Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
<h2>Expected results</h2><hr/> | <h2>Expected results</h2><hr/> | ||
+ | |||
<p>Figure 6 describes the possible outcomes of the Western Blot experiment. If everything in the YLP20 sequence is working, we will detect the scFv in both supernatant and pellet (cell lysate). If only the signal peptide is not working, we will have a signal only in the cell lysate. Finally, if the scFv is not well expressed, (e.g. because of the promoter, the RBS, or aggregation) we will have detect no signal neither from the supernatant nor from the pellet. As a positive control, we must run a WB on a strain containing a protein fused to an E-tag that we know is well expressed.</p> | <p>Figure 6 describes the possible outcomes of the Western Blot experiment. If everything in the YLP20 sequence is working, we will detect the scFv in both supernatant and pellet (cell lysate). If only the signal peptide is not working, we will have a signal only in the cell lysate. Finally, if the scFv is not well expressed, (e.g. because of the promoter, the RBS, or aggregation) we will have detect no signal neither from the supernatant nor from the pellet. As a positive control, we must run a WB on a strain containing a protein fused to an E-tag that we know is well expressed.</p> | ||
Line 145: | Line 146: | ||
<figcaption><span class="underline">Figure 6 :</span> Analysis of the WB results depending of what works and what does not work in the sequence.</figcaption> | <figcaption><span class="underline">Figure 6 :</span> Analysis of the WB results depending of what works and what does not work in the sequence.</figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h2>Results</h2><hr/> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>All the constructions were cloned in <i>E. coli</i> DH5ɑ. Currently, we did not succeed to transform <i>L. jensenii</i> with different antibody constructions.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h3>Cloning</h3> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <table> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th colspan=2>Part</th> | ||
+ | <th rowspan=2>Designed</th> | ||
+ | <th rowspan=2>Cloned</th> | ||
+ | <th rowspan=2>Characterized</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>Antibody</td> | ||
+ | <td>Signal Peptide</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td rowspan=4>YLP20</td> | ||
+ | <td>CbsA</td> | ||
+ | <td>YES</td> | ||
+ | <td>YES</td> | ||
+ | <td>YES</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </table | ||
+ | |||
</section> | </section> |
Revision as of 21:18, 17 October 2018
Designs
The following figure (Figure 1) is the caption for the next 3 figures of our designs. Orange frames are the variable parts between the constructs.
We decided to design several constructions to produce YLP20, our favorite candidate with four differents signal peptides : CbsA, Epr, YncM and Yjfa (Figure 2). We chose RpsU promoter [1] that is a strong promoter specific to L. jensenii.
We tested different signal peptides that we introduced you before without forgetting the amino sequence “APVT” to avoid truncating the protein. Finally, we added the sequence that encodes YLP20 scFv and E-tag.
To check the scFv production and conformation we designed constructions with LaM-4 instead of YLP20 sequence (Figure 3).
Indeed LaM-4 is a control [2]. It is an antibody against RFP & mcherry. This control allow us to check the efficiency of the promoter and the signal peptide.
The construction is very similar that the one with YLP20. The difference is just that we replaced the YLP20 sequence with the LaM-4 sequence.
Moreover, we would like to check signal peptides that we chose. Indeed, it is really important to verify the efficiency of the SP and determine new SP that are working in L. jensenii. We decided to fusion the SP to RFP to display the efficiency of the SP (Figure 4). For that, we used a plate reader and a flow cytometer.
Experimental design to assess Antisperm Antibodies production and secretion
To verify if our constructs are working correctly (i.e production and secretion in the supernatant) we designed several experiments (Figure 5).
The first experiment consists of a Western-Blot (WB) to verify that the antibody is produced by the bacteria. Our scFv is fused to an E-tag, allowing for straigthforward detection using a commercial antibody.
The second experiment consists of an ELISA test using YLP12 (biotinylated as follow : YLPVGGLRRIGG-Lys(Biotin)) which is the target antigen for the YLP20 scFv. The idea is to use streptavidin plates to fix YLP12, so that he repulsion between biotin and streptavidin forces the peptides not to lie on the bottom of the plate and facilitate the binding antigen-antibody. Different ELISA tests would need to be performed : First, using a supernatant from a bacterial culture to see if YLP20 is produced and secreted. In parallel, an ELISA using the cell lysate would be useful to see if YLP20 is produced but not secreted.
Expected results
Figure 6 describes the possible outcomes of the Western Blot experiment. If everything in the YLP20 sequence is working, we will detect the scFv in both supernatant and pellet (cell lysate). If only the signal peptide is not working, we will have a signal only in the cell lysate. Finally, if the scFv is not well expressed, (e.g. because of the promoter, the RBS, or aggregation) we will have detect no signal neither from the supernatant nor from the pellet. As a positive control, we must run a WB on a strain containing a protein fused to an E-tag that we know is well expressed.
Results
All the constructions were cloned in E. coli DH5ɑ. Currently, we did not succeed to transform L. jensenii with different antibody constructions.
Cloning
Part | Designed | Cloned | Characterized | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Antibody | Signal Peptide | |||
YLP20 | CbsA | YES | YES | YES |
References | |
---|---|
[1] | Xiaowen Liu, Laurel A. Lagenaur, David A. Simpson, Kirsten P. Essenmacher, Courtney L. Frazier-Parker, Yang Liu, Daniel Tsai, Srinivas S. Rao, Dean H. Hamer, Thomas P. Parks, Peter P. Lee and Qiang Xu. (2006). Engineered Vaginal Lactobacillus Strain for Mucosal Delivery of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Inhibitor Cyanovirin-N. Antimicrob Agents Chemother Vol. 50, No. 10, p. 3250–3259 |
[2] | Fridy, P. C., Li, Y., Keegan, S., Thompson, M. K., Nudelman, I., Scheid, J. F., ... & Rout, M. P. (2014). A robust pipeline for rapid production of versatile nanobody repertoires. Nature methods, 11(12), 1253. |