Ccastignani (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
− | <p class="page-title">IMPROVED PARTS</p> | + | <p class="page-title">IMPROVED PARTS: Optimizing the dynamic range of the promoter</p> |
<p><b>BBa_K2581011: Improved fatty acid acyl-CoA biosensor with medium RBS</b></p> | <p><b>BBa_K2581011: Improved fatty acid acyl-CoA biosensor with medium RBS</b></p> | ||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/e/ec/T--UPF_CRG_Barcelona--goldenpart32.svg" style="width: 50%;"></center> | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/e/ec/T--UPF_CRG_Barcelona--goldenpart32.svg" style="width: 50%;"></center> | ||
<div class="spacer"></div> | <div class="spacer"></div> | ||
− | <p><b> | + | <p><b>Introduction</b></p> |
− | <p> | + | <p>pFadBA (BBa_K817002) promoter is a natural LCFA biosensor. It is the promoter of the endogenous <i>E. coli</i> fadB and fadA genes and contains FadR binding sequences [1]. FadR is the main transcriptional regulator of the beta oxidation pathway, as it is constitutively repressing the fad genes. The DNA-binding activity of FadR is antagonyzed by intracellular LCFA-AcylCoA, thus, in the presence of intracellular LCFA the promoter is derepressed allowing the expression of the fad genes.</p> |
− | + | <p>Other iGEM teams have previously attempted to use it as a LCFA sensor, such as NTU_Taida 2014 [2]. However, their results showed a very high baseline expression of the reporter proteins coupled to the promoter. This did not allow them to see a significant rise in the signal after induction with LCFA.</p> | |
− | + | <p>Consequently, as pFadBA is a sensor with excessive leakage and a poor dynamic range our team tried to develop a better LFCA biosensor. Zhang et al. 2012 described a synthetic promoter with a higher dynamic range (pAR, BBa_K2581012), which we have characterized for the first time to avoid these levels of basality [3]. In short, this promoter contains an additional FadR binding sequence than the natural one.</p> | |
− | <p>This | + | <p>In order to evaluate the responses of this promoter, we builded a circuit with pAR coupled to fluorescent reporter (BBa_E1010). Top10 bacteria (DH5-alpha) expressing the construct were induced with different concentrations of PA in LB media. Fluorescence and OD600nm was analyzed once it had reached the steady state(13-15h).</p> |
− | + | <p><b>Characterization</b></p> | |
− | + | <p>FOTOOOOO</p> | |
− | + | ||
+ | <p>Our results showed an increased fold change after induction of the pAR promoter with different PA concentrations. Moreover, when compared with figure (x) we see a difference in the fold change induction. Suggesting that our PA dependent promoter responds to PA in a more on/off switch behavior. </p> | ||
+ | <p>Taken together, our results suggest that pAR has a higher dynamic range than pFadBA, being a suitable candidate for a LCFA biosensor.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class=”references>[1]Feng Y, Cronan JE Jr: Crosstalk of Escherichia coli FadR with global regulators in expression of fatty acid transport genes. PLoS One 2012, 7:e46275.</p> | ||
+ | <p class=”references>[2]NTU_Taida 2014 Wiki page. https://2014.igem.org/Team:NTU_Taida </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class=”references>[3] Zhang, F., Carothers, J. M., & Keasling, J. D. (2012). Design of a dynamic sensor-regulator system for production of chemicals and fuels derived from fatty acids. Nature biotechnology, 30(4), 354.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<div class="spacer"></div> | <div class="spacer"></div> | ||
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/5c/T--UPF_CRG_Barcelona--goldenpart34.svg" style="width: 50%;"></center> | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/5c/T--UPF_CRG_Barcelona--goldenpart34.svg" style="width: 50%;"></center> |
Revision as of 15:07, 17 October 2018
IMPROVED PARTS: Optimizing the dynamic range of the promoter
BBa_K2581011: Improved fatty acid acyl-CoA biosensor with medium RBS
The UPF_CRG_Barcelona iGEM team 2018 has create this part as an improved element from the existing fatty acid intracellular promoter pFadBA (BBa_K817002). It act as an intracellular biosensor of fatty acid acyl-coA but in this case the high basality activity of the promoter has been reduced.
This biobrick consists in the assembly of a double terminator which allows forward and reverse terminator (BBa_B0014), our improved promoter based on the previous pFadBA DNA sequence (BBa_K2581013), a weak RBS (BBa_B0032) and a reporter gene, an engineered mutant of red fluorescent protein from Discosoma striata (BBa_E1010).
Introduction
pFadBA (BBa_K817002) promoter is a natural LCFA biosensor. It is the promoter of the endogenous E. coli fadB and fadA genes and contains FadR binding sequences [1]. FadR is the main transcriptional regulator of the beta oxidation pathway, as it is constitutively repressing the fad genes. The DNA-binding activity of FadR is antagonyzed by intracellular LCFA-AcylCoA, thus, in the presence of intracellular LCFA the promoter is derepressed allowing the expression of the fad genes.
Other iGEM teams have previously attempted to use it as a LCFA sensor, such as NTU_Taida 2014 [2]. However, their results showed a very high baseline expression of the reporter proteins coupled to the promoter. This did not allow them to see a significant rise in the signal after induction with LCFA.
Consequently, as pFadBA is a sensor with excessive leakage and a poor dynamic range our team tried to develop a better LFCA biosensor. Zhang et al. 2012 described a synthetic promoter with a higher dynamic range (pAR, BBa_K2581012), which we have characterized for the first time to avoid these levels of basality [3]. In short, this promoter contains an additional FadR binding sequence than the natural one.
In order to evaluate the responses of this promoter, we builded a circuit with pAR coupled to fluorescent reporter (BBa_E1010). Top10 bacteria (DH5-alpha) expressing the construct were induced with different concentrations of PA in LB media. Fluorescence and OD600nm was analyzed once it had reached the steady state(13-15h).
Characterization
FOTOOOOO
Our results showed an increased fold change after induction of the pAR promoter with different PA concentrations. Moreover, when compared with figure (x) we see a difference in the fold change induction. Suggesting that our PA dependent promoter responds to PA in a more on/off switch behavior.
Taken together, our results suggest that pAR has a higher dynamic range than pFadBA, being a suitable candidate for a LCFA biosensor.
[1]Feng Y, Cronan JE Jr: Crosstalk of Escherichia coli FadR with global regulators in expression of fatty acid transport genes. PLoS One 2012, 7:e46275.
[2]NTU_Taida 2014 Wiki page. https://2014.igem.org/Team:NTU_Taida
[3] Zhang, F., Carothers, J. M., & Keasling, J. D. (2012). Design of a dynamic sensor-regulator system for production of chemicals and fuels derived from fatty acids. Nature biotechnology, 30(4), 354.