Difference between revisions of "Team:Nottingham/Collaborations"
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
We sent 8 samples of our promoters, including a negative control, with the same 3 day protocol we followed for our GFP assay. Please find a link to the protocol below. | We sent 8 samples of our promoters, including a negative control, with the same 3 day protocol we followed for our GFP assay. Please find a link to the protocol below. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/3d/T--Nottingham--imperial_graph.png"> | + | <img style="max-width:350px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/3d/T--Nottingham--imperial_graph.png"> |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/08/T--Nottingham--warwick_graph.png"> | + | <img style="max-width:350px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/08/T--Nottingham--warwick_graph.png"> |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/44/T--Nottingham--nottingham_graph.png"> | + | <img style="max-width:350px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/44/T--Nottingham--nottingham_graph.png"> |
<p> | <p> | ||
The data we acquired through this collaboration emphasises the importance of the standardised approach that iGEM promotes through their inter lab study, as both teams used the same standardised method as us and all achieved similar results. This increases our confidence in our data, and reassures us of our decision to use P<sub>Cac_thl</sub> in our constructs. | The data we acquired through this collaboration emphasises the importance of the standardised approach that iGEM promotes through their inter lab study, as both teams used the same standardised method as us and all achieved similar results. This increases our confidence in our data, and reassures us of our decision to use P<sub>Cac_thl</sub> in our constructs. | ||
Revision as of 18:31, 16 October 2018
The University of Warwick
We sent the University of Warwick water samples from our local river- the River Trent. These samples were then tested in their fluorometer and they return the data to our team. This was a very meaningful collaboration, as it gave their team a wider range of results to analyse in their attempts to improve water safety using their flurometer. By having a wider range of data, the team were able to have more confidence in their device and final conclusions. This data can be accessed via this link.
Team BioMarvel- Korea
Our team offered our grammar checking services, as native English speakers to Team BioMarvel for their wiki. We collaborated intensely over the summer months, reviewing their team’s drafts and sending redrafts of their wiki submissions. We edited their drafts over and over until the grammar was perfect! This was an incredibly meaningful collaboration, as it ensured their team had an outstanding wiki, with accurate grammar. This ensured that regardless of English not being their first language, their efforts in iGEM could still be fully recognised and understood with a grammatically correct wiki.
The University of Warwick and Imperial College London
We sent 8 samples of our promoters, including a negative control, with the same 3 day protocol we followed for our GFP assay. Please find a link to the protocol below.
The data we acquired through this collaboration emphasises the importance of the standardised approach that iGEM promotes through their inter lab study, as both teams used the same standardised method as us and all achieved similar results. This increases our confidence in our data, and reassures us of our decision to use PCac_thl in our constructs.
