Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
<img style="width:70%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/fa/T--Nottingham--wiki_diagramPD1.png"> | <img style="width:70%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/fa/T--Nottingham--wiki_diagramPD1.png"> | ||
− | <center> | + | </center> |
<p><em>C. difficile</em> is estimated to be present in the natural gut microbiota of around 4% of the healthy adult population however, exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics, such as cephalosporins, can cause disruption to the microbiota. This disruption can promote the colonisation of toxigenic strains allowing infection to persist. It is thought that non-toxigenic strains of <em>C. difficile</em> can act as a probiotic by outcompeting toxigenic strains in the gut and reducing the likelihood of disease. Currently, CDI is treated using two main antibiotics, metronidazole and vancomycin however, raised concerns over the emergence of antibiotic resistance has led to a desire for alternative treatments.<p> | <p><em>C. difficile</em> is estimated to be present in the natural gut microbiota of around 4% of the healthy adult population however, exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics, such as cephalosporins, can cause disruption to the microbiota. This disruption can promote the colonisation of toxigenic strains allowing infection to persist. It is thought that non-toxigenic strains of <em>C. difficile</em> can act as a probiotic by outcompeting toxigenic strains in the gut and reducing the likelihood of disease. Currently, CDI is treated using two main antibiotics, metronidazole and vancomycin however, raised concerns over the emergence of antibiotic resistance has led to a desire for alternative treatments.<p> | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
<img style="width:80%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/b2/T--Nottingham--wiki_digramPD2.png"> | <img style="width:80%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/b2/T--Nottingham--wiki_digramPD2.png"> | ||
− | <center> | + | </center> |
<p>Lytic phages exclusively follow the lytic lifecycle, following infection these phages will hijack the host cell machinery to produce multiple copies of the phage proteins. These proteins are then assembled into multiple phage progeny which burst out of the host cell and go onto infect other bacterial cells. Temperate phages can follow the lytic life cycle but are also able to follow the lysogenic life cycle. These phages can integrate their genome in the host cell chromosome upon infection where they can remain dormant for long periods of time as prophages. When conditions are favourable, usually due to host cell stress, these prophages can excise from the host cell chromosome and enter the lytic life cycle where progeny phage particles are produced. To date, all phages found to infect <em>C. difficile</em> are temperate phages.<p> | <p>Lytic phages exclusively follow the lytic lifecycle, following infection these phages will hijack the host cell machinery to produce multiple copies of the phage proteins. These proteins are then assembled into multiple phage progeny which burst out of the host cell and go onto infect other bacterial cells. Temperate phages can follow the lytic life cycle but are also able to follow the lysogenic life cycle. These phages can integrate their genome in the host cell chromosome upon infection where they can remain dormant for long periods of time as prophages. When conditions are favourable, usually due to host cell stress, these prophages can excise from the host cell chromosome and enter the lytic life cycle where progeny phage particles are produced. To date, all phages found to infect <em>C. difficile</em> are temperate phages.<p> | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
<img style="width:75%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/d7/T--Nottingham--wiki_diagramPD3.png"> | <img style="width:75%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/d7/T--Nottingham--wiki_diagramPD3.png"> | ||
− | <center> | + | </center> |
<p>This could reduce the incidence of relapse by allowing the gut microbiota to remain in its protective role against future colonisation. In comparison to antibiotics, the impact of resistance to phage therapy would be minimal due to phages and bacteria co-evolving. As bacteria gain resistance to overcome phage infection, the phages can evolve to evade these systems resulting in susceptible bacterial populations which can be treated. Although phage therapy would be the ideal alternative treatment for CDI the major roadblock is that no strictly lytic phages currently exist.<p> | <p>This could reduce the incidence of relapse by allowing the gut microbiota to remain in its protective role against future colonisation. In comparison to antibiotics, the impact of resistance to phage therapy would be minimal due to phages and bacteria co-evolving. As bacteria gain resistance to overcome phage infection, the phages can evolve to evade these systems resulting in susceptible bacterial populations which can be treated. Although phage therapy would be the ideal alternative treatment for CDI the major roadblock is that no strictly lytic phages currently exist.<p> | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
<img style="width:80%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a0/T--Nottingham--wiki_diagramPD4.png"> | <img style="width:80%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a0/T--Nottingham--wiki_diagramPD4.png"> | ||
− | <center> | + | </center> |
<center> | <center> | ||
<img style="width:80%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/01/T--Nottingham--wiki_diagramPD5.png"> | <img style="width:80%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/01/T--Nottingham--wiki_diagramPD5.png"> | ||
− | <center> | + | </center> |
<p>To achieve this two strategies of gene silencing are investigated, the use of anti-sense RNA and dead Cas9. In order to ensure the therapeutic is specific for <em>C. difficile</em> these “silencers” will be delivered to the gut using a phage. This ensures that only the <em>C. difficile</em> cells are targeted and due to the specificity of the “silencers” only strains capable of producing the toxins will be silenced allowing the now non-toxigenic strains to remain part of the gut microbiota to protect against other opportunistic toxic bacteria. In addition, with this approach the lack of a lytic phage is no longer an issue as using the ability of temperate phage to integrate into the host cell chromosome to express the “silencers” results in stable repression of the toxin while keeping the cells alive which allows the strains to become part of the gut microbiota. The presence of toxin silenced <em>C. difficile</em> strains in the gut microbiota can have a protective effect to reduce the likelihood of toxic strains colonising and causing future infections.<p> | <p>To achieve this two strategies of gene silencing are investigated, the use of anti-sense RNA and dead Cas9. In order to ensure the therapeutic is specific for <em>C. difficile</em> these “silencers” will be delivered to the gut using a phage. This ensures that only the <em>C. difficile</em> cells are targeted and due to the specificity of the “silencers” only strains capable of producing the toxins will be silenced allowing the now non-toxigenic strains to remain part of the gut microbiota to protect against other opportunistic toxic bacteria. In addition, with this approach the lack of a lytic phage is no longer an issue as using the ability of temperate phage to integrate into the host cell chromosome to express the “silencers” results in stable repression of the toxin while keeping the cells alive which allows the strains to become part of the gut microbiota. The presence of toxin silenced <em>C. difficile</em> strains in the gut microbiota can have a protective effect to reduce the likelihood of toxic strains colonising and causing future infections.<p> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 23:48, 16 October 2018