Difference between revisions of "Team:IIT Kanpur/Model"

Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Template:IIT_Kanpur}}
 
{{Template:IIT_Kanpur}}
 
<html>
 
<html>
 
+
<div id="whiteBox" style="width: auto;  padding: 10px; height: auto; margin-left: 0px;
 +
    margin-right: 0px; position: absolute; top: 0px; left: 10%; right: 10%; z-index:-1;">
 
<head>
 
<head>
 
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
 
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
Line 130: Line 131:
 
and the physical realisation of a biological circuit. Being able stimulate and
 
and the physical realisation of a biological circuit. Being able stimulate and
 
understand our system behaviour before actual implementation saves both time
 
understand our system behaviour before actual implementation saves both time
and resources.</span></p>
+
and resources.<br>Through our
 
+
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:16.0pt;line-height:107%'>&nbsp;</span></p>
+
 
+
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:16.0pt;line-height:107%'>&nbsp;</span></p>
+
 
+
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:16.0pt;line-height:107%'>Through our
+
 
modelling we tried to gain insight into our system so that we could improve it
 
modelling we tried to gain insight into our system so that we could improve it
 
and make it realistically achievable.</span></p>
 
and make it realistically achievable.</span></p>
Line 159: Line 154:
 
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:16.0pt;line-height:107%'>&nbsp;</span></p>
 
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:16.0pt;line-height:107%'>&nbsp;</span></p>
  
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:20.0pt;line-height:107%'>Single Cell
+
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:20.0pt;line-height:107%'><b>Single Cell
Modelling</span></p>
+
Modelling</b></span></p>
  
 
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:16.0pt;line-height:107%'><img
 
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:16.0pt;line-height:107%'><img
width=580 height=373 id="Picture 9" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/48/T--IIT_Kanpur--Model_1.jpg"></span></p>
+
width=580 height=373 margin=auto id="Picture 9" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/48/T--IIT_Kanpur--Model_1.jpg"></span></p>
  
 
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:16.0pt;line-height:107%'>Allows to
 
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:16.0pt;line-height:107%'>Allows to

Revision as of 02:27, 18 October 2018

 

 

Modelling

 

Overview

Mathematical modelling is fundamental to synthetic biology, a tool that allows for deeper understanding of biological systems, acting as a link between the conception and the physical realisation of a biological circuit. Being able stimulate and understand our system behaviour before actual implementation saves both time and resources.
Through our modelling we tried to gain insight into our system so that we could improve it and make it realistically achievable.

We tried to describe the whole system with a mathematical system of ODEs which could characterizes the expression and secretion of all enzymes, the associated substrate – enzyme kinetics.

In order to realize the long term goal of developing a detergent biodegradation device for household and commercial use we tried to implement continuous culture modelling on our bioreactor design in order to estimate yearly cost of detergent biodegradation.

 

 

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Single Cell Modelling

Allows to model our gene regulatory network (GRN) and the extracellular secretion of our enzyme alkyl sulfatase (SdsA1).

This model helped us gain insight into our system in order to understand dependence of rate of secretion of alkyl sulfatase in media under varying promoter strengths and secretion efficiencies due to the different secretion extracellular secretion tags PelB and OmpT.

Our model is based on overexpression of alkyl sulfatase under constitutive promoters from Anderson promoter collection in iGEM  registry. The concentration of our enzyme SdsA1 is then predicted using the rates of transcription, translation and degradation (of both mRNA and protein) that are known in literature.

Since under a constitutive gene expression is unregulated, it is always on and its strength could be modelled through the transcription rate constant k1.

 

 

Using the law of mass action

 

 

1.Transcription rate k1 is estimated from literature.

 

2.Translation rate k2 is estimated from the literature

 

3.mRNA degradation (d1) and Protein degradation rate (d2) are known for Ecoli through literature.

 

 

 

 

Since SdsA1 (alkyl sulfatase) a extracellular enzyme, it was essential to understand effect of secretion efficiencies of our enzyme from Ecoli cells, in order to determine concentration of SdsA1 in the media, which would be needed to model our enzyme substrate kinetics in order to understand SDS(Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate ) degradation.

We tried to model our protein secretion using a empirical secretion law used by iGEM Stuttgart 2017 team.

  

https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/3/31/Secretion.png

 

rsecretion : secretion rate

[enzyme] : enzyme concentration

s : secretion efficiency

t : time

 

Here the secretion efficiency is a value between zero and one .

 

 

Since reliable data on expression of SdsA1 and its extracellular expression in Ecoli was not available we concluded that our model could only provide a qualitative understanding various factors on these.

 

 

 

https://scontent-bom1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.15752-9/44185937_2064200740556003_6694159164534423552_n.png?_nc_cat=105&oh=040a1b04709ea79fa27d8959210921b6&oe=5C482425

Fig 1.Simbiology implementation of our Model

https://scontent-bom1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.15752-9/44351672_551274411976028_2657043464260157440_n.png?_nc_cat=102&oh=ebd37b04550aef2d5e8d2f15364d230b&oe=5C50AC06

Fig.2 Effect of secretion efficiency on enzyme production

https://scontent-bom1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.15752-9/44203308_1781628528626872_7513042899114655744_n.png?_nc_cat=111&oh=9400d852e101215b021771e1a18d90f4&oe=5C3F00B1

Fig.3 Effect of promoter strength on enzyme production

 

­­­­­­­­___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Enzyme Kinetics

 

We use the simple Michaelis-Menten formula to describe our enzymes’ kinetics.

      

Here, Vmax represents the maximum velocity achieved by the system, at maximum (saturating) substrate concentrations. KM (the Michaelis constant; sometimes represented as KS instead) is the substrate concentration at which the reaction velocity is 50% of the Vmax. [S] is the concentration of the substrate S.

Our enzyme (E) being SDS, substrate S being SdsA1 and P being our final product 1-Dodecanol.

Here k1 is rate of forward and k-1 being rate of backword reactions and k2 being rate of product formation.

In terms of specific Michaelis-Menten reaction, these constants are quoted in the literature as:

We assumed a average SDS concentration of 5-10 mg/L in domestic wastewater discharges.

 

 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Continuous Culture Modelling

https://scontent-bom1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.15752-9/44236260_489616118186439_8807087846427983872_n.png?_nc_cat=105&oh=12547d5feeea7af7a9a5ca9f30244400&oe=5C52B499

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fig4. Our SDS biodegradation chemostat illustration.

 

In order to understand if our project could be implemented in a real world we decided to check its economic sustainability by trying to estimate the yearly cost of operation of our bioreactor.

To do so we implement a model based on previous model developed by iGEM 2017 Manchester team who were trying to estimate cost of chemostat operation for cleaning Phosphate in wastewater.

The growth of bacteria in its exponential phase can be represented in the following exponential growth equation:

where:
x is the bacteria concentration (dry weight mass/unit volume) at time t
μ is the specific growth rate
td is the doubling time (time required for the concentration of organism to double)

Monod showed that there is a relationship between the specific growth rate and the concentration of a limiting growth substrate that can be represented in this equation:

                             

where:

s the concentration of a limiting growth substrate
μmax is the maximum growth rate (growth rate when organism is placed in excess nutrients without any limiting factors)

Ks is the saturation constant – the value of s when:                                                            

 

 

 

Bacterial  growth and utilization of substrate is depicted by the Monod by the equation:

where Y is known as the yield constant.

Here

 

In the chemostat fresh growth medium is added into the vessel at a steady flow-rate (F) and culture liquid exits at the same rate and the growth medium is uniformly dispersed. The rate of nutrient is exchange is given by the dilution rate (D):

Assuming every organism will have an equal probability of leaving the vessel within a given time. The wash-out rate (rate in which organism initially present in the vessel will be washed out) can be expressed as:

where x is the concentration of organisms in the vessel

 

 

1. Changes in concentration of organism

In a continuous culture, combining growth (1) and washout rate (5) we have the net rate of increase is therefore:

 

 

2. Changes in substrate concentration

Assuming  substrate enters the vessel at a concentration Sin, consumed by the bacterial cell in the vessel and then exits the vessel at concentration Sout. The net rate of change is therefore:

 

 

 

When dx/dt and ds/dt is 0, the system is said to be in a ‘steady state’ because the concentration of organism and substrate within the continuous culture is kept constant. The values of steady state x and s, designated as x~ and s~ are expressed as:

 

So the two parameters D and Sin control the steady state within the chemostat. Since we have been also using E.coli for SDS degradation we use values constants of (growth constant ) μmax, Ks and Y same as used by team iGEM Manchester 2017.

 

We use values of these constants as referenced here by iGEM Manchester 2017.

 

 

Finally output is modelled through the equation:

So there two design parameters in our bioreactor design model required for consideration. D (dilution rate) and Sin (initial substrate concentration)

 

Cost Estimation

In order to achieve economically viable bioreactor we need to use a cheap easily available source of growth medium like molasses.

-Molasses cost $0.07/kg

-The density of molasses is roughly 1.4 kg/L

-Therefore, 1 L of molasses will cost $0.07 x 1.4 = $0.098

 

 

1-Dodecanol manufactured by conventional methods usually is contaminated by long carbon chain compounds, hence are associated with expensive purification costs. The low downstream processing costs of our final product 1-dodecanol obtained from bacterial degradation of SDS may help us cut down our costs, hence this could lead to development of economically viable product.

 

So based our model we get the necessary cost for production of 1 kg of E.coli that would be needed for SDS degradation.

Also market price of detergent grade SDS is about Rs 160/kg = $2.18

 And price of of 1-dodecanol (98%) is about Rs 9070/kg =123.3

 

Based on these rough estimate of prices we can estimate our yearly cost of operation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

References:

1.Towards the Identification of Type II Secretion Signals in a Nonacylated Variant of Pullulanase from Klebsiella oxytoca (2005), Olivera Francetić and Anthony P. Pugsley.

2.http://www.bg.ic.ac.uk/research/g.stan/2010_Course_MiB_article.pdf, Accessed 04/08/2017.

3.Commercial Laundry Water CharacterisationJ. K. Braga*, M. B. A. Varesche

Department of Hydraulics and Sanitation, Engineering School of São Carlos, São Paulo University,

São Carlos, Brazil

4.Guy-Bart Stan. Modelling in Biology. Lecture notes, 2017.

5.https://math.la.asu.edu/~halsmith/bacteriagrow.pdf