Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
{{Tuebingen/ContentEnd}} | {{Tuebingen/ContentEnd}} | ||
{{Tuebingen/SideNavigationStart|initial=R}} | {{Tuebingen/SideNavigationStart|initial=R}} | ||
− | {{Tuebingen/SideNavigationEntry|id= | + | {{Tuebingen/SideNavigationEntry|id=Chemestry|title=Chemestry}} |
{{Tuebingen/SideNavigationEntry|id=Bioinformatics|title=Bioinformatics}} | {{Tuebingen/SideNavigationEntry|id=Bioinformatics|title=Bioinformatics}} | ||
{{Tuebingen/SideNavigationEnd}} | {{Tuebingen/SideNavigationEnd}} | ||
{{Tuebingen/DefaultPageEnd}} | {{Tuebingen/DefaultPageEnd}} |
Revision as of 15:05, 15 October 2018
Results
Success isn't about the end result, it's about what you learn along the way.- Vera Wang
![Placeholder](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/09/T--Tuebingen--Placeholder.jpg)
Chemestry
The Synthesis was not completed. The second step did not work, more correct no reaction took place. We thought that changing the conditions of the reaction could lead to a positive outcome.
Another way to improve the results could be a new approach as whole. Because of the alken as by-product, the yield was alway very small. If one did choose the alken as product, targeting it with an S-Nucleophilic, the yield could be improved.
The drying of the Azid-Donor is also critical, as the donor decomposes in vacuo and under heat. As it’s a non-explosive and air-stable salt, maybe drying it in a desiccator could be a solution. Nonetheless, the Donor is instabel as long it’s not completely dry and must be handled with care.
Bioinformatics