Difference between revisions of "Team:UMaryland/BCmodel"

(Created page with "{{UMaryland/something}} {{UMaryland/CSS}} {{UMaryland/Navbar}} <html> <body> <div class="row"> <!-- honestly idk why this is here - i just copied it from somewhere and then...")
 
 
(22 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
<body>
 
<body>
 
<div class="row"> <!-- honestly idk why this is here - i just copied it from somewhere and then now i'm too scared to remove this class !-->
 
<div class="row"> <!-- honestly idk why this is here - i just copied it from somewhere and then now i'm too scared to remove this class !-->
<div class="titleRegion" style="background-image: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/66/T--UMaryland--patternAlternateTwo.png)">
+
<div class="titleRegion" style="background-image: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/7b/T--UMaryland--PTNT4.png)">
 
<div class="container" style="height: 200px;">
 
<div class="container" style="height: 200px;">
 
<div class="titleContainer">
 
<div class="titleContainer">
<div class="titleText">Bacterial Cellulose Modeling</div>
+
<div class="titleText">Bacterial Cellulose</div>
<div class="subtitleText">How fast can PETase CBD degrade a bottle with cellulose binding?</div>
+
<div class="subtitleText">Does the addition of a cellulose binding domain accelerate the degradation of PET?</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 19: Line 19:
 
<div class="meatyRegion">
 
<div class="meatyRegion">
 
<div id="Overview">
 
<div id="Overview">
 +
                                        <div class="meatSubtitle">
 +
Model Setup
 +
</div>
 
<div class="meatMeat">
 
<div class="meatMeat">
Our PET degradation system is entirely cell free, created from lysed cells that have had the pathway enzymes inserted into their genomes as plasmids. PET degradation starts with the cleavage of the monomers of PET into their constituents, MHET and TPA, by the enzyme PETase.<br><br>
+
We considered the following degradation setup: a sheet of PET is “sandwiched” between two layers of bacterial cellulose, to which we add our PETase-CBD which is able to bind to the bacterial cellulose. The bacterial cellulose, due to its insulating nature, will prevent PETase that is close to the PET film from escape into the rest of the solution, resulting in a high local concentration of PETase close to the surface. <br><br>
We created cells that can act as a sensor for PET degradation. When the cells import PCA (a molecule produced from degraded TPA, which is produced from degraded PET),  PCAU binds to PCA, creating activated PCAU. Using activated PCAU as the promoter for GFP translation, the cells will fluoresce green in the presence of PCA, showing that PET degradation has occurred.<br><br>
+
<div class="center">
All of the parameters of our model have been taken from experimentally verified results, and we have verified the validity of our model by successfully detecting PCA using our modified  cells.<br><br>
+
<div class="imageBox">
We attempted to go further down the degradation pathway with the same cells metabolising PCA into 3-carboxy-cis,cis-muconate, but were unsuccessful. We leave this part of the pathway to future IGEM teams and researchers.<br>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/9/95/T--UMaryland--BCsandwich.png" style="max-width: 100%" alt="Waluigi Time!">
 
+
<div class="imageBoxDescription">Bacterial cellulose creates a "sandwich" to maximize PETase contact with the surface</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
<div id="explainationparameters">
+
<div class="meatMeat">
<div class="meatSubtitle">
+
We determined the surface area of a PET bottle modeling it as a perfect cylinder with diameter d = 7 cm, height h = 23 cm, and mass m = 4 g. which is about the average size of a disposable water bottle.
Explaination of our Parameters
+
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<div class="meatMeat">
 
<div class="meatMeat">
It's really long. Just download this <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/e/e7/T--UMaryland--simbioparameters.xlsx"><u>Excel file</u></a> instead.
+
- Surface area of bottle = 2dh = (2)(7π cm)(23 cm) = 322π cm²
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="meatMeat">
 +
- Volume of PET = wdh = (0.1 cm)(7π cm)(23 cm) = 16.1π cm3
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="meatMeat">
 +
We want to model the exact difference between the local and the global concentrations in such a scenario. In order to do this, we used an assumed value for the “working thickness” of cellulose, which is the thickness at which making the cellulose layer thicker will yield a small increase in the insulating behavior of the cellulose layers. We used a value that is an underestimate of 0.1 mm as our starting value. We aim to use experimental data to adjust this value. We determined the following parameters:  
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="meatMeat">
 +
- Cellulose density = 1.5 g/cm3
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="meatMeat">
 +
- Total working weight of cellulose = (1.5 g/cm3)(322π cm²)(0.01 cm) = 15.87  g cellulose
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="meatMeat">
 +
Using values obtained from the literature about the CipA-CBD [1] where our CBD was acquired from, we determined:
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="meatMeat">
 +
- Maximum binding of CipA-CBD to cellulose = 0.43 µM/g cellulose
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="meatMeat">
 +
- Local concentration of PETase at 50% binding = (0.5)(15.87 g)(0.43 µM/g) = 3.41 µM PETase
 
</div>
 
</div>
</div>
 
<div id="simulationresults">
 
 
<div class="meatSubtitle">
 
<div class="meatSubtitle">
Results of Simulation
+
Enzyme Kinetics
 +
<div class="meatMeat">
 +
The degradation of PET follows heterogeneous catalysis, where the reactants and the products [2] are in different phases. This creates difficulty in modeling the rate of degradation but teams such as Tianjin China has used Langmuir's Equation, secretion, and diffusion models to model the process of secretion, diffusion, adsorption, and degradation. However, while their models gave great insight into the mathematical relationships between these variables, it was not possible to obtain practical results as many of the variables used in the equation are not found in the literature and are difficult to obtain experimentally.
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<div class="meatMeat">
 
<div class="meatMeat">
 +
We have developed the “working cellulose” model which is more practical in predicting the rate of degradation when PETase with a cellulose binding domain is added to a degradation system. We modeled the rate of degradation of PETase as a zero-order system, where the concentration of the reactant is negligible to the rate of the reaction. This is present in many surface-limited chemical catalysis models, where the catalyst surface is saturated by the reactants, and the rate limiting step can be simplified in the surface area of the catalyst.
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="meatMeat">
 +
However, in our PET degradation model, the reverse holds true, where the concentration of PETase is the rate limiting variable compared to the surface area of the PET film when considering practical examples such as the degradation of a plastic bottle. We determined the following rate equation for the degradation of PET:
 
</div>
 
</div>
</div>
 
<div class="center">
 
 
<div class="imageBox">
 
<div class="imageBox">
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a9/T--UMaryland--modelresults.png" style="max-width: 100%" alt="Waluigi Time!">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a9/T--UMaryland--model1.png" style="max-width: 100%" alt="Waluigi Time!">
<div class="imageBoxDescription">Figure 1 - Results of the model</div>
+
<div class="imageBoxDescription"></div>
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="meatMeat">
 +
In our reduced and simplified zero order enzyme kinetics equation, we only need to know the product, time, and enzyme concentrations to determine the kinetic variable k to predict degradation. Through values obtained through the original PETase discovery paper by Yoshida et al, we were able to calculate the kinetic variable for both low-crystalline and high-crystalline PET. 
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="meatMeat">
 +
At 30°C, pH 7.0, [PETase concentration] = 50nM, time = 18 hrs: PETase produced a total of 0.015 mM of product when fed high-crystalline PET and 0.3 mM of product when fed thin-sheet PET.
 +
</div>
 +
                                        <div class="meatMeat">
 +
Using above data we can determine the rate constants.
 +
 
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="imageBox">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/40/T--UMaryland--consts.png" style="max-width: 100%" alt="Waluigi Time!">
 +
<div class="imageBoxDescription"></div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
</div>
 
<div id="comparison">
 
 
<div class="meatSubtitle">
 
<div class="meatSubtitle">
Comparison to Experimental Results
+
Results
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<div class="meatMeat">
 
<div class="meatMeat">
 +
Therefore, with the calculated local concentration of our enzyme and our enzyme kinetic parameter we were able to predict the rate of degradation of a plastic water bottle. If we desire 4 grams of PET to completely degrade to its subsequent product MHET, using the molecular weight of MHET (Mw = 210.185 g mol-1), we determine that the final concentration of MHET in a 1 L container would be 0.019 M. Since PET is not an aqueous substance, it is difficult to assign it a “concentration” value for our equation. Therefore we would determine the creation time of MHET rather than the degradation time of PET.
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="meatMeat">
 +
Using our equation:
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="imageBox">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/31/T--UMaryland--bceq.png" style="max-width: 100%" alt="Waluigi Time!">
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="meatMeat">
 +
With the following parameters:
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="meatMeat">
 +
-  [PETase] = 3.41 µM
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="meatMeat">
 +
-  k = 0.00463 s-1 for high crystalline PET
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="meatMeat">
 +
-  [MHET] = 0.019 M
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="meatMeat">
 +
Solving for time, we predict that complete degradation of one PET bottle sandwiched between two bacterial cellulose sheets with 50% saturation of our PETase-CBD fusion protein will occur in 1.2 x 106 seconds, or approximately 14 days.
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="meatMeat">
 +
As degradation progresses, the appropriateness of our zero-order enzyme kinetics model will decrease as the surface area of PET available to our enzyme will become more significant. Therefore, a time to 50% degradation will be more indicative of the actual degradation of PET. We determined this value to be about 7 days.
 
</div>
 
</div>
</div>
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
</div>
+
</div>
 +
<div>
 +
1: Sabathé, F. & Soucaille, P. Characterization of the CipA scaffolding protein and in vivo production of a minicellulosome in Clostridium acetobutylicum. J. Bacteriol. 185, 1092–1096 (2003).
 +
</div>
 +
<div>
 +
2: Yoshida, S. et al. A bacterium that degrades and assimilates poly(ethylene terephthalate). Science 351, 1196–1199 (2016).
 +
</div>
 +
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</body>
 
</body>
 
</html>
 
</html>
 
{{UMaryland/Footer}}
 
{{UMaryland/Footer}}

Latest revision as of 01:58, 18 October 2018

Template Title Template Title

Bacterial Cellulose
Does the addition of a cellulose binding domain accelerate the degradation of PET?
Model Setup
We considered the following degradation setup: a sheet of PET is “sandwiched” between two layers of bacterial cellulose, to which we add our PETase-CBD which is able to bind to the bacterial cellulose. The bacterial cellulose, due to its insulating nature, will prevent PETase that is close to the PET film from escape into the rest of the solution, resulting in a high local concentration of PETase close to the surface.

Waluigi Time!
Bacterial cellulose creates a "sandwich" to maximize PETase contact with the surface
We determined the surface area of a PET bottle modeling it as a perfect cylinder with diameter d = 7 cm, height h = 23 cm, and mass m = 4 g. which is about the average size of a disposable water bottle.
- Surface area of bottle = 2dh = (2)(7π cm)(23 cm) = 322π cm²
- Volume of PET = wdh = (0.1 cm)(7π cm)(23 cm) = 16.1π cm3
We want to model the exact difference between the local and the global concentrations in such a scenario. In order to do this, we used an assumed value for the “working thickness” of cellulose, which is the thickness at which making the cellulose layer thicker will yield a small increase in the insulating behavior of the cellulose layers. We used a value that is an underestimate of 0.1 mm as our starting value. We aim to use experimental data to adjust this value. We determined the following parameters:
- Cellulose density = 1.5 g/cm3
- Total working weight of cellulose = (1.5 g/cm3)(322π cm²)(0.01 cm) = 15.87 g cellulose
Using values obtained from the literature about the CipA-CBD [1] where our CBD was acquired from, we determined:
- Maximum binding of CipA-CBD to cellulose = 0.43 µM/g cellulose
- Local concentration of PETase at 50% binding = (0.5)(15.87 g)(0.43 µM/g) = 3.41 µM PETase
Enzyme Kinetics
The degradation of PET follows heterogeneous catalysis, where the reactants and the products [2] are in different phases. This creates difficulty in modeling the rate of degradation but teams such as Tianjin China has used Langmuir's Equation, secretion, and diffusion models to model the process of secretion, diffusion, adsorption, and degradation. However, while their models gave great insight into the mathematical relationships between these variables, it was not possible to obtain practical results as many of the variables used in the equation are not found in the literature and are difficult to obtain experimentally.
We have developed the “working cellulose” model which is more practical in predicting the rate of degradation when PETase with a cellulose binding domain is added to a degradation system. We modeled the rate of degradation of PETase as a zero-order system, where the concentration of the reactant is negligible to the rate of the reaction. This is present in many surface-limited chemical catalysis models, where the catalyst surface is saturated by the reactants, and the rate limiting step can be simplified in the surface area of the catalyst.
However, in our PET degradation model, the reverse holds true, where the concentration of PETase is the rate limiting variable compared to the surface area of the PET film when considering practical examples such as the degradation of a plastic bottle. We determined the following rate equation for the degradation of PET:
Waluigi Time!
In our reduced and simplified zero order enzyme kinetics equation, we only need to know the product, time, and enzyme concentrations to determine the kinetic variable k to predict degradation. Through values obtained through the original PETase discovery paper by Yoshida et al, we were able to calculate the kinetic variable for both low-crystalline and high-crystalline PET.
At 30°C, pH 7.0, [PETase concentration] = 50nM, time = 18 hrs: PETase produced a total of 0.015 mM of product when fed high-crystalline PET and 0.3 mM of product when fed thin-sheet PET.
Using above data we can determine the rate constants.
Waluigi Time!
Results
Therefore, with the calculated local concentration of our enzyme and our enzyme kinetic parameter we were able to predict the rate of degradation of a plastic water bottle. If we desire 4 grams of PET to completely degrade to its subsequent product MHET, using the molecular weight of MHET (Mw = 210.185 g mol-1), we determine that the final concentration of MHET in a 1 L container would be 0.019 M. Since PET is not an aqueous substance, it is difficult to assign it a “concentration” value for our equation. Therefore we would determine the creation time of MHET rather than the degradation time of PET.
Using our equation:
Waluigi Time!
With the following parameters:
- [PETase] = 3.41 µM
- k = 0.00463 s-1 for high crystalline PET
- [MHET] = 0.019 M
Solving for time, we predict that complete degradation of one PET bottle sandwiched between two bacterial cellulose sheets with 50% saturation of our PETase-CBD fusion protein will occur in 1.2 x 106 seconds, or approximately 14 days.
As degradation progresses, the appropriateness of our zero-order enzyme kinetics model will decrease as the surface area of PET available to our enzyme will become more significant. Therefore, a time to 50% degradation will be more indicative of the actual degradation of PET. We determined this value to be about 7 days.
1: Sabathé, F. & Soucaille, P. Characterization of the CipA scaffolding protein and in vivo production of a minicellulosome in Clostridium acetobutylicum. J. Bacteriol. 185, 1092–1096 (2003).
2: Yoshida, S. et al. A bacterium that degrades and assimilates poly(ethylene terephthalate). Science 351, 1196–1199 (2016).

Contact Us
umarylandigem@gmail.com
Biology - Psychology Building
4094 Campus Dr, College Park, MD 20742

© University of Maryland 2018
Follow Us
Facebook Instagram