Difference between revisions of "Team:UPF CRG Barcelona/Integration"

Line 105: Line 105:
 
           Coli Nissle by using strain independent MAGE plasmids, (pORT MAGE) which would allow for direct editing of
 
           Coli Nissle by using strain independent MAGE plasmids, (pORT MAGE) which would allow for direct editing of
 
           strains with therapeutic potential.</p>
 
           strains with therapeutic potential.</p>
 +
<div class="spacer"></div>
 
         <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/fc/T--UPF_CRG_Barcelona--mage_scheme.svg" alt="Mage general
 
         <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/fc/T--UPF_CRG_Barcelona--mage_scheme.svg" alt="Mage general
 
             scheme" style="width:60%;">
 
             scheme" style="width:60%;">
Line 110: Line 111:
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
</center>
 
</center>
 +
<div class="spacer"></div>
 
         <p class="subapart1">How does MAGE work?</p>
 
         <p class="subapart1">How does MAGE work?</p>
  
Line 120: Line 122:
 
           population expansion make the editing process highly scalable. Remarcably, this process can be free of
 
           population expansion make the editing process highly scalable. Remarcably, this process can be free of
 
           selection markers, which are not desired in biotherapeutical strains. </p>
 
           selection markers, which are not desired in biotherapeutical strains. </p>
 +
 +
<div class="spacer"></div>
  
 
   <center>
 
   <center>
Line 132: Line 136:
  
 
         </center>
 
         </center>
 +
<div class="spacer"></div>
 
         <p class="subapart1">Genomic integration of LCFA uptake:</p>
 
         <p class="subapart1">Genomic integration of LCFA uptake:</p>
  
Line 150: Line 155:
 
           stages of the probiotic strain production and batch culture. This would result in a more efficient
 
           stages of the probiotic strain production and batch culture. This would result in a more efficient
 
           production process.</p>
 
           production process.</p>
 
+
<div class="spacer"></div>
 
         <p class="subapart1">Semirational Directed Evolution of uptake capabilities:</p>
 
         <p class="subapart1">Semirational Directed Evolution of uptake capabilities:</p>
  
Line 158: Line 163:
 
           for recombinant strains with differential degradation of fatty acids based on their growth rate would be a
 
           for recombinant strains with differential degradation of fatty acids based on their growth rate would be a
 
           reality.</p>
 
           reality.</p>
 
+
<div class="spacer"></div>
 
         <p class="subapart1">Oligo design & Cycling process:</p>
 
         <p class="subapart1">Oligo design & Cycling process:</p>
  
Line 166: Line 171:
 
           order to induce STOP codons. Using the same in silico predictor, we designed recombinant oligos of 90bp in
 
           order to induce STOP codons. Using the same in silico predictor, we designed recombinant oligos of 90bp in
 
           length to include T7 polymerase promoter sequences as described in the CoSelection mage [4].</p>
 
           length to include T7 polymerase promoter sequences as described in the CoSelection mage [4].</p>
 
+
<div class="spacer"></div>
 
         <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/60/T--UPF_CRG_Barcelona--KOfadR.svg" alt="Oligonucleotide"
 
         <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/60/T--UPF_CRG_Barcelona--KOfadR.svg" alt="Oligonucleotide"
 
             style="width: 50%;">
 
             style="width: 50%;">
Line 173: Line 178:
 
             exo, beta and gam.</p>
 
             exo, beta and gam.</p>
 
         </center>
 
         </center>
 
+
<div class="spacer"></div>
 
         <p class="subapart1">Screening</p>
 
         <p class="subapart1">Screening</p>
  
Line 182: Line 187:
 
           screening of fadR knock-outs, since the absence of the regulator on the promoter should lead to the
 
           screening of fadR knock-outs, since the absence of the regulator on the promoter should lead to the
 
           expression of basal levels of RFP (<a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:UPF_CRG_Barcelona/Results">See More</a>).</p>
 
           expression of basal levels of RFP (<a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:UPF_CRG_Barcelona/Results">See More</a>).</p>
 
+
<div class="spacer"></div>
           <p class="references">References</p>
+
           <p class="subapart2">References</p>
 
           <p class="references">[1] Isabella, V. M., Ha, B. N., Castillo, M. J., Lubkowicz, D. J., Rowe, S. E.,
 
           <p class="references">[1] Isabella, V. M., Ha, B. N., Castillo, M. J., Lubkowicz, D. J., Rowe, S. E.,
 
             Millet, Y. A., ... & Reeder, P. J. (2018). Development of a synthetic live bacterial therapeutic for the
 
             Millet, Y. A., ... & Reeder, P. J. (2018). Development of a synthetic live bacterial therapeutic for the

Revision as of 15:27, 17 October 2018

Wiki

A LIVE BIOTHERAPEUTIC

Since GARGANTUA is planned to work as a live biotherapeutic, several facts should be considered to increase stability and safety of the chassis strain. Having in mind recent probiotic designed strains [1], FDA Guidance on Live Biotherapeutic Organisms (docket number FDA-2010-D-0500), and the concerns that came up from the discussion with specialists, we explored which is the best engineering approach to address this in the specific case of our probiotic. We discussed which steps could be added to our experimental design to pave the way for an appropriate medical implementation of our probiotic, coming up with the following.

Firstly, we aimed to circumvent the use of antibiotic resistance genes in our strain in order to avoid horizontal gene transfer of synthetic circuits from our therapeutical strain into the gut ecosystem. Secondly, we targeted chromosomal integration of the enhanced intake properties to provide our design with genetic stability and robustness of expression in the gut. Thirdly, we intended to make overexpression of beta oxidation genes inducible, eliminating the metabolic burden of protein synthesis during the growth phase. This is highly important in industrial large scale culture process, where this burden could diminish final yield.

We thought that Multiplex Automated Genome Engineering (MAGE) [2] technology could provide a ideal platform for achieving the aforementioned characteristics that a safe and efficient live biotherapeutic should incorporate. The reason that lead us to use MAGE was the fact that intake capabilities are already present in the metabolism of E. coli. Therefore, simply tuning their expression in order to achieve the desired result is needed. Moreover, MAGE is highly scalable, and can be implemented in strains such as E. Coli Nissle by using strain independent MAGE plasmids, (pORT MAGE) which would allow for direct editing of strains with therapeutic potential.

Mage general
            scheme

Figure 1 | Description of MAGE. Multiplex Automated Genome Engineering (MAGE) procedure allows for multiple site mutagenesis by recombination of degenerated oligonucleotides, with the possibility of targeting multiple specific sites at once. The possibility of genomic integration of our concept allows for compliance with international probiotic strain standards.

How does MAGE work?

Multiplex Automated Genome Engineering (MAGE) is a directed evolution tool for multiple genetic loci based on the lambda phage homologous recombination abilities for targeted mutagenesis. Exo, beta and gam phage lambda genes are induced under the temperature-sensible λ cI promoter which allows for temperature inducible expression of recombination machinery in MAGE strains . This expression promotes the recombination of electroporated ssDNA oligonucleotides targeting specific sites which can introduce deletions, mismatches or insertions. Multiple cycles of electro competence induction, electroporation, and population expansion make the editing process highly scalable. Remarcably, this process can be free of selection markers, which are not desired in biotherapeutical strains.

MAGE protocol scheme

Figure 2 | Summary of a MAGE cycle. Pre-grown colonies are electroporated for oligonucleotide incorporation in order to achieve the desired recombination. Different possibilities of screening are available in order to detect recombinant organisms of interest, such as allele specific PCR, or in the case of our fadR KO mutant, picking up red colonies.

Genomic integration of LCFA uptake:

A simplistic albeit efficient approach consists in silencing the fadR gene, which is the main regulator of fad genes. Its absence should therefore raise constitutive levels of fad genes. To achieve this, we designed an oligo that when introduced in to the genome by the recombineering machinery would code for two stop codons in the beginning of the fadR coding sequence.

Considering the fact that beta oxidation genes are not solely regulated by the fadR repressor [3] we considered the introduction of T7 phage RNA polymerase promoter sequences upstream of fatty acid (FA) intake and degradation pathway genes. This would provide an orthogonal and inducible control of all the components in our system, which would be complicated to achieve merely by the use of synthetic constructs due to the large sequence size of the pathway. Genomic integration of the T7 polymerase is needed so as to achieve the desired levels of expression of the modified genes. The control of the polymerase under an inducible promoter provides the possibility of avoiding the metabolic burden caused by overexpression of beta oxidation genes in early stages of the probiotic strain production and batch culture. This would result in a more efficient production process.

Semirational Directed Evolution of uptake capabilities:

Incorporating sequence variation in to RBS of a particular pathway using MAGE can be used for optimization of expression of a particular metabolic pathway. In our case, this could be used for fine tuning the efficiency of beta-oxidation. Coupled to selection based on minimal media supplemented with LCFA, screening for recombinant strains with differential degradation of fatty acids based on their growth rate would be a reality.

Oligo design & Cycling process:

The oligo of choice for silencing fadR was designed (using MODEST) so as to introduce two STOP codons within the coding frame of the gene. Glutamic acid 13 and 14 were mutated in order to induce STOP codons. Using the same in silico predictor, we designed recombinant oligos of 90bp in length to include T7 polymerase promoter sequences as described in the CoSelection mage [4].

Oligonucleotide

Figure 3 | MAGE deoligonucleotides target wild type sequences, and use Okazaki fragments during replication in order to be inserted in the genome by homology and recombination induced by exo, beta and gam.

Screening

LacZ silencing is used as a positive control when performing MAGE cycles due to its easily visible phenotype. Moreover, an improved alternative method for screening fadR mutants was designed. Our fatty acyl-CoA biosensor is dependant on fadR repressor levels, which acts on the pFadBA promoter sequence. We envisioned that transforming our part BBa_K2581006 into MAGE strain EcM2.1 could allow for a efficient screening of fadR knock-outs, since the absence of the regulator on the promoter should lead to the expression of basal levels of RFP (See More).

References

[1] Isabella, V. M., Ha, B. N., Castillo, M. J., Lubkowicz, D. J., Rowe, S. E., Millet, Y. A., ... & Reeder, P. J. (2018). Development of a synthetic live bacterial therapeutic for the human metabolic disease phenylketonuria. Nature biotechnology.

[2] Wang, H. H., Isaacs, F. J., Carr, P. A., Sun, Z. Z., Xu, G., Forest, C. R., & Church, G. M. (2009). Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution. Nature, 460(7257), 894.

[3] Cho, B. K., Knight, E. M., & Palsson, B. Ø. (2006). Transcriptional regulation of the fad regulon genes of Escherichia coli by ArcA. Microbiology, 152(8), 2207-2219.

[4] Wang, H. H., Kim, H., Cong, L., Jeong, J., Bang, D., & Church, G. M. (2012). Genome-scale promoter engineering by coselection MAGE, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1971