Difference between revisions of "Safety/Exemplary Projects"
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
<div class="column third_size"> | <div class="column third_size"> | ||
<a href="https://2018.igem.org/Safety/Biosafety_Image"> | <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Safety/Biosafety_Image"> | ||
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/c/c1/AV_iGEMBodyScan.jpg"></a> |
| − | <h3> | + | <h3>2013 Lethbridge</h3> |
| − | <p>For | + | <p>For working with the gene synthesis industry to test whether their screening techniques could <a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Lethbridge/human_practices">detect illicit orders</a> that had undergone a frame shift. Their security work was directly connected to their main project. This was an excellent example of responsible whitehat biohacking.</p><br> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 16:37, 28 March 2018
Exemplary Projects in Safety
Teams that accomplish something special on safety and security during iGEM have been rewarded with a special commendation. This award is not always given and is presented by the Safety Committee to reward excellence. Past recipients have included:
2017 Wageningen UR
For integrating safety and security into how they designed their project, decisions they made whilst working on it, and including these important topics in how they presented their work at the Jamboree
2016 Arizona State
For a White Paper on context specific risk assessment where they considered how risks associated with parts in their project might change if they were to come into contact with different organisms.
2015 Bielefeld-CeBiTec
For a report on the dual-use nature of advanced biotechnology – where its impact on society is determined by the intent of the user. This report was felt to be an excellent review of this issue - and an important resource for future iGEM teams.
2014 Aachen
For integrating safety considerations into the design and production of their project. This team undertook a series of experiments to determine whether safety-based decisions taken in project design actually resulted in the desired improvements.
2013 Lethbridge
For working with the gene synthesis industry to test whether their screening techniques could detect illicit orders that had undergone a frame shift. Their security work was directly connected to their main project. This was an excellent example of responsible whitehat biohacking.
2015 Bielefeld-CeBiTec
For a report on the dual-use nature of advanced biotechnology – where its impact on society is determined by the intent of the user. This report was felt to be an excellent review of this issue - and an important resource for future iGEM teams.