Difference between revisions of "Team:Uppsala/Transcriptomics/cDNA Conversion"

Line 364: Line 364:
  
 
<h4>Results:</h4>  
 
<h4>Results:</h4>  
<p>The table below shows average measured values for each of the samples. Measuring RNA (or DNA) with corresponding Kit resulted in expected results eg. around 10 ng of RNA and very low amount of DNA. Similar results were seen for DNA sample. When DNA was added into RNA, the measured RNA amount decreased, which was the only measuring bias we have observed. </p>
+
<p>The table below shows average measured values for each of the samples. Measuring RNA (or DNA) with corresponding Kit resulted in expected results eg. around 10 ng of RNA and very low amount of DNA. Similar results were seen for DNA sample. When DNA was added into RNA, the measured RNA amount decreased, which was the only measuring bias we have observed. </p><br>
  
  
Line 408: Line 408:
  
 
   
 
   
 +
<h4>Conclusion</h4>
 +
<p>Discussion: The experiment only investigated interactions between dsDNA and ssRNA, which are not supposed to introduce any bias into the measurement as per manufacturer's information (Source). The remaining question is how would a RNA:DNA hybrid be treated by the dye. It is possible that RNA was not properly digested and therefore remains in the hybrid form. A hybrid could hypothetically be detected by both RNA and DNA specific kit. Unfortunately no proven hybrid sample was available and therefore this hypothesis could not be tested. <br><br>
  
 +
Conclusion: It was concluded that having DNA - RNA mixture does not influence the measurement in a significant way. RNA amount is moderately decreased after addition of DNA into the sample, which would not explain the presence of RNA in cDNA samples. What remains to be investigated is how would a RNA:DNA hybrid influence the measurement. We therefore conclude that the RNA measurement in our samples is accurate and there is RNA present, either as a ssRNA of RNA:DNA hybrid. </p>
  
  

Revision as of 09:12, 15 October 2018