Difference between revisions of "Team:Stanford-Brown-RISD/Human Practices"

Line 31: Line 31:
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<div class="column third_size">
 
<div class="column third_size">
<img style="width:60%;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/35/T--Stanford-Brown-RISD--HumanPrac_img2.png">
+
<img style="width:70%;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/35/T--Stanford-Brown-RISD--HumanPrac_img2.png">
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<div class="column two_thirds_size">
 
<div class="column two_thirds_size">
Line 37: Line 37:
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<!--
 
 
 
<div class="clear"></div>
 
 
 
 
<div class="column full_size">
 
 
<h1>Human Practices</h1>
 
<p>
 
At iGEM we believe societal considerations should be upfront and integrated throughout the design and execution of synthetic biology projects. “Human Practices” refers to iGEM teams’ efforts to actively consider how the world affects their work and the work affects the world. Through your Human Practices activities, your team should demonstrate how you have thought carefully and creatively about whether your project is responsible and good for the world. We invite you to explore issues relating (but not limited) to the ethics, safety, security, and sustainability of your project, and to show how this exploration feeds back into your project purpose, design and execution.
 
</p>
 
 
 
 
<p>For more information, please see the <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Human_Practices">Human Practices Hub</a>. There you will find:</p>
 
 
<ul>
 
<li> an <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Human_Practices/Introduction">introduction</a> to Human Practices at iGEM </li>
 
<li>tips on <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Human_Practices/How_to_Succeed">how to succeed</a> including explanations of judging criteria and advice about how to conduct and document your Human Practices work</li>
 
<li>descriptions of <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Human_Practices/Examples">exemplary work</a> to inspire you</li>
 
<li>links to helpful <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Human_Practices/Resources">resources</a></li>
 
<li>And more! </li>
 
</ul>
 
 
 
 
 
 
<p>On this page, your team should document all of your Human Practices work and activities. You should write about the Human Practices topics you considered in your project, document any activities you conducted to explore these topics (such as engaging with experts and stakeholders), describe why you took a particular approach (including referencing any work you built upon), and explain if and how you integrated takeaways from your Human Practices work back into your project purpose, design and/or execution. </p>
 
 
<p>If your team has gone above and beyond in work related to safety, then you should document this work on your Safety wiki page and provide a description and link on this page. If your team has developed education and public engagement efforts that go beyond a focus on your particular project, and for which would like to nominate your team for the Best Education and Public Engagement Special Prize, you should document this work on your Education and Education wiki page and provide a description and link here. </p>
 
</div>
 
 
<div class="clear"></div>
 
 
 
<div class="column full_size">
 
<div class="highlight decoration_background">
 
<p>The iGEM judges will review this page to assess whether you have met the Silver and/or Gold medal requirements based on the Integrated Human Practices criteria listed below. If you nominate your team for the <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Judging/Awards">Best Integrated Human Practices Special Prize</a> by filling out the corresponding field in the <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Judging/Judging_Form">judging form</a>, the judges will also review this page to consider your team for that prize.
 
</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
 
<div class="clear extra_space"></div>
 
 
 
 
<div class="column full_size">
 
 
<h3>Silver Medal Criterion #3</h3>
 
<p>Convince the judges you have thought carefully and creatively about whether your work is responsible and good for the world. Document how you have investigated these issues and engaged with your relevant communities, why you chose this approach, and what you have learned. Please note that surveys will not fulfill this criteria unless you follow scientifically valid methods. </p>
 
 
 
<h3>Gold Medal Criterion #1</h3>
 
<p>Expand on your silver medal activity by demonstrating how you have integrated the investigated issues into the purpose, design and/or execution of your project. Document how your project has changed based upon your human practices work.
 
</p>
 
</div>
 
 
 
 
<div class="clear extra_space"></div>
 
 
 
 
<div class="column full_size">
 
<h3>Best Integrated Human Practices Special Prize</h3>
 
 
<p>To compete for the Best Integrated Human Practices prize, please describe your work on this page and also fill out the description on the judging form. </p>
 
 
<p>How does your project affect society and how does society influence the direction of your project? How might ethical considerations and stakeholder input guide your project purpose and design and the experiments you conduct in the lab? How does this feedback enter into the process of your work all through the iGEM competition? Document a thoughtful and creative approach to exploring these questions and how your project evolved in the process to compete for this award!</p>
 
<p>You must also delete the message box on the top of this page to be eligible for this prize.</p>
 
 
</div>
 
 
-->
 
  
 
</html>
 
</html>

Revision as of 16:13, 16 October 2018

Integrated Human Practices


Introduction

The impact of our project and researched conducted to bring it to fruition, will reach all the way from Earth to Mars. For that reason, we decided to define human practices in two different ways: how it will effect Mars and how it will effect the Earth.
For Mars we discussed with experts the parameters of our design and what cautionary steps we would need to talk in our design to not only protect travelers to Mars but the planet as well from contamination.
For earth we explored that technological implications of mycelium composites and how they could be used in sustainable industrial products and housing.
Below is how we engaged with experts and members of the community who had a stake by our research, for “Martian” and human practices.


Martian Habitats

The idea of people living on Mars is an inherently exciting prospect, and it can be a great deal of fun to dream of what the homes, or even cities, of a future martian colony would be like--will they be giant geodesic domes filled with lush greenery that dot the martian landscape and are connected by underground tunnels? Or will they be totally underground, an endless maze that will shield its inhabitants from the harsh cosmic rays? Or perhaps even crafted from ice--creating glistening ice sculptures upon the martian surface?

However, for our team just as alluring and fun as the imaginative aspect of designing for Mars is--which we certainly explored--was the challenge of designing our habitat to be a highly cost-effective, protective, and functional design.

There are a lot of moving parts that go into generating a design like this--from exploring the different options that exist already, to crafting the mission architecture, to considering the laws and regulation of planetary protection that would certainly impact our project.

In order to get the best possible answers to these questions we engaged directly with experts planning the exploration of Mars, and overseeing the protection of the planet.

We interviewed Dr. Michael Meyer, the lead scientist of NASA’s Mars Exploration Program (https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/mgs/michael-meyer.html), to answer some of our primary questions about what the design of a human mission to Mars would like. We asked about which options for martian habitats are currently being explored by NASA--he shared two, both 3D printed structures, one created from a composite made from Martian regolith the other ice--as well as questions about the longevity that is required of the mission, the estimated budget, the kinds of experiments that would be run, the benefit of having people on Mars versus and Rover, and how does NASA define acceptable risk.

Team Members Emilia Mann, Leo Penny, and Javier Syquia meeting with Dr.Michael Meyer

We also spoke with Dr. Lisa Pratt, NASA’s planetary protection officer, about concerns that may arise from the fact that we are using a biological material as our main building component. Pratt informed us that we needed to ensure that no spores would be able to form from our mycelium blocks, and to ensure that there will not be the creation of a superorganism due to the interaction between the mycelium and the substrate it eats. We were also reminded that there are specific parameters in regards to harvesting water from the Martian surface. But most importantly, Pratt emphasized that many of these regulations will be subject to change as real human missions to Mars are planned and that we therefore must remain adaptive and anticipate any potential issues.