Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | < | + | <hh>Ideonella sakaiensis</h4> |
<p> | <p> | ||
<em>Ideonella sakaiensisis</em> a bacterium that can degrade plastic (PET) using two enzymes. It was discovered outside a plastic recycling facility in Japan and subsequently isolated by research teams at Kyoto Institute of Technology and Keio University(Yoshida et al., 2016). The idea of being able to tackle the plastic crisis affecting the oceans and marine life was a particularly appealing one. However, we quickly realised that we didn’t know how to transform the organism and the time-scale for how long it would take. Also, our project was very similar to other research being conducted and so it would be difficult to come up with a novel way to address the crisis. | <em>Ideonella sakaiensisis</em> a bacterium that can degrade plastic (PET) using two enzymes. It was discovered outside a plastic recycling facility in Japan and subsequently isolated by research teams at Kyoto Institute of Technology and Keio University(Yoshida et al., 2016). The idea of being able to tackle the plastic crisis affecting the oceans and marine life was a particularly appealing one. However, we quickly realised that we didn’t know how to transform the organism and the time-scale for how long it would take. Also, our project was very similar to other research being conducted and so it would be difficult to come up with a novel way to address the crisis. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
− | < | + | <h4>Water bottle biosensor</h4> |
<p> | <p> | ||
According to the House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee, in their first report of the season (2017-19), in the UK alone we use ‘13 billion plastic bottles every year’ and ‘only 7.5 billion are recycled’. This prompted the team to suggest a biosensor that detects harmful substance in plastic bottles. As a result, the average consumer would buy fewer plastic bottles and reuse their bottle. However, many solutions immediately were proposed that counteracted the need for the biosensor-this included the fact that many people buy permanent water bottles that they wash and reuse; it would be more cost effective to campaign recycling efforts than to market a biosensor and it is cheaper to just recycle a plastic bottle and buy a new one than to buy a biosensor. Indeed in the report by the Environmental Audit Committee (potential stakeholders), they suggest increasing the number of water fountains in open spaces and improving recycling through a number of methods including Deposit Return Schemes (which incentivise consumers). | According to the House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee, in their first report of the season (2017-19), in the UK alone we use ‘13 billion plastic bottles every year’ and ‘only 7.5 billion are recycled’. This prompted the team to suggest a biosensor that detects harmful substance in plastic bottles. As a result, the average consumer would buy fewer plastic bottles and reuse their bottle. However, many solutions immediately were proposed that counteracted the need for the biosensor-this included the fact that many people buy permanent water bottles that they wash and reuse; it would be more cost effective to campaign recycling efforts than to market a biosensor and it is cheaper to just recycle a plastic bottle and buy a new one than to buy a biosensor. Indeed in the report by the Environmental Audit Committee (potential stakeholders), they suggest increasing the number of water fountains in open spaces and improving recycling through a number of methods including Deposit Return Schemes (which incentivise consumers). | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
− | < | + | <h4><em>Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus</em></h4> |
<p> | <p> | ||
<em>Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus</em> is a predatory bacterium that preys on other (Gram-negative) bacterial species (Rendulic et al., 2004). Its enzymes and their mechanisms are being studied in order to better understand the bacterium for future use as a possible therapeutic agent or as a method to penetrate biofilms (Kadouri and O'Toole, 2005; Sockett and Lambert, 2004). Our team was interested in engineering the bacterium to use it (and its enzymes) as a ‘pathogen eating machine’in food processes-for example targeting <em>Clostridium botulinum</em>, which releases the botulinum toxin. On top of it being an interesting species to work on, we had a leading expert on the <em>Bdellovibrio</em> species at our university. However, the main bacterium we were targeting <em>(Clostridium botulinum)</em> is a Gram-positive bacterium so is not recognised by <em>Bdellovibrio</em>. Also, it would take many weeks to engineer <em>Bdellovibrio</em> for single gene mutations, which is difficult to transform using random transposon mutagenesis. This was a project that required many years which our team did not have! | <em>Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus</em> is a predatory bacterium that preys on other (Gram-negative) bacterial species (Rendulic et al., 2004). Its enzymes and their mechanisms are being studied in order to better understand the bacterium for future use as a possible therapeutic agent or as a method to penetrate biofilms (Kadouri and O'Toole, 2005; Sockett and Lambert, 2004). Our team was interested in engineering the bacterium to use it (and its enzymes) as a ‘pathogen eating machine’in food processes-for example targeting <em>Clostridium botulinum</em>, which releases the botulinum toxin. On top of it being an interesting species to work on, we had a leading expert on the <em>Bdellovibrio</em> species at our university. However, the main bacterium we were targeting <em>(Clostridium botulinum)</em> is a Gram-positive bacterium so is not recognised by <em>Bdellovibrio</em>. Also, it would take many weeks to engineer <em>Bdellovibrio</em> for single gene mutations, which is difficult to transform using random transposon mutagenesis. This was a project that required many years which our team did not have! | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
− | < | + | <4>mRNA interference of <em>Streptococcus mutans</em></h4> |
<p> | <p> | ||
<em>Streptococcus mutansis</em> one of a number of bacteria involved in tooth decay and is the most prevalent. According to Public Health England, in the UK, ‘almost a quarter (24.7%) of 5 year olds have tooth decay’ of which 3 or 4 teeth are affected. Dental health problems also have a heavy financial burden on the NHS-it spends around £3.4 billion per year on dental care. What makes <em>S. mutans</em> particularly hard to deal wit his its ability to form biofilms regulated by glucosyltransferases which catalyse sucrose to adhesive glucan. In particular, GtfB and GtfB seem to be the most important in biofilm production-mutations in the gtfB and gtfC genes disrupted microcolony formation on saliva coated surfaces(Koo et al., 2010). Our idea was to use a bacteriophage (a virus that only infects bacteria) to deliver micro RNAs or small interfering RNAs to silence those genes. One of our supervisors works with phage so she would be able to guide the wet lab team. We opted to silence the toxins rather than kill the bacteria because we wanted a way of preventing glucan formation without disturbing the balance of the oral microbiome | <em>Streptococcus mutansis</em> one of a number of bacteria involved in tooth decay and is the most prevalent. According to Public Health England, in the UK, ‘almost a quarter (24.7%) of 5 year olds have tooth decay’ of which 3 or 4 teeth are affected. Dental health problems also have a heavy financial burden on the NHS-it spends around £3.4 billion per year on dental care. What makes <em>S. mutans</em> particularly hard to deal wit his its ability to form biofilms regulated by glucosyltransferases which catalyse sucrose to adhesive glucan. In particular, GtfB and GtfB seem to be the most important in biofilm production-mutations in the gtfB and gtfC genes disrupted microcolony formation on saliva coated surfaces(Koo et al., 2010). Our idea was to use a bacteriophage (a virus that only infects bacteria) to deliver micro RNAs or small interfering RNAs to silence those genes. One of our supervisors works with phage so she would be able to guide the wet lab team. We opted to silence the toxins rather than kill the bacteria because we wanted a way of preventing glucan formation without disturbing the balance of the oral microbiome | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
− | < | + | <h4>mRNA interference of <em>Clostridium difficile</em></h4> |
<p> | <p> | ||
<em>Clostridium difficile</em> is an anaerobic bacterium capable of forming spores (meaning it persists in the environment). <em>Clostridium difficil</em> einfection(CDI) is a major infection which causes hospital and community acquired-diarrhoea. It particularly affects those who have long-term hospital stays (especially the elderly), are immunocompromised/immunodeficient (for example due to chemotherapy) and/or are on broad-spectrum antibiotics. CDI has a heavy financial burden-according to Zhang et al. (2017), the annual costs due to <em>C. difficile</em> infections in the US alone are an estimated $6.3 billion with almost 2.4 million days spent in hospitals. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, between 1999 and 2007 there was an increase in the estimated number of deaths due to CDI from 3,000 to 14,000 which was seen across Europe and Canada as well (McDonaldet al., 2012; Lessa et al., 2012). This has been linked to a hypervirulent, resistance strain of <em>C. difficile</em>. | <em>Clostridium difficile</em> is an anaerobic bacterium capable of forming spores (meaning it persists in the environment). <em>Clostridium difficil</em> einfection(CDI) is a major infection which causes hospital and community acquired-diarrhoea. It particularly affects those who have long-term hospital stays (especially the elderly), are immunocompromised/immunodeficient (for example due to chemotherapy) and/or are on broad-spectrum antibiotics. CDI has a heavy financial burden-according to Zhang et al. (2017), the annual costs due to <em>C. difficile</em> infections in the US alone are an estimated $6.3 billion with almost 2.4 million days spent in hospitals. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, between 1999 and 2007 there was an increase in the estimated number of deaths due to CDI from 3,000 to 14,000 which was seen across Europe and Canada as well (McDonaldet al., 2012; Lessa et al., 2012). This has been linked to a hypervirulent, resistance strain of <em>C. difficile</em>. | ||
Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
<h6> | <h6> | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
− | <strong>Figure 1: Growth profile of wild-type <em>C. difficile</em> SBRC 078 and lysogenic <em>C. difficile</em> SBRC 078.<strong> The lysogenic strain has a slightly longer lag phase but both strains reach the same maximum OD. The negative control contains no bacteria and shows that no contamination has occurred over the time-period. OD was measured every hour for 24 hours in biological triplicate. | + | <strong>Figure 1: Growth profile of wild-type <em>C. difficile</em> SBRC 078 and lysogenic <em>C. difficile</em> SBRC 078.</strong> The lysogenic strain has a slightly longer lag phase but both strains reach the same maximum OD. The negative control contains no bacteria and shows that no contamination has occurred over the time-period. OD was measured every hour for 24 hours in biological triplicate. |
</center> | </center> | ||
</h6> | </h6> | ||
Line 131: | Line 131: | ||
<h6> | <h6> | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
− | <strong>Figure 2: Determination of phage phiSBRC burst size.<strong> <em>C. difficile</em> SBRC 078 was infected with phiSBRC and the subsequent burst was measured over 80 minutes. The first burst cycle is deemed complete when the phage titre, measured in plaque forming units per ml, reaches a small plateau. The burst size was calculated and determined as 33 phage particles per cell. | + | <strong>Figure 2: Determination of phage phiSBRC burst size.</strong> <em>C. difficile</em> SBRC 078 was infected with phiSBRC and the subsequent burst was measured over 80 minutes. The first burst cycle is deemed complete when the phage titre, measured in plaque forming units per ml, reaches a small plateau. The burst size was calculated and determined as 33 phage particles per cell. |
</center> | </center> | ||
<h6> | <h6> |
Revision as of 00:54, 17 October 2018