|
|
| Line 50: |
Line 50: |
| | </div> | | </div> |
| | </div> | | </div> |
| − |
| |
| − | <h2>
| |
| − | Optimizing a Cell-Free System
| |
| − | </h2>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | The first step of our project is the optimization of a cell-free expression system as a manufacturing platform for bacteriophages. For our purpose, it was necessary to produce a high-quality cell extrac, in a reproducible and easy manner. Considering a possible commercial use of our product we deemed it necessary to test the potential of upscaling of our preparation protocol.</p>
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | We decided on the following optimization goals:
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <ul style="">
| |
| − | <li>increase protein content</li>
| |
| − | <li>find reproducible methods of quality control</li>
| |
| − | <li>test cell cultivation in a bioreactor to enable upscaling</li>
| |
| − | <li>find optimal lysis conditions, that produce high-quality extract</li>
| |
| − | <li>test upscaling of cell lysis</li>
| |
| − | <li>produce cell-extract that allows phage assembly</li>
| |
| − | </ul>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h3>
| |
| − | Cultivation Can Be Upscaled In a Bioreactor
| |
| − | </h3>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <p>Cultivation is the first step in cell extract preparation. The original cell extract preparation protocol uses shaking flask cultivation for biomass production and states that cell harvest at OD 1,8-2,0 is strictly required to produce high-quality extract. To be able to transfer this to the bioreactor we first obtained growth data for both shaking flask and bioreactor cultivation.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/2/2b/T--Munich--WL2_fermenter.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">growh fermenter vs. shaking flask side by side with FI mtq2</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <p>The growth curve from shaking flask cultivation showed us that harvest at OD 1,8-2 correlates to the mid-to late logarithmic growth phase. In bioreactor fermentation this correlates to OD between 4 and 6. We decided to test which of these ODs is best to harvest cells for cell extract preparation.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/02/T--Munich--WL2_fermenter2.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">FI shaking flask vs fermenter</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | This experiment gave 2 important results:
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <ul style="">
| |
| − | <li>the optimal OD to harvest culture from the bioreactor is around 5. This gives the highest protein content and also the best expression.</li>
| |
| − | <li>preparing cell extract from bioreactor cultivated cells under comparable conditions gives equal quality extract than cell extract from shaking flask cultivated cells.</li>
| |
| − | </ul>
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | In our small lab-scale bioreactor with 2 L cultivation volume we were able to obtain 20 g cell pellet. 2 L cultivation in shaking flasks only yields 4,5 g pellet.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h3>
| |
| − | Sonication is The Superior Method For Cell Lysis
| |
| − | </h3>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>Of the three commonly used methods of cell lysis, each has their advantages and drawbacks. For cell extract preparation bead beating is most established, but the caveat there is, that it doesn’t leave room for upscaling, besides being tedious and time-consuming. Less often used is high-pressure cell disruption in a so called ‘french-press’, but these devices are very expensive and not widely prevalent which impedes our effort to provide a generally-applicable protocol for preparation of home-made cell extract. A sonication device on the other hand is available in most biochemical labs as it’s a widely used method for cell lysis in protein purification protocols. Nevertheless, we started by comparing all 3 lysis methods with settings commonly applied for cell lysis. For Sonication two commonly used sets of parameters were used.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <p>Our Initial test showed that cell lysis by Sonication yields extract with up to 2,8 and 4,4 fold higher expression than cell lysis by bead beating and French press respectively. These findings, combined with the limited options of optimization for both bead beating and French press lysis as well as restricted potential for upscaling of bead beating lead to the decision to focus our optimization efforts on Sonication as Lysis method.</p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/fc/T--Munich--Lysis_methods.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption"><p>Comparison of different cell Lysis methods: Sonication at 33 % Amplitude, 4 cycles; Sonication at 10 % Amplitude, 5 cycles; bead beating and high-pressure disruption (french press) – Expression Quality in cell extract measured as GFP Fluorescence Intensity</p></figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>Cell Lysis by Sonication offers 2 main parameters that can be varied: the Amplitude, that correlates to the energy emited by the device used and Cycle number, representing the total time of Sonication. AS mentioned in XY paper we decided to use 15 s pulses with 10 s pause between pulses to prevent excessive heating of the sample.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <p>Our screening revealed that cycle numbers above 33 % seem to be inept for cell extract preparation, therefore our further efforts focused on Lysis with 10 % and 33 % amplitudes.
| |
| − | Smaller cycle numbers offer the additional benefit of shorter overall processing time, cutting the cell expenditure of time for cell extract preparation short.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/1/14/T--Munich--Results_Lysis_conditionss.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption"></figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h3>Lysozyme Improves Cell-Extract Quality</h3>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>In the last step we made an effort towards upscaling of the sonication step. Preliminary experiments (results not shown) indicated 4 mL as the maximal sample volume that could efficiently be lysed with the device we had at our disposal. As indicated in the XY paper we decided to increase the number of sonication cycles in proportion to the increase of sample volume. The presented test revealed that this approach was successful; protein content in the cell extract and expression quality was not ustr maintained but increased through the use of higher sample volumes. This proves that upscaling of cell extract preparation with cell lysis by sonication is indeed feasible.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/52/T--Munich--Results_Wl2_lysoprot.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption"></figcaption>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/ae/T--Munich--Results_Wl2_lysofluo.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption"></figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>Additionally we tested the effect of addition of the cell-wall degrading enzyme Lysozyme to the cell lysis, following a tip from a lab member. To our knowledge usage of Lysozyme in cell extract preparation has not been a focus of previous studies. All the more surprised were we, to find that Lysozyme increases the protein yield of cell lysis for all tested settings. Moreover, the expression quality was likewise increased after Lysozyme addition, indicating that the remaining enzyme does not interfere with protein biosynthesis.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − | <h3>
| |
| − | Post-Processing Of Cell-Free Systems Is Mandatory
| |
| − | </h3>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | The suggested steps in cell extract processing are:
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <ul style="">
| |
| − | <li>run-off reaction</li>
| |
| − | <li>dialysis</li>
| |
| − | <li>storage at -80°C</li>
| |
| − | </ul>
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | We found that the run-off reaction as suggested by <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3960857/">Sun et.al</a> is indeed beneficial and that dialysis is superior to diafiltration via centrifugal filters.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h3>
| |
| − | Quality Control
| |
| − | </h3>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | LC-MS/MS measurements of the E. coli proteome lysates were performed in duplicates on a Q-Exactive HFX instrument in data-dependent acquisition mode (Top18 method). Total protein injection amount was 0.5 µg. Gradient length was 1h. The data was then analyzed using MaxQuant and the Uniprot E. coli K12 fasta file. The LFQ data was filtered for proteins that occur in both duplicates of at least one cell lysate group (Arbor E10 P14).
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | The TX-TL systems performed differentially regarding phage titers (E10>myTXTL>P15), protein content (E10>P15>myTXTL) and protein expression (P15>E10>Arbor), the proteome of the samples E10, P15 and myTXTL were analyzed by shotgun sequencing.</p>
| |
| − | <p>The main question was, if the difference, especially in phage titers, is due to a different composition of the cell extracts or caused by a discrepancy in activity of the relevant proteins e.g. transcription and translation related proteins.</p>
| |
| − | <p>Therefore, in collaboration with the Bavarian Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry Centre (BayBioMS) the samples were analyzed under supervision of Dr. Christina Ludwig.</p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <p>Discussion goes here</p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/5f/T--Munich--Results_Wl3_heatmap.png " class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">Ramachandran-Plot</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | Heatmap of the label-free quantification intensities of all proteins identified. Diagram shows duplicate samples from the three cell extracts analyzed. Green indicates high expression, red indicates low expression.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | The results of the Mass Spectrometry gave us insight into the composition of the different TX-TLs. We were able to identify 1771 proteins in all the extracts. The results indicate a high homogenicity between all three TX-TLs, as illustrated in the heatmap.
| |
| − | Based on the LFQ values (Label Free Quantification) a volcano plot of two samples (Arbor/E10, Arbor/P15 and E10/P15) was generated.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-4">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a2/T--Munich--Results_arbor_p15_volcano.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">Arbor p15</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-4">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/d8/T--Munich--Results_arbor_e10_volcano.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">Arbor e10</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-4">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/0c/T--Munich--Results_e10_p15_volcano.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">e10 p15</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | In general, all proteins are equally frequent in Arbor TX-TL in comparison to E10 and P15. In contrast, some translation-related proteins were slightly more abundant in E10 and P15, for instance certain tRNA ligases (PheS and PheT). The RecBCD subunits (the dsDNA degrading complex) are of similar abundance in all TX-TLs, showing the importance to consider its negative impact on the assembly. The results were further validated with DAVID, a tool for finding metabolic pathways based on proteomic data. The identified pathways indicate no correlation with transcription/translation related pathways (data not shown).
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | In conclusion, the performance differences are most likely caused by a loss of activity during TX-TL preparation rather than changes in composition.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − | <h3>Cell-Free Systems Amplify DNA And Express Coded Genes</h3>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <p>The DNA sequence added to the cell-free system serves as the template for the required phage. Therefore, it is translated to RNA by an RNA-Polymerase. In addition, DNA-Polymerases can amplify the DNA segment, multiplying the amount of DNA in the cell-free reaction.</p>
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | To assess this effect and its dependence on deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs), we performed an absolute quantification of T7 DNA in the cell-free reaction by quantitative PCR (qPCR). A standard curve with a serial dilution of T7 DNA. We used the TXTL qPCR protocol (add link).</p>
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | As a reference, we used the myTXTL (Arbor Biosciences) cell-free reaction system. The addition of dNTP to the reference reaction leads to an increase in DNA concentration by a factor of 15 in the reaction after 4 hours (290 ng compared to 19 ng). This is higher than in the myTXTL reaction without additional dNTPs, in which there is a 1.8-fold increase in DNA (91 ng compared to 51 ng) after the 4-hour reaction.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | The home-made cell extracts P10 and E15 however do not resemble this behavior.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | It would be desirable to increase DNA amplification in our cell extracts. We therefore conducted a cause analysis, focusing on the T7 replication system. A more than 250-fold increase in processivity of the T7 DNA polymerase is achieved by its binding behavior to E. coli thioredoxin1. We suspected reduced presence of this factor in our cell extract. Thioredoxin could be added to a phage assembly reaction to further test these assumptions. However, our proteome analysis did not confirm that there were low levels of thioredoxin present in our cell extract
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/36/T--Munich--Results_WL2_Qpcr.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption"></figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | It would be desirable to increase DNA amplification in our cell extracts. We therefore conducted a cause analysis, focusing on the T7 replication system. A more than 250-fold increase in processivity of the T7 DNA polymerase is achieved by its binding behavior to E. coli thioredoxin. We suspected reduced presence of this factor in our cell extract. Thioredoxin could be added to a phage assembly reaction to further test these assumptions. However, our proteome analysis did not confirm that there were low levels of thioredoxin present in our cell extract.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h3>
| |
| − | Cell-Extract Retains 90% Activity After Lyophilization
| |
| − | </h3>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | For long term storage of our cell-extract we decided to try lyophilization. After initial tests we found that:
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <ul style="">
| |
| − | <li>cell extract quality is only preserved when cell-extract is mixed with the txtl- reaction buffer prior to lyophilization. </li>
| |
| − | <li>the retention of quality does not depend on the size of lyophilized extract aliquots.</li>
| |
| − | <li>We then tested the expression quality of several of our home-made cell extracts from fresh vs. lyophilized aliquots.</li>
| |
| − | </ul>
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <p>eeeh
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/8a/T--Munich--Results_lyophilization.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">Our two tested samples of cell extract retained 70 and 90 % of expression quality respectively after lyophilization.</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | Our two tested samples of cell extract retained 70 and 90 % of expression quality respectively after lyophilization.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − | <h3>Msb-B Knockouts Reduce Endotoxin Levels By 49-Fold</h3>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <p>Endotoxins are pyrogens deriving from gram-negative bacteria. Their mini from any pharmaceutical product is mandatory. Therefore, or Phactory, we engineered an E. coli strain lacking lipid A, a major endotoxin component and used this bacterium to produce our cell extract To evaluate endotoxin content of different cell extracts, a Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL)-test was performed according to the <a href="https://www.genscript.com/product/documents?cat_no=L00350&catalogtype=Document-PROTOCOL">supplier manual</a>. As a reference, we compared the cell extract from our msbB-deficient strain (K2) to a cell extract from a wild-type strain (K4) as well as a commercial cell-free system (myTXTL, Arbor Biosciences). A solution with live <i>E. coli</i> served as a positive control.</p>
| |
| − | <p>Compared to the K4 strain our msbB-deficient K2 cell extract had 49-fold reduced endotoxin levels (0.06 EU/ml compared to 2.94 EU/ml). Other cell extracts such as the P15 cell extract (3.83 EU/ml) and the commercial myTXTL (4.65 EU/ml) had even higher endotoxin contents.</p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/53/T--Munich--Results_Wl2_LAL.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">Endotoxin content in different cell-extracts determined by LAL-Test. Error bars indicate standard deviation of the measured plateau values. Error bars indicate SD</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>A calibration curve using known endotoxin concentrations is required for the LAL-Test. A dilution series ranging from 0.625 EU/ml to 5 EU/ml. The fitting curve is used to interpolate the concentrations in the unknown sample. The linear fit of the calibration curve had a R2 of 0.98, an intersection with the y-axis at 0.38 and a slope of 0.39 ml/EU. These values are in accordance with the requirements of the LAL-Test manufacturer. </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>Removal of endotoxins is impeded by their tendency to form stable interactions with other biomolecules2. Our method of preventing the lipid A biosynthesis is therefore superior to extensive isolation steps required for removing endotoxins in conventional phage production. </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h2>
| |
| − | Bacteriophage Assembly
| |
| | </h2> | | </h2> |
| − | <h3>
| |
| − | Home-Made Systems Can Be Compared To Commercial Systems
| |
| − | </h3>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <p>Discussion goes here
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/79/T--Munich--Results_Phage_Titer.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption"></figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − | <h3>
| |
| − | Bacteriophages can be assembled independent from the host
| |
| − | </h3>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | Phactory has is the ability to assemble any bacteriophage, in a host-independent manner. To underline this feature and demonstrate universal applicability, we assembled a variety of different E. coli phages, both DNA and RNA-based.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <p>The successful assembly of all phages was confirmed by plaque assay and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). In addition, DNA encoding for NES and FFP phages was used to perform assembly of these phages in our cell extract. However, we were not in possession of the respective host bacterial strains and therefore could not demonstrate successful assembly.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/76/T--Munich--Results--WL3_Titer_difference.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">titer_dif</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | Pathogenic bacteria such as salmonella, pseudomonas and staphylococcus are prone to develop multi-drug resistance and pose an urgent or serious threat (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2013. Antibiotic/Antimicrobial Resistance.). Therefore, to fulfill this medical need, phages specific for these bacteria should be assembled next in our cell-free system. Potentially, this would require co-expression of the respective sigma factors that are needed for initiation of transcription.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − | <h3>
| |
| − | Bacteriophages From Phactory Assemble And Are Fully Functional
| |
| − | </h3>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <p>Discussion goes here
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/7f/T--Munich--Results_QPCR_Nils.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">qpcr</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h3>RNA-Detection via RT-qPCR</h3>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | To rapidly detect functionality of the phages, Reverse Transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was applied to pellets of T7-infected host cells at different timepoints. The RT-qPCR protocol was used (add link). Using the delta-delta-Ct method3, relative expression was determined and normalized to the value at 3 minutes after addition of the phages. Whereas expression of E. coli genes remains stable, expression of three T7 genes is elevated throughout the experiment. The change of expression of all three phage genes reaches a first peak after 12 minutes and a second peak after 18 or 21 minutes.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | The sharp increase of phage gene expression in the first phase of the experiment displays the ability of the phages to successfully infect the bacteria and initiate reproduction. The second and even higher increase of expression is likely attributed to a second wave of infection of already replicated phages. This indicates that the phages are capable of reproducing inside their host bacteria, resulting in multiplication of functional phages.
| |
| − | The increase of expression of T7P01 is more pronounced than that of T7P07, which is in turn is stronger than that of T7P29. This circumstance is likely caused by differences in primer efficacy, a value describing the doubling rate in between every PCR cycle. For better reliability of the RT-qPCR quality control, primer efficacy should be assessed by creating a standard curve.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <p>All RNA samples were pooled and checked for DNA contamination, which could have interfered with the RT-qPCR. Absence of DNA was determined electrophoresis in a gel electrophoresis</p>
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </h2>
| |
| − |
| |
| | Quality Control | | Quality Control |
| | </h2> | | </h2> |
| Line 656: |
Line 179: |
| | </p> | | </p> |
| | | | |
| − | <p>As the results indicate, the main contaminant in chloroform phenole extratction is E.coli, as the origin for the native phage DNA. DNAseI and the Norgene kit led to reduction of E.coli contamination. | + | <p>As the results indicate, the main contaminant in chloroform phenole extratction is <i>E. coli</i>, as the origin for the native phage DNA. DNAseI and the Norgene kit led to reduction of <i>E. coli</i> contamination. |
| | </p> | | </p> |
| | | | |
| Line 664: |
Line 187: |
| | <figure class="figure"> | | <figure class="figure"> |
| | <img src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/1/16/T--Munich--contamination_file_seq.jpeg" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure."> | | <img src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/1/16/T--Munich--contamination_file_seq.jpeg" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure."> |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption"> Illustration of DNA composition after purification, 3S phage DNA was purified from the E.coli host by chloroform-phenol (CM) and column extraction with and without DNAseI treatment after cell lysis.</figcaption> | + | <figcaption class="figure-caption"> Illustration of DNA composition after purification, 3S phage DNA was purified from the <i>E. coli</i> host by chloroform-phenol (CM) and column extraction with and without DNAseI treatment after cell lysis.</figcaption> |
| | </figure> | | </figure> |
| | </div> | | </div> |
| Line 684: |
Line 207: |
| | </figure> | | </figure> |
| | </div> | | </div> |
| − |
| |
| − | <h3>Bacteriophage Titers Correlate With DNA Concentration</h3>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <p>To prove the influence of the DNA concertation on the bacteriophage titer, cell extract reaction were prepared with varying T4 DNA concentration. The bacteriophage production was performed according to the protocol (link). The titer of the bacteriophages was measured with the top agar method and the formed plaques were counted. The increase in DNA concentration results also in an increase in the bacteriophage concentration. This increase in nonlinear and our model predicted.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| | </div> | | </div> |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/7b/T--Munich--Results_Wl3_Titer_DNA_Concentration.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">dna conc</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| | | | |
| − |
| |
| | | | |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>Discussion goes here
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h3>Determination of phage titer by Plaque Assay</h3>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>We performed a Plaque Assay to determine the titer of viable phages in our assembly batch. By creating serial dilutions, we were able to calculate a plaque forming units/milliliter (PFU/ml) value. The plaque assay protocol (link) was used.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-12">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/d0/T--Munich--Results_Wl3_T7_plaque.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption"></figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-12">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/b5/T--Munich--Results_Wl3_MS2_plaque.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption"></figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h3>
| |
| − | Burst Size Analysis
| |
| − | </h3>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h3>
| |
| − | RNA-Detection via RT-qPCR
| |
| − | </h3>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h3>
| |
| − | Phactory Yields Clinically Relevant Bacteriophages
| |
| − | </h3>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − | <h3>
| |
| − | Sequ-Into Complements Continuous Engineering Cycles in Phactory
| |
| − | </h3>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | We sequenced several phage genomes after preparation using ….
| |
| − | After receiving the phage genomes, one of the first steps to do is analyse the received sequences.
| |
| − | This has been done using an inhouse software poreSTAT [1].
| |
| − | For each sequencing sample, it is analysed how many bases are sequenced, what bp yield has been achieved and how many pore were used.
| |
| − | Considering the sequence in which the reads have been acquired, it can nicely be seen how the used chip gets worn out with each sequencing experiment.
| |
| − | While for the T7 sequencing almost all pores are usable, the used pores decreases with every sequencing experiment …
| |
| − | _*_*
| |
| − | 4 missing figures
| |
| − | _*_*
| |
| − | While the T7 experiment produced most reads and most base-pairs sequenced, the remaining three experiments produced less data.
| |
| − | The read and base-pair yield can be seen in Table 1.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <p>TABLE</p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <p>The actual task here was to assemble the phage genomes from the Nanopore reads.
| |
| − | Particularly Nanopore sequencing is well suitable for genome assembly, since its long reads allow to reduce ambiguity of highly similar and repetitive sequences.
| |
| − | Figure 2 shows the reads distributions of the sequencing experiments.
| |
| − | _*_*
| |
| − | 4 missing figures
| |
| − | _*_*
| |
| − | However, during the initial screening it could be seen, that the read lengths do not approach the thought length of the phage genomes in the 50-70kbp range for T7 and 100 kbp range for the remaining phages.
| |
| − | Smaller reads generally lead to more ambiguity and thus are to be avoided from a bioinformatics point of view.
| |
| − | However, since no bioinformatician can change the sequenced data afterwards, we went on with the given data.
| |
| − | There are several tools available for de-novo genome assembly in general, however most approaches are used for short-read genome assembly (2nd generation sequencing, Illumina) and employ a de bruijn graph approach.
| |
| − | Here we have 3rd generation sequencing data which must be handled totally different from old short-read sequencing data: the reads are less perfect in terms of sequencing errors. While short-reads nowadays have error-rates of about 1% (e.g. 1 base out of 100 is reported incorrectly), this error is up to 15% for nanopore sequencing data using newest sequencing chemistry (R9.4 at the time of wiki-freeze).
| |
| − | Thus the number of available assemblers drops dramatically, where canu [2] and miniasm [3] are the most prevalent ones. Both rely on a overlap-layout-consensus approach, which, historically, can be seen as the father of all assemblers (see celera assembler [5]).
| |
| − | We first used canu to assemble our genomes. Unfortunately we have been confronted with a major problem: contamination. We thus developed sequ-into to first detect the contamination and also get rid of contamination-originated reads.
| |
| − | More on the performance and finding while using sequ-into can be found at …[link to /Software].
| |
| − | Particularly for assembly, contamination is bad because it can lead the assembler into wrong directions – depending on the phylogenetic distance of the original sample and the contamination.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | After getting rid of the contamination we noticed some strange patterns in the phage genome assemblies after re-aligning the reads to the assembly, which can be seen in Figure 3.
| |
| − | *_*_
| |
| − | missing figure
| |
| − | *_*_
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | In theory we can expect a uniform coverage over the full genome, since there is no bias for read template generation during sample preparation (thanks to random primers).
| |
| − | However, what we saw here is that the first part has lower coverage than the remaining part and there is a high-coverage region in the middle of the assembled genome.
| |
| − | Since we know phage genomes may have repitions, we thought to splite the genome in the middle and reorganise the structure to no avail.
| |
| − | We thus tried to use the other assembler, miniasm, which is known for very fast assemblies, with little error correction.
| |
| − | However, this error correction can be achieved by combining miniasm with minimap for read mapping and racon for polishing the sequences.
| |
| − | Thus, the assembly pipeline changed to the following calls:
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | MAY BE COLLAPSIBLE
| |
| − | #!/usr/bin/env sh
| |
| − |
| |
| − | INREADS=$1
| |
| − | ASMFOLDER=$2
| |
| − | ASMPREFIX=$3
| |
| − |
| |
| − | THREADS=$4
| |
| − |
| |
| − | if [ -z "$4" ]
| |
| − | then
| |
| − | THREADS=4
| |
| − | fi
| |
| − |
| |
| − | # path to used executables
| |
| − | MINIMAP2=minimap2
| |
| − | MINIASM=miniasm
| |
| − | GRAPHMAP=graphmap
| |
| − | RACON=racon
| |
| − |
| |
| − | # first we must overlap all reads with each other
| |
| − | $MINIMAP2 -x ava-ont -t$THREADS $INREADS $INREADS > $ASMFOLDER/$ASMPREFIX.paf
| |
| − |
| |
| − | # then miniasm can create alignment
| |
| − | $MINIASM -f $INREADS $ASMFOLDER/$ASMPREFIX.paf > $ASMFOLDER/$ASMPREFIX.gfa
| |
| − |
| |
| − | # extract unitigs from miniasm
| |
| − | awk '$1 ~/S/ {print ">"$2"\n"$3}' $ASMFOLDER/$ASMPREFIX.gfa > $ASMFOLDER/$ASMPREFIX.unitigs.fasta
| |
| − |
| |
| − | # align reads with unitigs
| |
| − | $MINIMAP2 $ASMFOLDER/$ASMPREFIX.unitigs.fasta $INREADS > $ASMFOLDER/$ASMPREFIX.unitigs.paf
| |
| − |
| |
| − | # find contigs from unitigs
| |
| − | $RACON $INREADS $ASMFOLDER/$ASMPREFIX.unitigs.paf $ASMFOLDER/$ASMPREFIX.unitigs.fasta > $ASMFOLDER/$ASMPREFIX.contigs.fasta
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ~/progs/minimap2/minimap2 -x map-ont -a -t$THREADS $ASMFOLDER/$ASMPREFIX.contigs.fasta $INREADS > $ASMFOLDER/$ASMPREFIX.reads.mm2.sam
| |
| − | $GRAPHMAP align -r $ASMFOLDER/$ASMPREFIX.contigs.fasta -d $INREADS -o $ASMFOLDER/$ASMPREFIX.reads.gm.sam
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | And can be started simply from the command-line using: ./assemble.sh "FQ file" "PATH TO ASM FOLDER" "PREFIX of output"
| |
| − | This finally led to a good assembly after rearranging the middle part which initially was “over-expressed”.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h3>
| |
| − | Proposition of new bacteriophage genomes
| |
| − | </h3>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | After having a core genome we want to check how many protein-coding genes we can find on the genome.
| |
| − | For this task, again several programs exist. Two of the more common programs are glimmer [7] and genemark [8].
| |
| − | Because the reputation among the target audience is higher for genemark [9] we used this tool for the genome annotation.
| |
| − | We ran the tool on the assembled genome in FASTA format generating a gene annotation file (gff3) for the genome highlighting all coding sequences.
| |
| − | For easier and more compact usage, we transformed the genome in fasta format with the annotation in gff3 into the embl flat file format.
| |
| − | Finally, we can describe the assembled genomes as follows:
| |
| − | TABLE
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | Using the embl flat file format we visualized the phage genomes in a circular genome diagram plot (Figure 5).
| |
| − | *-+-+*
| |
| − | figures
| |
| − | *_*_*
| |
| − | Here we can see see several things.
| |
| − | For the 3S genome, we can see that at certain position we see a high decrease in the coverage (at 58kbp, 72kbp and 110kbp).
| |
| − | At these positions no reads align to the reference genome.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | For the NES genome we can see a similar behaviour at 330kbp. Additionally we can see two spikes at the ends of the genome. However, we could also see …
| |
| − | Finally the FFP genome again has the same problems as the NES genome ends.
| |
| − | Some final bliblubb …
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-4">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/6a/T--Munich--Results_3S_edit_phage.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">3S</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-4">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/9/99/T--Munich--results_FFP_edit_phage.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">FFP</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-4">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/80/T--Munich--Results_NES_phage.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">NES</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h2>
| |
| − | Modular Bacteriophage Composition
| |
| − | </h2>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row mt-3">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <div id="accordion">
| |
| − | <div class="card" style="background-color:#017FD4;">
| |
| − | <div class="card-header" id="headingOne">
| |
| − | <h5 class="mb-0">
| |
| − | <button class="btn btn-link collapsed" data-toggle="collapse" data-target="#collapseOne" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="collapseOne">
| |
| − | <span class="pl-3" style="color: white;">Protein Purificaton</span>
| |
| − | </button>
| |
| − | </h5>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div id="collapseOne" class="collapse" aria-labelledby="headingOne" data-parent="#accordion">
| |
| − | <div class="card-body bg-white">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/7c/T--Munich--Results_purifyHoc.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">Hoc Purification</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | For protein modification of the T4 capsid protein HOC, a plasmid for protein expression was cloned and His-YFP-HOC was expressed. The DNA sequence of HOC was generated from the T4 genome by PCR. The corresponding plasmid (psb1c3_T7_YFP) was ligated with HOC. The plasmid was transformed into BL21 and expression was induced by IPTG.
| |
| − | The protein was purified by nickel affinity chromatography and gelfiltration. After purification, the native state of the protein was verified by circular dichroism (CD) and the stability for the assembly was evaluated by thermal de-folding.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <p>FILM</p>
| |
| − | <p>MODEL</p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row mt-3">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <div id="accordion">
| |
| − | <div class="card" style="background-color:#017FD4;">
| |
| − | <div class="card-header" id="headingTwo">
| |
| − | <h5 class="mb-0">
| |
| − | <button class="btn btn-link collapsed" data-toggle="collapse" data-target="#collapseTwo" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="collapseTwo">
| |
| − | <span class="pl-3" style="color: white;">Protein Characterization</span>
| |
| − | </button>
| |
| − | </h5>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div id="collapseTwo" class="collapse" aria-labelledby="headingTwo" data-parent="#accordion">
| |
| − | <div class="card-body bg-white">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/1/10/T--Munich--Results_CD_His_YFP_HOC.PNG" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">CD His YFP HOC</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/5f/T--Munich--Results_thermo%C3%BCbergang_His_YFP_HOC.PNG" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">THERMA HIS YFP HOC</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | After the two chromatography steps, the purified protein had a final concentration of 70µM and no by-products were visible by silver staining. The CD-spectra (minima of 218nm) of the protein corresponds to the model and the Ramachandran plot indicates that the protein was not denatured during purification. Then, the purified protein was intentionally denatured by thermal transition. Thereby it was confirmed that the protein is stable below 40°C. This is of importance, as phage assembly is performed at 29°C.</p>
| |
| − | <p>The purified protein was added to the assembly mix. Bacteria were transfected with the modified phages. Unbound phages and protein were removed by centrifugation. Fluorescence was measured in dependence of the proximity to the bacteria.
| |
| − | Theoretically, YFP intensity should correlate with the binding of YFP-HOC modified phages to the bacteria. Due to high background fluorescence, it is uncertain if the modification was successful. The activity of the phages was not impacted by the addition of the protein, this was verified by plaque assay.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <p>In a similar way, NanoLuc luciferase was incorporated into the T4 capsid.</p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <p>Discussion goes here</p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-3">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/f2/T--Munich--Results_wl3_sampleT4_XY122-01.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption"></figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-3">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/be/T--Munich--Results_Engineering_negativecontrol-2.png " class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption"></figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <p>Discussion goes here</p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/9/96/T--Munich--Results_Ramachandran.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">Ramachandran-Plot</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − | <h2>
| |
| − | Isolation
| |
| − | </h2>
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − | <h3>
| |
| − | Phenol-Chloroform Precipitation Achieves High Titers
| |
| − | </h3>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − | <h2>
| |
| − | Encapsulation
| |
| − | </h2>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h3>Droplets are Monodisperse</h3>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <p>Discussion goes here
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/38/T--Munich--Results_droplet_optimization.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">growh fermenter vs. shaking flask side by side with FI mtq2</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h3>
| |
| − | Bacteriophages Encapsulated In Alginate Can Withstand Gastric Acid
| |
| − | </h3>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <p>Discussion goes here
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/4f/T--Munich--Results_Joe_SGF_Phages.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">growh fermenter vs. shaking flask side by side with FI mtq2</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <p>Discussion goes here
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a2/T--Munich--Results_Droplets_phages.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">growh fermenter vs. shaking flask side by side with FI mtq2</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Quality Control
| |
| − | </h2>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | Plaque Assay verifies functionality of our manufactured phages and cell extract
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <ul style="">
| |
| − | <li>we are able to produce functional phages in our cell extract</li>
| |
| − | <li>the cell extract of our optimized strain has an endotoxin content below the detection limit and our regular self-produced cell extract has fewer endotoxins than the commercial cell extract</li>
| |
| − | <li>next-generation sequencing allowed us to accurately quantify contamination</li>
| |
| − | <li>phenol-chloroform extraction leads to a large amount of contaminating DNA which complicates phage assembly</li>
| |
| − | <li>next-generation sequencing helped us to improve our purification protocols, leading to improved phage assembly</li>
| |
| − | </ul>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h3>
| |
| − | Assessing Phage Functionality by Plaque Assays
| |
| − | </h3>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>We performed a Plaque Assay to determine the activity of the viable phages (titer) in our assembly batch. By creating serial dilutions, we were able to calculate a plaque forming units/milliliter (PFU/ml) value. The <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/2/23/T--Munich--AgarOverlayPlaqueAssay_.pdf "> plaque assay protocol </a> was used.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-12">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/d0/T--Munich--Results_Wl3_T7_plaque.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption"> </figcaption>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-12">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/b5/T--Munich--Results_Wl3_MS2_plaque.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption"> Plaque Assay of manufactured T7 DNA -bacteriophage (top) and MS2 RNA-bacteriophage (bottom) in our self-produced cell extract P15</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <!---
| |
| − | <h5>
| |
| − | Bacteriophages From Phactory Assemble And Are Fully Functional
| |
| − | </h5>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <p>Discussion goes here
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/7f/T--Munich--Results_QPCR_Nils.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">qpcr</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h5>
| |
| − | RNA-Detection via RT-qPCR
| |
| − | </h5>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | To rapidly detect functionality of the phages, Reverse Transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was applied to pellets of T7-infected host cells at different timepoints. The RT-qPCR protocol was used (add link). Using the delta-delta-Ct method3, relative expression was determined and normalized to the value at 3 minutes after addition of the phages. Whereas expression of E. coli genes remains stable, expression of three T7 genes is elevated throughout the experiment. The change of expression of all three phage genes reaches a first peak after 12 minutes and a second peak after 18 or 21 minutes.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | The sharp increase of phage gene expression in the first phase of the experiment displays the ability of the phages to successfully infect the bacteria and initiate reproduction. The second and even higher increase of expression is likely attributed to a second wave of infection of already replicated phages. This indicates that the phages are capable of reproducing inside their host bacteria, resulting in multiplication of functional phages.
| |
| − | The increase of expression of T7P01 is more pronounced than that of T7P07, which is in turn is stronger than that of T7P29. This circumstance is likely caused by differences in primer efficacy, a value describing the doubling rate in between every PCR cycle. For better reliability of the RT-qPCR quality control, primer efficacy should be assessed by creating a standard curve.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <p>All RNA samples were pooled and checked for DNA contamination, which could have interfered with the RT-qPCR. Absence of DNA was determined electrophoresis in a gel electrophoresis</p>
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>--->
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h3>Assessing Endotoxin Levels</h3>
| |
| − | <h5>Msb-B Knockouts Reduce Endotoxin Levels By 49-Fold</h5>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <p>Endotoxins are pyrogens deriving from gram-negative bacteria. Their mini from any pharmaceutical product is mandatory. Therefore, or Phactory, we engineered an E. coli strain lacking lipid A, a major endotoxin component and used this bacterium to produce our cell extract To evaluate endotoxin content of different cell extracts, a Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL)-test was performed according to the <a href="https://www.genscript.com/product/documents?cat_no=L00350&catalogtype=Document-PROTOCOL">supplier manual</a>. As a reference, we compared the cell extract from our msbB-deficient strain (K2) to a cell extract from a wild-type strain (K4) as well as a commercial cell-free system (myTXTL, Arbor Biosciences). A solution with live <i>E. coli</i> served as a positive control.</p>
| |
| − | <p>Compared to the K4 strain our msbB-deficient K2 cell extract had 49-fold reduced endotoxin levels (0.06 EU/ml compared to 2.94 EU/ml). Other cell extracts such as the P15 cell extract (3.83 EU/ml) and the commercial myTXTL (4.65 EU/ml) had even higher endotoxin contents.</p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/53/T--Munich--Results_Wl2_LAL.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">Endotoxin content in different cell-extracts determined by LAL-Test. Error bars indicate standard deviation of the measured plateau values. Error bars indicate SD</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>A calibration curve using known endotoxin concentrations is required for the LAL-Test. A dilution series ranging from 0.625 EU/ml to 5 EU/ml. The fitting curve is used to interpolate the concentrations in the unknown sample. The linear fit of the calibration curve had a R2 of 0.98, an intersection with the y-axis at 0.38 and a slope of 0.39 ml/EU. These values are in accordance with the requirements of the LAL-Test manufacturer. </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>Removal of endotoxins is impeded by their tendency to form stable interactions with other biomolecules2. Our method of preventing the lipid A biosynthesis is therefore superior to extensive isolation steps required for removing endotoxins in conventional phage production. </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <h3>
| |
| − | Nanopore Sequencing enhances DNA purification
| |
| − | </h3>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>Besides the cell extract, the DNA quality is the key to phage assembly. Unpure DNA (Host DNA, proteins contamination) inhibits the assembly of the phage within the cell lysate.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <p>Our first attempts with classical chloroform/phenol extraction failed because of low molecular DNA (agarose gel). Therefore, we decided to search for other purification protocols, DNAseI and the Norgene kit (46800) tremendously increased DNA purity. With this DNA, we were finally able to achieve high titers by assembly.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <p>As the results indicate, the main contaminant in chloroform phenole extratction is E.coli, as the origin for the native phage DNA. DNAseI and the Norgene kit led to reduction of E.coli contamination.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/1/16/T--Munich--contamination_file_seq.jpeg" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption"> Illustration of DNA composition after purification, 3S phage DNA was purified from the E.coli host by chloroform-phenol (CM) and column extraction with and without DNAseI treatment after cell lysis.</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/52/T--Munich--MS2_gel_enge.jpeg" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">SDS gel of the His-tag purified MS2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | Phactory yields phages with toxicity levels that allow oral administration to the patient. However, oral delivery requires protection of the phages from rapid degradation in the acidic gastric juice, while direct intravenous application requires additional purification steps. To overcome these hurdles, we prototyped two 3D-printed fluidic devices that can be assembled for less than $5. For oral application, we built a nozzle to encapsulate the phages in monodisperse calcium-alginate microspheres protecting them in the stomach. The alginate solution, ejected from a dispenser needle with a syringe pump, was sheared off by a parallel stream of air. Our results show that after 1 hour incubation in simulated gastric fluid, active phages are successfully released in simulated intestinal fluid. For intravenous administration, we can purify the bacteriophages from the remaining cell-extract via fractionation in a pressure-driven size-exclusion filter system. Additionally, we built microfluidic hardware for our human practice project OraColi. </p>
| |
| − | <p> - Alginat für lokale pH wert erhöhung im magen und auflösung in chelatoren(darm), da Ca2+ Ionen quervernetzen</p>
| |
| − | <p> - Enkapsulierung durch Co-Flow System. Druckluft schert Tropfen von Spritzennadel ab, Düse == Hardware Quervernetzung 1h in CaCl2 Lsg Waschen Verifikation durch Mikroskopie Fertig für Einsatz (insg. Ca 1.5-2h)</p>
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | Experimente
| |
| − | 1. 3D Modell von SYBR Gold gelabelten Phagen im Droplet durch z-Stack (BF/GFP)
| |
| − | 2. Darkfield Bilder von gelabelten Droplets (bild)
| |
| − | 3. Droplet Zusammensetzung (Viskosität zweier Alginate)
| |
| − | 4. Droplet Größen bei Flussrate und Druck
| |
| − | 5. Verhalten im Magen bzw. saurem Millieu (pH: 1) und Pepsin (1h @37°C, 10h @ RT) -> Phagen Degradation (barplot)
| |
| − | 6. Verhalten im Darm bzw. pH 7 und Pankreatin (2h @ 37°C) ->Phagen relase über Zeit (plot)
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <hr>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div id="phareferences" class="row">
| |
| − | <h2>References</h2>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <ol>
| |
| − | <li> <a href=https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/05/21/054742 / http://science.sciencemag.org/content/353/6299/aaf5573>Abudayyeh, O.O. et al., 2016. C2c2 is a single-component programmable RNA-guided RNA-targeting CRISPR effector. Science 353, aaf5573.</a></li>
| |
| − | <li><a href=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1097276517301338 >Boothby, T.C., Tapia, H., Brozena, A.H., Piszkiewicz, S., Smith, A.E., Giovannini, I., Rebecchi, L., Pielak, G.J., Koshland, D., and Goldstein, B., 2017. Tardigrades use intrinsically disordered proteins to survive desiccation. Mol Cell 65, 975ñ984.</a></li>
| |
| − | <li><a href=https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/index.html> Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2017. Antibiotic/Antimicrobial Resistance.</a></li>
| |
| − | <li><a href=http://www.gddiergezondheid.nl/diergezondheid/dierziekten/mastitis>GDDiergezondheid, 2017. Mastitis (uierontsteking).</a></li>
| |
| − | <li><a href=http://www.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aam9321> Gootenberg, J.S. et al., 2017. Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2. Science 356, 438ñ442. </a></li>
| |
| − | <li><a href=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5210516/ >Jia, B. et al., 2017. CARD 2017: Expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Research 45(D1), D566ñD573.</a></li>
| |
| − | <li><a href="http://science.sciencemag.org/content/337/6096/816.long">Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J.A., Charpentier, E., 2012. A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity. Science 337, 816-821.</a></li>
| |
| − | <li> <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.050> Liu, L. et al., 2017. The molecular architecture for RNA-guided RNA cleavage by Cas13a. Cell 170, 714ñ726.e10.</a></li>
| |
| − | <li><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3697360/">McArthur, A.G. et al., 2013. The comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 57, 3348ñ3357.</a></li>
| |
| − | <li><a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2015.07.004> McArthur, A.G. and Wright, G.D., 2015. Bioinformatics of antimicrobial resistance in the age of molecular epidemiology. Current Opinion in Microbiology 27, 45ñ50.</a></li>
| |
| − | <li><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nrmicro3525">Schwechheimer, C., and Kuehn, M.J., 2015. Outer-membrane vesicles from Gram-negative bacteria: biogenesis and functions. Nature Reviews: Microbiology 13, 605-619.</a></li>
| |
| − | <li><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-05796-x">Sloan, D., Batista, A., and Loeb, A., 2017. The Resilience of Life to Astrophysical Events. Scientific Reports 7, 5419-5424.</a></li>
| |
| − | <li><a href=http://www.zuivelnl.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Dutch-dairy-in-figures-2015.pdf> Statistics Netherlands, 2015. Dutch dairy in figures. </a></li>
| |
| − | <li><a href=http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/antibiotic-resistance/en> World Health Organization, 2016. Antibiotic resistance. </a> </li>
| |
| − | <li><a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867415012003?via%3Dihub">Zetsche, B, Gootenberg, J.S., Abudayyeh, O.O., Slaymaker, I.M., Makarova, K.S., Essletzbichler, P., Volz, S.E., van der Oost, J., Regev, Aviv, Koonin, E.V., Zhang, F., 2015. Cpf1 Is a Single RNA-Guided Endonuclease of a Class 2 CRISPR-Cas System. Cell 163, 759-771. </a></li>
| |
| − | </ol>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </h2>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Quality Control
| |
| − | </h2>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | Plaque Assay verifies functionality of our manufactured phages and cell extract
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <ul style="">
| |
| − | <li>we are able to produce functional phages in our cell extract</li>
| |
| − | <li>the cell extract of our optimized strain has an endotoxin content below the detection limit and our regular self-produced cell extract has fewer endotoxins than the commercial cell extract</li>
| |
| − | <li>next-generation sequencing allowed us to accurately quantify contamination</li>
| |
| − | <li>phenol-chloroform extraction leads to a large amount of contaminating DNA which complicates phage assembly</li>
| |
| − | <li>next-generation sequencing helped us to improve our purification protocols, leading to improved phage assembly</li>
| |
| − | </ul>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h3>
| |
| − | Assessing Phage Functionality by Plaque Assays
| |
| − | </h3>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>We performed a Plaque Assay to determine the activity of the viable phages (titer) in our assembly batch. By creating serial dilutions, we were able to calculate a plaque forming units/milliliter (PFU/ml) value. The <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/2/23/T--Munich--AgarOverlayPlaqueAssay_.pdf "> plaque assay protocol </a> was used.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-12">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/d0/T--Munich--Results_Wl3_T7_plaque.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption"> </figcaption>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-12">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/b5/T--Munich--Results_Wl3_MS2_plaque.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption"> Plaque Assay of manufactured T7 DNA -bacteriophage (top) and MS2 RNA-bacteriophage (bottom) in our self-produced cell extract P15</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <!---
| |
| − | <h5>
| |
| − | Bacteriophages From Phactory Assemble And Are Fully Functional
| |
| − | </h5>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <p>Discussion goes here
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/7f/T--Munich--Results_QPCR_Nils.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">qpcr</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h5>
| |
| − | RNA-Detection via RT-qPCR
| |
| − | </h5>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | To rapidly detect functionality of the phages, Reverse Transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was applied to pellets of T7-infected host cells at different timepoints. The RT-qPCR protocol was used (add link). Using the delta-delta-Ct method3, relative expression was determined and normalized to the value at 3 minutes after addition of the phages. Whereas expression of E. coli genes remains stable, expression of three T7 genes is elevated throughout the experiment. The change of expression of all three phage genes reaches a first peak after 12 minutes and a second peak after 18 or 21 minutes.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | The sharp increase of phage gene expression in the first phase of the experiment displays the ability of the phages to successfully infect the bacteria and initiate reproduction. The second and even higher increase of expression is likely attributed to a second wave of infection of already replicated phages. This indicates that the phages are capable of reproducing inside their host bacteria, resulting in multiplication of functional phages.
| |
| − | The increase of expression of T7P01 is more pronounced than that of T7P07, which is in turn is stronger than that of T7P29. This circumstance is likely caused by differences in primer efficacy, a value describing the doubling rate in between every PCR cycle. For better reliability of the RT-qPCR quality control, primer efficacy should be assessed by creating a standard curve.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <p>All RNA samples were pooled and checked for DNA contamination, which could have interfered with the RT-qPCR. Absence of DNA was determined electrophoresis in a gel electrophoresis</p>
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>--->
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h3>Assessing Endotoxin Levels</h3>
| |
| − | <h5>Msb-B Knockouts Reduce Endotoxin Levels By 49-Fold</h5>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <p>Endotoxins are pyrogens deriving from gram-negative bacteria. Their mini from any pharmaceutical product is mandatory. Therefore, or Phactory, we engineered an E. coli strain lacking lipid A, a major endotoxin component and used this bacterium to produce our cell extract To evaluate endotoxin content of different cell extracts, a Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL)-test was performed according to the <a href="https://www.genscript.com/product/documents?cat_no=L00350&catalogtype=Document-PROTOCOL">supplier manual</a>. As a reference, we compared the cell extract from our msbB-deficient strain (K2) to a cell extract from a wild-type strain (K4) as well as a commercial cell-free system (myTXTL, Arbor Biosciences). A solution with live <i>E. coli</i> served as a positive control.</p>
| |
| − | <p>Compared to the K4 strain our msbB-deficient K2 cell extract had 49-fold reduced endotoxin levels (0.06 EU/ml compared to 2.94 EU/ml). Other cell extracts such as the P15 cell extract (3.83 EU/ml) and the commercial myTXTL (4.65 EU/ml) had even higher endotoxin contents.</p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/53/T--Munich--Results_Wl2_LAL.png" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">Endotoxin content in different cell-extracts determined by LAL-Test. Error bars indicate standard deviation of the measured plateau values. Error bars indicate SD</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>A calibration curve using known endotoxin concentrations is required for the LAL-Test. A dilution series ranging from 0.625 EU/ml to 5 EU/ml. The fitting curve is used to interpolate the concentrations in the unknown sample. The linear fit of the calibration curve had a R2 of 0.98, an intersection with the y-axis at 0.38 and a slope of 0.39 ml/EU. These values are in accordance with the requirements of the LAL-Test manufacturer. </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>Removal of endotoxins is impeded by their tendency to form stable interactions with other biomolecules2. Our method of preventing the lipid A biosynthesis is therefore superior to extensive isolation steps required for removing endotoxins in conventional phage production. </p>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <h3>
| |
| − | Nanopore Sequencing enhances DNA purification
| |
| − | </h3>
| |
| − | <div class="row">
| |
| − | <div class="col-12">
| |
| − | <p>Besides the cell extract, the DNA quality is the key to phage assembly. Unpure DNA (Host DNA, proteins contamination) inhibits the assembly of the phage within the cell lysate.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <p>Our first attempts with classical chloroform/phenol extraction failed because of low molecular DNA (agarose gel). Therefore, we decided to search for other purification protocols, DNAseI and the Norgene kit (46800) tremendously increased DNA purity. With this DNA, we were finally able to achieve high titers by assembly.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <p>As the results indicate, the main contaminant in chloroform phenole extratction is E.coli, as the origin for the native phage DNA. DNAseI and the Norgene kit led to reduction of E.coli contamination.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/1/16/T--Munich--contamination_file_seq.jpeg" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption"> Illustration of DNA composition after purification, 3S phage DNA was purified from the E.coli host by chloroform-phenol (CM) and column extraction with and without DNAseI treatment after cell lysis.</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <figure class="figure">
| |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/52/T--Munich--MS2_gel_enge.jpeg" class="figure-img img-fluid rounded" alt="A generic square placeholder image with rounded corners in a figure.">
| |
| − | <figcaption class="figure-caption">SDS gel of the His-tag purified MS2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase</figcaption>
| |
| − | </figure>
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
