Difference between revisions of "Team:Newcastle/Results/Endophyte"

Line 164: Line 164:
 
               <p><font size="3">Figure 6. <i>Pseudomonas sp.</i> DSM 25356 plated on tryptone soy agar containing gentamicin (100 µg/ml)</p>
 
               <p><font size="3">Figure 6. <i>Pseudomonas sp.</i> DSM 25356 plated on tryptone soy agar containing gentamicin (100 µg/ml)</p>
  
                    <h3 class="h2">Week beginning 20/08</h3>
+
      <p><font size="3">After identifying which antibiotics were active against <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. The next step was to identify working concentrations of these antibiotics to be used when selecting transformants. This was done by carrying out minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) experiments where growth was tested against a range of antibiotic concentrations.</font></p>
  
                    <h3 class="h2">Week beginning 27/08</h3>
+
<p><font size="3">The results of our MIC experiments showed a clear dose response between antibiotic concentration and growth of <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. for both streptomycin and gentamicin (Figures 7 and 8). Gentamicin was found to be the more effective antibiotic with a concentration of 1.5 µg/ml sufficient to prevent growth. A concentration of 6.0 µg/ml of streptomycin was required to prevent growth. A slight increase in absorbance was observed for the positive control for both antibiotics. This is likely due to release of compounds by bacterial cells upon death.</font></p>
      <p><font size="3">Wild type <i>Pseudomonas sp.</i> Isolated in pure culture from surface-sterilised seedlings inoculated by the seed-coating method. Surface-sterilised non-inoculated seedlings were used as a control from which only wild endophytes were obtained.</font></p>
+
  
 
                    <h3 class="h2">Week beginning 03/09</h3>
 
 
                            <p><font size="3">The results of our minimum inhibitory concentration experiments showed a clear dose response between antibiotic concentration and growth of <i>Pseudomonas sp.</i> for both streptomycin and gentamicin (Figures 7 and 8). Gentamicin was found to be the more effective antibiotic with a concentration of 1.5 µg/ml sufficient to prevent growth. A concentration of 6.0 µg/ml of streptomycin was required to prevent growth. A slight increase in absorbance was observed for the positive control for both antibiotics. This is likely due to release of compounds by bacterial cells upon death.</font></p>
 
  
 
       <!-- [Graph: Gentamicin MIC]
 
       <!-- [Graph: Gentamicin MIC]

Revision as of 16:32, 15 October 2018

Alternative Roots/Results

Introduction

The first steps in developing Pseudomonas sp. (CT 364) involve identifying antibiotics active that it is susceptible to in order to select transformants and optimistaion of transformation protocols. Five antibiotics were tested and two were found to be active against Pseudomonas sp. Working concentrations were identified for each antibiotic using lab automation. Additionally, a new streptomycin resistance cassette was constructed to be used in building plasmids for Pseudomonas sp.

Antibiotic Testing

Pseudomonas sp. (CT 364) was obtained from DSMZ, Germany (DSM No.: 25356). The strain arrived freeze-dried and was revived according to the protocol recommended by DSMZ.(Figure 1)

Figure 1. Pseudomonas sp. DSM 25356 plated on tryptone soy agar

Screening on tryptone soy agar (TSA) showed Pseudomonas sp. to be resistant to chloramphenicol, kanamycin and carbenicillin. Antibiotic concentrations of 50 and 100 µg/ml were tested with lawns forming on agar containing 100 µg/ml of each antibiotic. (Figures 2, 3 & 4) after 24 hours incubation at 28 °C.

Figure 2. Pseudomonas sp. DSM 25356 plated on tryptone soy agar containing chloramphenicol (100 µg/ml)

Figure 3. Pseudomonas sp. DSM 25356 plated on tryptone soy agar containing carbenicillin (100 µg/ml)

Figure 4. Pseudomonas sp. DSM 25356 plated on tryptone soy agar containing carbenicillin (100 µg/ml)

Screening on TSA showed that Pseudomonas sp. was susceptible to both streptomycin (Figure 5) and gentamicin (Figure 6) with no colony forming units (CFUs) visible on agar containing 50 µg/ml of either antibiotic after 24 hours incubation at 28 °C.

Figure 5. Pseudomonas sp. DSM 25356 plated on tryptone soy agar containing streptomycin (100 µg/ml)

Figure 6. Pseudomonas sp. DSM 25356 plated on tryptone soy agar containing gentamicin (100 µg/ml)

After identifying which antibiotics were active against Pseudomonas sp. The next step was to identify working concentrations of these antibiotics to be used when selecting transformants. This was done by carrying out minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) experiments where growth was tested against a range of antibiotic concentrations.

The results of our MIC experiments showed a clear dose response between antibiotic concentration and growth of Pseudomonas sp. for both streptomycin and gentamicin (Figures 7 and 8). Gentamicin was found to be the more effective antibiotic with a concentration of 1.5 µg/ml sufficient to prevent growth. A concentration of 6.0 µg/ml of streptomycin was required to prevent growth. A slight increase in absorbance was observed for the positive control for both antibiotics. This is likely due to release of compounds by bacterial cells upon death.

Figure 7. Pseudomonas sp. DSM 25356 grown in tryptone soy broth containing gentamicin at varying concentrations. Cells were grown in 96-well plate format in 200 µl volumes at 37 °C over 24 hours. (n=4 replicates, error bars are standard error of the mean)

Figure 8. Pseudomonas sp. DSM 25356 grown in tryptone soy broth containing streptomycin at varying concentrations. Cells were grown in 96-well plate format in 200 µl volumes at 37 °C over 24 hours. (n=4 replicates, error bars are standard error of the mean).

Week Beginning 10/09

Miniprep DNA concentrations,

Transformation plates

Table of DNA concentrations and CFUS

Prior to tran

Figure 8. Pseudomonas sp. DSM 25356 plated on tryptone soy agar containing gentamicin (4 µg/ml)

Figure 9. Pseudomonas sp. DSM 25356 plated on tryptone soy agar containing gentamicin (6 µg/ml)

Transformations

Figure 10. Pseudomonas sp. DSM 25356 transformed with gentamicin resistance plasmid from miniprep 1 plated on TSA containing gentamicin (10 μg/ml).

Figure 11. Pseudomonas sp. DSM 25356 transformed with gentamicin resistance plasmid from miniprep 2 plated on TSA containing gentamicin (10 μg/ml).

Figure 12. Pseudomonas sp. DSM 25356 transformed with gentamicin resistance plasmid from miniprep 3 plated on TSA containing gentamicin (10 μg/ml).

Figure 13. Pseudomonas sp. DSM 25356 transformed with sterile water (Control) plated on TSA containing gentamicin (10 μg/ml).

New Part

Week Beginning 17/09

Gibson assembly contents table?

Figure 15. E. coli strain DH5α transformed with streptomycin resistance part BBa_K2797002 plated on LB agar containing streptomycin (50 μg/ml).

Figure 16. E. coli strain DH5α transformed with Gibson assembly positive control plated on LB agar containing ampicillin (100 µg/ml)

Figure 17. E. coli strain DH5α transformed with sterile water (negative control) plated on LB agar containing streptomycin (50 µg/ml)

Figure 18. E. coli strain DH5α transformed with streptomycin resistance part BBa_K2797002 plated on LB agar containing streptomycin (50 μg/ml)

Figure 19. E. coli strain DH5α carrying the streptomycin resistance part BBa_K2797002 plated on LB agar containing chloramphenicol (25 μg/ml). The part is in the pSB1C3 backbone conferring resistance to chloramphenicol.

Week Beginning 24/09

Figure 20. E. coli DH5α with or without the BBa_K2797002 part in pSB1C3 were grown in LB medium containing streptomycin at varying concentrations. Cells were grown in 96-well plate format in 200 μl volumes at 37 °C over 24 hours. (n=3 replicates, error bars are standard error of the mean).

Week Beginning 01/10

Figure 22. Pseudomonas sp. with or without gentamicin resistance plasmid were grown in tryptone soy broth containing gentamicin at varying concentrations. Cells were grown in a 96-well plate format in 200 μl volumes at 28 °C over 24 hours. (n=5 replicates, error bats are standard error of the mean)

Conclusions





REFERENCES & Attributions

Attributions: Frank Eardley and Lewis Tomlinson