Difference between revisions of "Team:Newcastle/Medals"

m
m
Line 41: Line 41:
 
         <tr>
 
         <tr>
 
           <td class="medal bronze">1</td>
 
           <td class="medal bronze">1</td>
−
           <td>Register and Attend</td>
+
           <td>Registration and Jamboree Attendance</td>
−
           <td>Alternative roots (NCL team 2018) has registered and will be attending Giant Jamboree Boston</td>
+
           <td>Alternative roots has registered and will be attending Giant Jamboree Boston. Hello!</td>
 
         </tr>
 
         </tr>
 
         <tr>
 
         <tr>
 
           <td class="medal bronze">2</td>
 
           <td class="medal bronze">2</td>
−
           <td>Deliverables </td>
+
           <td>Competition Deliverables</td>
−
           <td>A team wiki, poster, presentation and project attributions were made. The safety form, judging form and registry pages were completed.</td>
+
           <td>We have completed the following tasks: 1. Wiki (right here!), 2. Our poster can be found in the poster hall, 3. Our presentation is scheduled for 26th October, between 11.00 and 12.30 in room 309 (Session F) and finally, 4. The judging form was completed and submitted on the 12th October.</td>
 
         </tr>
 
         </tr>
  

Revision as of 13:45, 11 October 2018

Menu
Alternative Roots/Protocols

Newcastle iGEM 2018

Medal Requirements

Medal Criteria Explanation
Bronze
1 Registration and Jamboree Attendance Alternative roots has registered and will be attending Giant Jamboree Boston. Hello!
2 Competition Deliverables We have completed the following tasks: 1. Wiki (right here!), 2. Our poster can be found in the poster hall, 3. Our presentation is scheduled for 26th October, between 11.00 and 12.30 in room 309 (Session F) and finally, 4. The judging form was completed and submitted on the 12th October.
3 Attributions The attributions can be found here.
4 Characteris/Contribution Our team collected and deposited data for the 2018 Interlab study. The data has been accepted by iGEM and can be found here
Silver
1 Validated Part/ contribution
2 Collaboration Exeter have asked us to produce a kill curve through the open trons. For Sorbonne university one of our architectures provided them with a visualisation of their concept. Warwick was our third collaboration, we sent their team water samples. These Collaborations are detailed here.
3 Human Practices We contextualised our Human Practices, within the Newcastle City Council plan to make Newcastle into a 'Smart City.' We have proposed an additional scenario to those already outlined, one concerning sustainable agriculture; an urban farm inside the Victoria Tunnel which runs underneath the city. This conceptual design project forced us to think carefully about the safety regarding GMOs when used in contained environments. Before designing the urban farm, we spoke to: local farmers, several commercial urban farms, a social food enterprise and a research director. We used this design exercise to bring together all that we learned from our comprehensive stakeholder engagement
Gold
1 Integrated Human Practices This design exercise outlined in the silver criteria integrates / was informed by all elements of our project: stakeholder engagement, wetware, hardware, and safety. Once we had consulted the relevant stakeholders and felt we had sufficient information we began to feed this in to the design and execution of the project. We have document on our wiki how our project has been influenced by our Human Practices work. See our integrated Human Practices journey here.
2 Improve a Previous Part or Project
3 Model Your Project
4 Demonstration of Your Work