Difference between revisions of "Team:Purdue/Medalling"

Line 2: Line 2:
 
<html>
 
<html>
 
<body>
 
<body>
 +
<style>
 +
table {
 +
display:block;
 +
margin:auto;
 +
}
 +
</style>
 
<div class='header'>
 
<div class='header'>
 
<img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/e/eb/T--Purdue--purpleAbs.jpg'/>
 
<img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/e/eb/T--Purdue--purpleAbs.jpg'/>

Revision as of 22:42, 17 October 2018

Bootstrap Example

Medalling

Bronze

Criteria Explanation How Purdue has met the criteria?
1 Registration and Giant Jamboree Attendance Check!
2 Competition Deliverables #1 Wiki
#2 Poster
#3 Presentation
#4 Judging Form
3 Attributions Check out our attributions page!
4 Characterization / Contribution Completed the Interlab Study!

Silver

Criteria Explanation How Purdue has met the criteria?
1 Validated Part / Validated Contribution Sent part HRP Yeast Operon (BBa_K2696003) to iGEM. Characterization can be found here: LINK?
2 Collaboration We mentored a new team, the Northwestern iGEM team. We also sent them a prototype of our paper-based assay to test its durability and its feasibility as a product.
3 Human Practices HELP

Gold

Criteria Explanation How Purdue has met the criteria?
1 Integrated Human Practices IRB approved survey was sent to various types of people by using Amazon Turk. This survey allowed us to determine confusing components and other factors to be improved on the paper-based assay. From there, changes were made like what???
2 Model Your Project HELP