Our experiment creates a biological device for
measuring Ni2+ concentration. Therefore, the main purpose of
our modeling is to find the functional relationship between the ambient Ni2+ concentration (Nienvior.) and the luminescent intensity (LI) expressed by
Lux. Firstly, we established a mathematical model to describe the dynamic process of the whole
experiment, compared the predicted results with the experimental data, and adjusted the model with the
experimental data to obtain the functional relationship between Nienvior.
and LI. Our model is divided into three parts. Firstly,
NikABCDE is an ABC superfamily transport system, whose function is to transport Ni2+. Secondly, NcrB protein is the core regulatory
system, which can bind with Ni2+
and then release the inhibition of
promoter PncrA. Thirdly, as the inhibition of PncrA is released, the fluorescent protein gene of
LuxCDABE connected downstream of PncrA can express and luminescence. Models are established for these
three parts, and the effect of Nienvior. concentration on luminescent intensity is
obtained. Symbol Description ki Rate constants for each reaction Ni The concentration of Ni2+ in cells Nienvior. Ni2+ concentration in the
extracellular environment E Ni2+
transporter protein
concentration (quantity)--NikABCDE R Concentration of NcrB in E.coli P Promoter PncrA that binds to NcrB
repressor LI Luminescent Intensity mRNA production rate from NcrB
DNA Translation rate of NcrB mRNA NikABCDE is an ABC superfamily transport system,
and can transport Ni2+ for E.coli. Among them, two transmembrane
proteins, NikB and NikC, constitute the transmembrane core of the transport system. NikA is the
periplasmic binding protein (PBP), which can transfer captured nickel ions to the NikBC core, and NikD
and NikE are two cytoplasmic proteins (De Pina, et al., 1995). Navarro, et al., 1993). NikABCDE system for transporting Ni2 +
process shows below ke is the binding rate of nikABCDE and Ni2+ ,
and the value of ke is 0.1uM(Englert, 2010). Ni2
+
diffusion equilibrium assumption when Ni2
+
are transported into the cell, internal balance of Ni2+
concentration will be influenced, which can lead to uneven distribution of Ni2+concentration
instantaneously. With a certain amount of time for the free diffusion, the Ni2+
concentration
in the cell can be steady. So we assume that Ni2+
transported
into the cell will have an uniform distribution instantaneously. And this assumption is completely true
in the case of lower transport rate of the transporter protein. Reference diffusion balance model, establish ODE
of Ni2 + diffusion model. From the law of mass action,
the ODE between Ni and NiE is obtained (1.1) (1.2) When the bacteria were in a low-concentration Ni2+
environment, the repressor protein NcrB binds to promoter PncrA, making LuxCDABE downstream of PncrA
unable to express. When bacteria are in a high concentration of Ni2+
environment, the intracellular Ni2+ concentration
accumulates, NcrB binds to Ni2+, changes the conformational mode of NcrB, which
falls off PncrA. The PncrA promoter is transcribed, and the LuxCDABE expression downstream of PncrA
promoter emitted fluorescence. In this model, a kinetic model is established, and the functional
relationship between Ni2+ concentration and Luminescent Intensity is
deduced.
Assumption of NcrB For NcrB, we make the assumption that there are
three forms in the cells within the NCRB, respectively is free NCRB, NCRB - PncrA compounds, as well as
the NCRB Ni2+ complexes. And in the process of inhibition of
Ni2+ contact NcrB protein, which can be treated as
competition between competition between Ni2 + and PncrA . In the process of competition, free NcrB can
be regarded as an intermediate transition state. Specifically, NcrB is detached from the promoter and
becomes a free NcrB, which then binds to the Ni2+
to form a NcrB-Ni2+ complex, so the concentration of NcrB in the
intermediate state can be seen as a constant.
Transcription
Assumption 1)
The total transcription rate is mainly determined by the amount of substrate – NcrB dissociates with
PncrA and the intensity of PncrA. 2)
The promoter PncrA intensity (in polymerase per second) is a constant that represents the maximum
expression rate of transcription. 3)
The total transcription rate is the function of the maximum transcription rate and the fraction of the
signal molecule bound to its binding site. 4)
For constitutive expression of genes - NcrB, we can assume that it is the maximum transcript.
Translation Assumption 1)
The main factor influencing the translation rate is the rate of ribosomes
across the mRNA, which can be approximated by constant rates. 2)
The translation rate is limited by the amount of available mRNA transcripts that bind with ribosome. 3)
The translation rate is a function of the ribosome velocity and the mRNA transcript concentration. Using the above parameters, we can construct a
series of ODE representing our biosensor network. (1.3) (1.5) (1.6) is mRNA production rate from NcrB DNA, which
values 0.0014nM·min-1(Junhua,
2012). is translation rate of NcrB mRNA, which values
0.0093nM·min-1
(Pengfei, 2013). To simplify the calculation, ignore the parts
that have little impact, and simplify the process as follows k2 is the reaction rate constant for the binding of
Ni2+ and NcrB, the value of k2
is 8nM (Xinming Yang. 2013). It can be seen from the assumption that R is the
intermediate constant value during the change process, and R0
is the total amount of intracellular
NcrB, which is a function of copy number B of plasmid Intracellular
PncrA has two states, that is, binding to NcrB and free (1.8) The
binding process of Ni2+ and R can be regarded as steady state
equilibrium, (1.9) (1.10) When Ni2+ is combined with NcrB, it can make promoter
PncrA transcription, and then LuxCDABE expression and luminescence in the downstream. Luminescent
intensity is related to the amount of LuxCDABE expression, and the amount of LuxCDABE expression is
related to the amount of promoter PncrA transcription.
All of the detected promoter PncrA were
produced by the unbinding of NcrB
The luminescent intensity is positively
correlated with the promoter concentration The
luminescent intensity can be modelled as below: (1.11) The purpose of modeling is to obtain the
relationship between Luminescent Intensity LI
and Ni2+ concentration in vitro, solve (1.1)~(1.10), and
substitute (1.11) to get the analytical solution of LI. (1.12) while (1.13) to
simplify the formula, we discuss it further LI can't go up indefinitely, or Ni2+ can't
go up indefinitely, so r1, r2 <0,γ>0. When the , (1.14) It
can be seen that when the external Ni2+ in vitro is a constant value, the final LI will
tend to be a constant value From the derivation, the relationship between lg(Nienvior.)
in vitro and LImax is linear.
However, according to the experimental
data, LImax shows a downward trend after reaching a certain
concentration, and tends to 0 as the concentration increases. Therefore, we suspect that this is
related to the cytotoxicity of Ni2+ and related experiments have been conducted.
Through the experimental results, the modified model of LI and lg(Nienvior.)
is established, and the original model was modified with this model. Compared with the experimental
results, the model is in good agreement. When the external Ni2+ in vitro is a constant value, the final LI will
tend to be a constant value. On this basis, we discuss how Nienvior is positively correlated with LImax. When
t→∞ while
according
to mode,the
relation between LImax and Nienvior. is positive correlation.
We analyze the experimental data and find, within
a certain range of Nienvior , concentration LImax and lg(Nienvior) are linear correlation. We
make a line graph of experimental data as figure 4 We
find that LImax and lg(Nienvior) tend to be a linear function with a positive
correlation when lg(Nienvior) is in the range of (-∞,-3]. However, after the value of lg(Nienvior) is greater than -3, the value of LImax
decreases significantly. Considering the influence of high concentration of nickel ions on
cytotoxicity, the cytotoxicity of nickel ions is analyzed. 3.
The
Cytotoxicity of Nickel Ions Using the Logistic equation to fit the data We can get the following results: Coefficients
(with 95% confidence bounds):
a = 1.086 (1.027, 1.146)
b = 0.2424 (-0.4756, 0.9605)
c =7.07 (1.872, 12.27) Goodness
of fit:
SSE: 0.005441
R-square: 0.9971
Adjusted R-square: 0.9957
RMSE: 0.03688 We
can find that the adjusted R-square is close to 1, indicating the regression equation for fitting data
is very appropriate. The figure of regression is as follows: Figure 5 The
Cytotoxicity of Nickel Ions Based
on the previous data and graphic,
toxicity function can be established as (1.17) According
to the above part, the model is modified as follows: Considering
cytotoxicity, the model is modified. LImax is modified to be . With the Matlab, we get the revised relationship between LI
and lg(Nienvior.) Compare
the revised model with the data. According to the modified model, the relationship
between LImax and lg(Nienvior) is predicted, as shown in figure 6. In the
figure, the red dots represent the measurement data of the real experiment. It can be seen that our
model has a good agreement with the experiment. [1]
Schinkel, A. H., & Jonker, J. W.
(2012). Mammalian drug efflux transporters of the ATP binding cassette (ABC) family: an overview.
Advanced drug delivery reviews, 64, 138-153. [2]
Proshkin, S. et al: Cooperation Between
Translating Ribosomes And RNA Polymerase In Transcription Elongation. Science 328.5977 (2010): 504-508.
Web. [3]
Young, R and H Bremer:
Polypeptide-Chain-Elongation Rate In Escherichia Coli B/R As A Function Of Growth Rate. Biochem. J.
160.2 (1976): 185-194. Web. [4]
Patricia A: Mathematical
model of the Lux luminescence system in the terrestrial bacterium Photorhabdus luminescens. Molecular
BioSystems. 10.1039(2009):68-76 [5]
Englert, Derek L: Repellent Taxis in
Response to Nickel Ion Requires neither Ni2+Transport nor the Periplasmic NikA Binding
Protein. Journal of Bacteriology 192.10(2010): 17 [6]
Oloo, E. O., & Tieleman, D. P.
(2004). Conformational transitions induced by the binding of MgATP to the vitamin B12 ATP-binding
cassette (ABC) transporter BtuCD. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279(43), 45013-45019. [7]
Rowe, J. L., Starnes, G. L., &
Chivers, P. T. (2005). Complex transcriptional control links NikABCDE-dependent nickel transport with
hydrogenase expression in Escherichia coli. Journal of bacteriology, 187(18), 6317-6323. [8]
Heddle, J., Scott, D. J., Unzai, S.,
Park, S. Y., & Tame, J. R. (2003). Crystal structures of the liganded and unliganded nickel-binding
protein NikA from Escherichia coli. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278(50), 50322-50329. [9]
Marchetti, S., de Vries, N. A., Buckle,
T., Bolijn, M. J., van Eijndhoven, M. A., Beijnen, J. H., ... & Schellens, J. H. (2008). Effect of
the ATP-binding cassette drug transporters ABCB1, ABCG2, and ABCC2 on erlotinib hydrochloride (Tarceva)
disposition in in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic studies employing
Bcrp1−/−/Mdr1a/1b−/−(triple-knockout) and wild-type mice. Molecular cancer therapeutics, 7(8),
2280-2287. [10] Omata, T., Price, G. D., Badger, M. R., Okamura, M., Gohta, S., & Ogawa, T. (1999). Identification of an ATP-binding cassette transporter involved in bicarbonate uptake in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7942. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(23), 13571-13576. [11] Geertsma, E. R., Mahmood, N. N., Schuurman-Wolters, G. K., & Poolman, B. (2008). Membrane reconstitution of ABC transporters and assays of translocator function. Nature protocols, 3(2), 256. [12] George, A. M., & Jones, P. M. (2012). Perspectives on the structure–function of ABC transporters: the switch and constant contact models. Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, 109(3), 95-107. [13]
Dosanjh, N. S., & Michel, S. L. (2006). Microbial nickel metalloregulation: NikRs for nickel ions. Current opinion in chemical biology, 10(2), 123-130.
[14]
Tao Zhu. Study on the Mechanism of
Regulation for the Nickel Resistance Determinant Expression in Leptospirillum
ferriphilum UBK03.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Dissertation,2011. [15]
Xinming
Yang, Dechen Xu, Tianfan Cheng, Zhaoyong Xi, Linhong Zhao, Yangzhong Liu, Hongzhe Sun. Recent Progress
of Copper and Nickel Chaperones. PROGRESS IN CHEMISTRY, 2013, 25(4). [16]
Junhua
Kang. Fermentation
of N- acetylglucosamine and N- acetylneuraminic acid by recombinant Escherichia coli. Shandong
University,
2012. [17] Pengfei
Gu. Production
of L-tryptophan by recombinant E-coli. Shandong University, 2013.
Model
Modelling
Symbol
Description
NikABCDE Transports Ni2+
1.
Assumption
2. Model
Regulation of PncrA Mediated by
NcrB
1. Assumption
2. Model
3.
Model Simplification
Luminescence Process of
LuxCDABE
1. Assumption
2. Model
Relationship between LI and t
Relationship between Ni2+ in vitro
and LImax
1.
The linear correlation between LI and lg(Nienvior.)
2. Model Verification By
Experiment
4. Modifying the Model
References