Difference between revisions of "Team:Newcastle/Software"

Line 27: Line 27:
  
 
                 <div class="home-content__buttons">
 
                 <div class="home-content__buttons">
                     <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Newcastle/Software/OT" class="smoothscroll btn btn--stroke">
+
                     <a onclick="location.href='https://2018.igem.org/Team:Newcastle/Software/OT'" class="smoothscroll btn btn--stroke">
 
                         OpenTrons
 
                         OpenTrons
 
                     </a>
 
                     </a>
                     <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Newcastle/Software/NH1" class="smoothscroll btn btn--stroke">
+
                     <a onclick="location.href='https://2018.igem.org/Team:Newcastle/Software/NH1'" class="smoothscroll btn btn--stroke">
 
                         NH-1
 
                         NH-1
 
                     </a>
 
                     </a>

Revision as of 15:34, 17 October 2018

Alternative Roots/Software

Alternative Roots

Software

Overview

A significant proportion of the Alternative Roots project was based on software, whether that was for automation of experiments via the OpenTrons OT-2 or small-scale plant growth via our NH-1. Both systems were carefully programmed by our team for efficiency and reliability.

Newcastle were fortunate to win an OpenTrons OT-2 liquid-handling robot in 2018. The OT-2 is programmed in Python and is equipped with two pipettes capable of pipetting between 1 and 300uL as well as a temperature module, capable of maintaining temperatures between 0-100C. We have created and deposited code that allows OT-2 users to automate small-scale (100 uL) heat-shock transformations of E. coli. The value of this code was demonstrated when it was used to perform a statistical ‘Definitive Screening Design’ screen to examine the impact that transformation buffers have on transformation efficiency. As a result, we identified a new buffer composition with 10-fold improved transformation efficiency. Perhaps more importantly, the combination of the code and the robot resulted in greater reliability than the manual protocol.