Difference between revisions of "Team:NDC-HighRiverAB/MedalCriteria"
Hufflepuff (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
<h3 class="title">Silver Medal Requirements</h3> | <h3 class="title">Silver Medal Requirements</h3> | ||
| − | <p>1. Validated Part/Validated Contribution</p> | + | <p><strong> 1. Validated Part/Validated Contribution </strong></p> |
<p>STANDARD TRACK</p> | <p>STANDARD TRACK</p> | ||
<p> Convince the judges that at least one new BioBrick Part (Basic or Composite, must be RFC10 compatible) of your own design that is related to your project works as expected. Clearly document the experimental characterization on that Part's Main Page on the Registry. You must submit a sample of this new part to the Registry. This part must be different from the new part documented for Gold #2. | <p> Convince the judges that at least one new BioBrick Part (Basic or Composite, must be RFC10 compatible) of your own design that is related to your project works as expected. Clearly document the experimental characterization on that Part's Main Page on the Registry. You must submit a sample of this new part to the Registry. This part must be different from the new part documented for Gold #2. | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
What We Did: | What We Did: | ||
| − | <p>2. Collaboration | + | <p><strong> 2. Collaboration </s>trong |
<p> Convince the judges you have significantly worked with one (or more) currently registered 2018 iGEM team(s) in a meaningful way. For example, mentor a team (or be mentored by a team), characterize a part, troubleshoot a project, host a meetup, model/simulate a system, or validate a software/hardware solution to a synbio problem. | <p> Convince the judges you have significantly worked with one (or more) currently registered 2018 iGEM team(s) in a meaningful way. For example, mentor a team (or be mentored by a team), characterize a part, troubleshoot a project, host a meetup, model/simulate a system, or validate a software/hardware solution to a synbio problem. | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
What We Did: | What We Did: | ||
| − | <p>3. Human Practices</p> | + | <p><strong>3. Human Practices </strong></p> |
<p>Convince the judges you have thought carefully and creatively about whether your work is responsible and good for the world. Document on your team wiki how you have investigated these issues and engaged with your relevant communities, why you chose this approach, and what you have learned. Please note that surveys will not fulfill this criteria unless you follow scientifically valid methods. | <p>Convince the judges you have thought carefully and creatively about whether your work is responsible and good for the world. Document on your team wiki how you have investigated these issues and engaged with your relevant communities, why you chose this approach, and what you have learned. Please note that surveys will not fulfill this criteria unless you follow scientifically valid methods. | ||
Revision as of 01:16, 17 October 2018
Medal Criteria
Bronze Medal Requirements
1. Registration and Giant Jamboree Attendance
Our team has registered for and will be attending the 2018 Giant Jamboree in Boston from October 24-28th.
2. Competition Deliverables
3. Attributions
Our Attributions page lists the team members, mentors, and other experts who aided us over the course of our project.
4. Characterization
Our team further characterized the pLac promoter, the results of which can be found on the BBa_R0011 part page.
SPECIAL TRACK
Document on your team wiki at least one new substantial contribution to the iGEM community that showcases a project related to BioBricks. This contribution should be central to your project and equivalent in difficulty to making and submitting a BioBrick Part.
Silver Medal Requirements
1. Validated Part/Validated Contribution
STANDARD TRACK
Convince the judges that at least one new BioBrick Part (Basic or Composite, must be RFC10 compatible) of your own design that is related to your project works as expected. Clearly document the experimental characterization on that Part's Main Page on the Registry. You must submit a sample of this new part to the Registry. This part must be different from the new part documented for Gold #2. Teams must follow all of the DNA Submission Requirements and Shipping Guidelines to qualify for medals. Failure to follow these guidelines will result in a rejected shipment or sample, which may prevent your team from winning medals and awards.
SPECIAL TRACK
Convince the judges that something you created (art & design, hardware, software, etc.) performs its intended function. Provide thorough documentation of this validation on your team wiki.
What We Did: 2. Collaboration trong
Convince the judges you have significantly worked with one (or more) currently registered 2018 iGEM team(s) in a meaningful way. For example, mentor a team (or be mentored by a team), characterize a part, troubleshoot a project, host a meetup, model/simulate a system, or validate a software/hardware solution to a synbio problem.
Document your collaboration in detail on your wiki. Judges will look at your collaborator's wiki to see what they say about your interaction. Simply filling out a survey for a team is not enough to demonstrate a significant interaction. 3. Human Practices Convince the judges you have thought carefully and creatively about whether your work is responsible and good for the world. Document on your team wiki how you have investigated these issues and engaged with your relevant communities, why you chose this approach, and what you have learned. Please note that surveys will not fulfill this criteria unless you follow scientifically valid methods.
See the Human Practices Hub (link) for more information and examples of previous teams' exemplary work.