Difference between revisions of "Team:Uppsala/Public Engagement"

Line 254: Line 254:
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 +
</p>
 +
  
From this session both the participants and audience developed new insight into synthetic biology and thus iGEM could decrease further misinterpretation about subjects, such as GMO, that are common among citizens who have none or too little education about it. The interface between humans and different technologies, both silica- and of organic based were also discussed together with its entailing ethical discussions. The scenario was encaptivating enough and involving so many of the people present in the audience that it was hard to push for a break mid-section. Its safe to say both then and in retrospect that people found there time worth spent attending the symposium that day. </p>
 
                       
 
 
                             <br>
 
                             <br>
  
Line 269: Line 269:
  
  
 
+
<p> From this session both the participants and audience developed new insight into synthetic biology and thus iGEM could decrease further misinterpretation about subjects, such as GMO, that are common among citizens who have none or too little education about it. The interface between humans and different technologies, both silica- and of organic based were also discussed together with its entailing ethical discussions. The scenario was encaptivating enough and involving so many of the people present in the audience that it was hard to push for a break mid-section. Its safe to say both then and in retrospect that people found there time worth spent attending the symposium that day. </p>
 +
                       
  
  
Line 358: Line 359:
 
                             <!-- Here you put your paragraphs -->  
 
                             <!-- Here you put your paragraphs -->  
 
<h2> The Student Conference in Science and Technology 2018 </h2>
 
<h2> The Student Conference in Science and Technology 2018 </h2>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 
                             <p>This conference is an annual event at Uppsala University that besides being a place for science enthusiasts to connect simultaneously, fulfills the purpose of communications training at the faculty of science and technology. Students are given an opportunity to give a presentation on a scientific subject in front of a larger audience and receive feedback on rhetorics. The challenge of this talk was adapting it to the diverse audience - students from different disciplines in different stages of their education. However, the public was bewildered by Wormbuster story. Special interest went to phage-display methodology as by coincidence announcement of this years Nobel prize winners in chemistry came the same morning and was pricing the development of the method. </p>
 
                             <p>This conference is an annual event at Uppsala University that besides being a place for science enthusiasts to connect simultaneously, fulfills the purpose of communications training at the faculty of science and technology. Students are given an opportunity to give a presentation on a scientific subject in front of a larger audience and receive feedback on rhetorics. The challenge of this talk was adapting it to the diverse audience - students from different disciplines in different stages of their education. However, the public was bewildered by Wormbuster story. Special interest went to phage-display methodology as by coincidence announcement of this years Nobel prize winners in chemistry came the same morning and was pricing the development of the method. </p>
 
                             <br>
 
                             <br>

Revision as of 13:50, 15 October 2018