Difference between revisions of "Team:Utrecht/Collaborations"
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<li><a href="#Munchen">München</a></li> | <li><a href="#Munchen">München</a></li> | ||
<li><a href="#Leiden">Leiden</a></li> | <li><a href="#Leiden">Leiden</a></li> | ||
| + | <li><a href="#Tar">Tar</a></li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 09:14, 10 October 2018
Collaboration iGEM team Aachen 2018 - iGEM Biotechnology Conference
After the meet-up in Munich, we started Skyping with them weekly to keep each other updated. We divided the tasks and both started with our search for speakers, companies and funding. Our team arranged the venue and facilities, catering services, ticket sales, two speakers (Dr. Silvia Mihaila and Dr. Mauro Muraro) and two companies (Single Cell Discoveries and Mimetas). Team Aachen arranged two speakers (Dr. Aljoscha Wahl and Dr. Karel Olavarria Gamez) and designed the flyers. They also helped with designing the powerpoint for the conference. Together we promoted the conference on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter, as well as face-to-face promotion both in Germany and the Netherlands.
Before the conference, we had two meetings in Utrecht to sort problems and to get to know each other even better. We had a lot of fun during these meet-ups and during the iGEM Biotechnology Conference itself. We are happy we managed to organize such a successful conference together, with about 60 paying participants!
Collaboration with iGEM team ETH Zurich 2018
This year, the ETH Zurich iGEM team is developing an autonomous robot that is using biosensors as its control element to follow molecule gradients in the air and to detect their source. To speed up their biosensors, they are also aiming at exploiting and modifying the natural Tar-receptor-based chemotaxis system of E. coli.
During the European iGEM Meetup in July, we came to the conclusion that both of our teams are working on a chemotaxis-based biosensor. Although our projects are based on somewhat other methods and slightly different applications, we did struggle with the same problem at that time. We decided to stay in touch and update each other about solutions, which formed the base for our collaboration.
Since then we have decided to take our collaboration to a higher level, skyping every week and planning future possibilities for our collaboration.
For a start, we plan to exchange parts in order to validate them. Furthermore, we aim to integrate our customized chemotaxis pathway containing E. coli in the air-sampling robot of team Zürich. This way the robot might be able to measure concentrations more precisely and potentially has a wider range of substrates it will be able to bind. Also, team Zurich customizes and optimizes microfluidic chips. If one of these chips is also applicable for our project, this will be a great tool to make our project usable in a wider range of end products.
European meetup in Munich (20 – 22/7/18)
During the European iGEM meetup 2018 in Munich (20th - 22nd July 2018), we contributed to the organisation by organising a Teambuilding Workshop for approximately 40 students in total. This workshop was inspired by both Amy Edmonson’s TEDx talk: ‘How to turn a group of strangers into a team?’ and the story about the Thailand cave rescue. We discussed the ways people with different cultural and academic backgrounds who did not know each other before, had to work together in one team to achieve their mutual goals such as in the Thailand cave rescue. This truly reflects the collaboration within any iGEM team: all individual team members of the separate iGEM teams have one common goal: make the project succeed and win as much medals as possible at the Giant Jamboree,and teams consist of members with different cultural and academic backgrounds. In situations as the Thailand cave rescue especially good communication within a group of strangers is essential in order to complete the task.
After the theoretic part, the participant got the chance to experience how difficult it is to communicate in a group of strangers by completing the ‘blindfolded rope square task’. In teams of 10 people, they had to make a perfect square out of a 15 meter rope without knowing eachothers names within a 20 minute time limit. For this challenge each individual was blindfolded while holding the rope, which they were not allowed to let go of. Almost every team managed to make a perfect square in time.
After the task, we evaluated the problems and findings, which arose during the task. The main conclusion was that structure and good communication is very important, regulated by a leader who guides the whole group by making sure everyone understands the task, evaluates if the task has been performed correctly and channels all the input of the group. This conclusion is also applicable in their own iGEM teams.
Leiden BBQ (17/8/18)
This summer all Dutch teams were invited to meet and socialize at the Dutch Meet-Up and BBQ. Here they were given the opportunity to get more acquainted with the other teams on a more personal level. Teams also participated in a pub quiz to immerse ourselves in other team's respective projects. The meeting was hosted by iGEM Leiden.
Tar-Transformation
Since the Tar receptor plays a central role in our project, we opted to use the biobricks BBa_K777000 and BBa_K777001. After isolation from the distribution kit and subsequent transformation of these parts to E. coli DH5-alpha we performed a colony PCR on several clones using the VF and VR primers, to confirm the presence of the Tar construct in our bacteria. The results of this screening showed the presence of a DNA fragment of 1200 bp, even though the expected fragment size should be 1762 bp (Figure 1). Sequencing results showed the presence of a GFP coding sequence downstream of an undefined region that presumably contains a promoter sequence. These results were confirmed by examining the plates under the fluorescence binoculars.
We hypothesized that this was due to inconsistency in our DNA distribution kit, since we did not isolate any GFP expressing constructs, with the exception of constructs that were already used for the interlab study. Because these constructs were isolated on a separate occasion, we asked other iGEM teams if they could replicate these results. The Dutch teams from Eindhoven and Groningen decided to help us by testing theses parts from their kit and sharing their results with us. From these results it became clear that the parts BBa_K777000 and BBa_K777001 from their kits showed no fluorescence at all (Figure 3 and 4).
Since we really needed these parts to complete the methylation part of our project, team Groningen decided to send their parts to us. The effort that both teams put into helping us is a perfect example of the iGEM spirit. We would like to thank both teams for their time and effort!
