Difference between revisions of "Team:Uppsala/Demonstrate"
| Line 200: | Line 200: | ||
<div class="card-holder"> | <div class="card-holder"> | ||
| − | <div class="card-holder | + | <div class="card-holder" style="width:50%; border: 1px solid #8B1A32"> |
<p> | <p> | ||
Computational analysis of our phage display peptides showed two especially promising peptides: | Computational analysis of our phage display peptides showed two especially promising peptides: | ||
| Line 210: | Line 210: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | <div class="card-holder | + | <div class="card-holder" style="width:50%; border: 1px solid #8B1A32"> |
<p> | <p> | ||
We proved that chromoproteins is detectable in horse feces as well as an improvement of a previous chromoprotein in the repository. | We proved that chromoproteins is detectable in horse feces as well as an improvement of a previous chromoprotein in the repository. | ||
Revision as of 18:47, 16 October 2018
In the worm buster project we have divided our work into separate subgroups to handle the massive burden of the project. To read more about how we designed our experiments and the results we got click on the buttons below. They will take you to each page for the different parts of the wet-lab project.
Our results were succesful, we managed to design a DNA sequence for our alternative reporter, we found interesting sequences using phage display that could be used to create a biosensor and we developed mutiple new applications for existing techniques. In turn this has made it more realistic to create future worm buster tools.
Computational analysis of our phage display peptides showed two especially promising peptides:
- EF01122224: TPIFLPTPAQEH
- EF01122218: FSPTQANTIHRW
We proved that chromoproteins is detectable in horse feces as well as an improvement of a previous chromoprotein in the repository.