Justas2010 (Talk | contribs) |
Justas2010 (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
<p></p> | <p></p> | ||
<p></p> | <p></p> | ||
− | |||
<p>At the beginning of the InterLab study we completed three distinct calibration protocols. At first, we performed the LUDOX Protocol in order to obtain a conversion factor to transform absorbance (Abs600) from the plate reader into a comparable OD600 measurement as would be obtained with a spectrophotometer. Next, we completed the Microsphere Protocol as it allows a standard curve of particle concentration which is used to convert Abs600 measurements to an estimated number of cells. Finally, by completing the Fluorescein Protocol we generated a standard fluorescence curve which is used to compare fluorescence output of different test devices. Completion of the calibrations ensured that we take cell measurements under the same conditions. It is worth mentioning that prior calibration, we prepared competent E. coli DH5-alpha cells and transformed them according to the standard transformation protocol. During all of the experiments we tested 8 plasmids: 2 controls and 6 test devices (Table 1). </p> | <p>At the beginning of the InterLab study we completed three distinct calibration protocols. At first, we performed the LUDOX Protocol in order to obtain a conversion factor to transform absorbance (Abs600) from the plate reader into a comparable OD600 measurement as would be obtained with a spectrophotometer. Next, we completed the Microsphere Protocol as it allows a standard curve of particle concentration which is used to convert Abs600 measurements to an estimated number of cells. Finally, by completing the Fluorescein Protocol we generated a standard fluorescence curve which is used to compare fluorescence output of different test devices. Completion of the calibrations ensured that we take cell measurements under the same conditions. It is worth mentioning that prior calibration, we prepared competent E. coli DH5-alpha cells and transformed them according to the standard transformation protocol. During all of the experiments we tested 8 plasmids: 2 controls and 6 test devices (Table 1). </p> | ||
<p>Table 1. Parts received and tested during iGEM’s fifth InterLab Study</p> | <p>Table 1. Parts received and tested during iGEM’s fifth InterLab Study</p> | ||
<p> Table 1. </p> | <p> Table 1. </p> | ||
+ | <p></p> | ||
+ | <p></p> | ||
+ | <p>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION </p> | ||
+ | <p></p> | ||
+ | <h2>1. MEASUREMENT OF LUDOX CL-X OD600 REFERENCE POINT</h2> | ||
<p></p> | <p></p> | ||
+ | <p>Using LUDOX CL-X as a single point reference allowed us to obtain a ratiometric conversion factor to transform absorbance data into a standard OD600 measurement. This is crucial to ensure that plate reader measurements are not volume dependent. After this calibration part we obtained a radiometric conversion factor (Table 2) which will be used in further Interlab study measurements.</p> <p></p> <p></p> <p></p> <p></p> <p></p> <p></p> | ||
<p>The framework also includes a possibility of adding a selection system that reduces the usage of antibiotics | <p>The framework also includes a possibility of adding a selection system that reduces the usage of antibiotics | ||
(only 1 antibiotic for up to 5 different plasmids!) and an active partitioning system to make sure that low | (only 1 antibiotic for up to 5 different plasmids!) and an active partitioning system to make sure that low |
Revision as of 20:29, 16 October 2018
InterLab
Abstract
The goal of this year’s InterLab Study was to identify and minimize the sources of systematic variability in fluorescence measurements by normalizing to absolute cell count or colony-forming units (CFUs) instead of optical density (OD).
Participating in the fifth iGEM InterLab Study was a great opportunity to start this year’s competition as well as acquire some valuable knowledge which we implemented into practice during the project.