Difference between revisions of "Team:EPFL/InterLab"

(Prototype team page)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
<html>
 
<html>
  
 
+
<div class="column fuLL_size">
<div class="column full_size judges-will-not-evaluate">
+
  <h1>iGEM 2018 InterLab Study</h1>
<h3>★  ALERT! </h3>
+
  <br>
<p>This page is used by the judges to evaluate your team for the <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Judging/Medals">medal criterion</a> or <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Judging/Awards"> award listed below</a>. </p>
+
  <h2 style="color:#5bc7d8">Introduction to the InterLab Study</h2>
<p> Delete this box in order to be evaluated for this medal criterion and/or award. See more information at <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Judging/Pages_for_Awards"> Instructions for Pages for awards</a>.</p>
+
  <br>
</div>
+
  <p>Reliable and repeatable measurement is a key component to all engineering disciplines. The same holds true for synthetic biology, which has also been called engineering biology. However, the ability to repeat measurements in different labs has been
 
+
    difficult. The Measurement Committee, through the InterLab study, has been developing a robust measurement procedure for green fluorescent protein (GFP) over the last several years. GFP was chosen as the measurement marker for this study since it's one of the most used markers in synthetic biology and, as a result, most laboratories are equipped to measure this protein.
 
+
  </p>
<div class="clear"></div>
+
 
+
  <p>The aim is to improve the measurement tools available to both the iGEM community and the synthetic biology community as a whole. One of the big challenges in synthetic biology measurement has been that fluorescence data usually cannot be compared because
 
+
    it has been reported in different units or because different groups process data in different ways. Many have tried to work around this using “relative expression” comparisons; however, being unable to directly compare measurements makes it harder to debug engineered biological constructs, harder to effectively share constructs between labs, and harder even to just interpret your experimental controls.
<div class="column full_size">
+
  </p>
<h1>InterLab</h1>
+
 
<h3>Bronze Medal Criterion #4</h3>
+
  <p>The InterLab protocol aims to address these issues by providing researchers with a detailed protocol and data analysis form that yields absolute units for measurements of GFP in a plate reader.</p>
<p><b>Standard Tracks:</b> Participate in the Interlab Measurement Study and/or obtain new, high quality experimental characterization data for an existing BioBrick Part or Device and enter this information on that part's Main Page in the Registry. The part that you are characterizing must NOT be from a 2018 part number range.
+
 
<br><br>
+
  <h2 style="color:#5bc7d8">Goal for the Fifth InterLab</h2>
For teams participating in the <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Measurement/InterLab">InterLab study</a>, all work must be shown on this page.
+
 
+
</p>
+
 
</div>
 
</div>
  

Revision as of 21:51, 29 July 2018

iGEM 2018 InterLab Study


Introduction to the InterLab Study


Reliable and repeatable measurement is a key component to all engineering disciplines. The same holds true for synthetic biology, which has also been called engineering biology. However, the ability to repeat measurements in different labs has been difficult. The Measurement Committee, through the InterLab study, has been developing a robust measurement procedure for green fluorescent protein (GFP) over the last several years. GFP was chosen as the measurement marker for this study since it's one of the most used markers in synthetic biology and, as a result, most laboratories are equipped to measure this protein.

The aim is to improve the measurement tools available to both the iGEM community and the synthetic biology community as a whole. One of the big challenges in synthetic biology measurement has been that fluorescence data usually cannot be compared because it has been reported in different units or because different groups process data in different ways. Many have tried to work around this using “relative expression” comparisons; however, being unable to directly compare measurements makes it harder to debug engineered biological constructs, harder to effectively share constructs between labs, and harder even to just interpret your experimental controls.

The InterLab protocol aims to address these issues by providing researchers with a detailed protocol and data analysis form that yields absolute units for measurements of GFP in a plate reader.

Goal for the Fifth InterLab