Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{UMaryland}} | + | {{UMaryland/something}} |
+ | {{UMaryland/CSS}} | ||
+ | {{UMaryland/Navbar}} | ||
+ | |||
<html> | <html> | ||
+ | <body> | ||
+ | <div class="row"> <!-- honestly idk why this is here - i just copied it from somewhere and then now i'm too scared to remove this class !--> | ||
+ | <div class="titleRegion" style="background-image: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/66/T--UMaryland--patternAlternateTwo.png)"> | ||
+ | <div class="container" style="height: 200px;"> | ||
+ | <div class="titleContainer"> | ||
+ | <div class="titleText">Improve</div> | ||
+ | <div class="subtitleText">Increasing the Efficacy of PETase</div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="titleRegionFade"></div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="columnLeft c16"></div> | ||
+ | <div class="columnLeft c66"> <!-- Where the actual content actually is !--> | ||
+ | <div class="meatyRegion"> | ||
+ | <div id="Overview"> | ||
+ | <div class="meatMeat"> | ||
+ | One of the factors that affects the efficiency of biodegradation of plastics is the concentration of the catalyzing enzyme near the surface of the plastic. If the enzyme is allowed to diffuse in solution freely it is less likely to interact with the plastic. In a situation like this degradation could be much slower than if the enzyme was highly concentrated around the surface of the plastic. The Ideonella sakaiensis was reported to have grown in a biofilm which enveloped plastic pieces. As such, we first considered maximizing production of biofilm on plastic. While researching this possibility we found that the 2017 ITB Indonesia iGEM team had attempted a similar project. They developed a system that facilitated biofilm production and expressed PETase simultaneously. Their results indicated that biofilm formation actually inhibited degradation. More plastic was degraded without biofilm than with. We decided to investigate other methods of localizing concentration while simultaneously allowing for the greater interaction of the substrate and enzyme than biofilm was seen to do. Imperial College of London in 2014 developed parts for a cellulose binding domain (CBD). This domain was capable of being incorporated with other subunits such as GFP. They were able to demonstrate that a GFP + CBD fusion protein was capable of binding to bacterial cellulose. Equipped with this information we decided to develop a fusion protein which incorporated PETase and CBD. Our hypothesis is that the bacterial cellulose surrounding the plastic will act as a scaffold on which the PETase can easily work in close proximity to the substrate. This should, in turn, increase the degradation rate. A model of our predictions can be found on the modeling page. | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> <!-- | ||
+ | <div id="week1"> | ||
+ | <div class="meatSubtitle"> | ||
+ | Waluigi | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="imageBox float_right" style=" width: 200px;"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/77/T--UMaryland--waaaa.png" style="height: inherit; width: inherit;" alt="Waluigi Time!"> | ||
+ | <div class="imageBoxDescription">Figure 1 - Float right Waluigi time!</div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="meatMeat"> | ||
+ | Waluigi is the ultimate example of the individual shaped by the signifier. Waluigi is a man seen only in mirror images; lost in a hall of mirrors he is a reflection of a reflection of a reflection. You start with Mario – the wholesome all Italian plumbing superman, you reflect him to create Luigi – the same thing but slightly less. You invert Mario to create Wario – Mario turned septic and libertarian – then you reflect the inversion in the reflection: you create a being who can only exist in reference to others. Waluigi is the true nowhere man, without the other characters he reflects, inverts and parodies he has no reason to exist. Waluigi’s identity only comes from what and who he isn’t – without a wider frame of reference he is nothing. He is not his own man. In a world where our identities are shaped by our warped relationships to brands and commerce we are all Waluigi. | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="imageBox center"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/77/T--UMaryland--waaaa.png" style="max-width: 100%" alt="Waluigi Time!"> | ||
+ | <div class="imageBoxDescription">Figure 2 - Big centered Waluigi time!</div> | ||
+ | </div> !--> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </body> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
− | + | {{UMaryland/Footer}} | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + |
Revision as of 20:28, 14 October 2018
Improve
Increasing the Efficacy of PETase
One of the factors that affects the efficiency of biodegradation of plastics is the concentration of the catalyzing enzyme near the surface of the plastic. If the enzyme is allowed to diffuse in solution freely it is less likely to interact with the plastic. In a situation like this degradation could be much slower than if the enzyme was highly concentrated around the surface of the plastic. The Ideonella sakaiensis was reported to have grown in a biofilm which enveloped plastic pieces. As such, we first considered maximizing production of biofilm on plastic. While researching this possibility we found that the 2017 ITB Indonesia iGEM team had attempted a similar project. They developed a system that facilitated biofilm production and expressed PETase simultaneously. Their results indicated that biofilm formation actually inhibited degradation. More plastic was degraded without biofilm than with. We decided to investigate other methods of localizing concentration while simultaneously allowing for the greater interaction of the substrate and enzyme than biofilm was seen to do. Imperial College of London in 2014 developed parts for a cellulose binding domain (CBD). This domain was capable of being incorporated with other subunits such as GFP. They were able to demonstrate that a GFP + CBD fusion protein was capable of binding to bacterial cellulose. Equipped with this information we decided to develop a fusion protein which incorporated PETase and CBD. Our hypothesis is that the bacterial cellulose surrounding the plastic will act as a scaffold on which the PETase can easily work in close proximity to the substrate. This should, in turn, increase the degradation rate. A model of our predictions can be found on the modeling page.
Contact Us
umarylandigem@gmail.com
Biology - Psychology Building
4094 Campus Dr, College Park, MD 20742
umarylandigem@gmail.com
Biology - Psychology Building
4094 Campus Dr, College Park, MD 20742
© University of Maryland 2018