 220 rpm for 4-5
 +
                        hours. Measured OD600. When OD600=0.5, we did the Bacteria Preservation.
 +
                    </p>
 +
                    <p>(2) At 18:00, add CuSO4 and Ara to 15mL medium (50μM/L for CuSO4 and 0.2% for Ara, 18℃, 220 rpm for
 +
                        1 hour,and than add IPTG to medium for 0.2mM, 18℃, 220 rpm 16 hours.
 +
                    </p>
 +
               
 +
                <p>Oct. 5</p>
 +
               
 +
                    <p>(1) Centrifuged the cultures and resuspended the cells in PBS. Ultrasonic broken the cells,
 +
                        Centrifuged again and take the supernatant in a refrigerator at 4 °C
 +
                    </p>
 +
                    <p>(2) Repeated the steps of Sept. 24.</p>
 +
               
 +
                <p>Oct. 6</p>
 +
                <p>We found that the E.coli BL21 was failed so we want to extracted plasmids from E.coli DH-5α.</p>
 +
                <p>(3) Pipetted 50 μL cultures to 5 mL new LB liquid medium (with antibiotic). 37℃, 220 rpm for 16
 +
                    hours.</p>
 +
                <p>Oct. 7</p>
 +
                <p>Today, we did the plasmids extraction and agarose gel. But the result was not well. So we wanted to
 +
                    do this step again.</p>
 +
                <table class="img">
 +
                    <tr>
 +
                        <td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/1/1d/T--DLUT_China_B--Notebook81.jpg" alt="">
 +
                        </td>
 +
                    </tr>
 +
                    <tr>
 +
                        <td>
 +
                            <p class="footnote"><b>Figure 10</b> 1~7 are our sample, 8 is Maker.</p>
 +
                        </td>
 +
                    </tr>
 +
                </table>
 +
                <p>Oct. 8</p>
 +
                <p>Activation of DH-5α single colony on a 10.2-day conversion plate.</p>
 +
                <p>Oct. 9</p>
 +
                <p>Extracted plasmids again,and we got a good result.</p>
 +
                <table class="img">
 +
                    <tr>
 +
                        <td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/42/T--DLUT_China_B--Notebook82.jpg" alt="">
 +
                        </td>
 +
                    </tr>
 +
                    <tr>
 +
                        <td>
 +
                            <p class="footnote"><b>Figure 11</b> 1-7 are our sample. 9-10 are Makers.</p>
 +
                        </td>
 +
                    </tr>
 +
                </table>
 +
                <table class="data">
 +
                    <tr>
 +
                        <td>Sample</td>
 +
                        <td>ng/μL</td>
 +
                        <td>A260/A280</td>
 +
                        <td>A260/A230</td>
 +
                        <td>A260</td>
 +
                        <td>A280
 +
                        </td>
 +
                    </tr>
 +
                    <tr>
 +
                        <td>1</td>
 +
                        <td>49.4</td>
 +
                        <td>1.67</td>
 +
                        <td>2.43</td>
 +
                        <td>0.99</td>
 +
                        <td>0.59
 +
                        </td>
 +
                    </tr>
 +
                    <tr>
 +
                        <td>2</td>
 +
                        <td>75.5</td>
 +
                        <td>1.82</td>
 +
                        <td>2.55</td>
 +
                        <td>1.51</td>
 +
                        <td>0.83
 +
                        </td>
 +
                    </tr>
 +
                    <tr>
 +
                        <td>3</td>
 +
                        <td>66.6</td>
 +
                        <td>1.83</td>
 +
                        <td>4.63</td>
 +
                        <td>1.33</td>
 +
                        <td>0.73
 +
                        </td>
 +
                    </tr>
 +
                    <tr>
 +
                        <td>4</td>
 +
                        <td>65.9</td>
 +
                        <td>1.82</td>
 +
                        <td>4.57</td>
 +
                        <td>1.32</td>
 +
                        <td>0.72
 +
                        </td>
 +
                    </tr>
 +
                    <tr>
 +
                        <td>5</td>
 +
                        <td>70.1</td>
 +
                        <td>1.76</td>
 +
                        <td>2.55</td>
 +
                        <td>1.40</td>
 +
                        <td>0.80
 +
                        </td>
 +
                    </tr>
 +
                    <tr>
 +
                        <td>6</td>
 +
                        <td>102.8</td>
 +
                        <td>1.86</td>
 +
                        <td>2.59</td>
 +
                        <td>2.06</td>
 +
                        <td>1.11
 +
                        </td>
 +
                    </tr>
 +
                    <tr>
 +
                        <td>7</td>
 +
                        <td>68.9</td>
 +
                        <td>1.75</td>
 +
                        <td>2.37</td>
 +
                        <td>1.38</td>
 +
                        <td>0.79</td>
 +
                    </tr>
 +
                </table>
 +
                <p class="footnote"><b>Figure 12</b> Concentration of each sample</p>
 +
                <p>Oct. 10</p>
 +
                <p>Transformation our two plasmids of BL21 cells. And Pipette 100 μL of the transformation onto a plate
 +
                    with antibiotic as appropiate (kanamycin 50 µg/ mL and 100 µg/mL for ampicillin).</p>
 +
                <p>Oct. 11</p>
 +
                <p>Picking up a single colony inoculation into 100 mL LB liquid medium (with antibiotic). 37℃, 220 rpm
 +
                    for 16 hours. Than we did the Bacteria Preservation and expanded cultures.</p>
 +
                <p>Oct. 12</p>
 +
                <p>pipetted 500 μL cultures to 50 mL new LB liquid medium (with antibiotic). 37℃, 220 rpm for
 +
                    4-5hours.</p>
 +
               
 +
                    <p>(1) Measured OD600.</p>
 +
                    <p>(2) We repeated the steps of Oct. 4 (2).</p>
 +
               
 +
                <p>Oct. 13</p>
 +
               
 +
                    <p>(1) Repeated the steps of 10.5(1). Take the supernatant and make it pH=4, Centrifuged again. Take
 +
                        100μL supernatant to a tube and add 5μL fluorescent dye to it. Wrpa the tube with tin foil 37℃
 +
                        for 6 hours. Resuspending the sample with PBS for the above precipitation.
 +
                    </p>
 +
                    <p>(2) Add 50 mM C18 acylhdrazine to 5 mL DMSO. Add 100μL the mixture to 1 mL supernatant. for two
 +
                        tubes. One at 37℃ for 3 hours. Another at 20℃ for 3 hours.
 +
                    </p>
 +
               
 +
                <p>Oct. 14</p>
 +
                <p>We did the SDS-PAGE. The order as follow:</p>
 +
                <ol>
 +
                    <li>Fluorescent dye modification</li>
 +
                    <li>2.C18 acylhdrazine modification for 37 ℃</li>
 +
                    <li>C18 acylhdrazine modification for 20 ℃</li>
 +
                    <li>Acidified supernatant</li>
 +
                    <li>Maker</li>
 +
                    <li>Maker</li>
 +
                    <li>Broken supernatant</li>
 +
                    <li>Post-crushing precipitation</li>
 +
                    <li>Induced bacterial solution</li>
 +
                    <li>Inductive bacteria solution</li>
 +
                </ol>
 +
                <p>The result was as follow.</p>
 +
                <table class="img">
 +
                    <tr>
 +
                        <td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/76/T--DLUT_China_B--Notebook83.jpg" alt="">
 +
                        </td>
 +
                    </tr>
 +
                    <tr>
 +
                        <td>
 +
                            <p class="footnote"><b>Figure 12</b> The result of SDS-PAGE</p>
 +
                        </td>
 +
                    </tr>
 +
                </table>
 +
                <p>Oct. 15</p>
 +
                <p>Determination of protein concentration of prepared nanometer antibody.</p>
 +
            </div>
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
Line 623: Line 945:
  
 
     <script src="https://2018.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:DLUT_China_B/js/script.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript"></script>
 
     <script src="https://2018.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:DLUT_China_B/js/script.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript"></script>
    <script src="https://2018.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:DLUT_China_B/js/contents.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript"></script>
 
 
     <script src="https://2018.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:DLUT_China_B/js/notebook.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript"></script>
 
     <script src="https://2018.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:DLUT_China_B/js/notebook.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript"></script>
 +
    <script src="https://2018.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:DLUT_China_B/js/timeline.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript"></script>
 
     <script>
 
     <script>
 
         $(document).ready(function () {
 
         $(document).ready(function () {

Latest revision as of 04:00, 18 October 2018

Notebook

Notebook

Based on the previous literature and preliminary experiments to determine the concentration of DMOAP used in the direct method we used, the following experimental procedures were obtained.

Liquid Crystal Debugging Experiment

Experimental Procedure Ⅰ

Pretreatment

Prepare 5% Decon 90 cleaning solution, stir, pour into the slide pool, soak the slides overnight; pour off the overnight cleaning solution, shake it with deionized water to achieve the purpose of washing, repeat 10 times; reload the ionized water was rinsed in the ultrasonic for 15 min and repeated twice; the tweezers were clamped on one end of the slide and washed with deionized water for 3 times, and dried with nitrogen, placed in an oven for 20 min, and taken out in a dry slide pool. Dustproof and spare.

Self-assembly of the upper and lower slides

DMOAP self-assembly of the upper slide: The cleaned slide is immersed in a 0.2% (v/v) DMOAP aqueous solution, allowed to stand at room temperature for half an hour, rinsed with deionized water, dried by N2, and dried at 110℃ for 1 h. Dustproof and spare.

APTES/DMOAP hybrid self-assembly of the lower slide: Immerse the cleaned slide in 3% (v/v) APTES and 1% (v/v) DMOAP in 10 mmol/L acetic acid-sodium acetate solution (pH =5) The solution was incubated at 80℃ for 2 h, rinsed with deionized water, dried with N2, dried at 110℃ for 1 h, then immersed in 1% (v/v) GA solution for 37 h at 37℃. Ion water rinse, N2 blow dry, dustproof and spare.

Fixation of Nanobodies

The Nanobody was dissolved in 0.01 mol/L of PBS buffer (pH=7.4) and configured to have different concentrations of the Nanobody solution. Appropriate amount of Nano-antibody solution was added dropwise to the surface of the lower slide, and reacted at 37℃ for 2 h. After removal, it was washed with 0.01 mol/L PBS buffer (pH=7.4) and deionized water to remove unfixed Nanobody molecules. N2 is blown dry, placed at -20℃ for freezing or dustproof at room temperature.

Production of liquid crystal cell

The treated upper and lower slides were assembled face to face, and the slides were separated by Mylar polyester sheets (intermediate open convex cavity), and the other three sides were fixed with small clips except for the opening direction. A small amount of liquid crystal is injected into the liquid crystal cell from the opening by capillary action, and the liquid crystal is filled with the entire cavity, and then observed by a polarizing microscope. And record the image results.

Optimization of Experimental Conditions

Explore the appropriate antibody concentration

Time:

  • 20 July: Antibody concentration 50ng/ml. Antibody concentration 200ng/ml.
  • 21 July: Antibody concentration 500ng/ml. Antibody concentration 1000ng/ml.
  • 30 July: Antibody concentration 1ng/ml. Antibody concentration 10ng/ml. Antibody concentration 50ng/ml.

Since the antibody itself has a corresponding perturbation effect on the liquid crystal, in order to avoid the influence of the nano-antibody perturbation effect on the experimental results, we carried out an experiment to determine the appropriate concentration of the antibody, and we selected 50 ng/mL, 500 ng/mL, 1000 ng/mL, 2000 ng/mL antibody respectively. The concentration was tested and three parallel experimental groups were set for each concentration. Parallel light and conical light were used for observation. The parallel light observation results (Fig. 1) were all black, indicating that the liquid crystal remained vertical.

Parallel light observations at 50 ng/mL, 200 ng/mL, 500 ng/mL and 1000 ng/mL

Figure 1 Effect of antigen concentration gradient on liquid crystal alignment

Since the experimental results did not result in antibody concentrations that caused the liquid crystals to align in parallel and cause color changes, we continued to increase the concentration for experiments. Experiments were performed at 1 ng/mL and 10 ng/mL to obtain the results of parallel light. Parallel light observations still show all black, and cross-contrast observations have crosshairs. It is indicated that the liquid crystals are still mostly arranged vertically. The critical concentration for changing the liquid crystal from the vertical alignment to the parallel alignment was not found, but it was found that the antibody concentration of 10 ng/mL or less did not cause a change in the color of the liquid crystal.

Parallel light observations at antibody concentrations of 1 ng/mL and 10 ng/mL

Figure 2 Effect of high antibody concentration on liquid crystal alignment

Explore the appropriate antibody concentration

Time:

  • 23 Aug: Antibody concentration 125ng/ml. Antibody concentration 2000ng/ml.

Since the preliminary experiment for exploring the appropriate antibody concentration did not find a critical value of the antibody concentration that can change the alignment of the liquid crystal, it is known from the search that the concentration of the antibody below 10 ng/mL does not affect the liquid crystal alignment, so we refer to the literature and related research. It is recommended by field personnel to select a concentration of 500 ng/mL as the initial antibody concentration for detecting the antigen. Since the amount of antigen (β2-MG) in the urine of our current patients with chronic kidney disease is 125 ng/mL in unit conversion, we hope to determine the optimal antibody critical concentration by antigen concentration so that the concentration is lower than 125 ng/mL. The antigen does not allow the liquid crystals to be aligned in parallel, while antigens at concentrations above 125 ng/mL just align the liquid crystals in parallel.

Therefore, our team selected 125 ng/mL, 1000 ng/mL and 2000 ng/mL antigen concentrations for experiments. The number of bright spots in 0.125 ng/mL-2 ng/mL parallel light images increased accordingly, but the overall color was black, and the difference was not large enough (Figure 3). Not enough to determine the standard line of detection. (Note: due to 1000 ng/mL data file corruption, not shown in the figure)

Parallel light observations at antigen concentrations of 125 ng/mL and 2000 ng/mL

Figure 3 Effect of antigen concentration on liquid crystal alignment

DMOAP interference exclusion experiment

Time:

  • 25 Aug: Antibody concentration 500ng/ml.

Since the previous experiments used high antibody concentration or high antigen concentration, the liquid crystals could not be arranged in parallel to discolor the observation. We reflect on whether the concentration of DMOAP in the experiment has an interference effect on the experimental results. Since DMOAP plays a role in inducing the vertical alignment of liquid crystals in the experiment, the reason for the analysis may be that DMOAP leads to the failure to obtain ideal experimental results. So we chose 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8% DMOAP concentration, and the antibody concentration was still 500 ng/mL. The DMOAP concentration was different, and the number of bright spots in the parallel light image was different (Fig. 4). From 0.8% to 0.2% concentration, the main body of the image is black, but the number of bright spots is significantly increased. The number of bright spots is much higher at 0.2%; the number of bright spots on the image is less at 0.8%, which is equivalent to the previous 1% concentration.

Parallel light observations at DMOAP concentrations of 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, and 0.8%

Figure 4 Effect of DMOAP concentration on liquid crystal alignment

Since the experimental results are not ideal, we consider re-selecting the experimental protocol. After consulting the literature and discussing with the professional researchers in the field, we decided to use the competition method. The following is the experimental plan.

Experimental Procedure Ⅱ

Pretreatment

Prepare 5% Decon 90 (5ml Decon 90+95ml water) cleaning solution, stir, pour into the slide pool, soak the slides overnight; pour off the overnight cleaning solution, shake it with deionized water to achieve the purpose of washing, repeat 10 times; reload The ionized water was rinsed in the ultrasonic for 15 min and repeated twice; the tweezers were clamped on one end of the slide and washed with deionized water for 3 times, and dried with nitrogen, placed in an oven for 20 min, and taken out in a dry slide pool. Dustproof and spare.

Self-assembly of the upper and lower slides

DMOAP self-assembly of the upper slide: The cleaned slide is immersed in a 0.2% (v/v) DMOAP aqueous solution, allowed to stand at room temperature for half an hour, rinsed with deionized water, dried by N2, and dried at 110℃ for 1 h. Dustproof and spare.

APTES/DMOAP hybrid self-assembly of the lower slide: Immerse the cleaned slide in 3% (v/v) APTES and 1% (v/v) DMOAP in 10 mmol/L acetic acid-sodium acetate solution (pH =5) The solution was incubated at 80 °C for 2 h, rinsed with deionized water, dried with N2, dried at 110℃ for 1 h, then immersed in 1% (v/v) GA solution for 37 h at 37℃. Ion water rinse, N2 blow dry, dustproof and spare.

Immobilization of antigen

The antigen was dissolved in 0.01 mol/L of PBS buffer (pH = 7.4) and configured to have different concentrations of the antigen solution. An appropriate amount of the antigen solution was added dropwise to the surface of the lower slide and reacted at 37℃ for 2 h. After taking out, they were washed with 0.01 mol/L PBS buffer (pH=7.4) and deionized water, and the unfixed antigen molecules were removed, dried with N2 and stored at -20℃.

Production of liquid crystal cell

The treated upper and lower slides were assembled face to face, and the slides were separated by Mylar polyester sheets (intermediate open convex cavity), and the other three sides were fixed with small clips except for the opening direction. A small amount of liquid crystal is injected into the liquid crystal cell from the opening by capillary action, and the liquid crystal is filled with the entire cavity, and then observed by a polarizing microscope. And record the image results.

Nanobody binds to immobilized antigen

According to the competitive immunoassay method, an appropriate amount of a certain concentration of the nano-antibody solution was sequentially added dropwise to the slide to which the antigen was immobilized, and reacted at 37℃ for 1 h. Rinse with 0.01 mol/L PBS buffer (pH=7.4) and deionized water to remove non-specific adsorbed substances, and dried with N2. A liquid crystal cell was prepared according to the method (4), and a change in color and brightness of the liquid crystal film was observed using a polarizing microscope and image analysis was performed.

Experiment of Suitable Antigen Concentration

Time:

  • 30 Aug: Antigen concentration 500ng/ml; Antigen concentration 1000ng/ml; Antigen concentration 2000ng/ml; Antigen concentration 4000ng/ml.
  • 2 Sept: Antigen concentration 100ng/ml; Antigen concentration 200ng/ml; Antigen concentration 300ng/ml; Antigen concentration 400ng/ml.

We investigated the effect of antigens of different concentrations on the vertical alignment of liquid crystals without antibodies. The methods of antigen-antibody immobilization on glass were collected from the literature of silkworm (crosslinked glutaraldehyde).The antigen was dissolved in 0.01 mol/L of PBS buffer (pH = 7.4) and configured to have 0.1mg/L, 0.2mg/L, 0.3mg/L, 0.4mg/L, 0.5mg/L, 1mg/L, 2mg/L and 4mg/L of the antigen solution to have experiments with 1% DMOAP. For details of subsequent treatment, please refer to the third step of competitive immunoassay method. Antigen concentration gradient is small in the first five groups while antigen concentration gradient of the last three groups is big. Three parallel experiments were carried out in each group, and we chose the best picture to integrate them together. We observed bright spots separately under quadruple and tenfold objective. The specific results of the experiment are recorded as follows:

a. Images of 0.1mg/L, 0.2mg/mL, 0.3mg/L, 0.4mg/L, 0.5mg/L, 1mg/L, 2mg/L, 4mg/L of antigens in proper order under a quadruple objective

b. Images of 0.1mg/L, 0.2mg/mL, 0.3mg/L, 0.4mg/L, 0.5mg/L, 1mg/L, 2mg/L, 4mg/L of antigens in proper order under a tenfold objective

From the image, we can see that there is little difference among 0.1mg/L, 0.2mg/L and 0.3mg/L of antigens. It showed that the antigens in this concentration range have almost no effect on the vertical alignment of liquid crystal. The number of bright spots increased, but not more differences among 0.5mg/L-4mg/L. It suggested that the molecular weight of antigen may be too small to affect the vertical alignment of liquid crystal. Therefore, the effect of antigens of 0.5mg/L concentration on the vertical alignment of liquid crystals is good.

Experiment of Suitable Nanobody Concentration

Time:

  • 8 Sept: Antigen concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 500 ng/ml; Antigen concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 1000 ng/ml; Antigen concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 1500 ng/ml; Antigen concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 2000 ng/ml.
  • 9 Sept: Antigen concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 250 ng/ml; Antigen concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 500 ng/ml.
  • 10 Sept: Antigen concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 500 ng/ml.

After the experiment of suitable antigen concentration, we found that the effect of antigens of 0.5mg/L concentration on the vertical alignment of liquid crystals is good. Therefore, we take the concentration of antibody solution as 0.5mg/L as the premise to investigate suitable nanobody concentration. An appropriate amount of 0.5mg/L, 1mg/L, 1.5mg/L and 0.5mg/L concentration of the nano-antibody solution was sequentially added dropwise to the slide to which the antigen was immobilized. For details of subsequent treatment, please refer to the fifth step of competitive immunoassay method .Three parallel experiments were carried out in each group, and we chose the best picture to integrate them together under both quadruple and tenfold objective. As the results are good, we intend to explore the lowest limit of antibody concentration by immersion(Add the liquid to a clean Petri dish and immerse the slide in). The specific results of the experiment are recorded as follows:

a. Images of 0.5mg/L, 1mg/L, 1.5mg/L and 2mg/L of Nanobodys in proper order under a quadruple objective

b. Images of 0.5mg/L, 1mg/L, 1.5mg/L and 2mg/L of nano-bodys in proper order under a quadruple objective

c. Images of 0.25mg/L and 0.5mg/L in proper order by immersion

Verify Antigen Concentration Experiment

Time:

  • 12 Sept: Antigen concentration 1000ng/ml, antibody concentration 1000 ng/ml; Antigen concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 1000 ng/ml; Antigen concentration 62.5mg/L, antibody concentration 5000 ng/ml; Antigen concentration 62.5 mg/L, antibody concentration 1000 ng/ml;Antigen concentration 31.25 mg/L, antibody concentration 500 ng/ml; Antigen concentration 31.25 mg/L, antibody concentration 1000 ng/ml.

Due to the instability of the experimental results we have done before, we need to detect the antigen concentration and antibody concentration, and use several extreme antigen concentrations to determine whether there is a problem with our antigen concentration. And considering the damage of the slide and the slide pool, in the self-assembly of the slide, the slide was dried at 110℃ for 1 h and changed to dry at 80℃ for 1 h. At the same time, the antigen fixation process still adopts the method of soaking.

We changed the fixed antigen concentration to 1 mg/L and the corresponding antibody to 1000 ng/mL (shown in Figure (5)a). Four parallel experiments were performed. We also made a fixed antigen to 62.5mg / L, 31.25mg / L, and explored the results of the two antigen concentrations, the combined antibody was 500ng / ml and 1000 ng / ml (Figure (5) b, c, d, e), did four experiments, four experiments in each group. Finally, we carried out the experimental results when the fixed antigen was 500 ng/mL and the antibody was 1000 ng/mL (shown in Figure (5)f). Two parallel experiments were performed to determine whether there was a deviation in the results of our previous experiments.

a. Antigen concentration 1 mg/L, antibody concentration 1000 ng/mL result image

b. Antigen concentration 62.5 mg/L, antibody concentration 500 ng/mL result image

c. Antigen concentration 62.5 mg/L, antibody concentration 1000 ng/mL result image

d. Antigen concentration 31.25 mg/L, antibody concentration 500 ng/mL result image

e. Antigen concentration 31.25 mg/L, antibody concentration 1000 ng/mL result image

f. Antigen concentration 500ng/mL, antibody concentration 1000 ng/mL result image

Figure 5 Verification of extreme antigen concentration

The result can be that the combination of the two can disturb the alignment of the liquid crystal. At the same time, the antigen is fixed.

Explore the Appropriate Concentration of Nanobodies Again

Time:

  • 15 Sept: Antigen concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 1000 ng/ml; Antigen concentration 500ng/ml, antibody concentration 1500 ng/ml.

Following the last experiment, we thought that 500 ng/mL antigen fixation is currently reasonable. So we did the effect of antibody concentration of 1000 ng/mL and 1500 ng/mL at an antigen concentration of 500 ng/mL (Figure (6) a, b), where we will self-assemble the upper and lower slides. And considering the damage of the slide and the slide pool, in the self-assembly of the slide, the slide was dried at 110℃ for 1 h and changed to dry at 80℃ for 1 h. At the same time, the antigen fixation process still adopts the method of soaking. Three sets of parallel experiments were performed separately.

Then we also made a set of antigen concentration of 500 ng / ml, antibody concentration of 1500 ng / ml (Figure (6) c). However, the method of soaking the immobilized antigen was not adopted, but the previous dropping method was employed.

a. Antigen concentration 500ng/mL, antibody concentration 1000 ng/mL result imag.

b. Antigen concentration 500ng/mL, antibody concentration 1500 ng/mL result image

c. Antigen concentration 500ng/mL, antibody concentration 1500 ng/mL result image(Antigen drop fixation)

Figure 6 Verifying the nanobody concentration experiment again

The experimental results showed that the antibody concentration was responsive at 1000 ng/mL and 1500 ng/mL, and the results were obvious. Among them, the method of dropping antigen is more stable.

The Influence of GA and APTES

Time:

  • 19 Sept: The influence with or without APTES and GA.

Since the previous results were more pronounced, we then explored the impact of GA and APTES on the results. We skipped the steps of immobilizing the antigen and dropping the antibody, directly performing the GA addition step after self-assembly of the slide, and exploring the effect of GA (shown in Figure (7)a). The impact of APTES is to observe the observations made after self-assembly (Figure (7)b).

a. APTES inquiry results

b. GA inquiry results

Figure 7 The impact of APTES and GA

It can be seen from the results that APTES and GA are negligible for liquid crystal disturbance.

Hydrophilic Experiment of Slide

In order to investigate how hydrophilic the slides were before and after antigen addition, we conducted a measurement of the contact angle experiment. Among them, we will self-assemble the upper and lower slides, and the upper and lower slides will be dried at 110℃ for 1 h, changed to be dried at 80℃ for 1 h. The method of immobilizing the antigen is to adopt a soaking method.

No antigen was added, and the contact angle of 50 ng/mL antigen with 500 ng/mL antigen was shown (Fig. 8 (8) a, b, c).

a. Unfixed antigen

b. Antigen concentration 50ng/mL

c. Antigen concentration 500ng/mL

Figure 8 Results of the hydrophilicity test of the lower slide

It can be concluded that as the concentration of the immobilized antigen increases, the slide changes from hydrophobic to hydrophilic.

Study on Antigen Concentration and Fixed Time

Time:

  • 26 Sept: Antigen concentrations of 500 ng/ml and 750 ng/ml were fixed for 12 h.
  • 27 Sept: Antigen concentrations of 500 ng/ml and 750 ng/ml were fixed for 8.5 h.

After the discussion of the previous results, we discussed with the teacher, and then explored whether there is a problem with the antigen fixed time. We performed experimental results at antigen concentrations of 50 ng/mL and 500 ng/mL and fixed for 8.5 h and 12 h (Figures (9) a, b, c, d). Among them, we will self-assemble the upper and lower slides, and the upper and lower slides will be dried at 110℃ for 1 h, changed to be dried at 80℃ for 1h. The antigen fixation method is fixed by dropping.

a. Antigen 50ng/mL fixed 8.5h result image

b. Antigen 500ng/mL fixed 8.5h result image

c. Antigen 50ng/mL fixed 12h result image

d. Antigen 500ng/mL fixed 12h result image

Figure 9 Results of antigen fixation time

The experimental results show that the fixed time has a great relationship with the degree of liquid crystal disturbance. The longer the time, the more serious the disturbance.

Experiment of Molecular Biology

Sept. 23

Transformation our two plasmids of BL21 cells. And Pipette 100 μL of the transformation onto a plate with antibiotic as appropiate (kanamycin 50 µg/ mL and 100 µg/mL for ampicillin).

Sept. 24

Picking up a single colony inoculation into 100 mL LB liquid medium (with antibiotic). 37℃, 220 rpm for 16 hours.

Sept. 25

(1) Measured OD600, the value was less than 0.5, pipetted 1 mL cultures to 100 mL new LB liquid medium (with antibiotic). 37℃, 220 rpm for 4 hours.

(2) Measured OD600, but the value was less than 0.5 too.

Sept. 26 ~ Sept. 28

We continued to train the cells, but the OD600 has been low, so we discussed the reasons for the failure and made a series of improvements to the steps.

Sept. 29

We repeat the steps of Sept. 24.

Sept. 30

Picking up a single colony inoculation into 5 mL LB liquid medium (with antibiotic). 37℃, 220 rpm for 16 hours.

Oct. 1

Picking up a single colony inoculation into 5 mL LB liquid medium (with antibiotic). 37℃, 220 rpm for 16 hours.

Oct. 2

When we reconfigured new medium, we found that the two pH meters we used were higher than the actual value of 2, so we switched to the pH test paper.

Than we repeat the steps of Sept. 24 again.

Oct. 3

(1) Today, We did the colony PCR and agarose gel. The methods are at the Protocols. But our retules was not good. We thought that was because we were’t boiled the cells.

(2) We picked up a single colony inoculation from the plate into 5 mL LB liquid medium (with antibiotic). 37℃, 220 rpm for 16 hours.

Oct. 4

(1) Pipetted 150 mL cultures to 15 mL LB liquid medium (with antibiotic). 37℃, 220 rpm for 4-5 hours. Measured OD600. When OD600=0.5, we did the Bacteria Preservation.

(2) At 18:00, add CuSO4 and Ara to 15mL medium (50μM/L for CuSO4 and 0.2% for Ara, 18℃, 220 rpm for 1 hour,and than add IPTG to medium for 0.2mM, 18℃, 220 rpm 16 hours.

Oct. 5

(1) Centrifuged the cultures and resuspended the cells in PBS. Ultrasonic broken the cells, Centrifuged again and take the supernatant in a refrigerator at 4 °C

(2) Repeated the steps of Sept. 24.

Oct. 6

We found that the E.coli BL21 was failed so we want to extracted plasmids from E.coli DH-5α.

(3) Pipetted 50 μL cultures to 5 mL new LB liquid medium (with antibiotic). 37℃, 220 rpm for 16 hours.

Oct. 7

Today, we did the plasmids extraction and agarose gel. But the result was not well. So we wanted to do this step again.

Figure 10 1~7 are our sample, 8 is Maker.

Oct. 8

Activation of DH-5α single colony on a 10.2-day conversion plate.

Oct. 9

Extracted plasmids again,and we got a good result.

Figure 11 1-7 are our sample. 9-10 are Makers.

Sample ng/μL A260/A280 A260/A230 A260 A280
1 49.4 1.67 2.43 0.99 0.59
2 75.5 1.82 2.55 1.51 0.83
3 66.6 1.83 4.63 1.33 0.73
4 65.9 1.82 4.57 1.32 0.72
5 70.1 1.76 2.55 1.40 0.80
6 102.8 1.86 2.59 2.06 1.11
7 68.9 1.75 2.37 1.38 0.79

Figure 12 Concentration of each sample

Oct. 10

Transformation our two plasmids of BL21 cells. And Pipette 100 μL of the transformation onto a plate with antibiotic as appropiate (kanamycin 50 µg/ mL and 100 µg/mL for ampicillin).

Oct. 11

Picking up a single colony inoculation into 100 mL LB liquid medium (with antibiotic). 37℃, 220 rpm for 16 hours. Than we did the Bacteria Preservation and expanded cultures.

Oct. 12

pipetted 500 μL cultures to 50 mL new LB liquid medium (with antibiotic). 37℃, 220 rpm for 4-5hours.

(1) Measured OD600.

(2) We repeated the steps of Oct. 4 (2).

Oct. 13

(1) Repeated the steps of 10.5(1). Take the supernatant and make it pH=4, Centrifuged again. Take 100μL supernatant to a tube and add 5μL fluorescent dye to it. Wrpa the tube with tin foil 37℃ for 6 hours. Resuspending the sample with PBS for the above precipitation.

(2) Add 50 mM C18 acylhdrazine to 5 mL DMSO. Add 100μL the mixture to 1 mL supernatant. for two tubes. One at 37℃ for 3 hours. Another at 20℃ for 3 hours.

Oct. 14

We did the SDS-PAGE. The order as follow:

  1. Fluorescent dye modification
  2. 2.C18 acylhdrazine modification for 37 ℃
  3. C18 acylhdrazine modification for 20 ℃
  4. Acidified supernatant
  5. Maker
  6. Maker
  7. Broken supernatant
  8. Post-crushing precipitation
  9. Induced bacterial solution
  10. Inductive bacteria solution

The result was as follow.

Figure 12 The result of SDS-PAGE

Oct. 15

Determination of protein concentration of prepared nanometer antibody.