Ccastignani (Talk | contribs) |
Ccastignani (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
<p class="subapart1">Characterization</p> | <p class="subapart1">Characterization</p> | ||
− | < | + | <div id="results_biosensor6" style="max-width: 70vw;"></div> |
+ | <script> | ||
+ | var pFadBA = { | ||
+ | x: ['LB', 'LB 0.4 mM PA', 'LB 1 mM PA'], | ||
+ | y: [1, 1.131746482, 1.542923974], | ||
+ | name: 'pFadBa', | ||
+ | type: 'bar', | ||
+ | width: .3, | ||
+ | marker: { | ||
+ | color: '#0079bf', | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | }; | ||
+ | |||
+ | var pAR = { | ||
+ | x: ['LB', 'LB 0.4 mM PA', 'LB 1 mM PA'], | ||
+ | y: [1, 2.848309281, 3.19905373], | ||
+ | name: 'pAR', | ||
+ | type: 'bar', | ||
+ | width: .3, | ||
+ | marker: { | ||
+ | color: '#225a7f', | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | }; | ||
+ | |||
+ | var data = [pFadBA, pAR]; | ||
+ | var layout = { | ||
+ | barmode: 'group', | ||
+ | title: "Comparison of Fold Change between pFadBA and pAR", | ||
+ | titlefont: { | ||
+ | family: "PT Sans Bold", | ||
+ | size: 16, | ||
+ | color: "#36393d", | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | xaxis: { | ||
+ | title: "", | ||
+ | titlefont: { | ||
+ | size: 15, | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | autorange: true, | ||
+ | showticklabels: true, | ||
+ | tickfont: { | ||
+ | family: "PT Sans", | ||
+ | size: 12, | ||
+ | color: "#36393d", | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | yaxis: { | ||
+ | zeroline: false, | ||
+ | range: [0.99, 3], | ||
+ | title: "Fold Change (FC/LB)", | ||
+ | titlefont: { | ||
+ | family: "PT Sans", | ||
+ | size: 15, | ||
+ | color: "#36393d", | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | showticklabels: true, | ||
+ | tickfont: { | ||
+ | family: "PT Sans", | ||
+ | size: 12, | ||
+ | color: "#36393d", | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | }; | ||
+ | Plotly.newPlot('results_biosensor6', data, layout, { | ||
+ | displayModeBar: false | ||
+ | }); | ||
+ | </script> | ||
<p>Our results showed an increased fold change after induction of the pAR promoter with different PA concentrations. Moreover, when compared with figure (x) we see a difference in the fold change induction. Suggesting that our PA dependent promoter responds to PA in a more on/off switch behavior. </p> | <p>Our results showed an increased fold change after induction of the pAR promoter with different PA concentrations. Moreover, when compared with figure (x) we see a difference in the fold change induction. Suggesting that our PA dependent promoter responds to PA in a more on/off switch behavior. </p> | ||
<p>Taken together, our results suggest that pAR has a higher dynamic range than pFadBA, being a suitable candidate for a LCFA biosensor.</p> | <p>Taken together, our results suggest that pAR has a higher dynamic range than pFadBA, being a suitable candidate for a LCFA biosensor.</p> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
Line 113: | Line 175: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | <p><b>Reference</b><p> | ||
+ | <p class="references">[1]Feng Y, Cronan JE Jr: Crosstalk of Escherichia coli FadR with global regulators in expression of fatty acid transport genes. PLoS One 2012, 7:e46275.</p> | ||
+ | <p class="references">[2]NTU_Taida 2014 Wiki page. https://2014.igem.org/Team:NTU_Taida </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="references">[3] Zhang, F., Carothers, J. M., & Keasling, J. D. (2012). Design of a dynamic sensor-regulator system for production of chemicals and fuels derived from fatty acids. Nature biotechnology, 30(4), 354.</p> | ||
</section> | </section> | ||
Revision as of 17:15, 17 October 2018
IMPROVED PARTS: Optimizing the dynamic range of the promoter
BBa_K2581011: Improved fatty acid acyl-CoA biosensor with medium RBS
The UPF_CRG_Barcelona iGEM team 2018 has create this part as an improved element from the existing fatty acid intracellular promoter pFadBA (BBa_K817002).
This biobrick consists in the assembly of a double terminator which allows forward and reverse terminator (BBa_B0014), our improved promoter based on the previous pFadBA DNA sequence (BBa_K2581013), a weak RBS (BBa_B0032) and a reporter gene, an engineered mutant of red fluorescent protein from Discosoma striata (BBa_E1010).
Introduction
pFadBA (BBa_K817002) promoter is a natural LCFA biosensor. It is the promoter of the endogenous E. coli fadB and fadA genes and contains FadR binding sequences [1]. FadR is the main transcriptional regulator of the beta oxidation pathway, as it is constitutively repressing the fad genes. The DNA-binding activity of FadR is antagonyzed by intracellular LCFA-AcylCoA, thus, in the presence of intracellular LCFA the promoter is derepressed allowing the expression of the fad genes.
Other iGEM teams have previously attempted to use it as a LCFA sensor, such as NTU_Taida 2014 [2]. However, their results showed a very high baseline expression of the reporter proteins coupled to the promoter. This did not allow them to see a significant rise in the signal after induction with LCFA.
Consequently, as pFadBA is a sensor with excessive leakage and a poor dynamic range our team tried to develop a better LFCA biosensor. Zhang et al. 2012 described a synthetic promoter with a higher dynamic range (pAR, BBa_K2581012), which we have characterized for the first time to avoid these levels of basality [3]. In short, this promoter contains an additional FadR binding sequence than the natural one.
In order to evaluate the responses of this promoter, we builded a circuit with pAR coupled to fluorescent reporter (BBa_E1010). Top10 bacteria (DH5-alpha) expressing the construct were induced with different concentrations of PA in LB media. Fluorescence and OD600nm was analyzed once it had reached the steady state(13-15h).
Characterization
Our results showed an increased fold change after induction of the pAR promoter with different PA concentrations. Moreover, when compared with figure (x) we see a difference in the fold change induction. Suggesting that our PA dependent promoter responds to PA in a more on/off switch behavior.
Taken together, our results suggest that pAR has a higher dynamic range than pFadBA, being a suitable candidate for a LCFA biosensor.
Reference
[1]Feng Y, Cronan JE Jr: Crosstalk of Escherichia coli FadR with global regulators in expression of fatty acid transport genes. PLoS One 2012, 7:e46275.
[2]NTU_Taida 2014 Wiki page. https://2014.igem.org/Team:NTU_Taida
[3] Zhang, F., Carothers, J. M., & Keasling, J. D. (2012). Design of a dynamic sensor-regulator system for production of chemicals and fuels derived from fatty acids. Nature biotechnology, 30(4), 354.