Difference between revisions of "Team:Purdue/Genetic Pathway"
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
However, unlike what the paper did, we didn't/don't know if our locking mechanism will work. So to do this, we needed a way to find how to split our sensing protein at sites that worked for our purposes. Since, most of our team lacks the training and the background involving protein structure and mechanics. Therefore, we are doing irrational design. This is a process where we generate various different split sequences. The procedure we used is similar to what is found in this paper <a href:"">here</a> | However, unlike what the paper did, we didn't/don't know if our locking mechanism will work. So to do this, we needed a way to find how to split our sensing protein at sites that worked for our purposes. Since, most of our team lacks the training and the background involving protein structure and mechanics. Therefore, we are doing irrational design. This is a process where we generate various different split sequences. The procedure we used is similar to what is found in this paper <a href:"">here</a> | ||
| − | </p> | + | </p> --> |
| − | --> | + | |
</html> | </html> | ||
Revision as of 19:42, 11 July 2018
Background Information
Using their findings, we are using the 58 site for the HRP split.
However, unlike what the paper did, we didn't/don't know if our locking mechanism will work. So to do this, we needed a way to find how to split our sensing protein at sites that worked for our purposes. Since, most of our team lacks the training and the background involving protein structure and mechanics. Therefore, we are doing irrational design. This is a process where we generate various different split sequences. The procedure we used is similar to what is found in this paper here
-->