Difference between revisions of "Team:CUNY Kingsborough/Description"

Line 23: Line 23:
 
</center>-->
 
</center>-->
  
<p class= "default-padding">In 1952, Alan Turing proposed a mechanism that explained pattern formation in developing embryos which are initially patternless in appearance. In the following years, Turing’s theory was shown to not only be correct, but also capable of explaining a much broader class of patterns. Everything from leopard spots to zebra stripes to leaf veins are classified as <b>Turing Patterns</b> and can be easily recreated in computer simulations. Despite its success as a mathematical model, the actual construction of a Turing system is extremely difficult due to the un-physical requirements for a “Turing capable” biological system. <a id="bodyLink" href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:CUNY_Kingsborough/Turing_Patterns">Read more about Turing patterns on our wiki page.</a></p>
+
<p class= "default-padding">This year, we focused on improving two main components in our 2016-2017 iGEM projects. We sought to improve results for a lab protocol to quantify DNA without the use of a nanodrop machine nor a spectrophotometer. We also looked to improve our modeling of the BBa K1616019 pDawn promoter and characterize production at low starting amounts which, to our knowledge, was not previously done. We had also explored the construction of a biological Turing system one of our initial project ideas. In the end, we left it as an academic exercise due to the complexity of the construction and limited lab access. Our proposed Turing system and related notes can be found under the Modeling tab.</p>
 
+
<p class="default-padding"> However, in a recently published paper, Karig et al. and team were able to produce and prove the formation of Turing patterns outside the original regime. We were inspired by their work to attempt to produce our own simplified version, still utilizing the Las and Rhl quorum sensing system to induce the desired behavior but using our past experience of working with the light operon to tune spot sizes. Due to a lack of access to a lab we were not able to test our hypothesis as desired. However, we recognized the benefit of further characterizing the light operon so that we or future teams could get a head start. We also wanted to make an effort to support resource limited teams so we worked on improving the standardization of last year’s <a id= "bodyLink" href= "https://2017.igem.org/Team:Kingsborough_NY/Protocol#DNA_Quantification">Ethidium Bromide Spot test</a>. This would enable teams and researchers a method of quantifying DNA without the use of a spectrophotometer or nanodrop machine within a reasonable threshold of the true quantity.</p>
+
 
+
<br>
+
  
 +
<!--
 
<center>
 
<center>
 
<div id="content-menu">
 
<div id="content-menu">
Line 36: Line 33:
 
<li><a id="bodyLink" href="#LO">Light Operon</a></li>
 
<li><a id="bodyLink" href="#LO">Light Operon</a></li>
 
<li><a id="bodyLink" href="#E">EtBr Spot Protocol </a></li>
 
<li><a id="bodyLink" href="#E">EtBr Spot Protocol </a></li>
 +
<li><a id="bodyLink" href="#TP">Turing Patterns</a></li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</center>
 
</center>
 
+
-->
<hr>
+
 
+
<h2 class="default-padding" id="LO">Light Operon</h2>
+
<p class="low-rise-padding">Developed by Ohlendorf et al., pDawn/pDusk or the light operon is a convenient system used to produce proteins and commonly used since it does not have limitations other optogenetic systems do. Last year, we chose to use the light operon – pDawn/pDusk – to produce MazF, a cell – killing protein. This year, we planned on implementing the light operon in a Turing system – however, due to resource limitations, as a first step we modeled it stochastically. <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:CUNY_Kingsborough/Light_Operon"><b>Learn more about the light operon here.</b></a></p>
+
 
+
  
 
<hr>
 
<hr>
Line 50: Line 43:
 
<h2 class="default-padding" id="E">Ethidium Bromide Spot Test</h2>
 
<h2 class="default-padding" id="E">Ethidium Bromide Spot Test</h2>
  
<p class="low-rise-padding">Quantifying DNA may be time consuming, especially if results are not as expected. One protocol that may help speed up the process of DNA quantification is the Ethidium Bromide Spot technique. The protocol, developed recently, requires a minimal amount of EtBr and DNA to measure DNA concentration. It also decreases contact time with harmful EtBr and does not require the use of a spectrophotometer or nanodrop machine. Last year, our team collected data from the images of diluted DNA in EtBr to create a standard curve varying pixel intensity of the DNA sample and its concentration. This year, we are improving our standard curve by finding its accuracy and adding more data – in hopes of measuring DNA as accurately as a spectrophotometer or nanodrop machine may. We hope to further standardize the EtBr Spot protocol so future beginner or funding-limited researchers and teams working with DNA can accurately perform their experiments.</p>
+
<p class="low-rise-padding">Being able to accurately quantify DNA is essential to many experiments in biology. For those without access to a spectrophotometer or nanodrop machine, the process to quantify DNA becomes time-consuming and produces inaccurate results. One promising alternative is the Ethidium Bromide Spot technique. This recently developed protocol only requires a small amount of EtBr and DNA to measure DNA concentration. Last year, our team collected images of DNA diluted in EtBr to create a standard curve which predicts concentration based on pixel intensity. The paper detailing our full results can be found here: <a id="bodyLink" href="https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/03/27/289108">Quantification of DNA samples by Ethidium Bromide Spot Technique</a>. This year, we provided a more rigorous measure of our curve’s accuracy and collected more data by collaborating with iGEM teams. Our end goal is to create a standardized protocol which any resource-challenged researcher or team can utilize in their experiments.</p>
  
 
<h3 class="low-rise-padding" id="DNA">How is DNA Quantified?</h3>
 
<h3 class="low-rise-padding" id="DNA">How is DNA Quantified?</h3>
Line 65: Line 58:
 
<figure>
 
<figure>
 
<img src ="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9d/EtBr2.JPG/800px-EtBr2.JPG" alt="Ethidium Bromide" width="350">
 
<img src ="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9d/EtBr2.JPG/800px-EtBr2.JPG" alt="Ethidium Bromide" width="350">
<figcaption><small>Ethidium Bromide</small></figcaption>
 
 
</figure>
 
</figure>
 
</center>
 
</center>
 +
 +
<hr>
 +
 +
<h2 class="default-padding" id="LO">Light Operon</h2>
 +
<p class="low-rise-padding">Developed by Ohlendorf et al., pDawn/pDusk or the light operon is a convenient system used to produce proteins and commonly used since it does not have limitations other optogenetic systems do. Last year, we chose to use the light operon to produce MazF, a cell–killing protein. This year, we used a stochastic algorithm to model protein production at low starting concentration and compared it to a deterministic model of the same system. <a id="bodyLink" href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:CUNY_Kingsborough/Light_Operon">See our model here.</a></p>
 +
 +
<hr>
 +
 +
<h2 class="default-padding" id="TP">Turing Patterns</h2>
 +
<p class="low-rise-padding">In 1952, Alan Turing proposed a mechanism that explained pattern formation in developing embryos which are initially patternless in appearance. In the following years, Turing’s theory was shown to be valid as well as capable of explaining a much broader class of patterns. Despite its success as a mathematical model, the actual construction of a Turing system is extremely difficult. <a id="bodyLink" href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:CUNY_Kingsborough/Turing_Patterns">Read more about Turing patterns on our wiki.</a></p>
 +
 +
<p class="default-padding"> However, in a recently published paper, Karig et al. and team were able to produce and prove the formation of Turing patterns in conditions that were originally thought to be incapable of doing so. We were inspired by their work to attempt to produce our own simplified version, utilizing their design with the Las/ Rhl quorum sensing system to induce the desired behavior but inserting the light operon in order to tune spot sizes.</p>
 +
 +
<hr>
  
 
<h3 class="default-padding">Citations</h3>
 
<h3 class="default-padding">Citations</h3>
<p class="no-rise-padding">Roles of Pseudomonas aeruginosa las and rhl quorum-sensing systems in control of elastase and rhamnolipid biosynthesis genes. J P Pearson, E C Pesci, B H Iglewski Journal of Bacteriology Sep 1997, 179 (18) 5756-5767; DOI: 10.1128/jb.179.18.5756-5767.1997<br>
+
<p class="no-rise-padding">Roles of Pseudomonas aeruginosa las and rhl quorum-sensing systems in control of elastase and rhamnolipid biosynthesis genes. J P Pearson, E C Pesci, B H Iglewski Journal of Bacteriology Sep 1997, 179 (18) 5756-5767; DOI: 10.1128/jb.179.18.5756-5767.1997<br><br>
 
The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis A. M. Turing Phiilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, Vol. 237, No. 641. (Aug. 14, 1952), pp. 37-72.
 
The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis A. M. Turing Phiilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, Vol. 237, No. 641. (Aug. 14, 1952), pp. 37-72.
 
</p>
 
</p>

Revision as of 16:35, 1 December 2018

Background

This year, we focused on improving two main components in our 2016-2017 iGEM projects. We sought to improve results for a lab protocol to quantify DNA without the use of a nanodrop machine nor a spectrophotometer. We also looked to improve our modeling of the BBa K1616019 pDawn promoter and characterize production at low starting amounts which, to our knowledge, was not previously done. We had also explored the construction of a biological Turing system one of our initial project ideas. In the end, we left it as an academic exercise due to the complexity of the construction and limited lab access. Our proposed Turing system and related notes can be found under the Modeling tab.


Ethidium Bromide Spot Test

Being able to accurately quantify DNA is essential to many experiments in biology. For those without access to a spectrophotometer or nanodrop machine, the process to quantify DNA becomes time-consuming and produces inaccurate results. One promising alternative is the Ethidium Bromide Spot technique. This recently developed protocol only requires a small amount of EtBr and DNA to measure DNA concentration. Last year, our team collected images of DNA diluted in EtBr to create a standard curve which predicts concentration based on pixel intensity. The paper detailing our full results can be found here: Quantification of DNA samples by Ethidium Bromide Spot Technique. This year, we provided a more rigorous measure of our curve’s accuracy and collected more data by collaborating with iGEM teams. Our end goal is to create a standardized protocol which any resource-challenged researcher or team can utilize in their experiments.

How is DNA Quantified?

DNA can be quantified through gel electrophoresis, a process that separates proteins in a sample by charge and molecular weight - with the lighter proteins traveling further down a gel and the heavier ones staying on the top. Since DNA is negatively charged, the more nucleotides in a sample (meaning the more DNA) the slower it will migrate to the end of the gel. These proteins are seen as bands on the gel - however, to truly visualize them the gel must be dyed with an agent such as EtBr.

How does EtBr Work?

Ethidium Bromide is an intercalating agent - this means that it inserts itself between the nucleotides of a nucleic acid such as DNA or RNA. It has been shown that the amount of EtBr intercalating throughout a sample is proportional to its concentration.

Once the agarose gel is stained with EtBr, it is run and imaged. During imaging, the gel is hit with UV light to visualize the bands. Fluorescence occurs because EtBr is an aromatic compound, meaning it contains many double bonds. When EtBr is hit with UV light, these double bonds absorb energy from the visible light at a certain wavelength and reflect light at others. The orange color we commonly associate with EtBr is the result of reflected light of a particular wavelength.

Ethidium Bromide

Light Operon

Developed by Ohlendorf et al., pDawn/pDusk or the light operon is a convenient system used to produce proteins and commonly used since it does not have limitations other optogenetic systems do. Last year, we chose to use the light operon to produce MazF, a cell–killing protein. This year, we used a stochastic algorithm to model protein production at low starting concentration and compared it to a deterministic model of the same system. See our model here.


Turing Patterns

In 1952, Alan Turing proposed a mechanism that explained pattern formation in developing embryos which are initially patternless in appearance. In the following years, Turing’s theory was shown to be valid as well as capable of explaining a much broader class of patterns. Despite its success as a mathematical model, the actual construction of a Turing system is extremely difficult. Read more about Turing patterns on our wiki.

However, in a recently published paper, Karig et al. and team were able to produce and prove the formation of Turing patterns in conditions that were originally thought to be incapable of doing so. We were inspired by their work to attempt to produce our own simplified version, utilizing their design with the Las/ Rhl quorum sensing system to induce the desired behavior but inserting the light operon in order to tune spot sizes.


Citations

Roles of Pseudomonas aeruginosa las and rhl quorum-sensing systems in control of elastase and rhamnolipid biosynthesis genes. J P Pearson, E C Pesci, B H Iglewski Journal of Bacteriology Sep 1997, 179 (18) 5756-5767; DOI: 10.1128/jb.179.18.5756-5767.1997

The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis A. M. Turing Phiilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, Vol. 237, No. 641. (Aug. 14, 1952), pp. 37-72.