Difference between revisions of "Team:Purdue/Medalling"

Line 97: Line 97:
 
<td>1</td>
 
<td>1</td>
 
<td>Integrated Human Practices</td>
 
<td>Integrated Human Practices</td>
<td>IRB approved survey was sent to various types of people by using Amazon Turk. This survey allowed us to determine confusing components and other factors to be improved on the paper-based assay. From there, changes were made like what???</td>
+
<td>IRB approved survey was sent to various types of people by using Amazon Turk. This survey allowed us to determine confusing components and other factors to be improved on the paper-based assay. From there, changes were made to the design to incorporate feedback about concerns. Labels were added to reaction zones. The layers of the assay was labeled. Other things were brainstormed to be included in the device, such as a way to check the "freshness zone" and a small electronic equipment to analyze the results and do a quick numerical comparison. Device steps were limited to what professionals in the field had said was the general requirements for an over the counter diagnostic. </td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>

Revision as of 22:43, 17 October 2018

Bootstrap Example

Medalling

Bronze

Criteria Explanation How Purdue has met the criteria?
1 Registration and Giant Jamboree Attendance Check!
2 Competition Deliverables #1 Wiki
#2 Poster
#3 Presentation
#4 Judging Form
3 Attributions Check out our attributions page!
4 Characterization / Contribution Completed the Interlab Study!

Silver

Criteria Explanation How Purdue has met the criteria?
1 Validated Part / Validated Contribution Sent part HRP Yeast Operon (BBa_K2696003) to iGEM. Characterization can be found here: LINK?
2 Collaboration We mentored a new team, the Northwestern iGEM team. We also sent them a prototype of our paper-based assay to test its durability and its feasibility as a product.
3 Human Practices HELP

Gold

Criteria Explanation How Purdue has met the criteria?
1 Integrated Human Practices IRB approved survey was sent to various types of people by using Amazon Turk. This survey allowed us to determine confusing components and other factors to be improved on the paper-based assay. From there, changes were made to the design to incorporate feedback about concerns. Labels were added to reaction zones. The layers of the assay was labeled. Other things were brainstormed to be included in the device, such as a way to check the "freshness zone" and a small electronic equipment to analyze the results and do a quick numerical comparison. Device steps were limited to what professionals in the field had said was the general requirements for an over the counter diagnostic.
2 Model Your Project HELP