Difference between revisions of "Judging/Apply"

m (Reverted edits by Kim (talk) to last revision by THaddock)
Line 68: Line 68:
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
−
<!--
+
 
  
 
<div class="clear extra_space"></div>
 
<div class="clear extra_space"></div>
Line 85: Line 85:
  
 
<div class="column full_size">
 
<div class="column full_size">
−
-->
+
 
  
  
Line 98: Line 98:
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
  
−
<!--
+
 
  
 
<div class="column full_size" style="text-align:center; margin:auto;"><h1> Judge Application Form </h1> </div>
 
<div class="column full_size" style="text-align:center; margin:auto;"><h1> Judge Application Form </h1> </div>
Line 119: Line 119:
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
−
-->
+
 
  
  
 
<div class="column full_size">
 
<div class="column full_size">
−
<!--
+
 
 
<div id="formtitlemodewrapper">
 
<div id="formtitlemodewrapper">
 
<h2 id="toptitle">
 
<h2 id="toptitle">
Line 135: Line 135:
 
</select>
 
</select>
  
−
-->
 
  
  
Line 160: Line 159:
  
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
−
<!--
+
 
  
 
<fieldset>  
 
<fieldset>  
Line 299: Line 298:
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
</fieldset>
 
</fieldset>
−
-->
+
 
  
  
Line 310: Line 309:
  
  
−
<!--
+
 
 
<fieldset>
 
<fieldset>
 
<h2>2.- Jamboree Information </h2>
 
<h2>2.- Jamboree Information </h2>
Line 419: Line 418:
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</fieldset>
 
</fieldset>
−
-->
+
 
  
  
Line 431: Line 430:
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
  
−
<!--
+
 
 
<fieldset>
 
<fieldset>
 
<h2> 3.-  Conflicts of Interest </h2>
 
<h2> 3.-  Conflicts of Interest </h2>
Line 471: Line 470:
 
<textarea rows="3" data-validation="optional" name="Other conflicts of interest" id="other_conflicts" data-form-field="other_conflicts" maxlength="500"></textarea>
 
<textarea rows="3" data-validation="optional" name="Other conflicts of interest" id="other_conflicts" data-form-field="other_conflicts" maxlength="500"></textarea>
 
</fieldset>
 
</fieldset>
−
-->
+
 
  
  
Line 483: Line 482:
  
  
−
<!--
+
 
 
<fieldset>  
 
<fieldset>  
  
Line 505: Line 504:
 
<textarea rows="6" name="What makes an iGEM team worthy of recognition" id="worthy" data-form-field="worthy"></textarea maxlength="2500">
 
<textarea rows="6" name="What makes an iGEM team worthy of recognition" id="worthy" data-form-field="worthy"></textarea maxlength="2500">
 
</fieldset>
 
</fieldset>
−
-->
+
 
  
  
Line 516: Line 515:
  
  
−
<!--
+
 
 
<fieldset>  
 
<fieldset>  
 
<h2>5.-  Track Preferences </h2>
 
<h2>5.-  Track Preferences </h2>
Line 650: Line 649:
 
</fieldset>
 
</fieldset>
 
</div>
 
</div>
−
-->
+
 
  
 
<!--Here is where formbody ends.-->
 
<!--Here is where formbody ends.-->
  
−
<!--
+
 
  
 
<div class="clear extra_space"></div>
 
<div class="clear extra_space"></div>
Line 674: Line 673:
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
−
-->
+
 
  
 
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Revision as of 16:30, 12 December 2017

Loading...


You have JavaScript disabled.

This page requires JavaScript in order to function correctly. Please enable JavaScript in your browser, then try again.

iGEM 2018 Judging Applications: Opens January 5, 2018

Judging in iGEM is a lot of fun, but it does require a strong commitment. iGEM teams work incredibly hard on their projects over the summer, so we need judges who are also committed to work hard to evaluate them. If you can spend time learning about the judging process during the summer, evaluating team wikis the week before the Jamboree, and attending the Jamboree in September, we would love to have you on board!

We need judges who understand iGEM, and judges who are willing to learn about iGEM. We will provide educational resources to help judges learn how to evaluate teams, and we will help you get up to speed if you are selected.

Please email kim [AT] igem [DOT] org if you have questions!

If you have colleagues who you think should apply, please feel free to direct them to this form.

We're looking for:

  • iGEM instructors and advisors
  • People who have judged iGEM in the past
  • People in the synthetic biology industry
  • Synthetic biology researchers who are new to iGEM
  • iGEM alumni who want to stay involved

If you are a student on a 2018 iGEM team, you can't apply to be a judge this year. But you can apply when you graduate and become an iGEM alum!

The iGEM 2018 Judging Roster has been finalized. The judging application form is now closed. This page will no longer be monitored for the rest of the 2018 season.

NEW: Instructor judges will receive a 50% discount on their Jamboree attendance fee!

Judge Application Form

This form has been submitted.

You can unsubmit the form if you wish to make further edits.

Click here to dismiss this message

-- Please choose a team

1.- General Information

Full name: -

Username: -

1. Email

2. Age

Note: To be eligible to become an iGEM judge, you must be at least 23 on the 31st of March 2018. Any applicants who do no meet this criteria will be evaluated on a case by case basis.

3. Gender

4. Institution

5. Institution type

6. Position

7. Region Where you currently live/work :

8. Number of years of iGEM experience as a:

Judge:

Instructor / PI:

Advisor:

Student:

Volunteer:

2.- Jamboree Information

Please complete this section as well as you can. You will be asked to check or update this information prior to the Jamboree.

1. Sweatshirt Size:

2. Dietary restrictions. If you have other dietary restrictions, please contact iGEM HQ

3. Are you available to attend the entire Giant Jamboree (November 9 - 11 2018, in Boston)?

3.1 If not, please indicate which days/times you are available to attend.

Day Morning Evening
Thursday
November 09

Friday
November 10



Saturday
November 11



Sunday
November 12



Monday
November 13

Note

If you are selected as a judge, you MUST attend the iGEM 2018 Giant Jamboree in Boston (November 9-13). iGEM currently cannot provide travel funding for judges to attend.

If you are registered as a Primary PI, Secondary PI, Instructor, or Advisor for a 2018 iGEM team, you will receive a 50% discount on your Giant Jamboree registration fee if you are selected as a judge. As both an instructor and a judge, your primary role must be as an instructor. We ensure that your judging assignments do not conflict with your own team's presentation.

If you are not on the roster of a 2018 iGEM team, your Jamboree attendance fee will be waived.

3.- Conflicts of Interest

There are many possible reasons why you might be unable to judge some teams impartially. For example if you are a PI or instructor for the team, if the team comes from a school that you attended, or a school where you work or if you mentored or advised the team informally
These situations could lead to a conflict of interest and iGEM takes conflicts of interests very seriously. Judges are not permitted to evaluate teams for which they have a conflict of interest. If you are a PI or instructor, your first responsibility is to your team, and we will schedule your judging assignment so that you are able to attend your team's presentation.



To select multiple teams, use Ctrl-click or Cmd-click. Don't recognize a team name? Look it up in the Team List.

1. Team Affiliations:

Please select any teams you are officially affiliated with (i.e. you are listed on the team roster as a PI, Instructor, or Advisor).



2. Conflicts of Interest:

Please select any teams for which you have a conflict of interest for another reason. (For example, a team that you mentored informally, or a team from the university where you were an undergrad student.)


3. If you have any other conflicts of interest that are not indicated above, please describe them:

4.- Motivation

Please answer these questions in detail, especially if this is your first IGEM judging application.

Did you apply to judge last year? View your answers from last year.

1. Why do you want to be a judge in iGEM?

2. What professional experience do you have that's relevant to iGEM (e.g., synthetic biology, hardware, software, human practices)?

3. Have you judged student competitions other than iGEM before? If so, which ones? (e.g. FIRST, BIOMOD, Science Olympiad)

4. What features of an iGEM team and their project make them worthy of recognition?

(New judges may want to familiarize themselves with the 2015 Judging Handbook Part 1. The 2018 Judging Handbook will be available later this year.)

5.- Track Preferences

iGEM teams compete in several "tracks", based on the topics of their projects. Please see the Track page for more information on each track.

When we assign judges to teams, we will try to assign you your first preferences wherever possible. However, we can't anticipate how many teams will be in each track, so it may not always be possible to assign you your first choice. Therefore, you can indicate how you feel about each track. The more first choices you select, the more likely it is that you will be assigned teams in those tracks. If you are unable to evaluate teams in some track areas (software or measurement, for example), please put "Avoid" for those tracks.

Please indicate how highly you prefer each track. You may select multiple first, second, and third preferences.

Track First Second Third Neutral Avoid
Art and Design
Diagnostics
Energy
Environment
Food and Nutrition
Foundational Advance
Hardware
High School
Information Processing
Manufacturing
Measurement
New Application
Software
Therapeutics

Thank you!

Thank you for filling out this form. We look forward to picking a strong judging team for 2018!

Finished?

Need to make changes?