Difference between revisions of "Team:NUS Singapore-Sci/Dual Reporter"

Line 28: Line 28:
  
 
On the other hand, HEK293 cells transfected with EGFP-T2A-mCherry-ACG mutant showed red fluorescence expression, with very low or undetectable green fluorescent protein levels as visualised via microscopy (Figure 2). Our experiment showed that the mutation of the start codon in EGFP is indeed effective in abolishing  the expression of EGFP without affecting the expression of the mCherry protein. Compared to the cells transfected with WT reporter, the percentage of EGFP+/mCherry+ positive cells in cells transfected with the EGFP-T2A-mCherry-ACG mutant is almost undetectable  (Figure 3). In addition, the mean fluorescence intensity for mCherry in cells transfected with EGFP-T2A-mCherry-WT and cells transfected with EGFP-T2A-mCherry-ACG mutant are similar, while there is significant reduction in EGFP expression between the two groups of cells.
 
On the other hand, HEK293 cells transfected with EGFP-T2A-mCherry-ACG mutant showed red fluorescence expression, with very low or undetectable green fluorescent protein levels as visualised via microscopy (Figure 2). Our experiment showed that the mutation of the start codon in EGFP is indeed effective in abolishing  the expression of EGFP without affecting the expression of the mCherry protein. Compared to the cells transfected with WT reporter, the percentage of EGFP+/mCherry+ positive cells in cells transfected with the EGFP-T2A-mCherry-ACG mutant is almost undetectable  (Figure 3). In addition, the mean fluorescence intensity for mCherry in cells transfected with EGFP-T2A-mCherry-WT and cells transfected with EGFP-T2A-mCherry-ACG mutant are similar, while there is significant reduction in EGFP expression between the two groups of cells.
 +
</div>
 +
 +
<figure class="center">
 +
  <caption style="font-size:13px;"><i><strong>Figure 1. Representative fluorescent images of ACG mutant reporter (ACG) wild type reporter (WT) transfected in HEK293T cells.</strong> Images taken at 60X magnification, scale bar = 50um. </i></caption>
 +
  <img src="" style="height:80%; width:80%;">
 +
</figure>
 +
 +
<figure class="center">
 +
  <caption style="font-size:13px;"><i><strong>Figure 2. Representative fluorescent images of ACG mutant reporter (ACG) wild type reporter (WT) transfected in HEK293T cells.</strong> Images taken at 10X magnification, scale bar = 400um.</i></caption>
 +
  <img src="" style="height:80%; width:80%;">
 +
</figure>
 +
 +
<figure class="center">
 +
  <caption style="font-size:13px;"><i><strong>Figure 3. Flow cytometry analysis of EGFP and mCherry expression on wild type (WT) and ACG mutant (ACG) reporters transfected in HEK293T cells.</strong> (A) Strong correlation between expression level of EGFP and mCherry. (B) No leaky expression of EGFP in mutant ACG reporter. (C) Percentage of EGFP mCherry double positive cells. (D): Quantification on mean fluorescent intensity. Error bar represents SEM, n=3. </i></caption>
 +
  <img src="" style="height:80%; width:80%;">
 +
</figure>
 +
 +
<div class="numberedsection">
 +
The EGFP-T2A-mCherry bicistronic reporter is a significant improvement over the reporter system from a previous iGEM team.
 +
</div>
 +
 +
<div class="text">
 +
 +
An important feature of a reliable reporter system is to have an internal control signal such that the reporter signal can be normalized to account for stochastic processes in cells. Expression of both EGFP and mCherry reporter on separate plasmids may lead to uneven gene expression due to stochastic processes. hus, it is more advantageous to have both EGFP and mCherry on the same plasmid. Therefore, we designed our reporter system with this intention in mind. We then carried out experiments to compare our reporter system with the reporter system described by the <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:WPI_Worcester" style="font-weight:normal;text-decoration:none;">Worcester 2016 team</a>. We evaluated the system in terms of background noise, as well as the reliability of the internal control. <br><br>
 +
 +
We performed double transfection of the mCherry plasmid with either ATG EGFP (BBa_K2083009)http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2083009 or ACG EGFP (BBa_K2083010) http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2083010 plasmid in HEK293T cells. As shown in Figure 4, WPI reporters showed the expected OFF to ON change from ACG mutant to ATG. However, the fluorescence intensity of EGFP and mCherry does not correlate well with one another, and there were some leaky expression of EGFP even in the mutant form (Figure 5A). Moreover, 2.3% of the cells are double positive for EGFP in cells expressing the WPI ACG mutant reporter (Figure 5B & 5C), which is higher than our ACG bicistronic reporter construct (Figure 3B). <br><br>
 +
 +
On the other hand, our bicistronic reporter construct showed a strong linear correlation between EGFP and mCherry fluorescence intensity in WT reporter (Figure 2A), and the number of cells positive for EGFP in our ACG mutant construct is effectively non-detectable. Therefore, our dual reporter system provides higher signal to noise ratio and allows for the quantification of relative editing efficiency between different cells  and in different transfection experiments. <br><br>
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 19:26, 16 October 2018

NUS Singapore Science: Dual Reporter

Dual Reporter

Validation of our designed EGFP-T2A-mCherry Reporter system in live cells
1) Mutation of the start codon ATG to ACG in EGFP can significantly block EGFP expression without affecting mCherry expression
To demonstrate that a single nucleotide mutation in the start codon could result in ON to OFF change in EGFP expression in cells, we cloned both the EGFP-T2A-mCherry-WT (BBa_K2807012) and the EGFP-T2A-mCherry-ACG mutant (BBa_K2807013) into C1 mammalian expression vector for expression in HEK293 cells. We transfected HEK293 cells with both wild type (WT) reporter and ACG mutated (ACG) reporter and thereafter, imaged them via microscopy and harvested them for flow cytometry analysis.

As shown in Figure 1, the cells transfected with EGFP-T2A-mCherry-WT reporter expressed both GFP and mCherry proteins in the same cells, showing that T2A self cleavage peptide is effective. We then further quantified the level of fluorescence by flow cytometry and our results showed that at least 36.6% of the transfected cells are both EGFP+/mCherry+ (Figure 3). There are about 7.9% of the transfected cells with EGFP signal only. This is expected because it is possible for the ribosome to fall off from the mRNA when it encounters the T2A signal peptide and cannot continue with translation. As a result, only EGFP protein is produced but not mCherry.

On the other hand, HEK293 cells transfected with EGFP-T2A-mCherry-ACG mutant showed red fluorescence expression, with very low or undetectable green fluorescent protein levels as visualised via microscopy (Figure 2). Our experiment showed that the mutation of the start codon in EGFP is indeed effective in abolishing the expression of EGFP without affecting the expression of the mCherry protein. Compared to the cells transfected with WT reporter, the percentage of EGFP+/mCherry+ positive cells in cells transfected with the EGFP-T2A-mCherry-ACG mutant is almost undetectable (Figure 3). In addition, the mean fluorescence intensity for mCherry in cells transfected with EGFP-T2A-mCherry-WT and cells transfected with EGFP-T2A-mCherry-ACG mutant are similar, while there is significant reduction in EGFP expression between the two groups of cells.
Figure 1. Representative fluorescent images of ACG mutant reporter (ACG) wild type reporter (WT) transfected in HEK293T cells. Images taken at 60X magnification, scale bar = 50um.
Figure 2. Representative fluorescent images of ACG mutant reporter (ACG) wild type reporter (WT) transfected in HEK293T cells. Images taken at 10X magnification, scale bar = 400um.
Figure 3. Flow cytometry analysis of EGFP and mCherry expression on wild type (WT) and ACG mutant (ACG) reporters transfected in HEK293T cells. (A) Strong correlation between expression level of EGFP and mCherry. (B) No leaky expression of EGFP in mutant ACG reporter. (C) Percentage of EGFP mCherry double positive cells. (D): Quantification on mean fluorescent intensity. Error bar represents SEM, n=3.
The EGFP-T2A-mCherry bicistronic reporter is a significant improvement over the reporter system from a previous iGEM team.
An important feature of a reliable reporter system is to have an internal control signal such that the reporter signal can be normalized to account for stochastic processes in cells. Expression of both EGFP and mCherry reporter on separate plasmids may lead to uneven gene expression due to stochastic processes. hus, it is more advantageous to have both EGFP and mCherry on the same plasmid. Therefore, we designed our reporter system with this intention in mind. We then carried out experiments to compare our reporter system with the reporter system described by the Worcester 2016 team. We evaluated the system in terms of background noise, as well as the reliability of the internal control.

We performed double transfection of the mCherry plasmid with either ATG EGFP (BBa_K2083009)http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2083009 or ACG EGFP (BBa_K2083010) http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2083010 plasmid in HEK293T cells. As shown in Figure 4, WPI reporters showed the expected OFF to ON change from ACG mutant to ATG. However, the fluorescence intensity of EGFP and mCherry does not correlate well with one another, and there were some leaky expression of EGFP even in the mutant form (Figure 5A). Moreover, 2.3% of the cells are double positive for EGFP in cells expressing the WPI ACG mutant reporter (Figure 5B & 5C), which is higher than our ACG bicistronic reporter construct (Figure 3B).

On the other hand, our bicistronic reporter construct showed a strong linear correlation between EGFP and mCherry fluorescence intensity in WT reporter (Figure 2A), and the number of cells positive for EGFP in our ACG mutant construct is effectively non-detectable. Therefore, our dual reporter system provides higher signal to noise ratio and allows for the quantification of relative editing efficiency between different cells and in different transfection experiments.