Difference between revisions of "Safety/Exemplary Projects"

Line 10: Line 10:
 
<a href="https://2018.igem.org/Safety/Biosafety_Image">
 
<a href="https://2018.igem.org/Safety/Biosafety_Image">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/6c/T--Wageningen_UR--MenuBannerSmallGreyLQ.png"></a>
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/6c/T--Wageningen_UR--MenuBannerSmallGreyLQ.png"></a>
<h3>Wageningen UR</h3>
+
<h3>2017 Wageningen UR</h3>
 
<p>For integrating safety and security into how they <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Wageningen_UR/HP/Silver">designed</a> their project, decisions they made whilst working on it, and including these important topics in how they presented their work at the Jamboree</p><br>
 
<p>For integrating safety and security into how they <a href="https://2017.igem.org/Team:Wageningen_UR/HP/Silver">designed</a> their project, decisions they made whilst working on it, and including these important topics in how they presented their work at the Jamboree</p><br>
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 23: Line 23:
 
       <div class="column third_size">
 
       <div class="column third_size">
 
<a href="https://2018.igem.org/Safety/Biosafety_Image">
 
<a href="https://2018.igem.org/Safety/Biosafety_Image">
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/78/T--Arizona_State--igemteampic.jpg"></a>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/4/44/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_gruppenbild.jpg"></a>
<h3>2016 Arizona State</h3>
+
<h3>2015 Bielefeld-CeBiTec</h3>
<p>For a <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Arizona_State/WhitePaper">White Paper</a> on context specific risk assessment where they considered how risks associated with parts in their project might change if they were to come into contact with different organisms.</p><br>
+
<p>For a <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/be/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_Dual-Use_Report.pdf">report</a> on the dual-use nature of advanced biotechnology – where its impact on society is determined by the intent of the user. This report was felt to be an excellent review of this issue - and an important resource for future iGEM teams.</p><br>
 
</div>
 
</div>
  

Revision as of 16:31, 28 March 2018

Loading...

Exemplary Projects in Safety

Teams that accomplish something special on safety and security during iGEM have been rewarded with a special commendation. This award is not always given and is presented by the Safety Committee to reward excellence. Past recipients have included:

2017 Wageningen UR

For integrating safety and security into how they designed their project, decisions they made whilst working on it, and including these important topics in how they presented their work at the Jamboree


2016 Arizona State

For a White Paper on context specific risk assessment where they considered how risks associated with parts in their project might change if they were to come into contact with different organisms.


2015 Bielefeld-CeBiTec

For a report on the dual-use nature of advanced biotechnology – where its impact on society is determined by the intent of the user. This report was felt to be an excellent review of this issue - and an important resource for future iGEM teams.