Line 311: | Line 311: | ||
<button class="btn btn-info" type="button" onclick="myFunction3()">Raw Results</button> | <button class="btn btn-info" type="button" onclick="myFunction3()">Raw Results</button> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
<div id="myDIV3"> | <div id="myDIV3"> | ||
<table> | <table> | ||
Line 702: | Line 704: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> |
Revision as of 01:38, 5 October 2018
InterLab
Our team chose to participate in the Fifth International InterLab Measurement Study in synthetic biology.
The goal of the iGEM InterLab Study is to identify and correct the sources of systematic variability in synthetic biology measurements, so that eventually, measurements that are taken in different labs will be no more variable than measurements taken within the same lab.
In this study we want to reduce lab-to-lab variability in fluorescence measurements by normalizing it to absolute cell count or colony-forming units (CFUs) instead of OD.
The fluorescence in the bacteria in our experiments occurs due to the presence of a gene that encodes a green fluorescent protein: GFP.
In cell and molecular biology, the GFP gene is frequently used as an expression reporter protein. Reporter genes are often used as an indication that a certain gene has been internalized or expressed in cells or organisms.
Equipment
All of our measurements were taken in a plate reader that can read both absorbance and fluorescence (Neoteck-Tecan-INFINITE M100) without a pathlength correction. The temperature was set to 25̊C, under shaking with a duration of 3 sec and an amplitude of 2 mm. We went through a tutorial and learned how to operate the machine.
In addition, we used the following reagents (Partially supplied by iGEM):
- 1.0 ml LUDOX CL-X
- 150 μL Silica Bead (microsphere suspension)
- Fluorescein (powder, in amber tube)
- iGEM Parts Distribution Kit Plates
- 1 x PBS (phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4 - 7.6)
- ddH2O
- Competent cells (Escherichia coli DH5α)
- LB (Luria Bertani) media
- Chloramphenicol
- 96 well plates, black with clear flat bottom
Safety procedures
As part of an ongoing work in a biological laboratory, safety gear was used to work with bacteria. The work was done with closed shoes, long pants, gloves and lab coats.
In order to maintain a clean environment, and sterility between the samples the work was performed next to a flame, and all the disposable parts were thrown after a single use into a biological waste bin.
Before and after work, work surfaces were sterilized with 70% alcohol.
Protocols
Calibration 1: OD600 Reference point - LUDOX Protocol:
100 μL LUDOX were added into wells A1, B1, C1, D1.
100 μLof ddH2O were added into wells A2, B2, C2, D2
LUDOX CL-X | H2O | |
---|---|---|
Replicate 1 | 0.0561 | 0.029 |
Replicate 2 | 0.0522 | 0.0266 |
Replicate 3 | 0.0554 | 0.033 |
Replicate 4 | 0.0534 | 0.0292 |
Arith. Mean | 0.054 | 0.029 |
Corrected Abs600 | 0.025 | |
Reference OD600 | 0.063 | |
OD600/Abs600 | 2.538 |
Table 1: OD600/Abs600 measurements.
The correction factor is 2.538.
Calibration 2: Particle Standard Curve - Microsphere Protocol
- The Silica Beads from the InterLab test kit were vigorously vortexed for 30 seconds.
- 96 μL microspheres were pipetted into a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes
- 904 μL of ddH2O were added to the microspheres
- The Microsphere Stock Solution was vortexed well
- 200 μL of Microsphere Stock Solution were transferred into each well in column 1
- 100 μL of ddH2O were added into each well (2-12) in the corresponding row
- Serial dilution by transfer of 100 μL from column to column with good mixing
- Absorbance measurements of all the samples in the plate reader in 600 nm
- Fluorescein kit tube was spun-down to make sure pellet is at the bottom of the tube.
- 10x fluorescein stock solution (100 μM) was prepared by resuspending fluorescein in 1.0 mL of 1xPBS.
- 10x fluorescein stock solution was diluted with 1x PBS to make a 1x fluorescein solution with a concentration 10 μM.
- 200 μL of 1x fluorescein was transferred into each well in column 1.
- Serial dilution by transferring 100 μL from column to column with good mixing.
- Fluorescence measurements of all the samples in the plate reader.
- 1:10 dilution of each overnight culture in LB+Chloramphenicol.
- Abs600 measurement of these 1:10 diluted cultures.
- Dilution of the cultures further to a target Abs600 of 0.02 in a final volume of 12 ml LB medium + Chloramphenicol.
- 500 µL samples of the diluted cultures at 0 hours were taken into 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes and placed on ice.
- The remainder of the cultures incubated at 37°C and 220 rpm for 6 hours.
- 500 µL samples of the cultures at 6 hours of incubation were taken into 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes and placed on ice.
- Abs600 and fluorescence measurement of all the samples- the results were added to the Excel sheet.
- The overnight culture of the Positive Control (BBa_I20270) and the Negative Control (BBa_R0040) were diluted 1:8: 25 μL culture to 175 μL LB + Cam in a well of a 96-well plate.
- OD600 measurement of the samples (include blank media measurement).
- Dilution of the overnight culture to OD600 = 0.1 in 1.0 mL of LB + Cam media according the calculation of (C1)(V1) = (C2)(V2).
- The dilution cultures were added in triplicate samples into the 96 well-plates. Each well had 200 μL.
- OD600 measurement of the samples.
- Serial Dilution was made to the triplicate Starting Samples of the previous step according to the instruction of the protocol.
- From each sample, 3 dilutions (8*10-3 , 8*10-4, 8*10-5) were plated on LB + Cam plate.
- Incubation of the plates at 37°C overnight.
- Colonies were counted after 18-20 hours of growth.
- The colonies on each plate were counted.
- The colony count was multiplied by the Final Dilution Factor on each plate as shown in Table 3:
Figure 1: Particle Standard Curve
Figure 2: Particle Standard Curve
We got a linear correlation between the Abs600 and the amount of particle.
Table 1: OD600/Abs600 measurements.
The correction factor is 2.538.
Calibration 3: Fluorescence standard curve - Fluorescein Protocol
When we got the feedback about out results, we were told that there was a problem with the measurements in which the positive and the negative results were too close, so we repeated the measurements.
After the second repetition of the measurements, we produced the results for the Excel sheet and the results were presented below in figures 3 and 4:
Figure 3: Fluorescein Standard Curve
Figure 4: Fluorescein Standard Curve log scale
The Fluorescence standard curve of Fluorescein (figure 3) allows us to convert cell-based fluorescence reading originating from GFP fluorescence (at the same wavelengths) readings to equivalent fluorescein concentrations found in the calibration curve.
Cell measurement protocol:
Day 1:
Escherichia coli DH5α was transformed with the following parts all harboured in pSB1C3) plasmids as indicated in table 2:
Device | Part Number | Plate | Plate Location |
---|---|---|---|
Negative control | BBa_R0040 | Kit Plate 7 | Well 2B |
Test Device 1 | BBa_J364000 | Kit Plate 7 | Well 2F |
Test Device 2 | BBa_J364001 | Kit Plate 7 | Well 2H |
Test Device 3 | BBa_J364002 | Kit Plate 7 | Well 2J |
Test Device 4 | BBa_J364007 | Kit Plate 7 | Well 2L |
Test Device 5 | BBa_J364008 | Kit Plate 7 | Well 2N |
Test Device 6 | BBa_J364009 | Kit Plate 7 | Well 2P |
Table 2: plasmids list and locations
Day 2:
2 colonies from each of the transformation plates were picked and inoculated in 10.0 mL LB medium + Chloramphenicol.
The cells were incubated overnight at 37°C and 220 rpm shaking.
Day3: Cell growth, sampling, and assay
Colony Forming Units per 0.1 OD600 E. coli cultures:
Step 1: “Starting Sample” Preparation
Step 2: Dilution Series
Step 3: CFU/mL/OD Calculation
(note: CFU values presented below are in 10^8 scale)
Plate number |
Number of colonies |
CFU*10^8 |
---|---|---|
1.1 dilution 3 |
>300 |
|
1.1 dilution 4 |
82 |
0.656 |
1.1 dilution 5 |
25 |
2 |
1.2 dilution 3 |
>300 |
|
1.2 dilution 4 |
102 |
0.816 |
1.2 dilution 5 |
8 |
0.64 |
1.3 dilution 3 |
>300 |
|
1.3 dilution 4 |
126 |
1.008 |
1.3 dilution 5 |
22 |
1.76 |
2.1 dilution 3 |
>300 |
|
2.1 dilution 4 |
61 |
0.488 |
2.1 dilution 5 |
5 |
0.4 |
2.2 dilution 3 |
237 |
0.1896 |
2.2 dilution 4 |
42 |
0.336 |
2.2 dilution 5 |
7 |
0.56 |
2.3 dilution 3 |
>300 |
|
2.3 dilution 4 |
85 |
0.68 |
2.3 dilution 5 |
10 |
0.8 |
3.1 dilution 3 |
>300 |
|
3.1 dilution 4 |
73 |
0.584 |
3.1 dilution 5 |
2 |
0.16 |
3.2 dilution 3 |
>300 |
|
3.2 dilution 4 |
52 |
0.416 |
3.2 dilution 5 |
4 |
0.32 |
3.3 dilution 3 |
>300 |
|
3.3 dilution 4 |
64 |
0.512 |
3.3 dilution 5 |
6 |
0.48 |
4.1 dilution 3 |
>300 |
|
4.1 dilution 4 |
38 |
0.304 |
4.1 dilution 5 |
14 |
1.12 |
4.2 dilution 3 |
>300 |
|
4.2 dilution 4 |
50 |
0.4 |
4.2 dilution 5 |
7 |
0.56 |
4.3 dilution 3 |
292 |
0.2336 |
4.3 dilution 4 |
36 |
0.288 |
4.3 dilution 5 |
0 |
0 |
Figure 5: Us, hard at work on the Interlab measurements