Latest revision as of 01:05, 18 October 2018

Collaboration:
_____We collaborated with Washington University St. Louis. We first communicated through email and we decided to share our yeast strain with them. We cultured our yeast strain with YPD media overnight. We aliquot drop of cultured yeast on autoclaved filter paper and wrap the filter paper with clean foil. The yeast was delivered to Washington University St. Louis and they successfully obtained the yeast from the filter paper and used the cell for their experiments. We also collaborated with University of California, Santa Cruz. They traveled to our campus during the summer and we guided them to tour our lab and several buildings located on the East Bank of our campus. Then we had a meeting together to share some details of our lab methodologies and human practice preparations. Since we started our project earlier then them, we were able to make some suggestions on plasmid construction and general lab techniques. Team UCSC put a lot of effort in their human practice activities and they showed us their description of their project as a whole. Their Professor also gave us some feedback on our project design, and we did some revisions on this part in the follow up experiments

×

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 <head>
 <meta charset="UTF-8" />
-<title>Team:Minnesota/2018/DESCRIPTION/igem</title>
+<title>Team:Minnesota/2018/EDUCATION AND ENGAGEMENT/igem</title>
 <meta name="generator" content="MediaWiki 1.24.1" />
 <link rel="shortcut icon" href="/favicon.ico" />
@@ Line 829: / Line 829: @@
                <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Minnesota/Results">Results</a>
                <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Minnesota/Attributions">Attributions</a>
+              <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Minnesota/Interlab">Interlab</a>
              </div>
          </div>
@@ Line 840: / Line 842: @@
              </div>
            </div>
-         <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Minnesota/Safety">Safety</a>
          <div class="dropdown">
              <button class="dropbtn">+Human Practices</button>
@@ Line 850: / Line 852: @@
-        <div class="dropdown">
-            <button class="dropbtn">+WARDS</button>
-            <div class="dropdown-content">
-              <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Minnesota/Applied_Design">Applied_Design</a>
-              <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Minnesota/Entrepreneurship">Entrepreneurship</a>
-              <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Minnesota/Hardware">Hardware</a>
-              <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Minnesota/Measurement">Measurement</a>
-              <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Minnesota/Model">Model</a>
-              <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Minnesota/Plant">Plant</a>
-              <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Minnesota/Software">Software</a>
-         </div>
+        <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Minnesota/Safety">Safety</a>
+         <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Minnesota/Judging">Medal Requirement</a>
-         </div>
          <a href="https://igem.org/2018_Judging_Form?team=Minnesota">JUDGING FORM</a>
          <p> #MINNESOTA 2018 </p>
 </div>
 <br/>
 <body>
-	<span style="font-size:30px; color:#ff9900">DESCRIPTION</span>
+	<span style="font-size:20px; color:black">Collaboration:</span>
 </body>
 <br/>
@@ Line 880: / Line 869: @@
-<span style="font-size:15px; color:black"><br/>
+<span style="font-size:25px; color:black">_____We collaborated with Washington University St. Louis. We first communicated through email
-_____Most of the mercury in the atmosphere is caused by human activities such as burning coal to produce electricity, processing taconite, and using mercury in products. Approximately 70% of current mercury comes from anthropogenic sources and 30% from natural sources. Elemental mercury vapor that occurs naturally in the environment and is released by industrial plants is oxidized to mercury(II) in the atmosphere and returned to Earth's surface in rainwater. Inorganic mercury if converted into organic forms by aquatic bacteria, and the primary methylation agents in most of these aquatic ecosystems are sulfate-reducing bacteria, which are ubiquitous in the top centimeters where most sediments transition from aerobic to anaerobic.<br/><br/>
+and we decided to share our yeast strain with them. We cultured our yeast strain with YPD
-_____Methylmercury is one of the most toxic forms of mercury, and it will biomagnify in aquatic food chain, and it will gradually accumulate from bacteria, planktons to vertebrate organisms. Common seen species of fishes in lakes located in Minnesota, such as sunfish and bass, contain approximately 500-5000 ppm of mercury. All mercury in fish tissues/vertebrates is methylmercury and is the only form that can accumulate in human neurological tissues. Approximately 95% of fish-derived methylmercury is absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. About 1 to 10% can be found in the blood primarily bound to hemoglobin. Methylmercury also enters the kidney and the liver and accumulates in growing hair. Methylmercury also crosses the blood-brain barrier. Mercury side effects numbness; difficulty in speaking; and loss of coordination, sight, or hearing. <br/><br/>
+media overnight. We aliquot drop of cultured yeast on autoclaved filter paper and wrap the filter
-_____Our team tries to provide an alternative solution to solve the methylmercury contamination problem in the lakes and streams, since the current solutions are mostly prevention and law enforcement. Previous iGEM Team Minnesota engineered mercury resistance protein into E. coli bacteria and then encapsulate these bacteria in silicon beads for water bioremediation. This award-winning idea has been experimentally proven to be effective in converting organic mercury into less toxic elemental form. However, since the engineered E. coli is encapsulated inside the silica beads to prevent unwanted proliferation in the environment, it only has a viability of up to 72 hours. The high cost, high maintenance of this system incites the question, “how can we engineer bacteria that are effective in converting organic mercury and maintain its viability for the length of the remediation process while not giving rise to any environmental risk.” Therefore, for this year’s iGEM, the goal is to expand on the previous project and develop a more enduring mercury detoxification method using engineered auxotrophic bacteria to increase the practical usability of the previously proposed system.<br/><br/>
+paper with clean foil. The yeast was delivered to Washington University St. Louis and they
-_____Our goal is to genetically engineer E. coli to make them capable of reducing ionic mercury to mercury substance. When the concentration of mercury ion is high the E. coli will proliferate and normally. When the concentration of mercury ion is below a certain, E. coli will not keep proliferating. Therefore, the engineered E. coli is a self-sustaining and self-maintaining solution to mercury pollution. The first step of our project was to construct a plasmid with chloramphenicol resistance as our selectable marker, this plasmid was transcribable and controlled by the LacI repressor with glutamine synthetase as the desired protein product. When IPTG, a lactose analogue, was added, GlnA was transcribed, causing glutamine synthetase to be translated. Once completed, this plasmid was transformed into a nonpathogenic E. coli strain with glnA knock out within its genome so it could not naturally produce glutamine synthase, making the E. coli dependent on IPTG for survival. Then a growth assay using glutamine-absent growth media was performed with varying concentrations of IPTG to characterize the system and colony transformation success.<br/><br/>
+successfully obtained the yeast from the filter paper and used the cell for their experiments.
-_____With the previously optimized IPTG level, the degree of MerA expression was measured using a western blot. This allowed us to obtain data on the expression of Mercury Reductase and simulate the bioremediation process without using ionic mercury. The final step will be to replace the LacI repressor with a MerR regulator, which is a mercury(II)-dependent transcriptional repressor/activator that acts on gram-negative Mer operons and functions as both the positive and negative regulator. And once this final plasmid is transformed into our strain, mercury(II) dose-response growth assays and mercury concentration kinetics will be performed.
+We also collaborated with University of California, Santa Cruz. They traveled to our campus
+during the summer and we guided them to tour our lab and several buildings located on the
+East Bank of our campus. Then we had a meeting together to share some details of our lab
+methodologies and human practice preparations. Since we started our project earlier then them,
+we were able to make some suggestions on plasmid construction and general lab techniques.
+Team UCSC put a lot of effort in their human practice activities and they showed us their
+description of their project as a whole. Their Professor also gave us some feedback on our
+project design, and we did some revisions on this part in the follow up experiments
 </span>
 <br/>
+<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/9/91/T--Minnesota--ZiyuanWangUCSC2.jpeg" height="250" width="250" margin:20px 10px; />
+<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/65/T--Minnesota--Collabration1.jpeg" height="250" width="250" margin:20px 10px; />
 <br/>
 <br/>

Difference between revisions of "Team:Minnesota/Collaborations"

Latest revision as of 01:05, 18 October 2018

Team:Minnesota

#Minnesota 2018

Loading ...