Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
Line 100: | Line 98: | ||
.demoslideshow:hover { | .demoslideshow:hover { | ||
opacity: 1; | opacity: 1; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | .fig1_right { | ||
+ | float: right; | ||
+ | width: 60%; | ||
+ | height: auto; | ||
+ | padding: 5px; | ||
+ | padding-bottom: 20 px; | ||
+ | margin-top: -20px; | ||
} | } | ||
− | + | .fig2_right { | |
− | . | + | float: right; |
+ | width: 60%; | ||
+ | height: auto; | ||
+ | padding: 20px; | ||
+ | padding-bottom: 10 px; | ||
+ | margin-top: -10px; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | .fig3_right { | ||
float: right; | float: right; | ||
width: 50%; | width: 50%; | ||
height: auto; | height: auto; | ||
− | padding: | + | padding: 80px; |
− | padding-bottom: | + | padding-bottom: 20 px; |
− | margin-top: - | + | margin-top: -20px; |
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | .fig4_right { | ||
+ | float: right; | ||
+ | width: 60%; | ||
+ | height: auto; | ||
+ | padding: 20px; | ||
+ | padding-bottom: 20 px; | ||
+ | margin-top: -20px; | ||
} | } | ||
Line 162: | Line 186: | ||
<div class="col-lg-8 col-md-8 col-sm-12 col-xs-12 nowbg" style="margin-right:20px;"> | <div class="col-lg-8 col-md-8 col-sm-12 col-xs-12 nowbg" style="margin-right:20px;"> | ||
− | <h1 class="jnnbl"> | + | <h1 class="jnnbl">Introduction</h1> |
− | + | ||
<p>Synthetic biology is currently one of the most rapidly developing fields in science. Recent advancements, particularly in genetic engineering, allow us to tackle major societal challenges. Gene engineering is even being applied to humans, with the use of gene therapy. Gene therapy is an experimental technique that uses genes to treat or prevent among others severe genetic disorders. However, major concerns are raised about the misuse of gene editing techniques, particularly for human enhancement. Gene doping, the misuse of gene therapy to enhance athletes’ performances, is one example. Thus to promote responsible use of synthetic biology and to help eliminate gene doping from sport, we developed a complete gene doping detection method: ADOPE, the Advanced Detection of Performance Enhancement. </p> | <p>Synthetic biology is currently one of the most rapidly developing fields in science. Recent advancements, particularly in genetic engineering, allow us to tackle major societal challenges. Gene engineering is even being applied to humans, with the use of gene therapy. Gene therapy is an experimental technique that uses genes to treat or prevent among others severe genetic disorders. However, major concerns are raised about the misuse of gene editing techniques, particularly for human enhancement. Gene doping, the misuse of gene therapy to enhance athletes’ performances, is one example. Thus to promote responsible use of synthetic biology and to help eliminate gene doping from sport, we developed a complete gene doping detection method: ADOPE, the Advanced Detection of Performance Enhancement. </p> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | < | + | <figure><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/4d/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure1_DescriptionPage.png" class="fig1_right" alt="Picture of Timeline of the relevance of gene doping"><figcaption class="jnnbl">Figure 1. The fusion protein consisting of Tn5 transposase and dxCas9. </figcaption></figure> |
+ | |||
+ | |||
<p>ADOPE is based on targeted Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), reducing the amount of data generated with NGS and effectively identifying gene doping DNA. We accomplished this by creating an innovative fusion protein used in rapid library preparation required for sequencing. Our fusion protein consists of a cleavage deficient nuclease specific dxCas9 and a Tn5 transposase. The dxCas9 part loaded with a single guide RNA (sgRNA) will interact with the specific target DNA sequence via complementary matching between sgRNA and target DNA. Whereas the Tn5 part will integrate two small DNA molecules (adapters) required for nanopore sequencing. Thus, the fusion protein is capable of performing dxCas9 guided adapter ligation for targeted sequencing library preparation, allowing us to identify gene doping in blood samples with our method ADOPE. | <p>ADOPE is based on targeted Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), reducing the amount of data generated with NGS and effectively identifying gene doping DNA. We accomplished this by creating an innovative fusion protein used in rapid library preparation required for sequencing. Our fusion protein consists of a cleavage deficient nuclease specific dxCas9 and a Tn5 transposase. The dxCas9 part loaded with a single guide RNA (sgRNA) will interact with the specific target DNA sequence via complementary matching between sgRNA and target DNA. Whereas the Tn5 part will integrate two small DNA molecules (adapters) required for nanopore sequencing. Thus, the fusion protein is capable of performing dxCas9 guided adapter ligation for targeted sequencing library preparation, allowing us to identify gene doping in blood samples with our method ADOPE. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 174: | Line 200: | ||
<p>We designed ADOPE to detect gene doping in blood samples by targeting the most striking difference between the natural and gene doping DNA, namely the exon-exon junctions that only exist in doping DNA (<a class="jnnbl" href="#References">Beiter <i>et al</i>., 2011</a>). ADOPE consists of 4 main steps: sample preparation, prescreening, library preparation, and sequencing.</p> | <p>We designed ADOPE to detect gene doping in blood samples by targeting the most striking difference between the natural and gene doping DNA, namely the exon-exon junctions that only exist in doping DNA (<a class="jnnbl" href="#References">Beiter <i>et al</i>., 2011</a>). ADOPE consists of 4 main steps: sample preparation, prescreening, library preparation, and sequencing.</p> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/37/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure3_DescriptionPage.png" class="img-responsive" alt="Picture of Timeline of the relevance of gene doping"></center> | + | |
+ | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/37/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure3_DescriptionPage.png" class="img-responsive" style="width: 1000px" alt="Picture of Timeline of the relevance of gene doping"></center> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | <figcapture class="jnnbl">Figure 3. A flow diagram of our detection method ADOPE. With the four steps sample preparation, prescreening, library preparation and sequencing. </figcapture> | + | |
+ | <center><figcapture class="jnnbl">Figure 3. A flow diagram of our detection method ADOPE. With the four steps sample preparation, prescreening, library preparation and sequencing. </figcapture></center> | ||
+ | |||
<div class="spcmkr" ></div> | <div class="spcmkr" ></div> | ||
<div class="spcmkr" id="ourMethod1"></div> | <div class="spcmkr" id="ourMethod1"></div> | ||
<h1 class="jnnbl">1. Sample preparation</h1> | <h1 class="jnnbl">1. Sample preparation</h1> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/9/99/T--TUDelft--Doping_DNA_in_Blood.png" class="fig2_right" alt="Picture of Timeline of the relevance of gene doping"></center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
<p>Blood samples are commonly taken from athletes during regular doping tests. We used these blood samples to extract DNA from serum or the buffycoat (serum and white blood cells) required for testing (<a class="jnnbl" href="#References">Ni <i>et al</i>., 2011</a>). We built an extensive gene doping kinetics model to predict the amount of gene doping fragments in blood over time based an input concentration of gene doping vectors and an injection frequency. We used this model to determine the appropriate time window for gene doping testing based on the measured sensitivity of DNA extraction.</p> | <p>Blood samples are commonly taken from athletes during regular doping tests. We used these blood samples to extract DNA from serum or the buffycoat (serum and white blood cells) required for testing (<a class="jnnbl" href="#References">Ni <i>et al</i>., 2011</a>). We built an extensive gene doping kinetics model to predict the amount of gene doping fragments in blood over time based an input concentration of gene doping vectors and an injection frequency. We used this model to determine the appropriate time window for gene doping testing based on the measured sensitivity of DNA extraction.</p> | ||
− | + | <br> | |
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
<figcapture class="jnnbl">Figure 4. Concentration of doping DNA in the blood over time after a single intramuscular injection of 141 billion viral vectors. The detection limit of 1000 copies per mL of blood is estimated based on the loss of DNA that occurs during sample preparation and targeted sequencing preparation. </figcapture> | <figcapture class="jnnbl">Figure 4. Concentration of doping DNA in the blood over time after a single intramuscular injection of 141 billion viral vectors. The detection limit of 1000 copies per mL of blood is estimated based on the loss of DNA that occurs during sample preparation and targeted sequencing preparation. </figcapture> | ||
<div class="spcmkr" ></div> | <div class="spcmkr" ></div> | ||
Line 187: | Line 224: | ||
<h1 class="jnnbl">2. Prescreening</h1> | <h1 class="jnnbl">2. Prescreening</h1> | ||
− | + | <figure><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/fd/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure5_DescriptionPage.png" class="fig3_right" alt="Picture of Timeline of the relevance of gene doping"> | |
− | + | <div class="spcmkr" ></div> | |
<p>We incorporated a prescreening step in our method based on the advice of Dr. Oliver de Hon of the Dutch Doping Authorities. He emphasised the importance of a high throughput assay that could screen thousands of athletes simultaneously. Therefore, we developed a colorimetric assay based on the extent of gold nanoparticle aggregation (<a class="jnnbl" href="#References">Baetsen-Young <i>et al</i>., 2018</a>). When target doping DNA is absent, the nanoparticle completely aggregates, resulting in a purple color. When target doping DNA is present, it forms a secondary structure with a targeting DNA probe, which stabilizes the nanoparticle from aggregating, resulting in a red color. </p> | <p>We incorporated a prescreening step in our method based on the advice of Dr. Oliver de Hon of the Dutch Doping Authorities. He emphasised the importance of a high throughput assay that could screen thousands of athletes simultaneously. Therefore, we developed a colorimetric assay based on the extent of gold nanoparticle aggregation (<a class="jnnbl" href="#References">Baetsen-Young <i>et al</i>., 2018</a>). When target doping DNA is absent, the nanoparticle completely aggregates, resulting in a purple color. When target doping DNA is present, it forms a secondary structure with a targeting DNA probe, which stabilizes the nanoparticle from aggregating, resulting in a red color. </p> | ||
+ | <figcapture class="jnnbl" >Figure 5. Colorimetric gold nanoparticle assay. Positive samples result in a red color, whereas negative samples result in a purple color. </figcapture> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
<div class="spcmkr" ></div> | <div class="spcmkr" ></div> | ||
− | |||
<div class="spcmkr" id="ourMethod3"></div> | <div class="spcmkr" id="ourMethod3"></div> | ||
<h1 class="jnnbl">3.Targeted library preparation</h1> | <h1 class="jnnbl">3.Targeted library preparation</h1> | ||
Line 200: | Line 235: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/bc/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure7A_DescriptionPage.png" class=" | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/bc/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure7A_DescriptionPage.png" class="fig4_right" |
alt="Picture of Timeline of the relevance of gene doping"></center> | alt="Picture of Timeline of the relevance of gene doping"></center> | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
<p> Further, we implemented multiplexing with barcodes to improve method efficiency, reduce cost, and expand the throughput. We created a barcoding webtool to generate unique barcodes, which are integrated into the adapter sequences that are ligated to the target sequence. This allows us to sequence samples from multiple different athletes in the same run and trace the output sequence back to corresponding barcode (<a class="jnnbl" href="#References">Bayliss <i>et al</i>., 2017</a>). | <p> Further, we implemented multiplexing with barcodes to improve method efficiency, reduce cost, and expand the throughput. We created a barcoding webtool to generate unique barcodes, which are integrated into the adapter sequences that are ligated to the target sequence. This allows us to sequence samples from multiple different athletes in the same run and trace the output sequence back to corresponding barcode (<a class="jnnbl" href="#References">Bayliss <i>et al</i>., 2017</a>). | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | <figcapture class="jnnbl">Figure 6. Targeted integration by our fusion protein. The sgRNA loaded dxCas9 binds to the target DNA via complementary matching. The transposase integrates sequencing adapters next to the target site.</figcapture> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="spcmkr" ></div> | ||
<div class="spcmkr" id="ourMethod4"></div> | <div class="spcmkr" id="ourMethod4"></div> | ||
<h1 class="jnnbl">4. Targeted sequencing</h1> | <h1 class="jnnbl">4. Targeted sequencing</h1> | ||
Line 214: | Line 251: | ||
<!--I think this is for a slide show (Lisbeth can you confirm I'm not changing anything)--> | <!--I think this is for a slide show (Lisbeth can you confirm I'm not changing anything)--> | ||
+ | |||
<div class="containerslideshow"> | <div class="containerslideshow"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="mySlidesslideshow"> | ||
+ | <div class="numbertextslideshowjnnbl">1 / 5</div> | ||
+ | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/4d/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure1_DescriptionPage.png" style="width:100%"></center> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
<div class="mySlidesslideshow"> | <div class="mySlidesslideshow"> | ||
− | <div class="numbertextslideshowjnnbl"> | + | <div class="numbertextslideshowjnnbl">2 / 5</div> |
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/bc/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure7A_DescriptionPage.png" style="width:100%"></center> | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/bc/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure7A_DescriptionPage.png" style="width:100%"></center> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="mySlidesslideshow"> | <div class="mySlidesslideshow"> | ||
− | <div class="numbertextslideshowjnnbl"> | + | <div class="numbertextslideshowjnnbl">3 / 5</div> |
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/55/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure7B_DescriptionPage.png" style="width:100%"></center> | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/55/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure7B_DescriptionPage.png" style="width:100%"></center> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="mySlidesslideshow"> | <div class="mySlidesslideshow"> | ||
− | <div class="numbertextslideshowjnnbl"> | + | <div class="numbertextslideshowjnnbl">4 / 5</div> |
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/4c/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure7C_DescriptionPage.png" style="width:100%"></center> | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/4c/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure7C_DescriptionPage.png" style="width:100%"></center> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="mySlidesslideshow"> | <div class="mySlidesslideshow"> | ||
− | <div class="numbertextslideshowjnnbl"> | + | <div class="numbertextslideshowjnnbl">5 / 5</div> |
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/7c/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure7D_DescriptionPage.png" style="width:100%"></center> | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/7c/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure7D_DescriptionPage.png" style="width:100%"></center> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 243: | Line 287: | ||
<div class="rowslideshow"> | <div class="rowslideshow"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="columnslideshow"> | ||
+ | <img class="demoslideshow cursorslideshow" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/4d/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure1_DescriptionPage.png" style="width:100%" onclick="currentSlide(1)" alt="Step 1: The fusion protein consisting of Tn5 transposase and dxCas9."> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
<div class="columnslideshow"> | <div class="columnslideshow"> | ||
− | <img class="demoslideshow cursorslideshow" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/bc/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure7A_DescriptionPage.png" style="width:100%" onclick="currentSlide(1)" alt="Step | + | <img class="demoslideshow cursorslideshow" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/bc/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure7A_DescriptionPage.png" style="width:100%" onclick="currentSlide(1)" alt="Step 2: The fusion protein scans the DNA and bind to a specific DNA sequence via complementary matching between sgRNA and target DNA."> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="columnslideshow"> | <div class="columnslideshow"> | ||
− | <img class="demoslideshow cursorslideshow" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/55/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure7B_DescriptionPage.png" style="width:100%" onclick="currentSlide(2)" alt="Step | + | <img class="demoslideshow cursorslideshow" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/55/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure7B_DescriptionPage.png" style="width:100%" onclick="currentSlide(2)" alt="Step 3: The fusion protein will integrate two small DNA molecules (adapters) required for Nanopore sequencing"> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="columnslideshow"> | <div class="columnslideshow"> | ||
− | <img class="demoslideshow cursorslideshow" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/4c/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure7C_DescriptionPage.png" style="width:100%" onclick="currentSlide(3)" alt="Step | + | <img class="demoslideshow cursorslideshow" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/4c/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure7C_DescriptionPage.png" style="width:100%" onclick="currentSlide(3)" alt="Step 4: A motor protein binds to the integrated adapter sequences"> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="columnslideshow"> | <div class="columnslideshow"> | ||
− | <img class="demoslideshow cursorslideshow" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/7c/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure7D_DescriptionPage.png" style="width:100%" onclick="currentSlide(4)" alt="Step | + | <img class="demoslideshow cursorslideshow" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/7c/T--TUDelft--2018_Figure7D_DescriptionPage.png" style="width:100%" onclick="currentSlide(4)" alt="Step 5: The motor protein guides the adapter tagged DNA through the nanopore and only targeted DNA is sequenced"> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 275: | Line 326: | ||
<div class="spcmkr" ></div> | <div class="spcmkr" ></div> | ||
+ | <div class="spcmkr" id="References"></div> | ||
+ | <h1 class="jnnbl">References</h1> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | <ol class="jnnbl" type="1"> | ||
+ | <li><a class="jnnbl" target="_blank"> Baetsen-Young, A.M., Vasher M., Matta L.L., Colgan P., Alocilja E. C., Day B. Direct Colorimetric Detection of Unamplified Pathogen DNA by Dextrin-capped Gold Nanoparticles. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 101 (2018): 29-36. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2017.10.011.</a></li> | ||
+ | <li><a class="jnnbl" target="_blank"> Bayliss, S. C., Hunt, V. L., Yokoyama, M., Thorpe, H. A., Feil, E. J. (2017). The use of Oxford Nanopore native barcoding for complete genome assembly. GigaScience, 6(3), 1–6. http://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/gix001</a></li> | ||
+ | <li><a class="jnnbl" target="_blank"> Beiter T, Zimmermann M, Fragasso A, Hudemann J, Niess AM, et al. Direct and long-term detection of gene doping in conventional blood samples. Gene Therapy. 2011, 18: 225–231.</a></li> | ||
+ | <li><a class="jnnbl" target="_blank"> Cong L.,, Ran F. A., Cox D., Lin S., Barretto R., Habib, N., Hsu P.D., Wu X., Jiang W, Marraffini L.A., Zhang F. Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems. SCIENCE. 15 FEB 2013 : 819-823</a></li> | ||
+ | <li><a class="jnnbl" target="_blank"> Ni W., Le Guiner C., Gernoux G., Penaud-Budloo M., Moullier P., Snyder R.O. Longevity of rAAV vector and plasmid DNA in blood after intramuscular injection in nonhuman primates: implications for gene doping. Gene Therapy. 2011, 18, 709–718. doi: 10.1038/gt.2011.19</a></li> | ||
+ | </ol></p> | ||
+ | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="col-lg-1 col-md-1 hidden-xs hidden-sm" nowbg> </div> | <div class="col-lg-1 col-md-1 hidden-xs hidden-sm" nowbg> </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | + | </div> | |
Line 323: | Line 385: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<!-- BETWEEN THESE TWO COMMENTS --> | <!-- BETWEEN THESE TWO COMMENTS --> |
Revision as of 17:01, 16 October 2018
Introduction
Synthetic biology is currently one of the most rapidly developing fields in science. Recent advancements, particularly in genetic engineering, allow us to tackle major societal challenges. Gene engineering is even being applied to humans, with the use of gene therapy. Gene therapy is an experimental technique that uses genes to treat or prevent among others severe genetic disorders. However, major concerns are raised about the misuse of gene editing techniques, particularly for human enhancement. Gene doping, the misuse of gene therapy to enhance athletes’ performances, is one example. Thus to promote responsible use of synthetic biology and to help eliminate gene doping from sport, we developed a complete gene doping detection method: ADOPE, the Advanced Detection of Performance Enhancement.
ADOPE is based on targeted Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), reducing the amount of data generated with NGS and effectively identifying gene doping DNA. We accomplished this by creating an innovative fusion protein used in rapid library preparation required for sequencing. Our fusion protein consists of a cleavage deficient nuclease specific dxCas9 and a Tn5 transposase. The dxCas9 part loaded with a single guide RNA (sgRNA) will interact with the specific target DNA sequence via complementary matching between sgRNA and target DNA. Whereas the Tn5 part will integrate two small DNA molecules (adapters) required for nanopore sequencing. Thus, the fusion protein is capable of performing dxCas9 guided adapter ligation for targeted sequencing library preparation, allowing us to identify gene doping in blood samples with our method ADOPE.
ADOPE
We designed ADOPE to detect gene doping in blood samples by targeting the most striking difference between the natural and gene doping DNA, namely the exon-exon junctions that only exist in doping DNA (Beiter et al., 2011). ADOPE consists of 4 main steps: sample preparation, prescreening, library preparation, and sequencing.
1. Sample preparation
Blood samples are commonly taken from athletes during regular doping tests. We used these blood samples to extract DNA from serum or the buffycoat (serum and white blood cells) required for testing (Ni et al., 2011). We built an extensive gene doping kinetics model to predict the amount of gene doping fragments in blood over time based an input concentration of gene doping vectors and an injection frequency. We used this model to determine the appropriate time window for gene doping testing based on the measured sensitivity of DNA extraction.