Difference between revisions of "Team:NEU China A/Demonstrate"

Line 60: Line 60:
 
                 <img class="responsive-img" title="Figure 1. The construction of our NO sensor." src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/1/14/T--NEU_China_A--results-1.png" />
 
                 <img class="responsive-img" title="Figure 1. The construction of our NO sensor." src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/1/14/T--NEU_China_A--results-1.png" />
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 +
 +
          <p class="tooltip center-align">
 +
<strong>Figure 1.  Diagram for NO sensor system in pCDFDuet-1 plasmid.</strong> T7 promoter, the gene downstream of this promoter will be transcribed when there is T7 RNA polymerase. lacO, the sequence represses the nearby promoter when there is no inducer (e.g. IPTG). RBS, ribosome binding site. NorR, NO binding protein. PnorV, a promoter which is sensitive to NO. amilCP, blue chromoprotein. T7 terminator, a terminator from T7 phage.
 +
            </p>
  
 
             <br />
 
             <br />
Line 75: Line 79:
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
             <p class="tooltip center-align">
 
             <p class="tooltip center-align">
                 From left to right: control, 0.5mM IPTG without SNP, 1mM IPTG without SNP, 0.5mM IPTG with 100μM SNP, 1mM IPTG with 100μM SNP.
+
                 <strong>Figure 2. Pellets of bacteria transformed with constructed NO sensor plasmid after 6hr induction at 37 ℃.</strong> From left to right: control, 0.5mM IPTG without SNP, 1mM IPTG without SNP, 0.5mM IPTG with 100μM SNP, 1mM IPTG with 100μM SNP.
 
             </p>
 
             </p>
 
<p class="borderleft">Besides, during our participation in the 5th CCiC (Conference of China iGEMer Community), we communicated with the iGEM team of SJTU-BioX-Shanghai and learnt that they detected colorectal cancer through the nitric oxide inducible promoter PyeaR, they used NO as their input signal. And at that time which happened to be difficult for us to detect the expression of the reporter gene GFP after using nitric oxide to drive PnorV. So, we also tested the effect of PyeaR (BBa_K381001) in the Distribution Kit (Figure 3).
 
<p class="borderleft">Besides, during our participation in the 5th CCiC (Conference of China iGEMer Community), we communicated with the iGEM team of SJTU-BioX-Shanghai and learnt that they detected colorectal cancer through the nitric oxide inducible promoter PyeaR, they used NO as their input signal. And at that time which happened to be difficult for us to detect the expression of the reporter gene GFP after using nitric oxide to drive PnorV. So, we also tested the effect of PyeaR (BBa_K381001) in the Distribution Kit (Figure 3).
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
             <br />
 
             <br />
            <p class="borderleft">
 
                We also tested the response of BBa_K381001 to NO in the Distribution Kit (Figure 3).
 
            </p>
 
 
             <div class="center-align">
 
             <div class="center-align">
 
                 <img class="responsive-img" title="Figure 3. The construction of BBa_K381001." src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/84/T--NEU_China_A--results-3.png" />
 
                 <img class="responsive-img" title="Figure 3. The construction of BBa_K381001." src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/84/T--NEU_China_A--results-3.png" />
Line 88: Line 89:
 
             <br />
 
             <br />
 
             <p class="borderleft">
 
             <p class="borderleft">
                We transformed the plasmid containing BBa_K381001 into DH5α, and cultured at 37 ℃ overnight to dilute to OD = 0.4. Then we took half as control and the other half added SNP aqueous solution and induced at 37 ℃ for 6 h. Then we detected the fluorescence using a microplate reader and a fluorescence microscope (Figure 4). We can see that PyeaR can also be effectively activated by NO with almost no leakage. In the future, we will compare the performance of PyeaR and PnorV in depth.
+
We transformed the plasmid containing BBa_K381001 into <i>DH5α</i>, and cultured at 37 ℃ overnight and then diluted to OD600 = 0.4. Then we took half of bacteria as control and the rest was added SNP aqueous solution, and induced at 37 ℃ for 6 h. Then the fluorescence intensity of cells were observed under microplate reader and fluorescence inverted microscope (Figure 4). The histogram of GFP fluorescent density and microscope images indicated that PyeaR could effectively activated by NO and there was almost no leakage expression. In the future, we will use PyeaR promoter based plasmid as the NO sensor.
 
             </p>
 
             </p>
 
             <div class="center-align">
 
             <div class="center-align">
Line 94: Line 95:
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
             <p class="tooltip center-align">
 
             <p class="tooltip center-align">
              Histogram of GFP fluorescence: LB control, without SNP, with 100μM SNP. B, GFP fluorescence image from top to bottom: without SNP, with 100μM SNP.
+
<strong>Figure 4. The response to NO of BBa_K381001. A</strong>, Histogram of GFP fluorescence: LB control, without SNP, with 100μM SNP. <strong>B</strong>, GFP fluorescence images from top to bottom: without SNP, with 100μM SNP.  
 
             </p>
 
             </p>
<p class="borderleft">In conclusion, we have confirmed that the NO sensor in E. coli we built capable of responding to chemically produced nitric oxide in vitro. And we believe that as a naturally NO response mechanism in E. coli, the NO sensor we construct will also work in vivo.
+
<p class="borderleft">In conclusion, we demonstrated that the validity of PyeaR based NO sensor in <i>E. coli</i> of responding to chemically produced nitric oxide <i>in vitro</i>. Since the PyeaR promoter is presence in wild type <i>E. coli.</i> strain, it should be functioning in our engineered probiotic <i>E. coli</i> strain. Moreover, this engineered probiotic might detect the inflammatory signal, NO, in host intestinal tract.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p><strong>Parts for this section: </strong>
 
<p><strong>Parts for this section: </strong>
Line 116: Line 117:
 
         <div class="s10 offset-s2">
 
         <div class="s10 offset-s2">
 
             <p class="borderleft">
 
             <p class="borderleft">
                At the beginning of the experiment, we directly constructed the plasmids of YebF-IL10 and YebF-myrosinase, but the effect of extracellular detection was not satisfactory. During the participation in CCiC, iGEMer suggested that we first start from testing the performance of the secretory tag YebF, so we constructed the plasmid YebF-GFP shown in Figure 5A. To express IL10 and myrosinase, we constructed plasmids IL10-flag and myrosinase-his as shown in Figure 5B and Figure 5C.
+
At the beginning of the experiment, we directly constructed the plasmids of YebF-IL10 and YebF-myrosinase, but the effect of extracellular detection was not good. During the participation in CCiC, iGEMer suggested that we should firstly try to test the performance of the secretory tag YebF, so we constructed the plasmid YebF-GFP shown in Figure 5A. To express IL10 and myrosinase, we constructed plasmids IL10-Flag and myrosinase-His as shown in Figure 5B and Figure 5C.
 
             </p>
 
             </p>
 
             <div class="center-align">
 
             <div class="center-align">
Line 122: Line 123:
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
             <p class="tooltip center-align">
 
             <p class="tooltip center-align">
                <strong>A</strong>, the construction of our YebF-GFP using strong promoter.
+
<strong>Figure 5. Production module construction. A</strong>, the construction of our YebF-GFP using strong promoter. J23110, a strong constitutive promoter. YebF-GFP, GFP with secretion tag. <strong>B</strong>, the construction of IL10 production module. IL10-Flag, human interleukin 10 with Flag tag. <strong>C</strong>, the construction of myrosinase production module. Myrosinase-his, our transferase with His tag.
                <strong>B</strong>, the construction of IL10 production module.
+
                <strong>C</strong>, the construction of myrosinase production module.
+
 
             </p>
 
             </p>
 
             <br />
 
             <br />
 
             <p class="borderleft">
 
             <p class="borderleft">
                When testing the validity of the secretory tag YebF, we transformed the constructed YebF-GFP plasmid into DH5α and cultured overnight at 37 ℃. The supernatant was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant was taken for fluorescence detection. The results are shown in the Figure 6. But we forgot to set up a positive control group. Due to time constraints, we have no time to repeat this experiment. But as a secretory tag used in both the literature and the iGEM team, we believe it can actually work.
+
According to previous works, the secretory tag YebF has been demonstrated as the functioning part in <i>E.coli</i> [2],thus, we chose this tag for further experiment.
 +
            </p>
 +
            <br />
 +
            <p class="borderleft">
 +
When testing the validity of the secretory tag YebF, we transformed the constructed YebF-GFP plasmid into <i>DH5α</i> and cultured overnight at 37 ℃. The bacterial suspension was centrifuged at 3,000 r.p.m for 5 min and the supernatant was taken for fluorescence detection. The result is shown in the Figure 6. From our data, the YebF based secretory part worked efficiently.
 
             </p>
 
             </p>
 
             <br />
 
             <br />
Line 134: Line 137:
 
                 <img class="responsive-img" title="Figure 6. The fluorescence of overnight bacterial suspension." src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/9/92/T--NEU_China_A--results-6.png" />
 
                 <img class="responsive-img" title="Figure 6. The fluorescence of overnight bacterial suspension." src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/9/92/T--NEU_China_A--results-6.png" />
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 +
            <p class="tooltip center-align">
 +
<strong>Figure 6. The fluorescence density of overnight bacterial suspension </strong>
 +
            </p>
 +
            <br />
 
             <p class="borderleft">
 
             <p class="borderleft">
                We transformed the IL10-flag plasmid into BL21, and incubated at 37 ℃ overnight to dilute to OD = 0.2. After 2 h of growth at 37 ℃, IPTG was added and induced at 30 ℃ for 16 h. Then, the bacterial solution was lysed and the expression of IL10 was detected by western blot (Figure 7). We used the human IL10 sequence optimized by E. coli from the previous iGEM team (the original part is <a class="link-color" href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php/Part:BBa_K554004">BBa_K554004</a>). So we have reason to believe that we have successfully expressed IL10. As a widely validated and used cytokine, we believe it can play an immunosuppressive role in vivo.
+
Next, we transformed the human IL10-Flag plasmid (Fig 5B) into <i>BL21</i>, incubated at 37 ℃ overnight and then diluted to OD600 = 0.2. After 2 h of growth at 37 ℃, IPTG was added to induce IL10 expression at 30 ℃ for 16 h. Then, the bacterial solution was lysed and the expressed IL10 was detected by Western Blot (Figure 7). From this result, IL10 was successfully expressed in our constructed plasmid. As a widely validated and used anti-inflammatory interleukin, IL10 has been identified with critical functions in immunosuppression in human [3].
 
             </p>
 
             </p>
 
             <br />
 
             <br />

Revision as of 08:17, 17 October 2018



Overview

Overview

The goal of NEU_China_A is to design a biological system to alleviate intestinal inflammatory diseases and prevent potential colorectal cancer. We chose the human probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917, as our chassis for constructing engineered probiotic. On the one hand, when the engineered bacteria senses an inflammatory signal in the intestine, it would release an anti-inflammatory compound (interleukin-10, IL-10) to reduce the intestinal inflammatory responses. On the other hand, engineered E. coli could secrete myrosinase to convert the cruciferous vegetables contained glucosinolate into sulforaphane that act as similar as IL-10 and prevent colorectal cancer induced by chronic inflammation.



For details about our project background and introduction, please click toDescription

For details of whole project design, please click toDesign

As a therapeutic project, we knew the difficulties for verifying the entire system in less than one year. We split the entire system into three core parts and verify them separately: the nitric oxide sensor (nitric oxide, NO, is a biomarker of intestinal inflammation), protein transport and production and the “kill switch”. In addition, we tested them in DH5α and BL21 E.coli competent cells. We believed that the success of these core parts will ultimately ensure the entire system functioning in IBD patients.


1.Nitric oxide sensor

In order to detect the NO specifically and accurately, we constructed pCDFDuet-1 plasmid as our expression vector, which contains the NO binding protein for expressing reporter gene. (Figure 1). Briefly, we integrated NO-binding protein, NorR, into this plasmid for activating the amilCP reporter gene expression via binding to PnorV promoter. To testify the validity of NO sensor, we used T7 promoter and lacO protein for boosting the NorR expression under the IPTG induction.

Figure 1. Diagram for NO sensor system in pCDFDuet-1 plasmid. T7 promoter, the gene downstream of this promoter will be transcribed when there is T7 RNA polymerase. lacO, the sequence represses the nearby promoter when there is no inducer (e.g. IPTG). RBS, ribosome binding site. NorR, NO binding protein. PnorV, a promoter which is sensitive to NO. amilCP, blue chromoprotein. T7 terminator, a terminator from T7 phage.


According to the previous work, ShanghaiTechChina_B 2016 team demonstrated 100μM Sodium Nitroprusside Dihydrate (SNP) aqueous solution could continuously release NO and its final concentration is stab at about 5.5μM, which as same as the NO amount in IBD patients and 100 times higher than healthy individuals [1]. According to their work, we could simulate the IBD patients’ NO signal in vitro. In the subsequent test of the NO sensor, the final concentration of the SNP aqueous solution was maintained at 100 μM.


We transformed the constructed plasmid with NO sensor into DH5α, cultured at 37 ℃ overnight, and then diluted to OD600 = 0.2. Culturing bacteria at 37 ℃ for 1.5 hours, the appropriate concentration of inducer IPTG and SNP aqueous solution were added. After 6 hours of culturing, 1 mL of the bacterial solution was centrifuged at 8000 r.p.m for 1 min (Figure 2). It can be seen that the NO released by the SNP aqueous solution can effectively activate the expression of the reporter gene. Surprisingly, the blue chromoprotein in group 1mM IPTG without SNP was also be activated with undetermined mechanisms. We speculated that it may be caused by leakage expression of promoter PnorV when the NorR is overexpressed. Due to this reason, we would use a weak promoter to express NorR in further engineered bacteria.


Figure 2. Pellets of bacteria transformed with constructed NO sensor plasmid after 6hr induction at 37 ℃. From left to right: control, 0.5mM IPTG without SNP, 1mM IPTG without SNP, 0.5mM IPTG with 100μM SNP, 1mM IPTG with 100μM SNP.

Besides, during our participation in the 5th CCiC (Conference of China iGEMer Community), we communicated with the iGEM team of SJTU-BioX-Shanghai and learnt that they detected colorectal cancer through the nitric oxide inducible promoter PyeaR, they used NO as their input signal. And at that time which happened to be difficult for us to detect the expression of the reporter gene GFP after using nitric oxide to drive PnorV. So, we also tested the effect of PyeaR (BBa_K381001) in the Distribution Kit (Figure 3).



We transformed the plasmid containing BBa_K381001 into DH5α, and cultured at 37 ℃ overnight and then diluted to OD600 = 0.4. Then we took half of bacteria as control and the rest was added SNP aqueous solution, and induced at 37 ℃ for 6 h. Then the fluorescence intensity of cells were observed under microplate reader and fluorescence inverted microscope (Figure 4). The histogram of GFP fluorescent density and microscope images indicated that PyeaR could effectively activated by NO and there was almost no leakage expression. In the future, we will use PyeaR promoter based plasmid as the NO sensor.

Figure 4. The response to NO of BBa_K381001. A, Histogram of GFP fluorescence: LB control, without SNP, with 100μM SNP. B, GFP fluorescence images from top to bottom: without SNP, with 100μM SNP.

In conclusion, we demonstrated that the validity of PyeaR based NO sensor in E. coli of responding to chemically produced nitric oxide in vitro. Since the PyeaR promoter is presence in wild type E. coli. strain, it should be functioning in our engineered probiotic E. coli strain. Moreover, this engineered probiotic might detect the inflammatory signal, NO, in host intestinal tract.

Parts for this section:
BBa_K2817000
BBa_K381001


2 Transport and Production

At the beginning of the experiment, we directly constructed the plasmids of YebF-IL10 and YebF-myrosinase, but the effect of extracellular detection was not good. During the participation in CCiC, iGEMer suggested that we should firstly try to test the performance of the secretory tag YebF, so we constructed the plasmid YebF-GFP shown in Figure 5A. To express IL10 and myrosinase, we constructed plasmids IL10-Flag and myrosinase-His as shown in Figure 5B and Figure 5C.

Figure 5. Production module construction. A, the construction of our YebF-GFP using strong promoter. J23110, a strong constitutive promoter. YebF-GFP, GFP with secretion tag. B, the construction of IL10 production module. IL10-Flag, human interleukin 10 with Flag tag. C, the construction of myrosinase production module. Myrosinase-his, our transferase with His tag.


According to previous works, the secretory tag YebF has been demonstrated as the functioning part in E.coli [2],thus, we chose this tag for further experiment.


When testing the validity of the secretory tag YebF, we transformed the constructed YebF-GFP plasmid into DH5α and cultured overnight at 37 ℃. The bacterial suspension was centrifuged at 3,000 r.p.m for 5 min and the supernatant was taken for fluorescence detection. The result is shown in the Figure 6. From our data, the YebF based secretory part worked efficiently.


Figure 6. The fluorescence density of overnight bacterial suspension


Next, we transformed the human IL10-Flag plasmid (Fig 5B) into BL21, incubated at 37 ℃ overnight and then diluted to OD600 = 0.2. After 2 h of growth at 37 ℃, IPTG was added to induce IL10 expression at 30 ℃ for 16 h. Then, the bacterial solution was lysed and the expressed IL10 was detected by Western Blot (Figure 7). From this result, IL10 was successfully expressed in our constructed plasmid. As a widely validated and used anti-inflammatory interleukin, IL10 has been identified with critical functions in immunosuppression in human [3].


Lane 1: Negative control (cell lysate without IPTG induction); Lane 2: 0.5mM IPTG, Lane3: 1mM IPTG induction for 16h at 30℃.

We transformed the plasmid of myrosinase-his into BL21, and cultured at 37 ℃ overnight and diluted to OD = 0.2. After growth for 2 h at 37 ℃, different concentrations of IPTG were added and induced at 16 ℃ for 16 h. The bacterial cell lysis was then performed to detect the expression of myrosinase by SDS-PAGE (Figure 8). The sequence of the myrosinase enzyme was optimized based on the K12 strain and the position of the strip is almost correct, so we believe we have successfully expressed it. The myrosinase can convert glucosinolates contained in cruciferous vegetables into sulforaphane which has well-known anti-cancer activity. A literature earlier this year (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-017-0181-y) has validated the activity of myrosinase expressed by E. coli Nissle 1917 in vivo and in vitro. So we believe that the myrosinase we expressed can work. For more details about this transferase related information, please see our project design.


Lane 1: Negative control (cell lysate without IPTG induction); Lane 2: 0.25mM IPTG; Lane3: 0.5mM IPTG, Lane4: 0.75mM IPTG induction for 16h at 16℃.

Parts for this section:
BBa_K2817013
BBa_K2817002
BBa_K2817004


3.Kill Switch

When we use engineered bacteria to treat IBD, we need to do biocontainment work to avoid the release of engineered bacteria into the environment. Therefore, in our project, we designed a cold shock kill switch based on the toxin-antitoxin system mazEF, so we can kill our engineered E. coli when it escape from human body. We inserted the reporter gene amilCP into the pColdI plasmid to characterize the performance of the cold shock promoter PcspA (Figure 9A). Then we inserted maz-F into the pColdI plasmid to build our kill switch (Figure 9B).

A, the construction of PcspA-amilCP plasmid. B, the construction of PcspA-mazF plasmid.


We transformed the PcspA-amilCP plasmid into DH5α and cultured overnight at 37℃. The overnight culture was diluted to OD = 0.2 and allowed to grow for 2 h at 37℃. It was then divided into different concentrations of IPTG at 16℃ and 37℃ for 6 h (Figure 10). It can be seen from the figure 11A that the reporter gene is efficiently expressed at low temperature, which indicates that the effective expression of the toxin gene mazF and the closed expression of the anti-toxin gene mazE at low temperature can kill our engineered bacteria in time. Although the cold shock promoter PcspA has a certain leakage at body temperature, the toxin is neutralized by the anti-toxin expressed at body temperature, so the effect is not significant. However, it is best to add a lacO site in the future to suppress leakage.


From left to right: 37℃ without IPTG, 37℃ with 0.5mM IPTG, 37℃ with 1mM IPTG, 16℃ without IPTG, 16℃ with 0.5mM IPTG, 16℃ with 1mM IPTG.

Next, we test the effect of mazF. We transformed the constructed PcspA-mazF plasmid into BL21, added 1 mM IPTG to the plate, and cultured at 16℃ for 16 h (Figure 11A). We then cultured BL21 transformed with the PcspA-mazF plasmid overnight at 16℃. After diluting to OD=0.2 on the next day, the cells were cultured at 16℃, and the OD value was measured every hour for 9 hours (Figure 11B). From Figure 11 below, you can see that our kill switch can work at low temperatures. Although some engineered bacteria still survive, we believe they will be effectively killed in the absence of nutritional support.


A, the plate of BL21 with and without killer gene under induction. B, the growth curve of BL21 with and without killer gene under induction.

Parts for this section:
BBa_K2817012
BBa_K2817006

Finally, we are convinced the integration of these successful module will guarantee the effective work of our engineered system in E. coli under realistic conditions.